Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur Heart J ; 30(2): 209-16, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18997178

RESUMO

AIMS: Although there is general agreement for the recommendation of the influenza vaccine to elderly and high-risk adults, the magnitude of clinical effectiveness and benefit from the annual vaccination is controversial. In this study, we have assessed the effects of annual influenza vaccination on winter mortality in older adults with chronic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cohort study that included 1340 Spanish community-dwelling individuals 65 years or older who had chronic heart disease (congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease) followed from January 2002 to April 2005. Annual influenza vaccine status was a time-varying condition and primary outcome was all-cause death during the study period. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazard models adjusted by age, sex, and comorbidity were used to evaluate vaccine effectiveness. Influenza vaccination was associated with a significant reduction of 37% in the adjusted risk of winter mortality during the overall period 2002-2005. The attributable mortality risk reduction in vaccinated people was 8.2 deaths per 1000 person-winters. We estimated that one death was prevented for every 122 annual vaccinations (ranging between 49 in Winter 2005 and 455 in Winter 2003). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a benefit from the influenza vaccination and support an annual vaccination strategy for elderly people with cardiac diseases.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Vacinação/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Cardiopatias/complicações , Humanos , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Estações do Ano
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 43(7): 860-8, 2006 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16941367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) is currently recommended for elderly persons and persons who are at high risk of infection. However, the effectiveness of the 23-valent PPV remains controversial. We assessed the effectiveness of this vaccine in older adults. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2002 through April 2005; it included all community-dwelling individuals aged >or=65 years who were assigned to 1 of 8 primary health care centers in Tarragona, Spain (11,241 subjects). The primary outcomes were invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumococcal pneumonia, overall pneumonia rate, and death due to pneumonia. All cases were validated by a check of the clinical records. The association between pneumococcal vaccination and the risk of each outcome was evaluated by means of multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, immunocompetence, and influenza vaccine status. RESULTS: Pneumococcal vaccination was associated with significant reductions in the risk of hospitalization for pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.92) and in the overall pneumonia rate (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98). The incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease was low (64 cases per 100,000 person-years), and a considerable protective effect against invasive pneumococcal disease did not attain statistical significance (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.22-1.65). However, the vaccine showed a significant effectiveness of 45% to prevent pneumococcal pneumonia (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88). Finally, vaccination was associated with a significant 59% reduction in the risk of death due to pneumonia among vaccinated subjects (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the 23-valent PPV effectively prevented pneumococcal pneumonia (with or without bacteremia) and decreased the rates of overall pneumonia and of mortality due to pneumonia in older adults, providing new arguments for systematic vaccination in the elderly population.


Assuntos
Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(11): 2953-2958, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27454779

RESUMO

There is scarce data about pneumococcal vaccination coverages among adults in recent years. We investigated current pneumococcal vaccination coverages in Catalonia, Spain, with a cross-sectional population-based study including 2,033,465 individuals aged 50 y or older assigned to the Catalonian Health Institute at 01/01/2015 (date of survey). A previously validated institutional research clinical Database was used to classify study subjects by their vaccination status for both 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), to identify comorbidities and underlying conditions, and establish the risk stratum of each individual: High risk stratum: functional or anatomic asplenia, cochlear implants, CSF leaks, or immunocompromising conditions; medium risk stratum: immunocompetent persons with history of chronic cardiac or respiratory disease, liver disease, diabetes mellitus, alcoholism and/or smoking; low risk stratum: persons without high or medium risk conditions. Of the total 2,033,465 study population, an amount of 789,098 (38.8%) had received PPVS23, whereas 5031 (0.2%) had received PCV13. PPSV23 coverages increased largely with increasing age: 4.8% in 50-59 y vs 35.5% in 60-69 y vs 71.9% in 70-79 y vs 79.5% in 80 y or older; p < 0.001). PCV13 coverages also increased with age, although they were very low in all age groups. PPSV23 coverages were 59.2% in high risk stratum, 48.3% in medium risk stratum and 28.1% in low risk stratum (p < 0.001). For the PCV13, uptakes were 1.2%, 0.3% and 0.1% in high, medium and low stratum, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, pneumococcal vaccination coverages in Catalonian adults are not optimal, being especially small for the PCV13 (even in high-risk subjects).


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia
4.
BMJ Open ; 4(6): e005133, 2014 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24928592

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether passive smoking exposure at home is a risk factor for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. SETTING: A population-based case-control study was designed in a Mediterranean area with 860 000 inhabitants >14 years of age. PARTICIPANTS: 1003 participants who had never smoked were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors for CAP, including home exposure to passive smoking, were registered. All new cases of CAP in a well-defined population were consecutively recruited during a 12-month period. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was designed to assess risk factors for CAP, including home exposure to passive smoking. All new cases of CAP in a well-defined population were consecutively recruited during a 12-month period. The subgroup of never smokers was selected for the present analysis. RESULTS: The study sample included 471 patients with CAP and 532 controls who had never smoked. The annual incidence of CAP was estimated to be 1.14 cases×10(-3) inhabitants in passive smokers and 0.90×10(-3) in non-passive smokers (risk ratio (RR) 1.26; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.55) in the whole sample. In participants ≥65 years of age, this incidence was 2.50×10(-3) in passive smokers and 1.69×10(-3) in non-passive smokers (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.03). In this last age group, the percentage of passive smokers in cases and controls was 26% and 18.1%, respectively (p=0.039), with a crude OR of 1.59 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.38) and an adjusted (by age and sex) OR of 1.56 (95% CI 1.00 to 2.45). CONCLUSIONS: Passive smoking at home is a risk factor for CAP in older adults (65 years or more).


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/etiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
5.
PLoS One ; 8(9): e73271, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24039899

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of inhaled steroids in patients with chronic respiratory diseases is a matter of debate due to the potential effect on the development and prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We assessed whether treatment with inhaled steroids in patients with chronic bronchitis, COPD or asthma and CAP may affect early outcome of the acute pneumonic episode. METHODS: Over 1-year period, all population-based cases of CAP in patients with chronic bronchitis, COPD or asthma were registered. Use of inhaled steroids were registered and patients were followed up to 30 days after diagnosis to assess severity of CAP and clinical course (hospital admission, ICU admission and mortality). RESULTS: Of 473 patients who fulfilled the selection criteria, inhaled steroids were regularly used by 109 (23%). In the overall sample, inhaled steroids were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (OR=1.96, p = 0.002) in the bivariate analysis, but this effect disappeared after adjusting by other severity-related factors (adjusted OR=1.08, p=0.787). This effect on hospitalization also disappeared when considering only patients with asthma (OR=1.38, p=0.542), with COPD alone (OR=4.68, p=0.194), but a protective effect was observed in CB patients (OR=0.15, p=0.027). Inhaled steroids showed no association with ICU admission, days to clinical recovery and mortality in the overall sample and in any disease subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with inhaled steroids is not a prognostic factor in COPD and asthmatic patients with CAP, but could prevent hospitalization for CAP in patients with clinical criteria of chronic bronchitis.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Bronquite Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Asma/complicações , Bronquite Crônica/complicações , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/complicações , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/complicações , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Vaccine ; 27(10): 1504-10, 2009 Mar 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19171174

RESUMO

The 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine is currently recommended in elderly and high-risk adults. Its efficacy against invasive pneumococcal disease has been demonstrated, but its effectiveness in preventing pneumonia remains uncertain. This study assessed the clinical effectiveness of vaccination against pneumonia among middle-aged and older adults. We conducted a population-based case-control study including 304 case patients over 50 years old with radiographically confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia (94 bacteremic and 210 nonbacteremic cases) and 608 outpatient control subjects (matched by primary care centre, age, sex and risk stratum). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for vaccination were calculated using conditional logistic regression, controlling for underlying conditions. Vaccine effectiveness against all pneumococcal pneumonia was 48% (OR: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73). Vaccination was effective against bacteremic cases (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27-0.66) as well as nonbacteremic cases (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.39-0.86). Vaccine effectiveness was highest against bacteremic infections caused by vaccine types (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09-0.66). These findings confirm the effectiveness of the vaccine against invasive disease, but they also support the benefit of vaccination in preventing nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.


Assuntos
Vacinas Pneumocócicas/farmacologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA