Correlates of suicidal behaviors and genetic risk among United States veterans with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder.

Persons diagnosed with schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar I disorder (BPI) are at high risk for self-injurious behavior, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behaviors (SB). Characterizing associations between diagnosed health problems, prior pharmacological treatments, and polygenic scores (PGS) has potential to inform risk stratification. We examined self-reported SB and ideation using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) among 3,942 SCZ and 5,414 BPI patients receiving care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). These cross-sectional data were integrated with electronic health records (EHRs), and compared across lifetime diagnoses, treatment histories, follow-up screenings, and mortality data. PGS were constructed using available genomic data for related traits. Genome-wide association studies were performed to identify and prioritize specific loci. Only 20% of the veterans who reported SB had a corroborating ICD-9/10 EHR code. Among those without prior SB, more than 20% reported new-onset SB at follow-up. SB were associated with a range of additional clinical diagnoses, and with treatment with specific classes of psychotropic medications (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, etc.). PGS for externalizing behaviors, smoking initiation, suicide attempt, and major depressive disorder were associated with SB. The GWAS for SB yielded no significant loci. Among individuals with a diagnosed mental illness, self-reported SB were strongly associated with clinical variables across several EHR domains. Analyses point to sequelae of substance-related and psychiatric comorbidities as strong correlates of prior and subsequent SB. Nonetheless, past SB was frequently not documented in health records, underscoring the value of regular screening with direct, in-person assessments, especially among high-risk individuals.

Identifying Veterans Who Benefit From Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir: A Target Trial Emulation.

BACKGROUND: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is recommended for persons at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but remains underutilized. Information on which eligible groups are likely to benefit from treatment is needed. METHODS: We conducted a target trial emulation study in the Veterans Health Administration comparing nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treated versus matched untreated veterans at risk for severe COVID-19 who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from April 2022 through March 2023. We measured incidence of any hospitalization or all-cause mortality at 30 days. Outcomes were measured for the entire cohort, as well as among subgroups defined by 30-day risk of death or hospitalization, estimated using an ensemble risk prediction model. RESULTS: Participants were 87% male with median age 66 years and 16% unvaccinated. Compared with matched untreated participants, those treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (n = 24 205) had a lower 30-day risk for hospitalization (1.80% vs 2.30%; risk difference [RD], -0.50% points [95% confidence interval {CI}: -.69 to -.35]) and death (0.11% vs 0.30%; RD, -0.20 [95% CI: -.24 to -.13]). The greatest reductions in combined hospitalization or death were observed in the highest risk quartile (RD -2.85 [95% CI: -3.94 to -1.76]), immunocompromised persons (RD -1.91 [95% CI: -3.09 to -.74]), and persons aged ≥75 years (RD -1.16 [95% CI: -1.73 to -.59]). No reductions were observed in the 2 lowest risk quartiles or persons younger than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was effective in reducing 30-day hospitalization and death in older veterans, those at highest predicted risk for severe outcomes, and immunocompromised groups. Benefit was not observed in younger veterans or groups at lower predicted risk for hospitalization and death.

INviting Veterans InTo Enrollment in Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (INVITE-ADRC): An NIA and VA-sponsored initiative to increase veteran participation in aging and dementia research.

INTRODUCTION: Older military veterans often present with unique and complex risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Increasing veteran participation in research studies offers one avenue to advance the field and improve health outcomes. METHODS: To this end, the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) partnered to build infrastructure, improve collaboration, and intensify targeted recruitment of veterans. This initiative, INviting Veterans InTo Enrollment in Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (INVITE-ADRC), provided funding for five sites and cross-site organizing structure. Diverse and innovative recruitment strategies were used. RESULTS: Across five sites, 172 veterans entered registries, and 99 were enrolled into ADRC studies. Of the enrolled, 39 were veterans from historically underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This initiative laid the groundwork to establish sustainable relationships between the VA and ADRCs. The partnership between both federal agencies demonstrates how mutual interests can accelerate progress. In turn, efforts can help our aging veterans.

VA Lessons From Partnering in COVID-19 Clinical Trials.

Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) supports an extensive clinical trials enterprise. Until recently, external partnerships were limited. The VA's potential value as a partner became more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic because of its large health care system, diverse patient population, and expertise in conducting clinical trials. Observations: By leveraging its infrastructure, the VA was able to participate in 7 large-scale COVID-19 therapeutic and vaccine trials. A key aspect of this enterprise approach is the ability to provide centralized direction and coordination. The VA's partnerships with external groups offered insights into the challenges associated with conducting important trials, especially when rapidity and coordination were essential. The ORD also developed solutions for reducing study startup time that could be established as best practices. We offer lessons for the challenges VA faced: site infrastructure needs and capabilities; study management roles and responsibilities; educational resources; local review; study design demands; contracting and budgeting; central-level systems; and communication. Conclusions: VA participation in major COVID-19 therapeutic and vaccine trials represented a significant part of its research response to the pandemic. These contributions extended beyond the participants, scientists, and data that helped inform subsequent regulatory approvals. The VA also had an opportunity to directly develop partnerships with non-VA groups. These groups became more familiar with the VA while enabling us to gain more experience in the diverse practices used to conduct multisite clinical studies. Ultimately, these efforts empower the VA to further serve the broader scientific and clinical communities.

The VA Research Enterprise: A Platform for National Partnerships Toward Evidence Building and Scientific Innovation.

Background: Within a year of the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was managing about 300 COVID-19-related research projects across roughly 100 facilities, which has since grown to more than 900 projects. This robust set of activities arose from an existing enterprise strategy and aimed at identifying needs for supporting the clinical care mission, more rapidly leveraging resources, and coordinating research across the VA. The VA's efforts to implement an enterprise strategy before March 2020 positioned its research community to dynamically partner with other federal agencies, academic institutions, and industry in addressing a national public health emergency. Observations: The VA research enterprise involves a broad range of functions, scientific and clinical leaders, and organizational resources to enhance the health and care of veterans and the nation. The scope of research activities enables it to support its priorities while also partnering with others who share in mutual commitments to veteran health. Moving toward being the nation's learning health care system, the VA's leadership support, staff, patient volunteers, and partners were key contributors to a national response to COVID-19. Swift action and consistent communication helped address the complexities of the pandemic and strengthened the VA's ability to prepare and mobilize for emergencies and other potential disease outbreaks. Documenting strategies and practices can enhance future opportunities aimed at addressing the most challenging health care needs while also focusing on the primary mission to serve veterans. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to critical knowledge and lessons that enabled the VA to advance enterprise goals, particularly in the context of its health care system. Sharing these unique processes and experiences will inform current and future partnerships among research, clinical, and public health communities oriented to serve veterans and the nation through scientific innovation.