Correlating Surface Activity with Interface-Induced Aggregation in a High-Concentration mAb Solution.

Interface-induced aggregation resulting in protein particle formation is an issue during the manufacturing and storage of protein-based therapeutics. High-concentration formulations of therapeutic proteins are even more prone to protein particle formation due to increased protein-protein interactions. However, the dependence of interface-induced protein particle formation on bulk protein concentration is not understood. Furthermore, the formation of protein particles is often mitigated by the addition of polysorbate-based surfactants. However, the details of surfactant-protein interactions that prevent protein particle formation at high concentrations remain unclear. In this work, a tensiometer technique was used to evaluate the surface pressure of an industrially relevant mAb at different bulk concentrations, and in the absence and presence of a polysorbate-based surfactant, polysorbate 20 (PS20). The adsorption kinetics was correlated with subvisible protein particle formation at the air-water interface and in the bulk protein solution using a microflow imaging technique. Our results showed that, in the absence of any surfactant, the number of subvisible particles in the bulk protein solutions increased linearly with mAb concentration, while the number of protein particles measured at the interface showed a logarithmic dependence on bulk protein concentration. In the presence of surfactants above the critical micelle concentration (CMC), our results for low-concentration mAb solutions (10 mg/mL) showed an interface that is surfactant-dominated, and particle characterization results showed that the addition of the surfactant led to reduced particle formation. In contrast, for the highest concentration (170 mg/mL), coadsorption of proteins and surfactants was observed at the air-water interface, even for surfactant formulations above CMC and the surfactant did not mitigate subvisible particle formation. Our results taken together provide evidence that the ratio between the surfactant and mAb molecules is an important consideration when formulating high-concentration mAb therapeutics to prevent unwanted aggregation.

Correlating Differences in the Surface Activity to Interface-Induced Particle Formation in Different Protein Modalities: IgG mAb Versus Fc-Fusion Protein.

The propensity of protein-based biologics to form protein particles during bioprocessing can be related to their interfacial properties. In this study, we compare the surface activity and interfacial film properties of two structurally different biologics, an IgG and Fc-fusion, in the absence and presence of interfacial dilatational stresses, and correlate these differences to their tendency to form interface-induced protein particles. Our results show that interface-induced particle formation is protein-dependent, with the Fc-fusion demonstrating greater interfacial stability. This observation can be correlated with faster adsorption kinetics of the Fc-fusion protein, and formation of a less incompressible film at the air-liquid interface. The addition of polysorbate 80 (PS80), commonly added to mitigate protein particle formation, led to a surfactant-dominant interface for quiescent conditions and coadsorption of protein and surfactant for the Fc-fusion when exposed to interfacial stress. On the other hand, for the IgG molecule, the surface always remained surfactant dominant. Image analysis demonstrated that PS80 was more effective in mitigating particle formation for the IgG than Fc-fusion. This suggests that a surfactant-dominant interface is necessary to prevent interface-induced protein particle formation. Further, while PS80 is effective in mitigating particle formation in the IgG formulation, it may not be the best choice for other protein modalities.

Comparison of Protein Particle Formation in IgG1 mAbs Formulated with PS20 Vs. PS80 When Subjected to Interfacial Dilatational Stress.

Polysorbates (PS) are nonionic surfactants that are commonly included in protein formulations to mitigate the formation of interfacial stress-induced protein particles and thus increase their long-term storage stability. Nonetheless, factors that dictate the efficiency of different polysorbates in mitigating protein particle formation, especially during the application of interfacial stresses, are often ill defined. Here, we used a Langmuir trough to determine the surface activity of two IgG1 monoclonal antibodies formulated with two different polysorbates (PS20 and PS80) when subjected to interfacial dilatational stress. Interfacial properties of these formulations were then correlated with characterization of subvisible protein particles measured by micro-flow imaging (MFI). Both mAbs, when formulated in PS20, demonstrate faster adsorption kinetics and higher surface activity compared to PS80 or surfactant-free formulations. Compression/expansion results suggest that when exposed to interfacial dilatational stresses, both mAb/PS20 formulations display interfacial properties of PS20 alone. In contrast, interfacial properties of both mAb/PS80 formulations suggest mAbs and PS80 are co-adsorbed to the air-water interface. Further, MFI analysis of the interface and the bulk solution confirms that PS20 is more effective than PS80 at mitigating the formation of larger particles in the bulk solution in both mAbs. Concomitantly, the efficiency of PS to prevent interface-induced protein particle formation also depended on the protein's inherent tendency to aggregate at a surfactant-free interface. Together, the studies presented here highlight the importance of determining the interfacial properties of mAbs, surfactants, and their combinations to make informed formulation decisions about the choice of surfactant.

Understanding the Impact of Combined Hydrodynamic Shear and Interfacial Dilatational Stress, on Interface-Mediated Particle Formation for Monoclonal Antibody Formulations.

During biomanufacturing, several unit operations expose solutions of biologics to multiple stresses, such as hydrodynamic shear forces due to fluid flow and interfacial dilatational stresses due to mechanical agitation or bubble collapse. When these stresses individually act on proteins adsorbed to interfaces, it results in an increase in protein particles in the bulk solution, a phenomenon referred to as interface-induced protein particle formation. However, an understanding of the dominant cause, when multiple stresses are acting simultaneously or sequentially, on interface-induced protein particle formation is limited. In this work, we established a unique set-up using a peristaltic pump and a Langmuir-Pockels trough to study the impact of hydrodynamic shear stress due to pumping and interfacial dilatational stress, on protein particle formation. Our experimental results together demonstrate that for protein solutions subjected to various combinations of stress (i.e., interfacial and hydrodynamic stress in different sequences), surface pressure values during adsorption and when subjected to compression/dilatational stresses, showed no change, suggesting that the interfacial properties of the protein film are not impacted by pumping. The concentration of protein particles is an order of magnitude higher when interfacial dilatational stress is applied at the air-liquid interface, compared to solutions that are only subjected to pumping. Furthermore, the order in which these stresses are applied, have a significant impact on the concentration of protein particles measured in the bulk solution. Together, these studies conclude that for biologics exposed to multiple stresses throughout bioprocessing and manufacturing, exposure to air-liquid interfacial dilatational stress is the predominant mechanism impacting protein particle formation at the interface and in the bulk solution.

Evaluating the Combined Impact of Temperature and Application of Interfacial Dilatational Stresses on Surface-mediated Protein Particle Formation in Monoclonal Antibody Formulations.

Formation of submicron and subvisible protein particles (0.1-100 µm) present a major obstacle during processing and storage of therapeutic proteins. While protein aggregation resulting in particle formation is well-understood in bulk solution, the mechanisms of aggregation due to interfacial stresses is less understood. Particularly, in this study, we focus on understanding the combined effect of temperature and application of interfacial dilatational stresses, on interface-induced protein particle formation, using two industrially relevant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The surface activity of Molecule C (MC) and Molecule B (MB) were measured at room temperature (RT) and 4 °C in the absence and presence of interfacial dilatation stress using a Langmuir trough. These results were correlated with Micro-flow imaging (MFI) to characterize formation of subvisible protein particles at the interface and in the bulk solution. Our results show that the surface activity for both proteins is temperature dependent. However, the extent of the impact of temperature on the mechanical properties of the monomolecular protein films when subjected to dilatational stresses is protein dependent. Protein particle analysis provided evidence that protein particles formed in bulk solution originate at the interface and are dependent on both application of thermal stresses and interfacial dilatational stresses. In the absence of any interfacial stresses, more and larger protein particles were formed at the interface at RT than at 4 °C. When mAb formulations are subjected to interfacial dilatational stresses, protein particle formation in bulk solution was found to be temperature dependent. Together our results validate that mAb solutions maintained at 4 °C can lower the surface activity of proteins and reduce their tendency to form interface-induced protein particles both in the absence and presence of interfacial dilatational stresses.