Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transplant ; 34(12): e14118, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33048372

RESUMO

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug with immunomodulatory effects used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and scleroderma. The antiviral effects of HCQ have raised attention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, although safety is controversial. We examined linkages of national transplant registry data with pharmaceutical claims and Medicare billing claims to study HCQ use among Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients with SLE or scleroderma (2008-2017; N = 1820). We compared three groups based on immunosuppression regimen 7 months-to-1 year post transplant: (a) tacrolimus (Tac) + mycophenolic acid (MPA) + prednisone (Pred) (referent group, 77.7%); (b) Tac + MPA + Pred + HCQ (16.5%); or (c) other immunosuppression + HCQ (5.7%). Compared to the referent group, recipients treated with other immunosuppression + HCQ had a 2-fold increased risk of abnormal ECG or QT prolongation (18.9% vs. 10.7%; aHR,1.12 1.963.42 , p = .02) and ventricular arrhythmias (15.2% vs. 11.4%; aHR,1.00 1.813.29 , p = .05) in the >1-to-3 years post-transplant. Tac + MPA + Pred + HCQ was associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (13.5% vs. 11.4%; aHR,1.02 1.542.31 , p = .04) and pancytopenia (35.9% vs. 31.4%; aHR,1.03 1.311.68 , p = .03) compared to triple immunosuppression without HCQ. However, HCQ-containing regimens were not associated with an increased risk of death or graft failure. HCQ may be used safely in selected kidney transplant recipients in addition to their maintenance immunosuppression, although attention to arrhythmias is warranted.


Assuntos
Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/métodos , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação , Seguro Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Transplant ; 34(9): e14005, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510628

RESUMO

The outcomes of benzodiazepine and opioid co-prescription are not well-defined in transplant populations. We examined linked national transplant registry and pharmaceutical records to characterize benzodiazepine and opioid use in the years before and after transplant in large US cohort of kidney transplant recipients (2007-2016; N = 98 620), and associations (adjusted hazard ratio, LCL aHRUCL ) with death and graft failure. Among the cohort, 15.6% filled benzodiazepine prescriptions in the year before transplant, and 14.0% filled benzodiazepine prescriptions in the year after transplant (short-acting, 9.5%; long-acting, 3.3%; both 1.1%). Use of short-acting benzodiazepines in the year before transplant was associated with a 22% increased risk of death in the year after transplant (aHR, 1.08 1.221.38 ), while use of all classes in the year after transplant was associated with increased risk of death from >1 to 5 years (aHR: short-acting 1.29 1.391.48 ; long-acting 1.12 1.251.40 ; both 1.46 1.742.07 ). Recipients who used benzodiazepines were also more likely to fill opioid prescriptions. Recipients who filled both classes of benzodiazepine and the highest level of opioids had a 2.9-fold increased risk of death compared to recipients who did not use either. Co-prescription of benzodiazepines and opioids in kidney transplant recipients is associated with increased mortality. Ongoing research is needed to understand mechanisms of risk relationships.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Transplante de Rim , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados
3.
Clin Transplant ; 34(8): e14000, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32502285

RESUMO

We examined a novel database linking national donor registry identifiers to records from a US pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2007-2015) to describe opioid and NSAID prescription patterns among LKDs during the first year postdonation, divided into three periods: 0-14 days, 15-182 days, and 183-365 days. Associations of opioid and NSAID prescription fills with baseline factors were examined by logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio, LCL aORUCL ). Among 23,565 donors, opioid prescriptions were highest during days 0-14 (36.6%), but 12.6% of donors filled opioids during days 183-365. NSAID prescriptions rose from 0.5% during days 0-14 to 3.3% during days 183-365. Women filled opioids more commonly than men, and black donors filled both opioids and NSAIDs more commonly than white donors. After covariate adjustment, significant correlates of opioid prescription fills during days 183-365 included obesity (aOR,1.24 1.381.53 ), less than college education (aOR,1.19 1.311.43 ), smoking (aOR,1.33 1.451.58 ), and nephrectomy complications (aOR,1.11 1.291.49 ). NSAID prescription fills in year 1 were not associated with differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate, incidence of proteinuria or new-onset hypertension at the first and second year postdonation. Prescription fills for opioids and NSAIDs for LKDs varied with demographic and clinic traits. Future work should examine longer-term outcome implications to help inform safe analgesic regimen choices after donation.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Farmácia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Rim , Doadores Vivos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros
4.
Clin Transplant ; 34(3): e13803, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997429

RESUMO

Hypertension guidelines recommend calcium channel blockers (CCBs), thiazide diuretics, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs) as first-line agents to treat hypertension. Hypertension is common among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients, but data are limited regarding patterns of antihypertensive medication (AHM) use in this population. We examined a novel database that links national registry data for adult KTx recipients (age > 18 years) with AHM fill records from a pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2007-2016) to describe use and correlates of AHM use during months 7-12 post-transplant. For patients filling AHMs, individual agents used included: dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs, 55.6%; beta-blockers (BBs), 52.8%; diuretics, 30.0%; ACEi/ARBs, 21.1%; non-DHP CCBs, 3.0%; and others, 20.1%. Both BB and ACEi/ARB use were significantly lower in the time period following the 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC-8) guidelines (2014-2016), compared with an earlier period (2007-2013). The median odds ratios generated from case-factor adjusted models supported variation in use of ACEi/ARBs (1.51) and BBs (1.55) across transplant centers. Contrary to hypertension guidelines for the general population, KTx recipients are prescribed relatively more BBs and fewer ACEi/ARBs. The clinical impact of this AHM prescribing pattern warrants further study.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Am J Transplant ; 19(12): 3405-3414, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397964

RESUMO

Impacts of the prescription opioid epidemic have not yet been examined in the context of heart transplantation. We examined a novel database in which national U.S. transplant registry records were linked to a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2007-2016) to characterize prescription opioid use before and after heart transplant, and associations (adjusted hazard ratio, 95%LCL aHR95%UCL ) with death and graft loss. Among 13 958 eligible patients, 40% filled opioids in the year before transplant. Use was more common among recipients who were female, white, or unemployed, or who underwent transplant in more recent years. Of those with the highest level of pretransplant opioid use, 71% continued opioid use posttransplant. Pretransplant use had graded associations with 1-year posttransplant outcomes; compared with no use, the highest-level use (>1000 mg morphine equivalents) predicted 33% increased risk of death (aHR 1.10 1.331.61 ) in the year after transplant. Risk relationships with opioid use in the first year posttransplant were stronger, with highest level use predicting 70% higher mortality (aHR 1.46 1.701.98 ) over the subsequent 4 years (from >1 to 5 years posttransplant). While associations may, in part, reflect underlying conditions or behaviors, opioid use history is relevant in assessing and providing care to transplant candidates and recipients.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cardiopatias/cirurgia , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
6.
Clin Transplant ; 33(10): e13696, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421057

RESUMO

We examined a novel linkage of national US donor registry data with records from a pharmacy claims warehouse (2007-2016) to examine associations (adjusted hazard ratio, LCL aHRUCL ) of post-donation fills of antidiabetic medications (ADM, insulin or non-insulin agents) with body mass index (BMI) at donation and other demographic and clinical factors. In 28 515 living kidney donors (LKDs), incidence of ADM use at 9 years rose in a graded manner with higher baseline BMI: underweight, 0.9%; normal weight, 2.1%; overweight, 3.5%; obese, 8.5%. Obesity was associated with higher risk of ADM use compared with normal BMI (aHR, 3.36 4.596.27 ). Metformin was the most commonly used ADM and was filled more often by obese than by normal weight donors (9-year incidence, 6.87% vs 1.85%, aHR, 3.55 5.007.04 ). Insulin use was uncommon and did not differ significantly by BMI. Among a subgroup with BMI data at the 1-year post-donation anniversary (n = 19 528), compared with stable BMI, BMI increase >0.5 kg/m2 by year 1 was associated with increased risk of subsequent ADM use (aHR, 1.03 1.482.14, P = .04). While this study did not assess the impact of donation on the development of obesity, these data support that among LKD, obesity is a strong correlate of ADM use.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim , Rim/fisiopatologia , Doadores Vivos/provisão & distribuição , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/patologia , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Circulation ; 136(23): 2210-2219, 2017 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29084735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are a novel class of medications for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease requiring additional lipid lowering beyond dietary measures and statin use. Because of the drugs' high cost, rates of prescription approval by payers may be low. We aimed to identify payer approval and rejection rates for PCSK9i prescriptions and the potential factors influencing these rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive cohort study using nationwide pharmacy claims linked to electronic medical records from a nationwide data warehouse. The data set includes >220 million patients from all 50 states and all payer types with 5140 distinct health plans. PCSK9i prescriptions were submitted for 51 466 patients in the pharmacy data set. The main outcome was approval or rejection of PCSK9i prescription claims. Factors associated with approval and rejection of these medications in the United States were assessed. RESULTS: Among patients who were prescribed a PCSK9i, 47.0% were approved for coverage by the payer. Variables that were associated with PCSK9i approval included age >65 years (P<0.01), history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (P<0.01), prescription by a cardiologist or nonprimary care provider (P<0.01), statin intolerance (P=0.03), longer statin duration (P=0.01), and noncommercial payers (P<0.01). Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not associated with higher approval rates. Commercial third-party payers had the lowest approval rates (24.4%) and Medicare had the highest (60.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of approval for PCSK9i therapy are low, even for patients who appear to meet labeled indications. Although a combination of clinical characteristics increases the likelihood of approval, payer type is the most significant factor.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Definição da Elegibilidade , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/uso terapêutico , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Aterosclerose/complicações , Aterosclerose/enzimologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Definição da Elegibilidade/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/complicações , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/enzimologia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
Am J Transplant ; 18(6): 1502-1509, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446874

RESUMO

Transplant immunosuppressants are often used off-label because of insufficient randomized prospective trial data to achieve organ-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Transplant recipients who rely on Medicare Part D for immunosuppressant drug coverage are vulnerable to coverage denial for off-label prescriptions, unless use is supported by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-approved compendia. An integrated dataset including national transplant registry data and 3 years of dispensed pharmacy records was used to identify the prevalence of immunosuppression use that is both off-label and not supported by CMS-approved compendia. Numbers of potentially vulnerable transplant recipients were identified. Off-label and off-compendia immunosuppression regimens are frequently prescribed (3-year mean: lung 66.5%, intestine 34.2%, pancreas 33.4%, heart 21.8%, liver 16.5%, kidney 0%). The annual retail cost of these at-risk medications exceeds $30 million. This population-based study of transplant immunosuppressants vulnerable to claim denials under Medicare Part D coverage demonstrates a substantial gap between clinical practice, current FDA approval processes, and policy mandates for pharmaceutical coverage. This coverage barrier reduces access to life-saving medications for patients without alternative resources and may increase the risk of graft loss and death from medication nonadherence.


Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Transplantados , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
9.
Transpl Int ; 31(1): 20-31, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771882

RESUMO

We examined a novel database wherein national US transplant registry identifiers were linked to records from a large pharmaceutical claims warehouse (2008-2015) to characterize antidepressant use before and after kidney transplantation, and associations [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 95% CI] with death and graft failure. Among 72 054 recipients, 12.6% filled antidepressant medications in the year before transplant, and use was more common among women and patients who were white, unemployed, and had limited functional status. Pre-transplant antidepressant use was associated with 39% higher 1-year mortality (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.18-1.64) and 15% higher all-cause graft loss risk (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30). More than 50% of patients who filled antidepressants pre-transplant continued fill post-transplant. Antidepressant use in the first year after transplant was associated with twofold higher risk of death (aHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.60-2.35), 38% higher risk of death-censored graft failure, and 61% higher risk of all-cause graft failure in the subsequent year. Pre-listing antidepressant use was also associated with increased mortality, but transplantation conferred a survival benefit regardless of prelisting antidepressant use status. While associations may in part reflect underlying behaviors or comorbidities, kidney transplant candidates and recipients treated with antidepressant medications should be monitored and supported to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Transplante de Rim/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Liver Transpl ; 23(3): 305-314, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027603

RESUMO

Implications of prescription opioid use for outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) have not been described. We integrated national transplant registry data with records from a large pharmaceutical claims clearinghouse (2008-2014; n = 29,673). Opioid fills on the waiting list were normalized to morphine equivalents (MEs), and exposure was categorized as follows: > 0-2 ME/day (level 1), > 2-10 ME/day (level 2), > 10-70 ME/day (level 3), and >70 ME/day (level 4). Associations (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 95% LCL aHR 95% UCL ) of pretransplant ME level with patient and graft survival over 5 years after transplant were quantified by multivariate Cox regression including adjustment for recipient, donor, and transplant factors, as well as propensity adjustment for opioid use. Overall, 9.3% of recipients filled opioids on the waiting list. Compared with no use, level 3 (aHR 1.06 1.281.55 ) and 4 (aHR 1.16 1.521.98 ) opioid use during listing were associated with increased mortality over 5 years after transplant. These associations were driven by risk after the first transplant anniversary, such that mortality >1-5 years increased in a graded manner with higher use on the waiting list (level 2, aHR, 1.00 1.271.62 ; level 3, aHR, 1.08 1.381.77 ; level 4, aHR, 1.49 2.012.72 ). Similar patterns occurred for graft failure. Of recipients with the highest level of opioids on the waiting list, 65% had level 3 or 4 use in the first year after transplant, including 55% with use at these levels from day 90-365 after transplant. Opioid use in the first year after transplant also bore graded associations with subsequent death and graft loss >1-5 years after transplant. Opioid use history may be relevant in assessing and providing care to LT candidates. Liver Transplantation 23 305-314 2017 AASLD.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Doença Hepática Terminal/mortalidade , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Fígado , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Seleção de Pacientes , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Doença Hepática Terminal/complicações , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Listas de Espera/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
11.
Genet Res (Camb) ; 97: e13, 2015 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26030725

RESUMO

Pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is currently available for a wide range of health problems including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, mental health disorders and infectious diseases. PGx contributes important information to the field of precision medicine by clarifying appropriate treatments for specific disease subtypes. Tangible benefits to patients including improved outcomes and reduced total health care costs have been observed. However, PGx-guided therapy faces many barriers to full integration into clinical practice and acceptance by stakeholders, whether practitioner, patient or payer. Each stakeholder has a unique perspective on the role of PGx testing, although all are similarly challenged with demonstrating or appraising its cost-to-benefit value. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of PGx testing. The acceleration of adoption of precision medicine in general and for PGx testing in particular will be determined by how quickly robust evidence can be accumulated that shows a return on investment for payers in terms of real dollars, for clinicians in terms of patient clinical responses, and for patients in terms of economic, health and quality of life outcomes. Trends in PGx testing utilization and uptake by payers in real-world practice are discussed; the role of pharmacoeconomics in assessing cost-effectiveness is highlighted using a case study in psychiatric care, and several issues that will affect adoption of PGx testing in the United States (US) over the next few years are reviewed.


Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes Genéticos/economia , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/economia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Farmacogenética/economia , Medicina de Precisão/economia
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(11): 2957-65, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23756616

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), darbepoetin alfa (DA), and epoetin alfa (EA) differ with respect to dosing schedule in chemotherapy-induced anemia. DA can be administered less frequently than EA, which may increase synchronicity between chemotherapy and ESA schedules. This study compared DA and EA with respect to frequency of synchronization and frequencies of total and ESA healthcare visits in current clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ESA utilization during ESA episodes of care was conducted on all cancer patients identified in the SDI health oncology electronic medical records database who underwent chemotherapy and received ESA therapy from July 1, 2007 to March 31, 2010 (n = 6522 DA, n = 3,439 EA). RESULTS: The frequency of synchronization (chemotherapy and ESA therapy on the same day) was higher with DA (67 %) than EA (58 %) (p < 0.001). The odds that an ESA administration was synchronized with chemotherapy were higher with DA compared with EA (odds ratio = 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.37, 1.54). Compared with EA, DA patients had 2.3 fewer visits with an ESA administration (p < 0.001) and 3.0 fewer total visits (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients receiving EA, DA patients were more likely to have an ESA administration on the same healthcare visit as chemotherapy and had fewer visits for any cause or for ESA administration. These results suggest that through greater synchronization of ESA and chemotherapy administrations, DA may reduce patient and practice burden and healthcare utilization.


Assuntos
Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Agendamento de Consultas , Eritropoese/efeitos dos fármacos , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Darbepoetina alfa , Bases de Dados Factuais , Esquema de Medicação , Epoetina alfa , Eritropoetina/administração & dosagem , Eritropoetina/efeitos adversos , Eritropoetina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Hematínicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 18(1): 91-98, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36719161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids, commonly used for treating neuropathic pain, may be misused and coprescribed with opioid and benzodiazepine, increasing the risk of mortality and dependency among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We identified adult kidney transplant recipients who enrolled in Medicare Part D in 2006-2017 using the United States Renal Data System/Medicare claims database. We characterized recipients' post-transplant concomitant prescription of gabapentinoids, opioids, and benzodiazepine stratified by transplant year and recipient factors (age, sex, race, and diabetes). We investigated whether concomitant prescriptions were associated with postkidney transplant mortality using Cox regression. Models incorporated inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Among 63,359 eligible recipients, 13% of recipients filled at least one gabapentinoid prescription within 1 year after kidney transplant. The prevalence of gabapentinoid prescriptions increased by 70% over the study period (16% in 2017 versus 10% in 2006). Compared with nonusers, gabapentinoids users were more likely to have diabetes (55% versus 37%) and obesity (46% versus 34%). Of the 8509 recipients with gabapentinoid prescriptions, 45% were coprescribed opioids, 7% were coprescribed benzodiazepines, and 3% were coprescribed both opioids and benzodiazepines. Compared with no study prescriptions, gabapentinoid monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.32) and combination therapy (gabapentinoids and opioids [aHR=1.49; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.60], gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines [aHR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.08], and coprescribing all three [aHR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.98]) were all associated with a higher risk of postkidney transplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentinoid coprescription with both benzodiazepines and opioids among kidney transplant recipients increased over time. Kidney transplant recipients prescribed gabapentinoids had a higher risk of post-transplant mortality, and the risk was higher with opioids or benzodiazepine coprescription.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Medicare Part D , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 9(1)2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549785

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (dAATD) in Denmark as of 31 December 2018, and dAATD incidence and mortality from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used the Danish National Patient Registry to identify patients with dAATD based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code E88.0A and the Danish Civil Registration System (CRS) for population counts and vital status. We estimated dAATD prevalence, incidence and mortality. We compared mortality among patients with dAATD and an age-matched and sex-matched cohort extracted from the Danish CRS. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine whether coding changes during 2000-2018, from a general to a more specific ICD-10 code for AATD, and left truncation affected results appreciably. RESULTS: The prevalence of dAATD was 12.9 (95% CI 11.9 to 13.8) per 100 000 persons. The age distribution was bimodal, with peaks at ages ≤12 and ≥45 years. The incidence rate per 100 000 person-years was 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), again with a bimodal age distribution. Mortality was higher for patients with dAATD than for the general population (mortality rate ratio (mRR) 4.7, 95% CI 4.1 to 5.3), especially for children (mRR 33.8, 95% CI 6.8 to 167.4). The sensitivity analysis indicated that dAATD prevalence might have been as high as 19.7 per 100 000 persons due to less specific ICD-10 coding for AATD early in the study period or 21.4 per 100 000 persons correcting for left truncation. CONCLUSION: Diagnosed AATD was associated with increased mortality, especially for children. The finding for children was based on few deaths and had very wide 95% CIs.


Assuntos
Deficiência de alfa 1-Antitripsina , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Prevalência , Deficiência de alfa 1-Antitripsina/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Dinamarca/epidemiologia
15.
Transplant Direct ; 8(1): e1260, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34912947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant diabetes (PTD), a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT), is often attributable to immunosuppression. The risk of PTD may increase with more potent steroid maintenance and older recipient age. METHODS: Using United States Renal Data System data, we studied 12 488 adult first-time KT recipients (2010-2015) with no known pre-KT diabetes. We compared the risk of PTD among recipients who underwent early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus continued steroid maintenance (CSM) using Cox regression with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. We tested whether the risk of PTD resulting from ESW differed by recipient age (18-29, 30-54, and ≥55 y). RESULTS: Of 12 488, 28.3% recipients received ESW. The incidence rate for PTD was 13 per 100 person-y and lower among recipients who received ESW (11 per 100 person-y in ESW; 14 per 100 person-y in CSM). Overall, ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD compared with CSM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.720.790.86), but the risk differed by recipient age (P interaction = 0.09 for comparison between recipients aged 18-29 and those aged 30-54; P interaction = 0.01 for comparison between recipients aged 18-29 and those aged ≥55). ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD among recipients aged ≥55 (aHR = 0.620.710.81) and those aged 30-54 (aHR = 0.730.830.95), but not among recipients aged 18-29 (aHR = 0.811.181.72). Although recipients who received ESW had a higher risk of acute rejection across the age groups (adjusted odds ratio = 1.011.171.34), recipients with no PTD had a lower risk of mortality (aHR = 0.580.660.74). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial association of ESW with decreased PTD was more pronounced among recipients aged ≥55, supporting an age-specific assessment of the risk-benefit balance regarding ESW.

16.
Kidney Med ; 4(6): 100474, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35669410

RESUMO

Rationale & Objective: Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism frequently develop with advanced kidney disease, may be exacerbated by immunosuppression after kidney transplantation, and increase the risk of fractures. Study Design: Retrospective database study. Setting & Participants: Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States captured in US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. Exposures: Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after kidney transplantation. Outcomes: The development of fractures, as ascertained using diagnostic codes on Medicare billing claims. Analytical Approach: We used multivariable Cox regression with inverse propensity weighting to compare the incidence of fractures >3 months-to-3 years after kidney transplantation associated with various immunosuppression regimens compared to a reference regimen of antithymocyte globulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: Overall, fractures were identified in 7.5% of kidney transplant recipients (women, 8.8%; men, 6.7%; age < 55 years, 5.9%; age ≥ 55 years, 9.3%). In time-varying regression, experiencing a fracture was associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent death within 3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.45-3.81). Fractures were also associated with increased Medicare spending (first year: $5,122; second year: $10,890; third year: $11,083; [P < 0.001]). Induction with TMG or ALEM and the avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids significantly reduced the risk of fractures in younger (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73) and older (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) patients. The avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids with any induction was associated with a reduced risk of fractures in women. Limitations: This was a retrospective study which lacked data on immunosuppression levels. Conclusions: Fractures after kidney transplantation are associated with significantly increased mortality risk and costs. The early avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids after induction with TMG or ALEM reduces the risk of fractures after kidney transplantation and should be considered for patients at high-risk of this complication, including older adults and women.

17.
Kidney Med ; 4(1): 100377, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35072042

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (DM) after kidney transplantation increases morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and obese recipients. We aimed to examine the impact of immunosuppression selection on the risk of posttransplant DM among both older and obese kidney transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States from US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. EXPOSURES: Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after transplant. OUTCOMES: Development of DM >3 months-to-1 year posttransplant. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the incidence of posttransplant DM by immunosuppression regimen with the reference regimen of thymoglobulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse propensity weighting. RESULTS: 12.7% of kidney transplant recipients developed posttransplant DM with higher incidences in older (≥55 years vs <55 years: 16.7% vs 10.1%) and obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2 vs BMI < 30 kg/m2: 17.1% vs 10.9%) patients. The incidence of posttransplant DM was lower with steroid avoidance [TMG/ALEM + no prednisone (8.4%) and IL2rAb + no prednisone (9.7%)] than TMG/ALEM with triple therapy (13.1%). After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics, TMG/ALEM with steroid avoidance was beneficial for all groups [age < 55 years: adjusted HR (aHR), 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.72); age ≥ 55 years: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.79); BMI < 30 kg/m2: aHR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.60-0.78); BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2: aHR, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57-0.79)]. However, IL2rAb with steroid avoidance was beneficial only for older patients (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99) and for those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and lacked data on immunosuppression levels. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial impact of steroid avoidance using tacrolimus on posttransplant DM appears to differ by patient age and induction regimen.

18.
ESC Heart Fail ; 8(3): 1915-1923, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33689217

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this study is to characterize healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a worsening heart failure event. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort analysis. Patients with HFrEF were identified from the PINNACLE Registry and linked to a nationwide pharmacy and medical claims database. Worsening heart failure was defined as stable heart failure with a subsequent hospitalization and/or intravenous diuretic therapy. Healthcare resource use and costs in 2015 US dollars were analysed for dispensed prescriptions, outpatient encounters, and hospital encounters. Among 11 064 patients with HFrEF, 3087 (27.9%) experienced a worsening heart failure event during an average follow-up of 973 days. During the first 30 days after the worsening event, 19.8% of patients had hospital readmissions with heart failure as the primary or secondary diagnosis. During that same time period, mean per patient heart failure-related healthcare resource use included 1.3 prescriptions, 0.5 practitioner visits, and 0.5 hospital encounters (admissions, observations, or emergency care), for an average total medical cost of $8779 per patient including $5359 in heart failure-related costs. During the first year following worsening heart failure onset, mean per patient total and heart failure-related costs were $62 615 and $35 329, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden following a worsening heart failure event calls for further review of methods to prevent progressive disease, improve adherence to guideline-directed therapy, and develop novel treatments and care strategies to moderate further progression.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Estudos de Coortes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico
19.
Transplant Direct ; 7(7): e715, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients, the risk of post-KT adverse outcomes differs by type of induction immunosuppression. Immune response to induction differs as recipients age; yet, choice of induction is barely tailored by age likely due to a lack of evidence of the risks and benefits. METHODS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 39336 first-time KT recipients (2010-2016). We estimated the length of stay (LOS), acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and death by induction type using logistic and Cox regression weighted by propensity score to adjust for confounders. We tested whether these estimates differed by age (65+ versus 18-64 y) using a Wald test. RESULTS: Overall, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) was associated with a decreased risk of AR (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.85) compared with basiliximab. The effect of induction on LOS and death (interaction P = 0.03 and 0.003) differed by recipient age. Discharge was on average 11% shorter in rATG among younger recipients (relative time = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.99) but not among older recipients (relative time = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08). rATG was not associated with mortality among older (hazard ratio = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.15), but among younger recipients (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), it was associated with reduced mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: rATG should be considered to prevent AR, especially among recipients with high-immunologic risk regardless of age; however, choice of induction should be tailored to reduce LOS and risk of mortality, particularly among younger recipients.

20.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 40(6): 513-524, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846078

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid and benzodiazepine use have been associated with morbidity and mortality among some groups of solid organ transplant recipients, but implications for outcomes among lung transplant patients are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked national transplant registry and pharmaceutical records to characterize the associations between benzodiazepine and opioid prescription fills in the years before and after lung transplant (2006-2017), with risk-adjusted posttransplant survival (adjusted hazard ratio, LCLaHRUCL). RESULTS: Among 11,568 recipients, 33.7% filled an opioid prescription, and 25.8% filled a benzodiazepine prescription before transplant. Compared to patients without prescriptions, those who filled both short- and long-acting benzodiazepine prescriptions before transplant had 2-fold higher mortality in the first year posttransplant (aHR, 1.392.123.21), after adjustment for baseline factors and opioid fills, while pretransplant opioid fills were not associated with posttransplant mortality after adjustment for benzodiazepine fills. Pretransplant opioid and benzodiazepine use strongly predicted more use after transplant. Fills of both short- and long-acting benzodiazepines in the first year posttransplant were associated with 77% increased mortality >1-to-2 years posttransplant (aHR, 1.061.772.96). Compared with no posttransplant opioid fills, there was a dose-dependent association between first-year opioid fills and subsequent adjusted mortality risk (level 2: aHR, 1.171.501.92 to level 4: aHR, 1.562.012.59). These effects were independent, and interactions were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepine prescription fills before and after lung transplant, and opioid fills after transplant, are independently associated with posttransplant mortality. Review of benzodiazepine and opioid use history is relevant to risk-stratifying patients before and after lung transplant.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Transplantados , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA