Eosinophil chemotaxis and anterior uveitis from topical dimaprit and nordimaprit.

Topical application of the H2-histamine receptor agonist, dimaprit (S-[4-N,N-dimethylaminopropyl]isothiourea), produced eosinophil chemotaxis into the anterior segment of rabbit eyes only when an H2-antagonist was co-administered. Nordimaprit (S-[4-N,N-dimethylaminoethyl]isothiourea), a structural homologue of dimaprit that lacked activity at histamine receptors, produced eosinophil chemotaxis whether or not an H2-antagonist was co-administered. Onset of eosinophil chemotaxis began after 2 or more days of treatment, and was accompanied by corneal edema, opacification, and ocular inflammation. There was no concurrent eosinophilia in the peripheral blood or in the conjunctiva. The response occurred in pigmented and albino rabbit eyes, and was facilitated by prior co-administration of proparacaine eye drops. Another dimaprit homologue without activity at histamine receptors, homodimaprit (S-[4-N,N-dimethylaminobutyl]isothiourea), did not produce eosinophil chemotaxis when applied topically, nor did the H2-agonists impromidine, histamine, or 4-methylhistamine, whether co-administered with an H2-antagonist or not. It was concluded that dimaprit and nordimaprit produced a selective eosinophil chemotaxis unrelated to H1- and H2-histamine receptor activity. However, the H2-agonist activity of dimaprit appeared to inhibit this response unless neutralized by an H2-antagonist. Topical application of dimaprit with an H2-antagonist or nordimaprit alone may allow large numbers of non-degranulated eosinophils, free of other cell types, to be harvested from the aqueous humor.

Pharmacodynamic effects of bezafibrate and niacin combination: implications of the mode of administration.

The goal of this investigation was to optimize antilipid therapy by utilizing the combined activity of two lipid-lowering agents, niacin and bezafibrate, and improve their efficacy by targeting them to their presumed presystemic site(s) of action. Thus, continuous duodenal (IGI) administration of the drug combination should augment their efficacy in comparison with intermittent oral treatment. Three hyperlipidemic rat models were studied: Models A and B were based on cholesterol-enriched diets and Model C was based on on acute hyperlipidemia induced by triton injection. Continuous IGI administration of the drug combination [bezafibrate, 30mg/kg/day, and niacin, 40 mg/kg/day for 3 days (Models A and B) or for 18 h (Model C)] produced significantly greater lowering of total cholesterol and triglycerides and elevation of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in comparison with intermittent oral administration of the same doses either given individually or in combination (Models A and B). Similar results were found in Model C for the IGI administration of the drug combination in contrast to oral and also to intravenous infusions. The results indicate that the combination of bezafibrate and niacin produces a significant hypolipidemic response, with major site(s) of action located presystemically. Because a slow-release matrix tablet of the drug combination resulted in a similar magnitude of effect as the IGI administration, the present study provides a pharmacodynamic rationale for the use of a slow-release low-dose niacin-bezafibrate combination.