Significance of glucocorticoid signaling in triple-negative breast cancer patients: a newly revealed interaction with androgen signaling.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy is the only current effective systemic treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Therefore, the identification of active biological pathways that could become therapeutic targets is crucial. In this study, considering the well-reported biological roles of glucocorticoid and androgen receptors (GR, AR) in TNBC, we attempted to explore the effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) on cell kinetics as well as the potential interaction between GR and AR in TNBC. METHODS: We first explored the association between the status of GR, AR, and/or GCs-metabolizing enzymes such as 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßHSD) 1 and 2 and the clinicopathological variables of the TNBC patients. Thereafter, we also studied the effects of dexamethasone (DEX) with/without dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on TNBC cell lines by assessing the cell proliferation, migration and GC response genes at the transcriptional level. RESULTS: GR positivity in carcinoma cells was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcome of the patients and AR positivity was significantly associated with lower histological grade and Ki-67 labeling index of the cases examined. In particular, AR positivity was significantly associated with decreased risks of developing recurrence in GR-positive TNBC patients. The subsequent in vitro studies revealed that DEX-promoted cell migration was inhibited by the co-treatment with DHT in GR/AR double-positive HCC38 cells. In addition, DHT inhibited the DEX-increased serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase-1 (SGK1) mRNA expression. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to reveal that the interaction of GR and AR did influence the clinical outcome of TNBC patients and GCs induced cell migration in TNBC cells.

Impact of Topoisomerase IIα, PTEN, ABCC1/MRP1, and KI67 on triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) harbor higher risk of relapse, and eventual demise compared to those who achieve pathologic complete response. Therefore, in this study, we assessed a panel of molecules involved in key pathways of drug resistance and tumor progression before and after NAC in TNBC patients, in order to clarify the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: We studied 148 TNBC Japanese patients treated with anthracycline/taxane-based NAC. KI67, Topoisomerase IIα (TopoIIα), PTEN, p53, Bcl2, vimentin, ABCG2/BCRP1, ABCB1/MDR1, and ABCC1/MRP1 were immunolocalized in surgical pathology materials before and after NAC. RESULTS: The status of vimentin and increasing labeling index (LI) of TopoIIα and KI67 in biopsy specimens were significantly associated with those who responded to NAC treatment. The abundance of p53 (p = 0.003), ABCC1/MRP1 (p = 0.033), ABCB1/MDR1 (p = 0.022), and a loss of PTEN (p < 0.0001) in surgery specimens following treatment were associated with pathologic parameters. TopoIIα, PTEN, and ABCC1/MRP1 status predicted pathologic response. In addition, the status of PTEN, ABCC1/MRP1, ABCB1/MDR1, Bcl2, and vimentin in surgical specimens was also significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological factors in surgery specimens, suggesting that these alterations could be responsible for tumor relapse in TNBC patients. CONCLUSION: KI67, TopoIIα, PTEN, and ABCC1/MRP1 status could predict treatment response and/or eventual clinical outcomes. These results could also provide an insight into the mechanisms of drug resistance and relapse of TNBC patients receiving NAC.

In breast cancer subtypes steroid sulfatase (STS) is associated with less aggressive tumour characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The majority of breast cancer cases are steroid dependent neoplasms, with hormonal manipulation of either CYP19/aromatase or oestrogen receptor alpha axis being the most common therapy. Alternate pathways of steroid actions are documented, but their interconnections and correlations to BC subtypes and clinical outcome could be further explored. METHODS: We evaluated selected steroid receptors (Androgen Receptor, Oestrogen Receptor alpha and Beta, Glucocorticoid Receptor) and oestrogen pathways (steroid sulfatase (STS), 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 (17ßHSD2) and aromatase) in a cohort of 139 BC cases from Norway. Using logistic and cox regression analysis, we examined interactions between these and clinical outcomes such as distant metastasis, local relapse and survival. RESULTS: Our principal finding is an impact of STS expression on the risk for distant metastasis (p<0.001) and local relapses (p <0.001), HER2 subtype (p<0.015), and survival (p<0.001). The suggestion of a beneficial effect of alternative oestrogen synthesis pathways was strengthened by inverted, but non-significant findings for 17ßHSD2. CONCLUSIONS: Increased intratumoural metabolism of oestrogens through STS is associated with significantly lower incidence of relapse and/or distant metastasis and correspondingly improved prognosis. The enrichment of STS in the HER2 overexpressing subtype is intriguing, especially given the possible role of HER-2 over-expression in endocrine resistance.

Correction to: IRIS study: a phase II study of the steroid sulfatase inhibitor Irosustat when added to an aromatase inhibitor in ER-positive breast cancer patients.

In the original publication of the article, a part of acknowledgement section was missed out. The omitted acknowledgement is given below: 'The study was coordinated by the Imperial Clinical Trials Unit-Cancer, Imperial College London and Sponsored by Imperial College London. The Imperial Clinical Trials Unit receives funding from the National Institute for Health (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. This study was supported by Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and Cancer Research UK Imperial Centre'.

The presence and impact of estrogen metabolism on the biology of triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: While triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is negative for estrogen receptor alpha, a substantial proportion of carcinomas express estrogen receptor beta (ERß); consequently, estrogen actions and metabolism may be relevant in this cancer subtype. METHODS: A cohort of 81 TNBC patients from Tohoku University Hospital, Japan were characterised with regard to the expression of estrogen receptor beta and enzymes known to modulate levels of estrogens in breast and other tissues (Aromatase, 17-beta- Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases 1, 2 and 6). This was done at the protein level by means of immunohistochemistry. As this cohort has been previously characterised for androgens, this also allows for comparison between the expressions of estrogen-related proteins and of androgen-related proteins. Preliminary mechanistic studies in cell culture were also undertaken. RESULTS: 17ßHSD2 was detected in the highest number of cases followed by 17ßHSD1, 17ßHSD6 and aromatase. When comparing the expression of ERß with that of the enzymes, it was positively correlated with the expression of 17ßHSD6 (p < 0.05) and trended towards correlation with dual expression of 17ßHSD1 and 2 (p < 0.07). 17ßHSD1 was associated with significantly reduced tumour volume (p = 0.0025), while ERß was associated with a trend towards reduced lymphovascular invasion, (p < 0.061). Interestingly, in survival analysis, 17ßHSD6 expression was the only one of these five factors that influenced survival, with positive samples being associated with longer disease-free survival compared to those that were negative for 17ßHSD6 (p < 0.05). In assessing associations with expression of proteins in the androgenic pathway, expression of aromatase appeared to be associated with androgenic pathways in TNBC patients (p < 0.05). Due to this association and the potential relevance to androgen-directed therapies in TNBC, we evaluated this interaction in vitro. We observed androgen-dependent upregulation of aromatase and ERß in a subset of AR expressing TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-453, SUM-185-PE and MFM-223). CONCLUSION: Overall this study suggests the presence of, and a potential protective effect of estrogens in TNBC.

IRIS study: a phase II study of the steroid sulfatase inhibitor Irosustat when added to an aromatase inhibitor in ER-positive breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Irosustat is a first-generation, orally active, irreversible steroid sulfatase inhibitor. We performed a multicentre, open label phase II trial of the addition of Irosustat to a first-line aromatase inhibitor (AI) in patients with advanced BC to evaluate the safety of the combination and to test the hypothesis that the addition of Irosustat to AI may further suppress estradiol levels and result in clinical benefit. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had derived clinical benefit from a first-line AI and who subsequently progressed were enrolled. The first-line AI was continued and Irosustat (40 mg orally daily) added. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic end points. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women were recruited, four discontinued treatment without response assessment. Based on local reporting, the CBR was 18.5% (95% CI 6.3-38.1%) on an intent to treat basis, increasing to 21.7% (95% CI 7.4-43.7%) by per-protocol analysis. In those patients that achieved clinical benefit (n = 5), the median (interquartile range) duration was 9.4 months (8.1-11.3) months. The median progression-free survival time was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.5-4.6) in both the ITT and per-protocol analyses. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were dry skin (28%), nausea (13%), fatigue (13%), diarrhoea (8%), headache (7%), anorexia (7%) and lethargy (7%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of Irosustat to aromatase inhibitor therapy resulted in clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile. The study met its pre-defined success criterion by both local and central radiological assessments.

How far have we come in terms of estrogens in breast cancer? [Review].

Major advances in breast cancer treatment have almost always been linked to the actions of estrogen. Therefore, this review focused on estrogen actions in the breast, particularly the developments of the past 20 years, the present understanding of disease biology and possible future developments. Within these areas have focused on what is known about the underlying molecular biology and in particular integration of the bioinformatics revolution of the last 15 years with other facets of research. In addition, there will be an emphasis on the understanding brought about by a greater appreciation for the intracrinology of the breast.

Interleukin (IL)-17A in triple-negative breast cancer: a potent prognostic factor associated with intratumoral neutrophil infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized as highly immunogenic and lacks specific targeted therapies. Interleukin 17A (IL-17A) is a controversial cytokine and is known to have anti-tumor and pro-tumor roles depending on the tumor microenvironment. In addition, IL-17A has been recently implicated in the recruitments of neutrophil into tumor tissues. Although IL-17A is considered tumor-promoting in breast cancer, its significance in the possible regulation of neutrophil infiltration in TNBC is not clearly defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We immunolocalized IL-17A, CD66b (neutrophil marker), and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1, neutrophil chemoattractant) in 108 TNBC specimens and assessed their correlation among each other. The correlation between these markers and clinicopathological parameters was also assessed. We subsequently performed in vitro study to address the possible regulation of CXCL1 by IL-17A using TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and HCC-38. RESULTS: It was revealed that IL-17A correlated significantly with CXCL1 and CD66b, also CD66b with CXCL1. Furthermore, IL-17A was significantly associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival, especially in a high density CD66b group of patients. In vitro results revealed that IL-17A upregulated CXCL1 mRNA expression in a dose and time dependent manner, and this induction was significantly suppressed by an Akt inhibitor. CONCLUSION: IL-17A was considered to contribute to neutrophil infiltration by inducing CXCL1 in TNBC tissues and educating neutrophils to promote tumor progression. IL-17A might therefore serve as a potent prognostic factor in TNBC.

Androgen Receptor Is a Non-canonical Inhibitor of Wild-Type and Mutant Estrogen Receptors in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers.

Sustained treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer with ER-targeting drugs results in ER mutations and refractory unresponsive cancers. Androgen receptor (AR), which is expressed in 80%-95% of ER-positive breast cancers, could serve as an alternate therapeutic target. Although AR agonists were used in the past to treat breast cancer, their use is currently infrequent due to virilizing side effects. Discovery of tissue-selective AR modulators (SARMs) has renewed interest in using AR agonists to treat breast cancer. Using translational models, we show that AR agonist and SARM, but not antagonist, inhibit the proliferation and growth of ER-positive breast cancer cells, patient-derived tissues, and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Ligand-activated AR inhibits wild-type and mutant ER activity by reprogramming the ER and FOXA1 cistrome and rendering tumor growth inhibition. These findings suggest that ligand-activated AR may function as a non-canonical inhibitor of ER and that AR agonists may offer a safe and effective treatment for ER-positive breast cancer.

Triple negative breast cancer chemosensitivity and chemoresistance: current advances in biomarkers indentification.

INTRODUCTION: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous clinicopathological entity constituting approximately 15 - 20% of all breast cancer (BC) patients. It shows high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. At this juncture, because of the lack of specific targeted therapies available and the development in patients of resistance to some therapeutic agents, clinical and translational settings have gained importance over the past decades. AREAS COVERED: The development of novel, safe and effective alternatives for the treatment of TNBC are in high demand. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the state of the art of TNBC, its current therapies and potential therapeutic targets. In particular, focus is put on recent advances regarding the identification of emerging biomarkers as prognostic and/or predictive markers, including surrogate markers for molecular tumor subtyping and identifying potential responders to new therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Effective development of informative markers could constitute an important armamentarium tool for identifying appropriate therapies to challenge the aggressiveness of TNBC.