Benefits of Paediatric to Adult Transition Programme in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The BUTTERFLY Study of GETECCU and SEGHNP.

(1) Background: Transition is a planned movement of paediatric patients to adult healthcare systems, and its implementation is not yet established in all inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of transition on IBD outcomes. (2) Methods: Multicentre, retrospective and observational study of IBD paediatric patients transferred to an adult IBD unit between 2017-2020. Two groups were compared: transition (≥1 joint visit involving the gastroenterologist, the paediatrician, a programme coordinator, the parents and the patient) and no-transition. Outcomes within one year after transfer were analysed. The main variable was poor clinical outcome (IBD flare, hospitalisation, surgery or any change in the treatment because of a flare). Predictive factors of poor clinical outcome were identified with multivariable analysis. (3) Results: A total of 278 patients from 34 Spanish hospitals were included. One hundred eighty-five patients (67%) from twenty-two hospitals (65%) performed a structured transition. Eighty-nine patients had poor clinical outcome at one year after transfer: 27% in the transition and 43% in the no-transition group (p = 0.005). One year after transfer, no-transition patients were more likely to have a flare (36% vs. 22%; p = 0.018) and reported more hospitalisations (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.025). The lack of transition, as well as parameters at transfer, including IBD activity, body mass index < 18.5 and corticosteroid treatment, were associated with poor clinical outcome. One patient in the transition group (0.4%) was lost to follow-up. (4) Conclusion: Transition care programmes improve patients' outcomes after the transfer from paediatric to adult IBD units. Active IBD at transfer impairs outcomes.

[Covid-19 pandemic impact in pediatricians: stress factors and their consequences]. / El impacto de la epidemia Covid-19 en los pediatras: factores estresantes y sus consecuencias.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic has had negative psychological consequences on healthcare professionals, however, specific data on pediatricians are scarce. Ob jective: To evaluate anxiety among pediatricians after the first COVID-19 wave as well as to identify possible related risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional multicentric survey study was designed and sent to Spanish pediatricians through the Asociación Española de Pediatría's e-mail lists. Demographic, socio-familial, occupational, emotional self-perception, psychosomatic symptoms, smoking, alcohol, and psychotropic drugs use data were collected. The State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI) was included, and its association with qualitative and quantitative variables of the sample was studied. RESULTS: 440 surveys were registered. 42.2% of the participants expressed moderate-intense anxiety symptomatology according to the Anxiety-State scale and 26.9% on the Anxiety-Trait scale. Isolation at home was associated with a higher score on both scales. A change in the work situation of the cohabitant resulted in a higher score on the Anxiety-State scale. 41.1% of the respondents clas sified the psychological impact suffered as mild, 50% as moderate, and 8.9% as severe. Up to 71.8% of the participants manifested some psychosomatic symptoms, with a linear association between the concurrence of symptoms and higher scores on the two scales. CONCLUSIONS: After the first pandemic wave, pediatricians have suffered anxiety, causing physical and emotional discomfort. Personal sit uations were the main source of concern. Likewise, the presence of several somatic symptoms was associated with higher levels of anxiety.

Implementation of smart pump technology in a paediatric intensive care unit.

Patient safety is a matter of major concern that involves every health professional. Nowadays, emerging technologies such as smart pumps can diminish medication errors as well as standardise and improve clinical practice with the subsequent benefits for patients. The aim of this paper was to describe the smart pump implementation process in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to present the most relevant infusion-related programming errors that were prevented. This was a comparative study between CareFusion Alaris Guardrails(®) and Hospira MedNet(®) systems, as well as a prospective and intervention study with analytical components carried out in the PICU of Gregorio Marañón General and Teaching Hospital. All intravenous infusions programmed with a pump in the eleven beds of the unit were analyzed. A drug library was developed and subsequently loaded into CareFusion and Hospira pumps that were used during a three month period each. The most suitable system for implementation was selected according to their differences in features and users' acceptance. Data stored in the pumps were analyzed to assess user compliance with the technology, health care setting and type of errors intercepted. The implementation process was carried out with CareFusion systems. Compliance with the technology was 92% and user acceptance was high. Vacation substitution and drug administration periods were significantly associated with a greater number of infusion-related programming errors. High risk drugs were involved in 48% of intercepted errors. Based on these results we can conclude that implementation of smart pumps proved effective in intercepting infusion-related programming errors from reaching patients. User awareness of the importance of programming infusions with the drug library is the key to succeed in the implementation process.