Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pain Med ; 24(8): 993-1000, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37027224

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was (1) to examine the degree to which perceived burdensomeness mediates the relationship between pain severity and suicidal cognitions and (2) to determine whether this mediated relationship was moderated by pain acceptance. We predicted that high levels of pain acceptance would buffer relationships on both paths of the indirect effect. METHODS: Two-hundred seven patients with chronic pain completed an anonymous self-report battery of measures, including the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire, the Suicidal Cognitions Scale, and the pain severity subscale of the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Conditional process models were examined with Mplus. RESULTS: Chronic pain acceptance significantly moderated both paths of the mediation model. Results from the conditional indirect effect model indicated that the indirect effect was significant for those with low (b = 2.50, P = .004) and medium (b = 0.99, P = .01) but not high (b = 0.08, P = .68) levels of pain acceptance and became progressively stronger as pain acceptance scores decreased. The nonlinear indirect effect became nonsignificant at acceptance scores 0.38 standard deviation above the mean-a clinically attainable treatment target. CONCLUSIONS: Higher acceptance mitigated the relationship between pain severity and perceived burdensomeness and the relationship between perceived burdensomeness and suicidal cognitions in this clinical sample of patients experiencing chronic pain. Findings indicate that any improvement in pain acceptance can be beneficial, and they provide clinicians with a clinical cut-point that might indicate lower vs higher suicide risk.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Suicídio , Humanos , Ideação Suicida , Medição da Dor , Relações Interpessoais , Cognição , Fatores de Risco
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 41, 2022 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35038985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma-focused psychotherapies for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in military veterans are efficacious, but there are many barriers to receiving treatment. The objective of this study was to determine if cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD among active duty military personnel and veterans would result in increased acceptability, fewer dropouts, and better outcomes when delivered In-Home or by Telehealth as compared to In-Office treatment. METHODS: The trial used an equipoise-stratified randomization design in which participants (N = 120) could decline none or any 1 arm of the study and were then randomized equally to 1 of the remaining arms. Therapists delivered CPT in 12 sessions lasting 60-min each. Self-reported PTSD symptoms on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) served as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Over half of the participants (57%) declined 1 treatment arm. Telehealth was the most acceptable and least often refused delivery format (17%), followed by In-Office (29%), and In-Home (54%); these differences were significant (p = 0.0008). Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms occurred with all treatment formats (p < .0001). Improvement on the PCL-5 was about twice as large in the In-Home (d = 2.1) and Telehealth (d = 2.0) formats than In-Office (d = 1.3); those differences were statistically large and significant (d = 0.8, 0.7 and p = 0.009, 0.014, respectively). There were no significant differences between In-Home and Telehealth outcomes (p = 0.77, d = -.08). Dropout from treatment was numerically lowest when therapy was delivered In-Home (25%) compared to Telehealth (34%) and In-Office (43%), but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: CPT delivered by telehealth is an efficient and effective treatment modality for PTSD, especially considering in-person restrictions resulting from COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02290847 (Registered 13/08/2014; First Posted Date 14/11/2014).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Militares , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Telemedicina , Veteranos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Trauma Stress ; 35(6): 1684-1695, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36039506

RESUMO

This study examined the impact of a history of head injury (HHI) on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms in active duty military personnel following group and individual cognitive processing therapy (CPT). Data for these secondary analyses were drawn from a clinical trial comparing group and individual CPT. Service members (N = 268, 91.0% male) were randomized to 12 sessions of group (n = 133) or individual (n = 135) CPT. Most participants (57.1%) endorsed a deployment-related HHI, 92.8% of whom reported currently experiencing symptoms (CES) related to the head injury (i.e., HHI/CES). Patients classified as non-HHI/CES demonstrated large, significant improvements in PTSD symptom severity in both individual and group therapy, ds = 1.1, p < .001. Patients with HHI/CES status showed similar significant improvements when randomized to individual CPT, d = 1.4, p < .001, but did not demonstrate significant improvements when randomized to group CPT, d = 0.4, p = .060. For participants classified as HHI/CES, individual CPT was significantly superior to group CPT, d = 0.98, p = .003. Symptoms of depression improved following treatment, with no significant differences by treatment delivery format or HHI/CES status. The findings of this clinical trial subgroup study demonstrate evidence that group CPT is less effective than individual CPT for service members classified as HHI/CES. The results suggest that HHI/CES status may be important to consider in selecting patients for group or individual CPT; additional research is needed to confirm the clinical implications of these findings.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Militares , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Veteranos/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Cogn Behav Ther ; 51(4): 309-325, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001842

RESUMO

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if the efficacy of imaginal exposure for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be improved by adding aerobic exercise. We hypothesized that aerobic exercise would enhance the efficacy of exposure therapy. Active duty service members with clinically significant symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTSD Checklist-Stressor-Specific Version, [PCL-S], ≥25) were randomized into one of four conditions: exercise only; imaginal exposure only; imaginal exposure plus exercise; no exercise/no exposure therapy (control). Participants (N = 72) were primarily male, Army, noncommissioned officers ranging in age from 22 to 52. PTSD symptom severity decreased over time (p < .0001); however, there were no significant differences between the experimental conditions. The prediction that imaginal exposure augmented with aerobic exercise would be superior to either imaginal exposure alone or aerobic exercise alone was not supported, suggesting that engaging in exercise and imaginal exposure simultaneously may not be any better than engaging in either activity alone. A better understanding of individually administered and combined exercise and exposure therapy interventions for PTSD is warranted.


Assuntos
Terapia Implosiva , Militares , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Exercício Físico , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia
5.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; 50(2): 203-218, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053477

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recovery from trauma can be naturally occurring or facilitated through psychotherapy. Few brief measures exist to provide clinicians with dispositional, empirical assessments of patient's sentiments during psychotherapy. AIMS: This manuscript presents the Dispositional Recovery and Dysfunction Inventory (DRDI), a measure created to assist clinicians in evaluating patient's treatment progress during psychotherapy, as well as evaluate its factor structure, reliability estimates, measurement invariance, and correlates. METHOD: The DRDI was created based on feedback from experts with experience treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and was structurally validated in two distinct populations. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted in sample 1 consisting of (n=401) university students. Confirmatory factor analysis, measure validity and structure validation were then conducted in sample 2 (n=249) composed of 49% individuals with clinically significant PTSD symptoms. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the DRDI was best represented by a two-factor correlated traits model representing sentiments related to dispositional recovery and dysfunctional cognitions. The recovery subscale exhibited relationships with convergent measures including authenticity and psychological hardiness (r values of .30 to .60). The dysfunctional beliefs subscale exhibited relationships with convergent measures: PTSD, depression, suicidality and stress (r values of .55 to 80). Measurement invariance across gender and PTSD status was observed. CONCLUSION: Initial findings indicate that the DRDI has the potential to be a useful tool to assess individuals' beliefs about their propensity to recover from and thrive through adversity.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Cognição , Análise Fatorial , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia
6.
Headache ; 61(9): 1334-1341, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570899

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between head trauma types (blast injury, blunt injury, combined blast+blunt injury) with subsequent headache presentations and functioning. BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic headaches (PTHs), the most common sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI), are painful and disabling. More than 400,000 veterans report having experienced a TBI, and understanding the predictors of PTHs may guide treatment developments. METHODS: This study used a nested-cohort design analyzing baseline data from a randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for PTH (N = 190). Participants had PTH (from blast and/or blunt head trauma) and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Structured Diagnostic Interview for Headache-Revised and Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method were used to phenotype headaches and head injury histories, respectively. RESULTS: Individuals with persistent PTHs after a combined blast and blunt head trauma were more likely (OR =3.45; 95% CI [1.41, 8.4]) to experience chronic (vs. episodic) PTHs compared with the blunt trauma only group (23/33, 70% vs. 26/65, 40%, respectively); and they were more likely (OR =2.51; 95% CI [1.07, 5.9]) to experience chronic PTH compared with the blast trauma only group (44/92, 48%). There were no differences between head injury type on headache-related disability, depression symptoms, or severity of PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSION: The combination of blast and blunt injuries was associated with headache chronicity, but not headache disability. Considering the refractory nature of chronic headaches, the potential added and synergistic effects of distinct head injuries warrant further study.


Assuntos
Traumatismos por Explosões/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Traumatismos Cranianos Fechados/complicações , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/fisiopatologia , Veteranos , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Pessoas com Deficiência , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/etiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Trauma Stress ; 34(1): 200-209, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33084109

RESUMO

The current study evaluated the factor structure, reliability estimates, correlates, and predictive utility of the Perceived Military Healthcare Stressor Scale (PMHSS) in a sample of active duty military medical personnel (N = 1,131) deployed to Joint Base Balad in Iraq. The sample was composed of an approximately even split of male (51.2%) and female (48.8%) participants who ranged in age from 18 to 60 years. The PMHSS is a 21-item measure that was designed to assess the impact of specific medical stressors that military healthcare providers may encounter while deployed. An exploratory factor analysis of the PMHSS revealed the presence of two distinct factors: trainable and futility stressors. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a bifactor model best represented the data, with all items loading higher on the general factor relative to their specific subscale factors. Evidence of partial scalar invariance by gender was found. The PMHSS was significantly correlated with several convergent measures, including assessments of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression severity, distress due to both combat exposure and general deployment-related concerns, and positive affect, rs = .30-.59. PMHSS scores were more strongly correlated with PTSD and depression in women than in men, and they provided incremental validity in predicting convergent measures over and above other related constructs. Healthcare-specific stressors are an understudied area, and this study provides new insights into how deployment-related caregiving stress may impact deployed military medical personnel independently of the impact of combat experiences.


Assuntos
Exposição à Violência/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Guerra do Iraque 2003-2011 , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição por Sexo , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Trauma Stress ; 34(1): 210-220, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33078467

RESUMO

This study was a secondary data analysis of clinical trial data collected from 268 active duty U.S. military service members seeking cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at Fort Hood, Texas, related to combat operations following September 11, 2001. Our primary aim was to evaluate changes in PTSD symptom severity and alcohol misuse as a function of baseline hazardous drinking and treatment format (i.e., group or individual). At baseline and posttreatment, PTSD was assessed using the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview Version and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. Hazardous drinking was categorically defined as an Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test total score of 8 or higher. Employing intent-to-treat, mixed-effects regression analysis, all groups reported reduced PTSD symptom severity, Hedges' gs = -0.33 to -1.01, except, unexpectedly, nonhazardous drinkers who were randomized to group CPT, Hedges' g = -0.12. Hazardous drinkers who were randomized to individual therapy had larger reductions in PTSD symptoms than nonhazardous drinkers who were randomized to group CPT, Hedges' g = -0.25. Hazardous drinkers also reported significant reductions in alcohol misuse, regardless of treatment format, Hedges' gs = -0.78 to -0.86. This study builds upon an emerging literature suggesting that individuals with PTSD and co-occurring alcohol use disorder can engage successfully in CPT, which appears to be an appropriate treatment for these individuals whether it is delivered individually or in a group format. However, as a portion of participants remained classified as hazardous drinkers at posttreatment, some individuals may benefit from integrated treatment.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Militares/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Adulto , Alcoolismo/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações
9.
J Clin Psychol ; 77(11): 2507-2528, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487365

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: As a malleable risk-factor, psychological inflexibility is implicated in the development and maintenance of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS). Unfortunately, limited research has addressed whether changes in psychological inflexibility are antecedent to changes in PTS severity over time, or whether such changes are mutually dependent. METHODS: Utilizing bivariate latent difference score modeling, this longitudinal study sequenced intraindividual changes in psychological inflexibility and PTS severity within a sample of 305 returning US veterans. Veterans' self-reported psychological inflexibility and PTS severity were assessed quarterly over 1 year. RESULTS: Results indicated that early reductions in psychological inflexibility potentiated later declines in veterans' PTS severity, accounting for veterans' prior levels of psychological inflexibility and PTS severity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the unique role of changes in psychological inflexibility as an important mechanism of change in PTS severity and provide empirical support for an antecedent model of the role of psychological inflexibility in PTS recovery.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Veteranos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Fatores de Risco , Autorrelato
10.
Mil Psychol ; 33(6): 436-445, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536282

RESUMO

Psychiatric aeromedical evacuations are one of the leading causes of medical related evacuations of US military personnel from combat. Currently, no studies have examined gender and marital status of individuals who were evacuated from combat for a psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric aeromedical evacuation data from 5,957 United States military personnel deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan between 2001 and 2013 were analyzed using chi-square tests of independence, odds ratios (OR), and standardized residuals. Analyses showed that female service members were evacuated at higher rates (178 per 100,000) than males (115 per 100,000). When compared to nonmarried females, married females did not present with increased risk of psychiatric aeromedical evacuation on any diagnosis. Married males, however, were more likely to be evacuated than married females for PTSD (OR = 1.98) and TBI (OR = 1.14). Likewise, married males, compared to nonmarried males, were more likely to be evacuated for PTSD (OR = 1.66) and anxiety (OR = 1.38). Although deployments can be extremely stressful experiences for some military service members, they may be especially so among unmarried females and married males. This study provides a unique contribution to enhancing the understanding of risk factors related to psychiatric aeromedical evacuation for deployed service members.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA