Combined pancreatojejunal and hepatojejunal anastomotic stent placement in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a technically demanding procedure that is considered safe and feasible if performed in a high-volume institution, where surgeons and medical staff is appropriately trained. For this advanced abdominal procedure only few studies described a reproducible stepwise technique and a standard approach is still lacking. METHODS: The attached video reports all steps of our standardized LPD with pancreatojejunal and hepatojejunal anastomotic stent placement performed with a double approach. The laparoscopic demolitive phase, exactly as the laparotomic one, begins with the surgeon placed on the patient's right side, while for the reconstructive one he moves between the patient's legs. The main characteristic of this technique is an easy realization of the end-to-side biliary anastomosis with a Kehr's "T" tube segment placement as internal biliary stent. This easy technical tip can facilitate the anastomosis realization that remains the most challenging step of this laparoscopic technique, especially in case of small common bile duct. RESULTS: We consider that our standardized technique can be safely performed and it can facilitate the anastomosis execution, especially the hepatic-jejunal. DISCUSSION: Despite our reproducible stepwise technique could help to minimize the learning curve for LPD, further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the superiority of minimally invasive approach.

Liver transplantation in recipients over 65 yr old: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The advanced age of the recipient is considered a "relative contraindication" to liver transplantation (LT). However, recently some studies reported a morbidity rate and an overall survival comparable with those of younger patients. Here, we reported the outcome after LT in recipients aged >65 yr. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2006, 565 LT was performed in 502 recipients in our institution. Of these, 34 were recipients of >65 yr old (aged group). We focused our study comparing: donor age, co-morbidities, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, duration of operation, transfusions and outcome between the two groups (young/aged). RESULTS: For the group aged >65: the mean donor age was 52.5 (range 16-75) yr and the graft weight 1339 g (890-1880 g). Co-morbidity was recorded in 25 (73.5%), coronary artery disease (CAD) in 17 (50%), diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic renal insufficiency in four (11.7%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in three patients (8.8%). Mean MELD score was 14.9 (range 12-29) and ASA score was two in 15 (44.1%); and three in 19 (55.8%) recipients. Mean operation time was four h 45 min, three patients also received combined kidney transplantation. Twenty-five (73.5%) recipients received blood transfusions (mean 3.2). Morbidity was observed in 20 patients (58.8%); of these two had hepatic artery thrombosis requiring re-LT. Overall survival was 80% (40 months of follow-up), in particularly, at 30-d, one yr, three yr was 91%, 84%, 80%, respectively. The only two statistical differences reported (p = 0.02) are: the lower rate of CAD in the younger group of recipients (12%), compared with the aged group (50%) and the subsequently lower mortality rate secondary to cardiac causes in the younger group (1.4%) compared with aged group (8.8%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the recipient age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for LT when the graft/recipient matching is optimal and when an adequate cardiac assessment is performed.