Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular outcomes among cancer survivors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Analyze current evidence on racial/ethnic disparities in cardiovascular outcomes among cancer survivors, identifying factors and proposing measures to address health inequities. RECENT FINDINGS: Existing literature indicates that the Black population experiences worse cardiovascular outcomes following the diagnosis of both initial primary cancer and second primary cancer, with a notably higher prevalence of cardio-toxic events, particularly among breast cancer survivors. Contributing socioeconomic factors to these disparities include unfavorable social determinants of health, inadequate insurance coverage, and structural racism within the healthcare system. Additionally, proinflammatory epigenetic modification is hypothesized to be a contributing genetic variation factor. Addressing these disparities requires a multiperspective approach, encompassing efforts to address racial disparities and social determinants of health within the healthcare system, refine healthcare policies and access, and integrate historically stigmatized racial groups into clinical research. Racial and ethnic disparities persist in cardiovascular outcomes among cancer survivors, driven by multifactorial causes, predominantly associated with social determinants of health. Addressing these healthcare inequities is imperative, and timely efforts must be implemented to narrow the existing gap effectively.

Examining the interplay between cardiovascular disease and cancer incidence: Data from NHANES III and continuous.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between risk factors of cancer among individuals with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: The analysis included 438 and 2100 CVD patients aged 65+ from NHANES-III and Continuous datasets, respectively. Competing risk models with subdistribution hazards ratio (aHR) were used to identify risk factors. Results: Females in NHANES-III had lower cancer risk (aHR 0.39, P = 0.001) compared to males. Poor physical activity was associated with increased cancer risk in both datasets (aHR 2.59 in NHANES-III, aHR 1.59 in Continuous). In NHANES-Continuous, age (aHR 1.07, P < 0.001) and current smoking (aHR 2.55, P = 0.001) also showed a significant association with developing cancer. No other factors investigated showed significant associations. Discussion: This study highlights the interplay between traditional risk factors and the elevated risk of cancer in CVD patients. Further research with larger samples and wider age ranges is needed to solidify these findings and inform intervention strategies.

Community Engagement to Advance Equitable Cardio-Oncology Care: A Call to Action: JACC: CardioOncology How To.

•Situating engagement within the experience and priorities of survivors will enhance translational research and health equity.•The TRUST framework provides a guide to expand opportunities for community engagement in cardio-oncology for multiple constituents and across the care continuum.•Training community members as cardio-oncology champions may promote stakeholder representation.•Community connectors can support bidirectional engagement and support for survivors as they transition from active treatment.

Cardiovascular Diseases Increase Cancer Mortality in Adults: NHANES-Continuous Study.

BACKGROUND: Both cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are the leading causes of death worldwide. Although our previous study detected a relationship between CVD and cancer incidence, limited evidence is available regarding the relationship between CVD, cardiovascular risk factors, and cancer mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study using data from the continuous NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2016) merged with Medicare and National Death Index mortality data, through December 31, 2018. We included individuals with no history of cancer at baseline. The primary exposure was CVD at baseline. We also conducted a comprehensive risk factor analysis as secondary exposure. The main outcome was cancer mortality data collected from Medicare and National Death Index. We included 44 591 adult individuals representing 1 738 423 317 individuals (52% female, 67% non-Hispanic White, and 9% Hispanic). Competing risk modeling showed a significantly higher risk of cancer mortality in individuals with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.37 [95% CI 1.07-1.76], P=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, and race and ethnicity. Notably, cancer mortality increased with aging (aHR, 1.08 [95% CI 1.05-1.11], P<0.0001), current smoking status (aHR, 6.78 [95% CI, 3.43-13.42], P<0.0001), and obesity (aHR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.13-4.79], P=0.02). Finally, a significant interaction (P=0.034) was found where those with CVD and obesity showed higher cancer mortality than those with normal body mass index (aHR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.03-2.91], P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the close relationship between cardiovascular health and cancer mortality. Our findings suggest that obesity may play a significant role in cancer mortality among individuals with CVD. These findings emphasize the need for a more proactive approach in managing the shared risk factors for CVD and cancer.

Adverse Social Determinants of Health Elevate Uncontrolled Hypertension Risk: A Cardio-Oncology Prospective Cohort Study.

The role of social determinants of health (SDOH) in controlling hypertension (HTN) in cancer patients is unknown. We hypothesize that high SDOH scores correlate with uncontrolled HTN in hypertensive cancer patients. In our prospective study patients completed the PRAPARE questionnaire. After integrating home and clinic blood pressure readings, uncontrolled HTN was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg. Using Cox regression, we analyzed the impact of SDOH on HTN control, adjusting for relevant factors. The study involved 318 participants (median age 66.4, median follow-up 166 days, SDOH score 6.5 ± 3.2), with stress, educational insecurity, and social isolation as prevalent adverse SDOH. High SDOH scores led to 77% increased risk of uncontrolled HTN (aHR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.83, p = .018). Urban residents with high SDOH scores were at an even greater risk. Identifying SDOH and mitigating underlying factors may help control HTN, the most typical disease process treated in all cardio-oncology clinics.

Allostatic Load/Chronic Stress and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed With Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease and cancer share a common risk factor: chronic stress/allostatic load (AL). A 1-point increase in AL is linked to up to a 30% higher risk of major cardiac events (MACE) in patients with prostate cancer. However, AL's role in MACE in breast cancer, lung cancer, or colorectal cancer remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with the mentioned 3 cancers of interest (2010-2019) and followed up at a large, hybrid academic-community practice were included in this retrospective cohort study. AL was modeled as an ordinal measure (0-11). Adjusted Fine-Gray competing risks regressions estimated the impact of AL precancer diagnosis on 2-year MACE (a composite of heart failure, ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and atrial fibrillation). The effect of AL changes over time on MACE was calculated via piecewise Cox regression (before, and 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after cancer diagnosis). Among 16 467 patients, 50.5% had breast cancer, 27.9% had lung cancer, and 21.4% had colorectal cancer. A 1-point elevation in AL before breast cancer diagnosis corresponded to a 10% heightened associated risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.06-1.13]). Similar findings were noted in lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.20]) and colorectal cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.08-1.19]). When considering AL as a time-varying exposure, the peak associated MACE risk occurred with a 1-point AL rise between 6 and 12 months post- breast cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: AL warrants investigation as a potential marker in these patients to identify those at elevated cardiovascular risk and intervene accordingly.

Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer following Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) associates with long-term cardiotoxicity. In preclinical models, RT exposure induces early cardiotoxic arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF). Yet, whether this occurs in patients is unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Leveraging a large cohort of consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with thoracic RT from 2007 to 2019, we assessed incidence and outcomes of incident AF. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as AF, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death, by cardiac RT dose. We also assessed the relationship between AF development and progression-free and overall survival. Observed incident AF rates were compared with Framingham predicted rates, and absolute excess risks were estimated. Multivariate regression was used to define the relationship between clinical and RT measures, and outcomes. Differences in outcomes, by AF status, were also evaluated via 30-day landmark analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of cardiac substructure RT dose (eg, left atrium, LA) on the risk of post RT-related outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, from 238 RT treated patients with esophageal cancer, 21.4% developed incident AF, and 33% developed MACE with the majority (84%) of events occurring ≤2 years of RT initiation (median time to AF, 4.1 months). Cumulative incidence of AF and MACE at 1 year was 19.5%, and 25.7%, respectively; translating into an observed incident AF rate of 824 per 10,000 person-years, compared with the Framingham predicted rate of 92 (relative risk, 8.96; P < .001, absolute excess risk 732). Increasing LA dose strongly associated with incident AF (P = .001); and those with AF saw worse disease progression (hazard ratio, 1.54; P = .03). In multivariate models, outside of traditional cancer-related factors, increasing RT dose to the LA remained associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with esophageal cancer, radiation therapy increases AF risk, and associates with worse long-term outcomes.

Advancing the care of individuals with cancer through innovation & technology: Proceedings from the cardiology oncology innovation summit 2020 and 2021.

As cancer therapies increase in effectiveness and patients' life expectancies improve, balancing oncologic efficacy while reducing acute and long-term cardiovascular toxicities has become of paramount importance. To address this pressing need, the Cardiology Oncology Innovation Network (COIN) was formed to bring together domain experts with the overarching goal of collaboratively investigating, applying, and educating widely on various forms of innovation to improve the quality of life and cardiovascular healthcare of patients undergoing and surviving cancer therapies. The COIN mission pillars of innovation, collaboration, and education have been implemented with cross-collaboration among academic institutions, private and public establishments, and industry and technology companies. In this report, we summarize proceedings from the first two annual COIN summits (inaugural in 2020 and subsequent in 2021) including educational sessions on technological innovations for establishing best practices and aligning resources. Herein, we highlight emerging areas for innovation and defining unmet needs to further improve the outcome for cancer patients and survivors of all ages. Additionally, we provide actionable suggestions for advancing innovation, collaboration, and education in cardio-oncology in the digital era.

Chemotherapy in Pregnancy: Assessing the Safety of Adriamycin Administration in Pregnancy Complicated by Breast Cancer.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is challenging to treat. Treatment with chemotherapeutic agents such as anthracyclines poses a risk of cardiotoxicity, despite being considered safe after the second trimester of pregnancy. Management requires multidisciplinary comanagement with cardio-obstetrics, cardiology-oncology, maternal-fetal medicine, and oncology.