Correlation between CT imaging and symptom scores in cystic fibrosis associated chronic sinusitis.

PURPOSE: There are limited guidelines for diagnosing and managing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in the cystic fibrosis (CF) population. While CF patients are known to have significant opacification on paranasal computed tomography (CT), limited evidence suggests that CT findings are not indicative of patients' symptom burden and therefore not a reliable indicator for surgical intervention. This provides a diagnostic challenge for otolaryngologists taking care of this patient population. The purpose of this study is to better define the relationship between objective imaging findings and patients' symptom severity in the CF-CRS population with the goal of providing more selective and effective patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 67 patients with CF CRS had their CT scans scored according to a modified Lund Mackay CT score (LMCTS), which was compared to their Sinonasal Outcome Test scores (SNOT-22). Total SNOT-22 and individual domains were evaluated. Pearson's correlation was performed. RESULTS: The overall mean SNOT-22 score was 32.3. The mean LMCTS was 17.6. These metrics correlate with relatively low subjective symptom scores in comparison to the high objective presence of sinus disease. While patients had high LMCTS, there was no correlation found between LMCTS and total SNOT-22 or individual SNOT-22 domains. CONCLUSIONS: CT findings in CF CRS patients do not accurately reflect patients' symptom burden and should not be used as a primary driver in the clinical management of these patients.

Electrocardiographic Changes Associated With Ibrutinib Exposure.

Although ibrutinib-associated atrial and ventricular arrhythmias have been well described, there is little information about ibrutinib's effects on other electrocardiographic parameters, particularly the QT interval. Using our database of 137 patients treated with ibrutinib, we retrospectively identified 21 patients in whom an electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained both prior to and after ibrutinib exposure. All traditional ECG parameters as well as QT dispersion were manually measured by an electrophysiologist. Compared to baseline ECGs, post ibrutinib ECGs demonstrated QT interval shortening from 386 ms to 356 ms (P = .007), corrected QT interval shortening using Bazett's formula from 446 ms to 437 ms (P = .04), and corrected QT interval shortening using Fridericia's formula from 425 ms to 407 ms (P = .003). QT dispersion also increased post ibrutinib exposure compared to baseline (39.8 ms vs 57.3 ms, P = .002). There was no significant change in other ECG parameters. In conclusion, both the absolute and corrected QT intervals significantly shortened after ibrutinib exposure, while there was a significant increase in QT dispersion. These findings may point to a common underlying electrophysiologic mechanism of ibrutinib-associated arrhythmias.

Association between ibrutinib treatment and hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor most commonly associated with atrial fibrillation. However, additional cardiotoxicities have been identified, including accelerated hypertension. The incidence and risk factors of new or worsening hypertension following ibrutinib treatment are not as well known. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 144 patients diagnosed with B cell malignancies treated with ibrutinib (n=93) versus conventional chemoimmunotherapy (n=51) and evaluated their effects on blood pressure at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics for each treatment group. Fisher's exact test was used to identify covariates significantly associated with the development of hypertension. Repeated measures analyses were conducted to analyse longitudinal blood pressure changes. RESULTS: Both treatments had similar prevalence of baseline hypertension at 63.4% and 66.7%, respectively. There were no differences between treatments by age, sex and baseline cardiac comorbidities. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure significantly increased over time with ibrutinib compared with baseline, whereas conventional chemoimmunotherapy was not associated with significant changes in blood pressure. Baseline hypertensive status did not affect the degree of blood pressure change over time. A significant increase in systolic blood pressure (defined as more than 10 mm Hg) was noted for ibrutinib (36.6%) compared with conventional chemoimmunotherapy (7.9%) at 1 month after treatment initiation. Despite being hypertensive at follow-up, 61.2% of patients who were treated with ibrutinib did not receive adequate blood pressure management (increase or addition of blood pressure medications). Within the ibrutinib group, of patients who developed more than 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure, only 52.9% had hypertension management changes. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib is associated with the development of hypertension and worsening of blood pressure. Cardiologists and oncologists must be aware of this cardiotoxicity to allow timely management of blood pressure elevations.

Rates and Risk of Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients Treated With Ibrutinib Compared With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.

There is increasing evidence that rates of atrial arrhythmias (AA), specifically atrial fibrillation and flutter are elevated in patients treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ibrutinib; however, the exact risk of ibrutinib-associated AA is not definitively established. We conducted a retrospective study of 137 patients diagnosed with B-cell malignancies treated with ibrutinib compared with 106 patients treated with chemotherapy for the same cancers in order to quantify the rates and risk of AA in a "real-world" sample of cancer patients. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate for any statistically significant differences between groups. Logistic regression was used to generate odds ratios, adjusting for potential confounders. Incidence of AA was 14% (n = 17) in ibrutinib-treated patients compared with 3% (n = 3) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.009). Ibrutinib-treated patients were significantly older (mean age 67 vs 63 years, p = 0.003); however, there were no other significant differences in baseline characteristics. Ibrutinib use, age, hypertension, and previous use of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker use, ß blocker use, and aspirin use were independently associated with incident arrhythmias. In multivariable analysis, patients treated with ibrutinib were associated with a 5-fold increased risk of developing AA (odds ratio = 5.18, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 18.89). In conclusion, the rates and risk of AA are higher in patients treated with ibrutinib compared with chemotherapy, and this study provides strong evidence that ibrutinib itself is an independent risk factor for the development of incident AA.

Molecular and clinical significance of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2 /bFGF) in malignancies of solid and hematological cancers for personalized therapies.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling is essential for normal and cancer biology. Mammalian FGF family members participate in multiple signaling pathways by binding to heparan sulfate and FGF receptors (FGFR) with varying affinities. FGF2 is the prototype member of the FGF family and interacts with its receptor to mediate receptor dimerization, phosphorylation, and activation of signaling pathways, such as Ras-MAPK and PI3K pathways. Excessive mitogenic signaling through the FGF/FGFR axis may induce carcinogenic effects by promoting cancer progression and increasing the angiogenic potential, which can lead to metastatic tumor phenotypes. Dysregulated FGF/FGFR signaling is associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes, enhanced chemotherapy resistance and poor clinical outcomes. In vitro experimental settings have indicated that extracellular FGF2 affects proliferation, drug sensitivity, and apoptosis of cancer cells. Therapeutically targeting FGF2 and FGFR has been extensively assessed in multiple preclinical studies and numerous drugs and treatment options have been tested in clinical trials. Diagnostic assays are used to quantify FGF2, FGFRs, and downstream signaling molecules to better select a target patient population for higher efficacy of cancer therapies. This review focuses on the prognostic significance of FGF2 in cancer with emphasis on therapeutic intervention strategies for solid and hematological malignancies.

Molecular and clinical profiles of syndecan-1 in solid and hematological cancer for prognosis and precision medicine.

Syndecan-1 (SDC1, CD138) is a key cell surface adhesion molecule essential for maintaining cell morphology and interaction with the surrounding microenvironment. Deregulation of SDC1 contributes to cancer progression by promoting cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis, and is associated with relapse through chemoresistance. SDC1 expression level is also associated with responses to chemotherapy and with prognosis in multiple solid and hematological cancers, including multiple myeloma and Hodgkin lymphoma. At the tissue level, the expression levels of SDC1 and the released extracellular domain of SDC1 correlate with tumor malignancy, phenotype, and metastatic potential for both solid and hematological tumors in a tissue-specific manner. The SDC1 expression profile varies among cancer types, but the differential expression signatures between normal and cancer cells in epithelial and stromal compartments are directly associated with aggressiveness of tumors and patient's clinical outcome and survival. Therefore, relevant biomarkers of SDC signaling may be useful for selecting patients that would most likely respond to a particular therapy at the time of diagnosis or perhaps for predicting relapse. In addition, the reciprocal expression signature of SDC between tumor epithelial and stromal compartments may have synergistic value for patient selection and the prediction of clinical outcome.