Using dropout based active learning and surrogate models in the inverse viscoelastic parameter identification of human brain tissue.

Inverse mechanical parameter identification enables the characterization of ultrasoft materials, for which it is difficult to achieve homogeneous deformation states. However, this usually involves high computational costs that are mainly determined by the complexity of the forward model. While simulation methods like finite element models can capture nearly arbitrary geometries and implement involved constitutive equations, they are also computationally expensive. Machine learning models, such as neural networks, can help mitigate this problem when they are used as surrogate models replacing the complex high fidelity models. Thereby, they serve as a reduced order model after an initial training phase, where they learn the relation of in- and outputs of the high fidelity model. The generation of the required training data is computationally expensive due to the necessary simulation runs. Here, active learning techniques enable the selection of the "most rewarding" training points in terms of estimated gained accuracy for the trained model. In this work, we present a recurrent neural network that can well approximate the output of a viscoelastic finite element simulation while significantly speeding up the evaluation times. Additionally, we use Monte-Carlo dropout based active learning to identify highly informative training data. Finally, we showcase the potential of the developed pipeline by identifying viscoelastic material parameters for human brain tissue.

Multilayer 3D bioprinting and complex mechanical properties of alginate-gelatin mesostructures.

In the biomedical field, extrusion-based 3D bioprinting has emerged as a promising technique to fabricate tissue replacements. However, a main challenge is to find suitable bioinks and reproducible procedures that ensure good printability and generate final printed constructs with high shape fidelity, similarity to the designed model, and controllable mechanical properties. In this study, our main goal is to 3D print multilayered structures from alginate-gelatin (AG) hydrogels and to quantify their complex mechanical properties with particular focus on the effects of the extrusion process and geometrical parameters, i.e. different mesostructures and macroporosities. We first introduce a procedure including a pre-cooling step and optimized printing parameters to control and improve the printability of AG hydrogels based on rheological tests and printability studies. Through this procedure, we significantly improve the printability and flow stability of AG hydrogels and successfully fabricate well-defined constructs similar to our design models. Our subsequent complex mechanical analyses highlight that the extrusion process and the mesostructure, characterized by pore size, layer height and filament diameter, significantly change the complex mechanical response of printed constructs. The presented approach and the corresponding results have important implications for future 3D bioprinting applications when aiming to produce replacements with good structural integrity and defined mechanical properties similar to the native tissue, especially in soft tissue engineering. The approach is also applicable to the printing of gelatin-based hydrogels with different accompanying materials, concentrations, or cells.

Inverse identification of region-specific hyperelastic material parameters for human brain tissue.

The identification of material parameters accurately describing the region-dependent mechanical behavior of human brain tissue is crucial for computational models used to assist, e.g., the development of safety equipment like helmets or the planning and execution of brain surgery. While the division of the human brain into different anatomical regions is well established, knowledge about regions with distinct mechanical properties remains limited. Here, we establish an inverse parameter identification scheme using a hyperelastic Ogden model and experimental data from multi-modal testing of tissue from 19 anatomical human brain regions to identify mechanically distinct regions and provide the corresponding material parameters. We assign the 19 anatomical regions to nine governing regions based on similar parameters and microstructures. Statistical analyses confirm differences between the regions and indicate that at least the corpus callosum and the corona radiata should be assigned different material parameters in computational models of the human brain. We provide a total of four parameter sets based on the two initial Poisson's ratios of 0.45 and 0.49 as well as the pre- and unconditioned experimental responses, respectively. Our results highlight the close interrelation between the Poisson's ratio and the remaining model parameters. The identified parameters will contribute to more precise computational models enabling spatially resolved predictions of the stress and strain states in human brains under complex mechanical loading conditions.

Poro-viscoelastic material parameter identification of brain tissue-mimicking hydrogels.

Understanding and characterizing the mechanical and structural properties of brain tissue is essential for developing and calibrating reliable material models. Based on the Theory of Porous Media, a novel nonlinear poro-viscoelastic computational model was recently proposed to describe the mechanical response of the tissue under different loading conditions. The model contains parameters related to the time-dependent behavior arising from both the viscoelastic relaxation of the solid matrix and its interaction with the fluid phase. This study focuses on the characterization of these parameters through indentation experiments on a tailor-made polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel mimicking brain tissue. The material behavior is adjusted to ex vivo porcine brain tissue. An inverse parameter identification scheme using a trust region reflective algorithm is introduced and applied to match experimental data obtained from the indentation with the proposed computational model. By minimizing the error between experimental values and finite element simulation results, the optimal constitutive model parameters of the brain tissue-mimicking hydrogel are extracted. Finally, the model is validated using the derived material parameters in a finite element simulation.

Tissue-Scale Biomechanical Testing of Brain Tissue for the Calibration of Nonlinear Material Models.

Brain tissue is one of the most complex and softest tissues in the human body. Due to its ultrasoft and biphasic nature, it is difficult to control the deformation state during biomechanical testing and to quantify the highly nonlinear, time-dependent tissue response. In numerous experimental studies that have investigated the mechanical properties of brain tissue over the last decades, stiffness values have varied significantly. One reason for the observed discrepancies is the lack of standardized testing protocols and corresponding data analyses. The tissue properties have been tested on different length and time scales depending on the testing technique, and the corresponding data have been analyzed based on simplifying assumptions. In this review, we highlight the advantage of using nonlinear continuum mechanics based modeling and finite element simulations to carefully design experimental setups and protocols as well as to comprehensively analyze the corresponding experimental data. We review testing techniques and protocols that have been used to calibrate material model parameters and discuss artifacts that might falsify the measured properties. The aim of this work is to provide standardized procedures to reliably quantify the mechanical properties of brain tissue and to more accurately calibrate appropriate constitutive models for computational simulations of brain development, injury and disease. Computational models can not only be used to predictively understand brain tissue behavior, but can also serve as valuable tools to assist diagnosis and treatment of diseases or to plan neurosurgical procedures. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.