Cerebral Edema Monitoring and Management Strategies: Results from an International Practice Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations. METHODS: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials.

Acute headache in pregnant and post-partum patients: A clinical review.

BACKGROUND: Headaches during pregnancy and the post-partum period may be due to either an exacerbation of a pre-existing neurological presentation, a new pregnancy-related process, or a non-pregnancy related condition. Key physiologic changes during pregnancy and the post-partum period contribute to the vulnerability of this patient population and the increased risk of complications. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: Review causes of headaches in pregnant and post-partum patients as well as neuroimaging techniques performed. DISCUSSION: Headaches are a common complaint for pregnant and post-partum patients. For pregnant patients, a range of serious causes must be considered including cerebral venous thrombosis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and stroke. Primary headaches are responsible for most post-partum headaches, however other causes also include pre-clampsia, cerebral venous thrombosis and post-dural headache. Determining the optimal imaging technique in this vulnerable population remains a challenge given the scarce guidelines. CONCLUSION: The greatest difficulty while evaluating pregnant and post-partum patients presenting with an acute headache in an emergency setting is to determine whether the headache is due to a primary disorder such as migraines or is secondary to an underlying, sometimes serious pathology. The following review explores evidenced-based diagnosis of headache in this particular setting.

Challenging Cases in Neurology: Neurologic Complications of COVID-19.

Since the first reported cases of pneumonia in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly become recognized as a multisystem illness, with known effects on virtually every organ system. In particular, neurologic complications of COVID-19 have been reported since the beginning of the pandemic in both ambulatory patients with mild disease and critically ill patients. Although it remains unclear whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has the potential to directly invade the central nervous system, strokes and other neurovascular complications, sequelae of critical illness and metabolic derangements, parainfectious inflammatory disorders, and a poorly understood post-COVID syndrome have all been reported in patients with COVID-19. Here, we describe cases representing a diverse range of neurologic complications in patients infected with COVID-19.

Why Are Women Less Represented in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trials?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fewer women than men tend to be enrolled in clinical trials of intracerebral hemorrhage. It is unclear whether this reflects lower prevalence of intracerebral hemorrhage in women, selection bias, or poor recruitment efforts. We undertook this study to examine differences between men and women in the reasons for exclusion from the iDEF trial (Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine). METHODS: The screen failure log included 29 different reasons for exclusion. Chi-square statistics were used to evaluate the differences in reasons for exclusion between men and women. RESULTS: A total of 38.2% of participants in iDEF were women. Three thousand nine hundred eighty-two women (45.7%) and 4736 men (54.3%) were screen failures (P<0.0001). Similar proportions of women (1.28%) and men (1.73%) were excluded due to inability to obtain consent (P=0.1). Patients or families declined participation in 1.26% of women versus 1.31% of men (P=0.9). More women than men failed screening because of age>80 (22.40% versus 12.61%; adjusted P=0.0007) and preexisting do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate (3.69% versus 2.83%; adjusted P=0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Lower rates of women enrollment in the iDEF trial may be attributed to older age. Inability to obtain consent or declining participation was similar between women and men, arguing against selection bias. Our findings should be confirmed in other intracerebral hemorrhage trials to determine best strategies to improve women's representation in future trials.

Retrospective Review of Pregnant Patients Presenting for Evaluation of Acute Neurologic Complaints.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Data suggest an increase in neurologic-related hospitalizations during pregnancy. It is crucial for health care providers to develop effective strategies to evaluate this young, generally healthy cohort of patients for whom missed neurologic diagnoses can have devastating results. We aim to describe the epidemiology of this high risk patient population by investigating exam findings, imaging studies, and clinical outcomes of pregnant women presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute neurologic complaints. METHODS: We conducted a 7-year retrospective chart review of pregnant patients presenting with neurologic chief complaints to the emergency department of an urban tertiary academic medical center in the northeastern United States. We investigated examination findings, imaging studies, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, 205 pregnant patients presented to the ED with a neurologic chief complaint. The majority of patients had a normal neurologic examination result. Patients with an abnormal examination result were not more likely to have clinically significant imaging findings. Within our population, 28% underwent imaging, and noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging was the most common modality. Five patients had clinically significant imaging findings. Specifically, 3.3% of patients with abnormal examination result had significant findings and 2.3% of those with a normal examination result had significant findings. A minority of the patients with a visit resulting in discharge (9.8%) returned to the ED within a 7-day period. None required additional neuroimaging. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, our study is unique in that it incorporated all neurologic complaints. Headache was the most common complaint, followed by dizziness and seizures. Most of the headaches were related to first-trimester migraines. There was a high incidence of imaging used in clinical practice even when there was a normal neurologic examination result. A normal examination result does not adequately exclude serious intracranial pathology, and diagnostic vigilance is justified.

Outcomes of a novel ED observation pathway for mild traumatic brain injury and associated intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the majority of non-anticoagulated patients with small subdural or subarachnoid intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury do not experience clinical deterioration or require neurosurgical intervention. We implemented a novel ED observation pathway to reduce unnecessary admissions among patients with ICH in the setting of mild TBI (complicated mild TBI, cmTBI). METHODS: Prospective, single-center study of ED patients presenting to a Level-1 Trauma Center, 4/2016-12/2018. INCLUSION CRITERIA: head injury with GCS ≥ 14, minor positive CT findings (i.e. subdural hematoma <1 cm). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: GCS < 14, multi-system trauma procedural intervention or admission, epidural hematoma, skull fracture, seizure, anticoagulant/antiplatelet use beyond aspirin, physician discretion. OUTCOMES: pathway completion rate, ED length-of-stay (LOS), neurosurgical intervention, hospital LOS, 7-day return visits. RESULTS: 138 patients met all pathway criteria and were included in analysis. 113/138 (81.9%) patients were discharged home after observation with mean ED LOS of 17.3 h (median 15.4 h, SD +/- 10.5) including 91/111 (81.9%) patients transferred from outside hospitals (median 18.1 h, SD +/- 11.0). Increased age and aspirin use were correlated with pathway non-completion requiring admission, but not due to hematoma expansion. Among admitted patients, none required neurosurgical intervention. Seven (5.1%) 7-day return visits occurred, 3 (2%) related to initial cmTBI; 1 (0.9%) was admitted for neurologic monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: ED observation for patients with cmTBI resulted in an 82% pathway completion rate, including outside hospital transfers. These results suggest that patients with cmTBI may be safely discharged from the ED after a brief period of observation. Our pathway protocol and implementation involved neurosurgical consultation and the ability to perform repeat neurologic exams in the ED. Future studies should examine the feasibility of non-transfer protocols for appropriately selected patients and access to neurosurgical expertise in the community setting.

A Pooled Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Importance: The etiology and significance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate which factors are associated with DWI lesions, whether associated factors differ by ICH location, and whether DWI lesions are associated with functional outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This analysis pooled individual patient data from 3 randomized clinical trials (Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation phase 3 trial, Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage trial, and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine phase 2 trial) and 1 multicenter prospective study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage). Patients were enrolled from August 1, 2010, to September 30, 2018. Of the 4782 patients, 1788 who underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain were included. Data were analyzed from July 1 to December 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome consisted of factors associated with DWI lesions. Secondary outcomes were poor functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 4 to 6, and mortality, both assessed at 3 months. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between exposures and outcomes. Subgroup analyses stratified by hematoma location were performed. Results: After exclusion of 36 patients with missing data on DWI lesions, 1752 patients were included in the analysis (1019 men [58.2%]; mean [SD] age, 60.8 [13.3] years). Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions occurred in 549 patients (31.3%). In mixed-effects regression models, factors associated with DWI lesions included younger age (odds ratio [OR] per year, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), black race (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.17-2.30), admission systolic blood pressure (OR per 10-mm Hg increase, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.18), baseline hematoma volume (OR per 10-mL increase, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22), cerebral microbleeds (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39-2.46), and leukoaraiosis (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.67-2.17). Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions were independently associated with poor mRS (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-2.00), but not with mortality (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.72-1.71). In subgroup analyses, similar factors were associated with DWI lesions in lobar and deep ICH. Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions were associated with poor mRS in deep but not lobar ICH. Conclusions and Relevance: In a large, heterogeneous cohort of prospectively identified patients with ICH, results were consistent with the hypothesis that DWI lesions represent acute sequelae of chronic cerebral small vessel disease, particularly hypertensive vasculopathy. Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions portend a worse prognosis after ICH, mainly deep hemorrhages.