Diagnosis and management of progressive ataxia in adults.

Progressive ataxia in adults can be difficult to diagnose, owing to its heterogeneity and the rarity of individual causes. Many patients remain undiagnosed ('idiopathic' ataxia). This paper provides suggested diagnostic pathways for the general neurologist, based on Ataxia UK's guidelines for professionals. MR brain scanning can provide diagnostic clues, as well as identify 'structural' causes such as tumours and multiple sclerosis. Advances in molecular genetics, including the wider and cheaper availability of 'next-generation sequencing', have enabled clinicians to identify many more cases with a genetic cause. Finally, autoimmunity is probably an under-recognised cause of progressive ataxia: as well as patients with antigliadin antibodies there are smaller numbers with various antibodies, including some associated with cancer. There are a few treatable ataxias, but also symptomatic treatments to help people with the spectrum of complications that might accompany progressive ataxias. Multidisciplinary team involvement and allied health professionals' input are critical to excellent patient care, including in the palliative phase. We can no longer justify a nihilistic approach to the management of ataxia.

'You don't get told anything, they don't do anything and nothing changes'. Medicine as a resource and constraint in progressive ataxia.

BACKGROUND: Progressive ataxias are neurological disorders affecting balance, co-ordination of movement and speech. OBJECTIVE: A qualitative study was undertaken to discover patients' experiences of ataxia and its symptoms. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight people with ataxia recruited from patient support groups and two hospital outpatients departments. DESIGN: Cross-sectional qualitative study with thematic analysis. RESULTS: These accounts highlight the limits of medicine in the context of a rare, incurable and disabling disorder, and the embodied uncertainties brought by slowly progressive diseases that lie at the boundaries of mainstream medical knowledge. The existential crises faced by people with ataxia are seemingly magnified by sometimes idiopathic aetiologies and the limited number of inherited conditions identifiable by the available genetic tests. Interviewees were drawn into a medical system that was focused mainly on the diagnosis process, with widely varying results. However, when asked, most had rather valued the provision of disability aids and physical therapies. Only one informant reported overcoming the myriad uncertainties of progressive ataxia, and their account supported the notion of 'biographical repair' in chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical uncertainties in ataxia constrained people's attempts to deal with their condition. The construction of the proactive, informed, medical consumer who is assumed to be a partner in care is problematic in the context of a rare and difficult-to-diagnose disease for which there is usually no cure. Service providers should be mindful of the need to manage patient expectations in relation to diagnosis and cure. More focus might usefully be placed on the provision of physical therapies and disability aids.

Understanding dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) symptoms and impacts on daily life: a qualitative interview study with patients and caregivers.

Background: Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) is a rare, neurodegenerative disorder with no disease-modifying treatments. There is a dearth of information in the literature about the patient and caregiver experience living with DRPLA. Objectives: This study aimed to (1) understand symptoms experienced by adult- and juvenile-onset DRPLA populations and their impact on daily life and (2) explore patient and caregiver treatment goals and clinical trial participation preferences. Design: The study was a qualitative interview study. Methods: Interviews were conducted remotely with adult patients with DRPLA and caregivers. Participants described patient symptoms and the impact of those symptoms on daily life, and they discussed treatment goals and potential clinical trial participation. There were 18 patients described in the interviews with two patients and seven caregivers. Some participants were caregivers to multiple patients with DRPLA. Results: Interview transcripts were coded for themes, and reported symptoms were summarized with descriptive statistics. Adult-onset patients (N = 7) experienced difficulty with ataxia (100%), cognition (100%), fine motor skills (100%), gross motor skills (100%), speech (100%), personality changes (100%), and seizures (57%). Juvenile-onset patients (N = 11) experienced difficulty with ataxia (100%), sleep (100%), speech (100%), jerking/twitching (83%), behavior (82%), cognition (82%), fine motor skills (82%), gross motor skills (82%), sensory sensitivity (75%), and seizures (64%). When considering aspects of DRPLA to target for future treatment, patients prioritized ataxia/mobility (100%), juvenile-onset caregivers prioritized ataxia/mobility (60%) and independence (60%), and adult-onset caregivers prioritized personality (60%). Almost all patients (93%) would participate in a clinical trial if given the opportunity, but travel to a clinical site could pose a participation barrier for half. Conclusion: This study found that there are symptom domains that are relevant across the DRPLA population, but there is heterogeneity within each domain based on the age of symptom onset and disease stage, which has implications for clinical trial design.

Understanding dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) symptoms and impacts on daily life through interviews with patients and caregivers Why was the study done? Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) is a rare and progressive brain disorder. Little is known about the patient and caregiver experience living with DRPLA and this lack of information has hindered the development of patient-focused treatments and the measurement of outcomes that are most meaningful to caregivers and patients. What did the researchers do? To address this problem, researchers conducted interviews with patients and caregivers of DRPLA to (1) better understand symptoms experienced by adult- and juvenile-onset DRPLA populations and their impact on daily life and (2) explore patient and caregiver treatment goals and clinical trial participation preferences. What did the researchers find? Eighteen patients were described in the interviews. Adult-onset patients (onset at age 20 or older) experienced difficulty with coordination, cognition, motor skills, speech, personality changes, and seizures. Juvenile-onset patients (onset before age 20) experienced difficulty with coordination, sleep, speech, jerking/twitching, behavior, cognition, motor skills, sensory sensitivity, and seizures. When considering symptoms to prioritize for future treatment, patients and caregivers identified coordination/mobility, independence, and personality as important. Nearly all participants indicated they would participate in a clinical trial if given an opportunity, however half expressed that travel to a clinical site could pose a barrier. What do the findings mean? This study provides a better understanding of the symptoms experienced by DRPLA patients and their impact on daily life. Additionally, it identifies important targets for treatment and considerations when designing clinical trials for DRPLA such as the barrier caused by travel to a clinical site.

Impact of specialist ataxia centres on health service resource utilisation and costs across Europe: cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the costs of treating ataxia and whether treatment at a specialist ataxia centre affects the cost of care. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients who attended specialist ataxia centres in three European countries reported differences in their health care use and costs compared with patients who did not attend a specialist ataxia centre. We compared mean resource use and health service costs per patient affected by ataxia in the United Kingdom, Italy and Germany over a 12-month period. Data were obtained from a survey distributed to people with ataxia in the three countries. We compared mean resource use for each contact type and costs, stratifying patients by whether they were currently attending a specialist ataxia centre or had never attended one. RESULTS: Responses were received from 181 patients from the United Kingdom, 96 from Italy and 43 from Germany. Differences in the numbers of contacts for most types of health service use between the specialist ataxia centre and non-specialist ataxia centre groups were non-significant. In the United Kingdom the mean total cost per patient was €2209 for non-specialist ataxia centre patients and €1813 for specialist ataxia centre patients (P = 0.59). In Italy these figures were €2126 and €1971, respectively (P = 0.84). In Germany they were €2431 and €4087, respectively (P = 0.19). Inpatient stays made the largest contribution to total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Within each country, resource use and costs were broadly similar for specialist ataxia centre and non-specialist ataxia centre groups. There were differences between countries in terms of health care contacts and costs.

Patient pathways for rare diseases in Europe: ataxia as an example.

BACKGROUND: Progressive ataxias are rare and complex neurological disorders that represent a challenge for the clinicians to diagnose and manage them. This study explored the patient pathways of individuals attending specialist ataxia centres (SAC) compared with non-specialist settings. We investigated specifically how diagnosis was reached, the access to healthcare services, treatments, and care satisfaction. The focus of this study was on early intervention, coordination of treatment to understand the care provision in different countries. METHODS: A patient survey was done in the UK, Germany and Italy to gather information about diagnosis and management of the ataxias in specialist (SAC) and non-specialist settings, utilisation of other primary and secondary health care services, and patients' satisfaction of received treatment. RESULTS: Patients gave positive feedback about the role of SAC in understanding their condition, ways to manage their ataxia (p < 0.001; UK) and delivering care adapted to their needs (p < 0.001; UK), in coordinating referrals to other healthcare specialists, and in offering opportunities to take part in research studies. Similar barriers for patients were identified in accessing the SACs among the selected countries, UK, Germany, and Italy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides crucial information about the ataxia patients care pathways in three European countries. Overall, the results showed a trend in patients' satisfaction being better in SAC compared to non-SAC. The outcomes can be used now for policy recommendations on how to improve treatment and care for people with these very rare and complex neurological diseases across Europe.

Medical Research Charities and Biopharmaceutical Companies as Partners in Patient-Centred R&D.

Life science research and development (R&D) companies are all too aware of the importance of patient perspectives but also of the barriers to engaging directly with patients, not least compliance, complex technical and regulatory issues, and the need to meet multifaceted expectations. Medical research charities (MRCs), highly technical and professional organisations, work directly with patients; they represent an expert resource for the science of their field, for disease-related patient advocacy issues and to advise and assist R&D companies in devising meaningful trials. The Pistoia Alliance, a non-profit organisation facilitating life sciences R&D, gathered a number of UK MRCs focused on complex lifelong conditions. The group used workshops and an opinion questionnaire for a snapshot of how the charities believe their knowledge and patient experiences could contribute insights and efficiencies to commercial R&D. MRCs argued that for chronic conditions, the patient perspective is vital in facilitating and de-risking trials, promoting patient motivation, compliance and study viability. MRCs and the patients they represent want to see successful trials, and it is in everyone's interest that well considered studies can proceed. Today, with remote assessments, consumer wearables and digital health technologies, MRCs and patients are already collating substantial data sets that are relevant to quality-of-life benefits, regulatory and value assessments, all of great interest to biopharmaceutical companies. In turn, MRCs would benefit from the experience of biopharma in generating clinical data and implementing novel technologies.

The attitude of patients with progressive ataxias towards clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The development of new therapies may rely on the conduct of human experimentation as well as later clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. Ethical considerations seek to protect the patient from risk but few have sought to ascertain the attitude to such risk of patients with progressive debilitating or terminal conditions, for which no mitigating or curative therapies exist. Such understanding is also important if recruitment is to be maximized. We therefore sought to define the motivations for and barriers to trial participation amongst patients with progressive ataxias, as well as their condition-specific trial preferences. METHODS: We conducted an online survey consisting of 29 questions covering four key domains (demographics, personal motivation, drug therapy and study design) relating to the design of clinical trials. Two major ataxia charities, Ataxia UK and the Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA) sent the survey to their members. Responses were analysed by disease and by ambulatory status. RESULTS: Of 342 respondents, 204 reported a diagnosis of Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA), 55 inherited cerebellar ataxia (CA) and 70 idiopathic CA. The most important symptoms to be addressed by a trial were considered to be balance problems and ambulation, although these were superseded by speech problems in wheelchair users. Common motivations for participation were potential benefits to self and others. Reasons for non-participation included concerns about side effects, and the burden and cost of travel. Financial reimbursement for expenses was reported to be likely to increase trial engagement, Phase two trials were the most popular to participate in, and the use of a placebo arm was seen as a disincentive. Across all disease subgroups, drug repurposing trials proved popular and just under 70% of participants would be prepared to undergo intrathecal drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of motivations for and barriers to trial participation as well as the acceptability of investigations, time commitments and routes of drug administration should inform better, more patient focused trial design. This in turn may improve recruitment and retention of participants to future trials.

Symptom burden of people with progressive ataxia, and its wider impact on their friends and relatives: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Progressive ataxias are complex disorders that result in a wide variety of symptoms. Whilst we currently have a relatively good understanding of the symptom patterns associated with the various types of ataxia, and how these diseases progress over time, their impact on the person with ataxia is less well understood. In addition, little is known about how carers, friends and families are affected by them. This paper aims to provide preliminary information on the presence and impact of medical symptoms and day-to-day challenges on people with ataxia and their friends and relatives. Method: Data were extracted from a survey by Ataxia UK for their members. The views of 366 people with ataxia and 52 friends and relatives are reported. Data were analysed for the entire groups, as well as for the three most common ataxia types represented in the sample, Friedreich's ataxia, inherited ataxia (excluding Friedreich's ataxia), and cerebellar ataxia of unknown cause. Results: The survey confirmed the symptom patterns described in previous research, but further showed that the impact of these symptoms can vary across ataxia populations. Similar findings were observed for day-to-day challenges. Friends and relatives experienced similar challenges to people with ataxia, indicating that support provided has to consider those supporting people with ataxia as well as the patient. Respondents also highlighted limitations in terms of accessing support services, and not all services were able to cater fully to their specific needs. Conclusion: This study begins to provide information that can be used in further research to explore the needs of people with ataxia and their carers, friends, and relatives. Such research will support treatment trial design, ensuring patients' needs are considered, help to tailor support services to their needs, and ensure health care professionals have the necessary skills to fully address them.

Ataxias are movement disorders that result in poor coordination and can include a variety of other difficulties, including speech difficulties, heart conditions, and problems with eyesight. Every type of ataxia results in a different pattern of symptoms, and they also differ in the age at which symptoms first appear. In progressive ataxias, symptoms become more severe over time. The medical symptoms often impact daily living, such as moving about, eating and drinking, socialising, or the ability to work. They also affect those who live with or look after the person with ataxia. It is therefore important to collect people's views about how the symptoms of their condition affect their daily lives, and what kind of support helps to alleviate these. This paper reports the results of a survey of people with ataxia and their friends and relatives to explore these questions. It was highlighted that people with ataxia deal with a wide variety of medical symptoms and that these have important effects on their lives. It also showed that those caring for them are similarly affected and also need support. The study has highlighted several areas where more research needs to be conducted to provide effective support for people with ataxia and their friends and relatives, and to inform the design of treatment trials to ensure the needs of patients are being addressed.

Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of the progressive ataxias.

The progressive ataxias are a group of rare and complicated neurological disorders, knowledge of which is often poor among healthcare professionals (HCPs). The patient support group Ataxia UK, recognising the lack of awareness of this group of conditions, has developed medical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ataxia. Although ataxia can be a symptom of many common conditions, the focus here is on the progressive ataxias, and include hereditary ataxia (e.g. spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA)), idiopathic sporadic cerebellar ataxia, and specific neurodegenerative disorders in which ataxia is the dominant symptom (e.g. cerebellar variant of multiple systems atrophy (MSA-C)). Over 100 different disorders can lead to ataxia, so diagnosis can be challenging. Although there are no disease-modifying treatments for most of these entities, many aspects of the conditions are treatable, and their identification by HCPs is vital. The early diagnosis and management of the (currently) few reversible causes are also of paramount importance. More than 30 UK health professionals with experience in the field contributed to the guidelines, their input reflecting their respective clinical expertise in various aspects of ataxia diagnosis and management. They reviewed the published literature in their fields, and provided summaries on "best" practice, including the grading of evidence available for interventions, using the Guideline International Network (GIN) criteria, in the relevant sections.A Guideline Development Group, consisting of ataxia specialist neurologists and representatives of Ataxia UK (including patients and carers), reviewed all sections, produced recommendations with levels of evidence, and discussed modifications (where necessary) with contributors until consensus was reached. Where no specific published data existed, recommendations were based on data related to similar conditions (e.g. multiple sclerosis) and/or expert opinion. The guidelines aim to assist HCPs when caring for patients with progressive ataxia, indicate evidence-based (where it exists) and best practice, and act overall as a useful resource for clinicians involved in managing ataxic patients. They do, however, also highlight the urgent need to develop effective disease-modifying treatments, and, given the large number of recommendations based on "good practice points", emphasise the need for further research to provide evidence for effective symptomatic therapies.These guidelines are aimed predominantly at HCPs in secondary care (such as general neurologists, clinical geneticists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, etc.) who provide care for individuals with progressive ataxia and their families, and not ataxia specialists. It is a useful, practical tool to forward to HCPs at the time referrals are made for on-going care, for example in the community.

Centres of Excellence for the care of people with progressive ataxias.

This article provides a description of the progressive ataxias and how such a diagnosis impacts on a person's life. The nurse's role in helping these patients, who can face numerous difficulties in everyday life, is highlighted. Moreover, the authors discuss the development of Ataxia Specialist Centres of Excellence for the diagnosis and management of people with ataxia, and the benefits believe these centres will bring to the care of these patients.

"Six sessions is a drop in the ocean": an exploratory study of neurological physiotherapy in idiopathic and inherited ataxias.

OBJECTIVE: An exploratory study to examine specialist neurological physiotherapy service provision and utilisation for people with progressive ataxia. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving thematic analysis of accounts in semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists and patients. SETTING: People with ataxia and specialist neuro-rehabilitation physiotherapists in Greater Manchester, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 38 people with ataxia and 8 neurological-physiotherapists working in academic and hospital and community-based services in NHS and private settings. Recruiting physiotherapists experienced in working with the patient group was a challenge. INTERVENTIONS: One hour cross-sectional semi-structured interview at physiotherapists' workplaces or in patients' own homes. RESULTS: Neurological physiotherapy was experienced by 25 (66%) of the 38 people with ataxia. The overarching themes emerging from the analysis were 'making a difference,' engagement and service provision. A majority of both samples felt that services should be organised so as to provide longer term therapy and support that goes beyond short care packages followed by provision of home exercise programme. Engagement with services was linked to patient expectations, adherence and perception of outcomes. The most predominant codes in the data set were encapsulated by the theme 'making a difference,' which further included concerns about how to measure perceived clinical improvement (as experienced by patients) in the context of progressive decline. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a model of idealised service provision involving a holistic, open-access service including research efforts to improve the evidence base. Special attention needs to be paid to measuring improvements following therapy.

Trouble with ataxia: A longitudinal qualitative study of the diagnosis and medical management of a group of rare, progressive neurological conditions.

OBJECTIVES: An exploratory investigation of diagnosis and management in progressive ataxias: rare neurological conditions usually affecting balance, mobility and speech. METHODS: A longitudinal qualitative study into the experiences of people with ataxia and neurologists. Thematic analysis and follow-up interviews were used to determine diagnosis and management issues over time. RESULTS: People with ataxia recruited via two hospital departments and Ataxia UK were interviewed at baseline (n = 38) and 12-month follow-up (n = 31). Eight consultant neurologists were interviewed once. Patient accounts were diverse, but many expressed frustration at having an incurable condition and dissatisfaction with service outcomes. At follow-up, there was variation in their contact and satisfaction with helping agencies. Service issues regarding continuity of care and the primary/secondary care interface were evident. Neurologists' accounts also varied. One-half reported that there is nothing that can be done, and one-half favoured specialist referral to increase the likelihood of finding an underlying aetiology within budget constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic uncertainties existing at baseline remained for patients at follow-up interviews, although some had learned to deal with the uncertainties brought by the diagnosis of a largely untreatable condition. Care pathways only seemed to operate in the case of defined conditions, such as Friedreich's Ataxia, the most commonly inherited cause. The findings point to a need to develop the evidence base to inform the relative utility of diagnostic procedures in the context of finite resources for patient care and support.

Getting a diagnosis v. learning to live with it? The case of the progressive ataxias.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceptions and experiences of the diagnosis process in people with a progressive ataxia, a group of rare complex neurological conditions usually leading to disturbances in balance and speech. METHODS: An explorative qualitative study involving analysis of public accounts posted to specialist Internet discussion forums by people with symptoms of ataxia. Internet data were utilized partly because ataxia is a rare condition. RESULTS: The main themes that emerged were diagnosis as an arduous process, achieving diagnosis as a privilege, the importance of getting a medical label, being believed with regard to symptoms and 'idiopathic' diagnosis as a non-diagnosis. The accounts of people who were not able to secure a definitive diagnosis suggested that their priorities had changed from getting a diagnosis to managing and learning to live with their progressive disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of the progressive ataxias presents challenges for patients, clinicians and in terms of the extensive use of finite healthcare resources. Our findings suggest there are varied views on the importance of diagnosis to people with progressive ataxia. This warrants further in-depth research to understand how people rate the relative utility of diagnostics.