Repetitive endoscopic drainage as initial intervention is safe and effective for early treatment of pancreatic necrotic collections.

BACKGROUND: While endoscopic step-up approach with delayed drainage (more than 28 days from diagnosis) was shown to produce the best outcomes in the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), we assessed our single centre experience of early versus delayed endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrotic collections. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrotic collections between 2011 and 2022 under Monash Health were identified. They were excluded if below 18 years old or their follow up data were missing. The included patients' medical records, pathology results, and imaging findings were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included. 31.58% required percutaneous drainage and 15% received either endoscopic or surgical necrosectomy. The disease related mortality was 8.47% and the average length of stay (LOS) was 70.92 days. No significant difference was shown in disease-related mortality (10.5% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.697) or LOS (75.35 vs. 68.7, P = 0.644) between early and delayed drainage cohorts, but patients who received early drainage have higher qSOFA score on the day of drainage (2 vs. 0, P = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Repetitive endoscopic drainage with selective percutaneous drainage is effective in the management of pancreatic necrotic collections. Early drainage should be considered in patients who developed severe sepsis.

Gastric intestinal metaplasia: Prevalence in a large Australian center and nationwide survey of endoscopic practice.

Background and Aim: Atrophic gastritis (AG) and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) are early changes in the stepwise progression to gastric adenocarcinoma. There is heterogeneity in international guidelines regarding the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of AG and GIM. This study aims to determine the prevalence of GIM in an Australian center and assess the approach of Australian endoscopists for these two conditions. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients between January 2015 and December 2020 diagnosed with GIM on gastric biopsy following upper gastric endoscopy. A web-based, 25-question, investigator-designed, multiple-choice survey was distributed among all registered endoscopists in Australia. Results: The overall prevalence of GIM within a single Australian center was 11.7% over 5 years. Of the 1026 patients identified, only 58.7% underwent mapping biopsies using the modified Sydney protocol. Among the cohort, 1.6% had low-grade dysplasia, 0.9% had high-grade dysplasia, and 1.8% had malignancy on initial gastroscopy. Two hundred and sixty-seven (7.2%) endoscopists completed the survey, 44.2% indicated they would perform mapping for all patients, and 36% only for high-risk patients. Only 1.5% (n = 4) of respondents were able to correctly identify all six endoscopic photos of GIM/AG. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that in a large tertiary center, GIM is a prevalent endoscopic finding, but the associated rates of dysplasia and cancer were low. Additionally, among a small proportion of surveyed Australian endoscopists, there is notable variability in the endoscopic approach for AG and GIM and significant knowledge gaps. More training is required to increase the recognition of GIM and compliance with histological mapping.