A Cleavable Crosslinking Strategy for Commodity Polymer Functionalization and Generation of Reprocessable Thermosets.

Covalently crosslinked polymeric materials, known as thermosets, possess enhanced mechanical strength and thermal stability relative to the corresponding uncrosslinked thermoplastics. However, the presence of covalent inter-chain crosslinks that makes thermosets so attractive is precisely what makes them so difficult to reprocess and recycle. Here, we demonstrate the introduction of chemically cleavable groups into a bis-diazirine crosslinker. Application of this cleavable crosslinker reagent to commercial low-functionality polyolefins (or to a small-molecule model) results in the rapid, efficient introduction of molecular crosslinks that can be uncoupled by specific chemical inputs. These proof-of-concept findings provide one potential strategy for circularization of the thermoplastic/thermoset plastics economy, and may allow crosslinked polyolefins to be manufactured, used, reprocessed, and re-used without losing value. As an added benefit, the method allows the ready introduction of functionality into non-functionalized commodity polymers.

Dual-Energy CT Material Density Iodine Quantification for Distinguishing Vascular From Nonvascular Renal Lesions: Normalization Reduces Intermanufacturer Threshold Variability.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a single, uniform normalized iodine threshold reduces variability and enables reliable differentiation between vascular and nonvascular renal lesions independent of the dual-energy CT (DECT) platform used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 247 patients (156 men, 91 women; mean age ± SD, 67 ± 12 years old) with 263 renal lesions (193 nonvascular, 70 vascular) underwent unenhanced single-energy and contrast-enhanced DECT scans. One hundred and six nonvascular and 38 vascular lesions were scanned on two dual-source DECT (dsDECT) scanners, and 87 nonvascular and 32 vascular lesions were scanned on two rapid-kilovoltage-switching single-source DECT (rsDECT) scanners. Optimal absolute and normalized (to aorta) lesion iodine thresholds were determined for each platform type and for the entire cohort combined. RESULTS: Mean optimal absolute discriminant thresholds were 1.3 mg I/mL (95% CI, 1.2-1.9 mg I/mL), 1.6 mg I/mL (95% CI, 0.9-1.5 mg I/mL), and 1.5 mg I/mL (95% CI, 1.4-1.7 mg I/mL) for dsDECT, rsDECT, and combined cohorts, respectively. Optimal normalized discriminant thresholds were 0.3 mg I/mL (95% CI, 0.2-0.4 mg I/mL) for both the dsDECT and rsDECT cohorts, and 0.3 mg I/mL (0.3-0.4 mg I/mL) for the combined cohort. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for the combined optimal normalized discriminant threshold of 0.3 mg I/mL was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00), 0.93 (0.84-0.97), and 0.95 (0.91-0.98), respectively. Normalization resulted in decreased variability and better lesion separation (effect size, 1.77 vs 1.69, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The optimal absolute discriminant threshold for evaluating renal lesions varies depending on the type of DECT platform, though this difference is not statistically significant. Variation can be reduced with a better separation of vascular and nonvascular lesions by normalizing iodine quantification to the aorta.

A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to ascertain if standardized radiologic reporting for appendicitis imaging increases diagnostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a standardized appendicitis reporting system that includes objective imaging findings common in appendicitis and a certainty score ranging from 1 (definitely not appendicitis) through 5 (definitely appendicitis). Four radiologists retrospectively reviewed the preoperative CT scans of 96 appendectomy patients using our reporting system. The presence of appendicitis-specific imaging findings and certainty scores were compared with final pathology. These comparisons were summarized using odds ratios (ORs) and the AUC. RESULTS: The appendix was visualized on CT in 89 patients, of whom 71 (80%) had pathologically proven appendicitis. Imaging findings associated with appendicitis included appendiceal diameter (odds ratio [OR] = 14 [> 10 vs < 6 mm]; p = 0.002), periappendiceal fat stranding (OR = 8.9; p < 0.001), and appendiceal mucosal hyperenhancement (OR = 8.7; p < 0.001). Of 35 patients whose initial clinical findings were reported as indeterminate, 28 (80%) had appendicitis. In this initially indeterminate group, using the standardized reporting system, radiologists assigned higher certainty scores (4 or 5) in 21 of the 28 patients with appendicitis (75%) and lower scores (1 or 2) in five of the seven patients without appendicitis (71%) (AUC = 0.90; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Standardized reporting and grading of objective imaging findings correlated well with postoperative pathology and may decrease the number of CT findings reported as indeterminate for appendicitis. Prospective evaluation of this reporting system on a cohort of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis is currently under way.

The Reliability of a Standardized Reporting System for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is a fast and ubiquitous tool to evaluate intra-abdominal organs and diagnose appendicitis. However, traditional CT reporting does not necessarily capture the degree of uncertainty and indeterminate findings are still common. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of a standardized CT reporting system for appendicitis across a large population and the system's impact on radiologists' certainty in diagnosing appendicitis. METHODS: Using a previously described standardized reporting system, eight radiologists retrospectively evaluated CT scans, blinded to all clinical information, in a stratified random sample of 237 patients from a larger cohort of patients imaged for possible appendicitis (2010-2014). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of readers for identifying appendicitis. Two-thirds of these scans were randomly selected to be independently read by a second reader, using the original CT reports to balance the number of positive, negative and indeterminate exams across all readers. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 113 patients with appendicitis (mean age 38, 67% male). Using the standardized report, radiologists were highly accurate at identifying appendicitis (AUC=0.968, 95%CI confidence interval: 0.95, 0.99. Inter-reader agreement was >80% for most objective findings, and certainty in diagnosing appendicitis was high and reproducible (AUC=0.955 and AUC=0.936 for the first and second readers, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized reporting system resulted in high reproducibility of objective CT findings for appendicitis and achieved high diagnostic accuracy in an at-risk population. Predictive tools based on this reporting system may further improve communication about certainty in diagnosis and guide patient management, especially when CT findings are indeterminate.

Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

While computed tomography (CT) remains the most accurate and widely used modality for appendicitis imaging, ultrasound has developed its own niche role, especially in the pediatric population and in premenopausal women. Ultrasound is commonly used as the initial imaging test when available, with indeterminate or clinically equivocal cases proceeding to CT.To avoid the radiation and time and cost of CT, ultrasound needs to be improved. While previous studies have focused on improving the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound through better patient selection and technique, relatively little attention has been brought to the ultrasound report, which often serves as the sole mode of communication between the radiologist and the clinician.Standardization of reporting and terminology has been found to improve patient outcomes and management in breast imaging. A standardized report for appendicitis has the potential to decrease confusion and increase accuracy. A potential format could include a standardized list of the presence or absence of imaging findings associated with appendicitis, with a final summary or score indicating the likelihood of appendicitis being present. Aggregation of data over time through use of a common format could help guide radiologist recommendations based on which imaging findings are present. Overall, a standardized report could help increase the value of ultrasound, leading to improved radiologist-clinician communication, better patient outcomes, and decreased costs.

Thyroid lesions visualized on CT: sonographic and pathologic correlation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: There are no definitive guidelines for the management of incidental thyroid lesions on computed tomography (CT). The objectives of our study were to assess the association between CT and ultrasound (US) characteristics of thyroid lesions and identify CT predictors of benignity or malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients who had undergone both CT of the chest or neck and thyroid US had at least one thyroid lesion visible on CT; both incidentally detected and palpable or symptomatic lesions were included. The CT and US examinations were retrospectively reviewed and lesions characterized. Pathologic results from fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and surgical excision were used to classify lesions as benign or malignant. Thyroid lesions without pathologic correlation were classified as either benign or indeterminate based on US evaluation. Lesions that were cystic, predominantly cystic, solid and cystic with features consistent with a colloid nodule, or stable for at least 1 year were considered benign. Fisher exact tests, Spearman correlations, and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between CT and US characteristics and CT predictors of benignity or malignancy. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the joint associations between the CT features and sonographically assessed benignity. RESULTS: Of 259 patients, 168 (64.9%) patients had incidentally detected thyroid lesions, 49 (18.9%) patients had palpable/symptomatic lesions, and 116 (44.8%) patients underwent surgical resection and/or FNA biopsy. The malignancy prevalence was 1.8% (3 of 168) for incidental thyroid lesions and 10.2% (5 of 49) for palpable/symptomatic lesions. The malignancy prevalence of incidental lesions initially detected on CT was 1.6% (2 of 125). Of the 143 patients without pathologic data, 58 (40.6%) were classified as benign and 85 (59.4%) were categorized as indeterminate based on US evaluation. Statistically significant associations were found between CT and US with regard to lesion number, dominant lesion size, lesion consistency/composition, and associated calcifications. No CT characteristics of thyroid lesions predicted malignancy. However, there were statistically significant associations on multivariate analysis between indeterminate/benign nodules and CT characteristics of smaller lesion size, lower mean attenuation, and homogeneous composition. CONCLUSIONS: Recommending sonographic evaluation of all incidentally detected thyroid lesions is likely not the appropriate strategy, given the high prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas, low probability of malignancy, and cost effectiveness of workup. Small, homogeneous, low-attenuation lesions have a high probability of being benign.