Unexpected results of a randomized quality improvement program for children with severe asthma.

Objective: To assess whether an asthma intervention program reduces treatment days outside the home among children with severe asthma receiving comprehensive care (CC) in our center.Methods: Between October 21, 2014 and September 28, 2016, children with severe asthma were randomized to receive CC alone (n = 29) or CC plus the asthma intervention program (n = 34) which involved collaboration with pharmacists and school nurses, motivational interviewing, and tracking the one-second forced expiratory volume at home. All patients were followed through March 31, 2017. Frequentist and Bayesian intent-to-treat analyses were performed.Results: The asthma intervention program doubled the telephone calls between the staff and families (753 vs 356 per 100 child years for the intervention group vs. control group; Rate Ratio [RR], 2.11 [95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.45]). Yet, we found no evidence that it reduced the composite number of days of healthcare outside home which includes: clinic visits, ED visits, and hospital admissions (1179 vs 958 per 100 child-years in the intervention group vs. control group; [RR], 1.23 [95% CI, 0.82-1.84]) or secondary outcomes which are individual components (clinic visits, ED visits, hospitalizations, PICU admissions and school absences; RR 1.15 - 2.30; p > 0.05). Bayesian analysis indicated a 67% probability that the intervention program increases total treatment days outside the home and only a 14% probability of a true decrease of >20% as originally hypothesized.Conclusion: A multi-component intervention program provided to children with severe asthma failed to reduce and may have increased days of healthcare outside home and school absenteeism.

Role of prophylactic azithromycin to reduce airway inflammation and mortality in a RSV mouse infection model.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in vulnerable populations. Macrolides have received considerable attention for their anti-inflammatory actions beyond their antibacterial effect. We hypothesize that prophylactic azithromycin will be effective in reducing the severity of RSV infection in a mouse model. METHODS: Four groups of BALB/c mice were studied for 8 days: Control (C), RSV-infected (R), early prophylaxis with daily azithromycin from days 1 to 8, (E), and late prophylaxis with daily azithromycin from days 4 to 8 (L). Mice were infected with RSV on day 4, except for the control group. All groups were followed for a total of 8 days when bronchoalveolar lavage cell count and cytokines levels were measured. Mouse weight, histopathology, and mortality data were obtained. RESULTS: Prophylactic azithromycin significantly attenuated post-viral weight loss between group R and both groups E and L (P = 0.0236, 0.0179, respectively). IL-6, IL-5, and Interferon-Gamma were significantly lower in group L (P = 0.0294, 0.0131, and 0.0056, respectively) compared with group R. The total cell count was significantly lower for group L as compared with group R (P < 0.05). Mortality was only observed in group R (8%). Lung histology in the prophylactic groups showed diminished inflammatory infiltrates and cellularity when compared with group R. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic azithromycin effectively reduced weight loss, airway inflammation, cytokine levels and mortality in RSV-infected mice. These results support the rationale for future clinical trials to evaluate the effects of prophylactic azithromycin for RSV infection.

Use of Nasal Non-Invasive Ventilation with a RAM Cannula in the Outpatient Home Setting.

BACKGROUND: Nasal non-invasive-ventilation (Nasal NIV) is a mode of ventilatory support providing positive pressure to patients via a nasal interface. The RAM Cannula is an oxygen delivery device that can be used as an alternative approach to deliver positive pressure. Together they have been successfully used to provide respiratory support in neonatal in-patient settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outpatient use of Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula as a feasible alternative for home respiratory support in children with chronic respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series of 18 children (4 months to 19 years old) using the Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula in the Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic at the McGovern Medical School, UTHealth (2014-16). Consideration for Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula utilization included: inability to wean-off in-patient respiratory support, comfort for dyspnea, intolerability of conventional mask interfaces and tracheostomy avoidance. RESULTS: Average age was 7 years. 50% were Caucasian, 38% African-American and 11% Hispanics. Pulmonary disorders included: chest wall weakness (38%), central control abnormalities (33%), obstructive lung disease (16%) and restrictive lung disease (11%). Indications for Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula initiation included: CPAP/BPAP masks intolerability (11%), dyspnea secondary to chest wall weakness (38%) and tracheostomy avoidance (50%). Average length of use of Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula was 8.4 months. Successful implementation of Nasal NIV/Ram Cannula was 94%. One patient required a tracheostomy following the use of Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula. Significant decrease in arterial PaCO2 pre and post Nasal NIV/RAM cannula initiation was notable (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Outpatient use of Nasal NIV/RAM Cannula may prove to be a feasible and save treatment alternative for children with chronic respiratory failure, chest wall weakness, dyspnea and traditional nasal/face mask intolerance to avoid tracheostomy.