Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 33(6): 1033-1041, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30603824

RESUMO

The multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) using gas chromatography (GC) is an established but time-consuming method of determining ventilation/perfusion (VA/Q) distributions. MIGET-when performed using Micropore Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry (MMIMS)-has been proven to correlate well with GC-MIGET and reduces analysis time substantially. We aimed at comparing shunt fractions and dead space derived from MMIMS-MIGET with Riley shunt and Bohr dead space, respectively. Thirty anesthetized pigs were randomly assigned to lavage or pulmonary embolism groups. Inert gas infusion (saline mixture of SF6, krypton, desflurane, enflurane, diethyl ether, acetone) was maintained, and after induction of lung damage, blood and breath samples were taken at 15-min intervals over 4 h. The samples were injected into the MMIMS, and resultant retention and excretion data were translated to VA/Q distributions. We compared MMIMS-derived shunt (MM-S) to Riley shunt, and MMIMS-derived dead space (MM-VD) to Bohr dead space in 349 data pairs. MM-S was on average lower than Riley shunt (- 0.05 ± 0.10), with lower and upper limits of agreement of - 0.15 and 0.04, respectively. MM-VD was on average lower than Bohr dead space (- 0.09 ± 0.14), with lower and upper limits of agreement of - 0.24 and 0.05. MM-S and MM-VD correlated and agreed well with Riley shunt and with Bohr dead space. MM-S increased significantly after lung injury only in the lavage group, whereas MM-VD increased significantly in both groups. This is the first work evaluating and demonstrating the feasibility of near real-time VA/Q distribution measurements with the MIGET and the MMIMS methods.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Pulmão/cirurgia , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Espaço Morto Respiratório , Anestesia Geral , Animais , Gasometria , Cromatografia Gasosa , Gases , Hemodinâmica , Lesão Pulmonar/cirurgia , Espectrometria de Massas , Filtros Microporos , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Embolia Pulmonar/cirurgia , Suínos , Relação Ventilação-Perfusão
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 111(2): 197-208, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23512864

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In open TCI and anaesthesia display systems, the choice of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter sets of opioids is clinically relevant. Accuracy and bias of the PK models may be affected by administration mode and the co-administered hypnotic drug. We retrospectively evaluated the performance of eight PK parameter sets for alfentanil in two data sets (infusion and bolus application). METHODS: With the dosing history from two studies in orthopaedic patients anaesthetized with propofol or inhalation anaesthetics the alfentanil plasma concentration over time was calculated with eight PK parameter sets. Median absolute performance error (MDAPE), log accuracy, median performance error (MDPE), log bias, Wobble, and Divergence were computed. Mann-Whitney rank test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison between bolus and infusion data, repeated measures analysis of variance on ranks was used for comparison among parameter sets. RESULTS: The parameters by Scott (original and weight adjusted) and Fragen had a MDAPE ≤30% and a median log accuracy <0.15 independent of the administration mode, while MDPE was within ±20% and log bias nearly within ±0.1, respectively. The sets by Maitre and Lemmens were within these limits only in the bolus data. All other parameter sets were outside these limits. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy orthopaedic patients, the PK parameters by Scott and by Maitre were equally valid when alfentanil was given as repeated boluses. When given as infusion, the Maitre parameters were less accurate and subject to a significant bias. We cannot exclude that the difference between bolus and infusion is partially because of the different hypnotics used.


Assuntos
Alfentanil/farmacocinética , Anestesia Intravenosa/métodos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/farmacocinética , Terminais de Computador , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alfentanil/administração & dosagem , Alfentanil/sangue , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Bombas de Infusão , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Anaesthesia ; 66(8): 715-20, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21692759

RESUMO

We evaluated a novel, sled-mounted needle guide for ultrasound-guided vessel cannulation. Fifty medical students were randomly assigned to use ultrasound with the sled (sled group, n = 23) or ultrasound without the sled (control group, n = 27) for vessel cannulation in a phantom. For each of 15 attempts we recorded cannulation time and designated a successful cannulation as 1 and a failure as 0. Our primary outcome was the mean overall success rate. The median (IQR [range]) number of successes in the sled group and control group were 15.0 (13.0-15.0 [11.0-15.0]) and 11.0 (9.0-13.0 [6.0-15.0]), respectively (p < 0.001). Cannulation time decreased from the first to the last attempt in the sled group from 7.0 s (6.0-10.0 [4.0-16]) s to 4.0 s (3.0-4.0 [1.0-6.0]) s and in the control group from 35.0 s (27.0-35.0 [11.0-35.0]) s to 7.0 s (5.0-10.0 [3.0-25.0]) s. The sled group demonstrated a shorter cannulation time at each attempt (p < 0.001). The novel sled improved the success rate and efficiency of ultrasound-guided phantom vessel cannulation.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Adulto , Anestesiologia/educação , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Competência Clínica , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Agulhas , Imagens de Fantasmas , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA