Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 40(5): 644-648, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483180

RESUMO

Caesarean delivery rates are increasing in many Asian countries. This study investigated the effects of caesarean section on breastfeeding practices from delivery to twelve months postpartum. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 2030 pregnant women recruited from three cities in Vietnam during 2015-2017. The overall caesarean rate was 38.1%. Mothers who underwent caesarean section were more likely to give prelacteal feeds to their infants (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 13.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.52-18.39) and as a result have lower rates of early initiation of breastfeeding (adjusted OR 0.04, 95%CI 0.02-0.05). Having a caesarean section reduced the likelihood of (any, predominant and exclusive) breastfeeding from discharge to 6 months postpartum. After 1 year, the any breastfeeding rate was still lower in the caesarean delivery (70.2%) compared with the vaginal delivery group (72.9%), p = .232. Vietnamese women who give birth by caesarean section need extra support to initiate and maintain breastfeeding.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Early initiation of breastfeeding, and 'exclusive' or 'predominant' breastfeeding rates at discharge are lower in mothers delivering by caesarean section compared to vaginal delivery. Prelacteal feeding rates are higher following caesarean section. However, the association between 'any' breastfeeding duration and caesarean delivery has not been established.What the results of this study add? This study showed that caesarean delivery reduced all breastfeeding rates from discharge to six months and any breastfeeding rate at 12 months postpartum in Vietnamese women.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further breastfeeding interventions are needed during the postpartum period for mothers who deliver by caesarean section.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Vietnã
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(21): 3706-3712, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30843751

RESUMO

Background: Several diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been developed and used internationally. This study estimated the prevalence of GDM and pregnancy outcomes among Vietnamese women.Methods: A prospective cohort study of 2030 women was undertaken in Vietnam between 2015 and 2016. Baseline interview and a single-step 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were conducted at 24-28 weeks of gestation. GDM was defined by five international diagnostic criteria: America Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy study groups (IADPSG), National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed using medical records. Besides descriptive statistics and univariate analyses, logistic regressions were performed to ascertain the associations between GDM and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Results: The prevalence of GDM varied considerably by the diagnostic criteria: 6.4% (ADA), 7.9% (EASD), 22.8% (IADPSG/WHO), and 24.2% (NICE). Women with GDM according to EASD were more likely to have macrosomic infants (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-12.72), despite no apparent increase in risk under other criteria. Babies born to mothers with GDM appeared to be large-for-gestational age (LGA) by ADA criteria (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.10-4.02) or EASD criteria (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.16-3.98), when compared to their counterparts in the normal group. No significant differences in maternal and other neonatal outcomes were found between the normal and GDM groups.Conclusions: A global guideline is needed for the diagnosis, prevention and management of GDM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Vietnã/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA