Prevalence, risk factors and evolution of diabetes mellitus after treatment in primary aldosteronism. Results from the SPAIN-ALDO registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and evolution of diabetes mellitus (DM) after targeted treatment in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study of PA patients in follow-up at 27 Spanish tertiary hospitals (SPAIN-ALDO Register). RESULTS: Overall, 646 patients with PA were included. At diagnosis, 21.2% (n = 137) had DM and 67% of them had HbA1c levels < 7%. In multivariate analysis, family history of DM (OR 4.00 [1.68-9.53]), the coexistence of dyslipidemia (OR 3.57 [1.51-8.43]) and advanced age (OR 1.04 per year of increase [1.00-1.09]) were identified as independent predictive factors of DM. Diabetic patients were on beta blockers (46.7% (n = 64) vs. 27.5% (n = 140), P < 0.001) and diuretics (51.1% (n = 70) vs. 33.2% (n = 169), p < 0.001) more frequently than non-diabetics. After a median follow-up of 22 months [IQR 7.5-63.0], 6.9% of patients developed DM, with no difference between those undergoing adrenalectomy and those treated medically (HR 1.07 [0.49-2.36], p = 0.866). There was also no significant difference in the evolution of glycemic control between DM patients who underwent surgery and those medically treated (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: DM affects about one quarter of patients with PA and the risk factors for its development are common to those of the general population. Medical and surgical treatment provides similar benefit in glycemic control in patients with PA and DM.

Anti-HLA Antibodies After Precocious Transplantectomy by Vascular Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Our objective in this study was to determine the effects of early renal transplantectomy on patients and the production of anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies. METHODS: Between January 2003 and May 2017, we analyzed a group of patients for the presence of specific HLA class I and/or II donor-specific antibodies (DSA), their panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), and the time period in which the antibodies were still detectable after transplantectomy. RESULTS: Anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 60.8% of patients, 60.8% and 52.2% of those patients had anti-class I and anti-class II antibodies, respectively. DSA were detected in 91.7% of the anti-HLA class I patients. Class II DSA were detected all of the patients with anti-HLA class II antibodies. The average (mean ± SD) PRA levels in our patients after transplantectomy was 60 ± 34% in class I and 63 ± 36% in class II. CONCLUSION: Anti-HLA antibodies can be detected well after transplantectomy. Even if the kidney allograft had been transplanted for only a short time, when the intensity of immunosuppression was the highest, many patients developed anti-HLA antibodies. The patients who continued with immunosuppression after transplantectomy did not develop anti-HLA antibodies.