Pediatric Palliative Epilepsy Surgery: A Report From the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery is an underutilized resource for children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Palliative and definitive surgical options can reduce seizure burden and improve quality of life. Palliative epilepsy surgery is often seen as a "last resort" compared to definitive surgical options. We compare patient characteristics between palliative and definitive epilepsy surgical patients and present palliative surgical outcomes from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium surgical database. METHODS: The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Surgery database is a prospective registry of patients aged 0-18 years undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery at 20 pediatric epilepsy centers. We included all children with completed surgical therapy characterized as definitive or palliative. Demographics, epilepsy type, age of onset, age at referral, etiology of epilepsy, treatment history, time-to-referral/evaluation, number of failed anti-seizure medications (ASMs), imaging results, type of surgery, and postoperative outcome were acquired. RESULTS: Six hundred forty patients undergoing epilepsy surgery were identified. Patients undergoing palliative procedures were younger at seizure onset (median: 2.1 vs 4 years, P= 0.0008), failed more ASM trials before referral for presurgical evaluation (P=<0.0001), and had longer duration of epilepsy before referral for surgery (P=<0.0001). During presurgical evaluation, patients undergoing palliative surgery had shorter median duration of video-EEG data collected (P=0.007) but number of cases where ictal data were acquired was similar between groups. The most commonly performed palliative procedure was corpus callosotmy (31%), followed by lobectomy (21%) and neuromodulation (82% responsive neurostimulation vs 18% deep brain stimulation). Palliative patients were further categorized into traditionally palliative procedures vs traditionally definitive procedures. The majority of palliative patients had 50% reduction or better in seizure burden. Seizure free outcomes were significantly higher among those with traditional definitive surgeries, 41% (95% confidence interval: 26% to 57%) compared with traditional palliative surgeries and 9% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 17%). Rate of seizure freedom was 46% at 24 months or greater of follow-up in the traditional definitive group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving palliative epilepsy surgery trialed more ASMs, were referred later after becoming drug resistant, and had longer gaps between drug resistance and epilepsy surgery compared with patients undergoing definitive epilepsy surgery. The extent of surgical evaluation is impacted if surgery is thought to be palliative. A majority of palliative surgery patients achieved >50% seizure reduction at follow-up, both in groups that received traditionally palliative and traditionally definitive surgical procedures. Palliative surgical patients can achieve greater seizure control and should be referred to an epilepsy surgery center promptly after failing two appropriate anti-seizure medications.

Epilepsy-Related Mortality After Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report was to study the incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) after laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). METHODS: A prospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with LITT between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. The primary outcome was the occurrence of SUDEP during postoperative follow-up. Surgical outcome was classified according to the Engel scale. RESULTS: There were 5 deaths, including 4 SUDEPs, among 135 patients with a median follow-up duration of 3.5 (range 0.1-9.0) years and a total of 501.3 person-years at risk. The estimated incidence of SUDEP was 8.0 (95% CI 2.2-20.4) per 1,000 person-years. Three SUDEPs occurred in patients with poor seizure outcomes, whereas 1 patient was seizure-free. Compared with pooled historical data, SUDEP occurred at a higher rate than in cohorts treated with resective surgery and at a rate similar to nonsurgical controls. DISCUSSION: SUDEP occurred early and late after mesial temporal LITT. The SUDEP rate was comparable with rates reported in epilepsy surgery candidates who did not receive intervention. These findings reinforce targeting seizure freedom to decrease SUDEP risk, including early consideration for further intervention. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that LITT is not effective in reducing SUDEP incidence in patients with DRE.

Prognostic Value of Preoperative and Postoperative Electroencephalography Findings in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hemispheric Epilepsy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The seizure outcomes after hemispheric epilepsy surgery have been excellent, with 54%-90% of patients achieving long-term freedom from seizures. Similarly, the neuropsychological outcomes have been favorable. The prognostic value of pre- and postoperative electroencephalography (EEG) has not been well-studied. In the present study, we characterized the value of the pre- and postoperative EEG findings for predicting the seizure and neuropsychological outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing hemispherectomy. METHODS: A total of 22 children who had undergone functional hemispherectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2020 were included. The ictal and interictal findings were categorized as ipsilateral to the operated hemisphere, independently arising from the contralateral hemisphere, and/or generalized. The seizure outcomes were classified using the Engel scale. All neuropsychological evaluations were performed in accordance with our institution's protocol. The relationship between the EEG findings and outcomes was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients, 19 (86%) were seizure free (Engel class IA) at the latest follow-up (mean, 4.2 years). On the preoperative EEGs, 9 had had seizures, all had had ipsilateral interictal discharges, and 9 had had contralateral interictal discharges. On the postoperative EEGs, obtained a median of 1 year after surgery, 3 had had seizures, 16 had had ipsilateral interictal discharges, and 5 had had contralateral interictal discharges. Of the 3 patients with seizures found on the postoperative EEG, all were clinically free of seizures. The patients who had not achieved Engel class IA were not significantly more likely to have abnormalities found on the EEG. The neuropsychological scores were stable from before to after surgery, with no evidence of EEG abnormalities having predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The seizure and neuropsychology outcomes after hemispherectomy were excellent in our study, with 86% of our cohort achieving freedom from seizures. The presence, lateralization, and evolution of pre- and postoperative EEG abnormalities were not predictive of the outcomes.