Brain imaging determinants of functional prognosis after severe endocarditis: a multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a detailed imaging phenotype of the cerebral complications in critically ill patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and determine whether any specific imaging pattern could impact prognostic information. METHODS: One hundred ninety-two patients admitted to the intensive care units of seven tertiary centers with severe, definite left IE and neurological complications were included. All underwent cerebral imaging few days after admission to define the types of lesions, their volumes, and their locations using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). We employed uni- and multi-variate logistic regression analyses to explore the associations among imaging features and other prognostic variables and the 6-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. RESULTS: Ischemic lesions were the most common lesions (75%; mean volume, 15.3 ± 33 mL) followed by microbleeds (50%; mean number, 4 ± 7.5), subarachnoidal hemorrhages (20%), hemorrhagic strokes (16%; mean volume, 14.6 ± 21 mL), and hemorrhagic transformations (10%; mean volume, 5.6 ± 11 mL). The volume of hemorrhagic transformations, the severity of leukopathy, and the compromises of certain locations on the motor pathway from the VLSM were associated with a poor 6-month mRS score on univariate analyses. However, upon multivariate analyses, no such specific imaging pattern independently predicted the mRS; this was instead influenced principally by age (OR = 1.03 [1.004-1.06]) and cardiac surgery status (OR = 0.06 [0.02-0.16]) in the entire cohort, and by age (OR = 1.04 [1.01-1.08]) and Staphylococcus aureus status (OR = 2.86 [1.19-6.89]) in operated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of severely ill IE patients with neurological complications, no specific imaging pattern could be highlighted as a reliable predictor of prognosis.

Critically ill patients with infective endocarditis, neurological complications and indication for cardiac surgery: a multicenter propensity-adjusted study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit-risk balance and optimal timing of surgery for severe infective endocarditis (IE) with ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes is unknown. The study aim was to compare the neurological outcome between patients receiving surgery or not. METHODS: In a prospective register-based multicenter ICU study, patients were included if they met the following criteria: (i) left-sided IE with an indication for heart surgery; (ii) with cerebral complications documented by cerebral imaging before cardiac surgery; (iii) with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥ 3. Exclusion criteria were isolated right-sided IE, in-hospital acquired IE and patients with cerebral complications only after cardiac surgery. In the primary analysis, the prognostic value of surgery in term of disability at 6 month was assessed by using a propensity score-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: 192 patients were included including ischemic stroke (74.5%) and hemorrhagic lesion (15.6%): 67 (35%) had medical treatment and 125 (65%) cardiac surgery. In the propensity score-adjusted logistic regression, a favorable 6-month neurological outcome was associated with surgery (odds ratio 13.8 (95% CI 6.2-33.7). The 1-year mortality was strongly reduced with surgery in the fixed-effect propensity-adjusted Cox model (hazard ratio 0.18; 95% CI 0.11-0.27; p < 0.001). These effects remained whether the patients received delayed surgery (n = 62/125) or not and whether they were deeply comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 10) or not. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill IE patients with an indication for surgery and previous cerebral events, a better propensity-adjusted neurological outcome was associated with surgery compared with medical treatment.