Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
FASEB J ; 31(10): 4216-4225, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28821637

RESUMO

Every institution that is involved in research with animals is expected to have in place policies and procedures for the management of allegations of noncompliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. We present here a model set of recommendations for institutional animal care and use committees and institutional officials to ensure appropriate consideration of allegations of noncompliance with federal Animal Welfare Act regulations that carry a significant risk or specific threat to animal welfare. This guidance has 3 overarching aims: 1) protecting the welfare of research animals; 2) according fair treatment and due process to an individual accused of noncompliance; and 3) ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Through this guidance, the present work seeks to advance the cause of scientific integrity, animal welfare, and the public trust while recognizing and supporting the critical importance of animal research for the betterment of the health of both humans and animals.-Hansen, B. C., Gografe, S., Pritt, S., Jen, K.-L. C., McWhirter, C. A., Barman, S. M., Comuzzie, A., Greene, M., McNulty, J. A., Michele, D. E., Moaddab, N., Nelson, R. J., Norris, K., Uray, K. D., Banks, R., Westlund, K. N., Yates, B. J., Silverman, J., Hansen, K. D., Redman, B. Ensuring due process in the IACUC and animal welfare setting: considerations in developing noncompliance policies and procedures for institutional animal care and use committees and institutional officials.


Assuntos
Comitês de Cuidado Animal , Experimentação Animal , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais de Laboratório , Direitos Civis , Experimentação Animal/normas , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Animais , DNA/metabolismo , Humanos
2.
Lab Anim (NY) ; 45(8): 297-300, 2016 Jul 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439099

RESUMO

With the ever-increasing call to reduce self-imposed regulatory and administrative burden in the animal research oversight process, knowledge of the regulations and a desire to streamline policies and procedures are needed to affect a change in culture. In this opinion piece, we provide details on why institutionally imposed regulatory burden can arise.


Assuntos
Experimentação Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Políticas , Comitês de Cuidado Animal/organização & administração , Experimentação Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Animais
3.
Lab Anim (NY) ; 34(10): 33-7, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16261151

RESUMO

The IACUC is one of the most important committees at a research institution and plays a critical role in the success of an animal care and use program. It is the responsibility of the institution to provide IACUC members with adequate and appropriate training. The authors explore various IACUC training options.


Assuntos
Comitês de Cuidado Animal , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Ciência dos Animais de Laboratório/educação , Ensino/métodos
5.
ILAR J ; 49(4): 426-34, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18849596

RESUMO

The authors discuss the impact of regulatory burden on the research enterprise, with emphasis on animal care and use programs. They identify three sources of regulatory burden: specific requirements in law and regulation, interpretive requirements or "guidance" by regulatory agencies, and self-imposed regulatory burden resulting from institutional interpretations. Attempting to minimize the risks of noncompliance through the overzealous application of "requirements" does not necessarily benefit the animals. Balancing risks associated with animal research and burden in a successful program requires clear and consistent communication among all stakeholders--the institutional leadership, institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC), attending veterinarian and staff, and scientists. An evaluation tool is provided for institutions to assess their approach to required and voluntary activities in their animal care program. Drawing on the knowledge and experience gained in a combined 40 years of serving on, managing, training, and evaluating animal care programs, the authors conclude that institutions must thoughtfully balance their research and compliance needs to successfully maintain their institutional goals. They stress that a culture of compliance based on knowledge of the regulations, dedication to quality animal care, reasoned use of science-based performance standards, and the judicious application of professional judgment is the foundation for facilitation of research in the context of animal welfare and regulatory compliance.


Assuntos
Comitês de Cuidado Animal/organização & administração , Experimentação Animal/normas , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Experimentação Animal/ética , Bem-Estar do Animal/legislação & jurisprudência , Bem-Estar do Animal/organização & administração , Animais , Abrigo para Animais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA