Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty among pediatric patients with complex renal anatomy: A retrospective comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has been increasingly utilized in the treatment of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with reported success rates of >95%. Complex renal anatomy can make some cases challenging to reconstruct. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of children undergoing RALP with aberrant renal anatomy and compare it to those with simple renal anatomy. METHODS: An IRB approved prospective registry was queried to retrospectively identify all patients who underwent robotic pyeloplasty at our institution from 2012 to 2022. Patients undergoing re-do pyeloplasty were excluded. Complex anatomy was defined as horseshoe kidney, ectopic/pelvic kidney, duplex collecting system, fully bifid renal pelvis and severe malrotation (≥180°). A comparative analysis of baseline demographics, pre-operative clinical/radiological characteristics, intra and post-operative details, and long-term success was performed between those patients with complex anatomy and those without. RESULTS: Of 405 total robotic pyeloplasty's, 375 patients (378 total pyeloplasty; 353 simple, 22 complex) met inclusion criteria. 27 re-do were excluded from analysis. The complex pyeloplasty cohort included 9 horseshoe kidneys, 8 duplex collecting systems, 3 ectopic/pelvic kidneys and 2 kidneys with severe malrotation. There was no difference in age (58 vs 31 months; p = 0.38), procedure time (203 vs 207 min; p = 0.06), length of stay (1.4 vs 1.3 days; p = 0.99), or success (91.6% vs 100%; p = 0.24) between the simple and complex groups. Etiology of obstruction differed significantly between groups - high insertion was more common (3.9% vs 18.2%, p = 0.02) and intrinsic narrowing was less common (60.1% vs 36.4%, p = 0.04) in patients with complex anatomy. A multivariate logistic regression was adjusted for age, gender, etiology of obstruction, preoperative differential renal function and post-operative complications and found no difference in success between complex and simple RALP. DISCUSSION: The findings showed no significant differences in age, procedure time, length of hospital stay, or success rates between the two groups. Specifically, the success rates were 91.6% for the complex group and 100% for the simple group (p = 0.24), indicating comparable efficacy. However, the etiology of obstruction varied significantly, with high ureteral insertion more common in the complex anatomy group (18.2% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.02) and intrinsic narrowing less common (36.4% vs. 60.1%, p = 0.04). Despite these differences, multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for confounders, confirmed no difference in success rates between the groups. CONCLUSION: RALP is a safe and efficacious approach in patients with complex anatomy with success rates comparable to index patients. High ureteral insertion does appear to be more common in patients with complex anatomy undergoing pyeloplasty.

Unmasking Ureteral Polyps: Insights From a Case Series.

Fibroepithelial polyps in the urinary tract are a rare cause of obstructive uropathy with fewer than 130 cases reported in the literature. In our series, we describe polyps that were missed on preoperative imaging and later found in the operating room during pyeloplasty. It is critical for urologists to be aware of polyps as a potential source of obstruction as they can increase the complexity of a reconstruction and, if missed, may result in a failed repair and persistent obstruction. We hypothesize that performing a retrograde pyelogram prior to ureteric reconstruction will facilitate diagnosis prior to surgical repair.

Prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients

ABSTRACT As patients with end-stage renal disease are receiving renal allografts at older ages, the number of male renal transplant recipients (RTRs) being diagnosed with prostate cancer (CaP) is increasing. Historically, the literature regarding the management of CaP in RTR's is limited to case reports and small case series. To date, there are no standardized guidelines for screening or management of CaP in these complex patients. To better understand the unique characteristics of CaP in the renal transplant population, we performed a literature review of PubMed, without date limitations, using a combination of search terms including prostate cancer, end stage renal disease, renal transplantation, prostate cancer screening, prostate specific antigen kinetics, immuno-suppression, prostatectomy, and radiation therapy. Of special note, teams facilitating the care of these complex patients must carefully and meticulously consider the altered anatomy for surgical and radiotherapeutic planning. Active surveillance, though gaining popularity in the general low risk prostate cancer population, needs further study in this group, as does the management of advance disease. This review provides a comprehensive and contemporary understanding of the incidence, screening measures, risk stratification, and treatment options for CaP in RTRs.