An Evidence-Based Cue-Selection Guide and Logic Model to Improve Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long-term Care.

Pressure ulcers have consistently resisted prevention efforts in long-term care facilities nationwide. Recent research has described cueing innovations that-when selected according to the assumptions and resources of particular facilities-support best practices of pressure ulcer prevention. This article synthesizes that research into a unified, dynamic logic model to facilitate effective staff implementation of a pressure ulcer prevention program.

Exploratory study of nursing home factors associated with successful implementation of clinical decision support tools for pressure ulcer prevention.

OBJECTIVES: To determine those factors that are associated with nursing homes' success in implementing the On-Time quality improvement (QI) for pressure ulcer prevention program and integrating health information technology (HIT) tools into practice at the unit level. DESIGN: Observational study with quantitative analysis of nursing home characteristics, team participation levels, and implementation milestones collected as part of a QI program. SETTING: Fourteen nursing homes in Washington, District of Columbia, participating in the On-Time Pressure Ulcer Prevention program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The nursing home level of implementation was measured by counting the number of implementation milestones achieved after at least 9 months of implementation effort. MAIN RESULTS: After at least 9 months of implementation effort, 36% of the nursing homes achieved level III, a high level of implementation, of the On-Time QI-HIT program. Factors significantly associated with high implementation were high level of involvement from the administrator or director of nursing, high level of nurse manager participation, presence of in-house dietitian, high level of participation of staff educator and QI personnel, presence of an internal champion, and team's openness to redesign. One factor that was identified as a barrier to high level of implementation was higher numbers of health inspection deficiencies per bed. CONCLUSION: The learning from On-Time QI offers several lessons associated with facility factors that contribute to high level of implementation of a QI-HIT program in a nursing home.

Leveraging certified nursing assistant documentation and knowledge to improve clinical decision making: the on-time quality improvement program to prevent pressure ulcers.

The goal of this article was to enhance understanding of the On-Time Quality Improvement for Long-term Care Program, a practical approach to embed health information technology into quality improvement in nursing homes that leverages certified nursing assistant documentation and knowledge, supports frontline clinical decision making, and establishes proactive intervention for pressure ulcer prevention.

Incorporating INTERACT II Clinical Decision Support Tools into Nursing Home Health Information Technology.

A substantial reduction in hospitalization rates has been associated with the implementation of the Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) quality improvement intervention using the accompanying paper-based clinical practice tools (INTERACT II). There is significant potential to further increase the impact of INTERACT by integrating INTERACT II tools into nursing home (NH) health information technology (HIT) via standalone or integrated clinical decision support (CDS) systems. This article highlights the process of translating INTERACT II tools from paper to NH HIT. The authors believe that widespread dissemination and integration of INTERACT II CDS tools into various NH HIT products could lead to sustainable improvement in resident and clinician process and outcome measures, including enhanced interclinician communication and a reduction in potentially avoidable hospitalizations.

Pressure ulcer prevention in long-term-care facilities: a pilot study implementing standardized nurse aide documentation and feedback reports.

OBJECTIVE: To design and facilitate implementation of practice-based evidence changes associated with decreases in pressure ulcer (PrU) development in long-term-care (LTC) facilities and promote these practices as part of routine care. DESIGN: Pre/post observational study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Frail older adult residents in 11 US LTC facilities. INTERVENTION: Project facilitators assisted frontline multidisciplinary teams (certified nurse aides [CNAs], nurses, and dietitians/dietary aides) to develop streamlined standardized CNA documentation and weekly reports to identify high-risk residents and to integrate clinical reports into day-to-day practice and clinical decision making. The program was called "Real-Time Optimal Care Plans for Nursing Home QI" (Real-Time). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of PrUs using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) quality measures (QMs), number of in-house-acquired PrUs, and number and completeness of CNA documentation forms. MAIN RESULTS: Seven study LTC facilities that reported data to CMS experienced a combined 33% (SD, 36.1%) reduction in the CMS high-risk PrU QM in 18 months and reduction in newly occurring PrUs (number of ulcers in the fourth quarter of 2003: range, 2-19; and in the third quarter of 2005: range, 1-6). Five of these LTC facilities that fully implemented Real-Time experienced a combined 48.1% (SD, 23.4%) reduction in the CMS high-risk PrU QM. Ten facilities reduced by an average of 2 to 5 their number of CNA documentation forms; CNA weekly documentation completeness reached a consistent level of 90% to 95%, and 8 facilities integrated the use of 2 to 4 weekly project reports in routine clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts that provide access to focused and timely clinical information, facilitate change, and promote staff working together in multidisciplinary teams impacted clinical outcomes. Prevention of PrUs showed a trend of improvement in facilities that fully integrated tools to identify high-risk residents into day-to-day practice. CNA documentation facilitated better information for clinical decision making. More than 70 additional LTC facilities across the United States are implementing this QI program.

Workforce Characteristics, Perceptions, Stress, and Satisfaction among Staff in Green House and Other Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare workforce characteristics and staff perceptions of safety, satisfaction, and stress between Green House (GH) and comparison nursing homes (CNHs). DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data on staff perceptions of safety, stress, and satisfaction from 13 GHs and 8 comparison NHs in 11 states; secondary data from human resources records on workforce characteristics, turnover, and staffing from 01/01/2011-06/30/2012. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Workforce data were from human resources offices; staff perceptions were from surveys. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Few significant differences were found between GH and CNHs. Exceptions were GH direct caregivers were older, provided twice the normalized hours per week budgeted per resident than CNAs in CNHs or Legacy NHs, and trended toward lower turnover. CONCLUSIONS: GH environment may promote staff longevity and does not negatively affect worker's stress, safety perceptions, or satisfaction. Larger studies are needed to confirm findings.

The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Green House (GH) model of nursing home (NH) care, and examine how GH homes vary from the model, one another, and their founding (or legacy) NH. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data include primary quantitative and qualitative data and secondary quantitative data, derived from 12 GH/legacy NH organizations February 2012-September 2014. STUDY DESIGN: This mixed methods, cross-sectional study used structured interviews to obtain information about presence of, and variation in, GH-relevant structures and processes of care. Qualitative questions explored reasons for variation in model implementation. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Interview data were analyzed using related-sample tests, and qualitative data were iteratively analyzed using a directed content approach. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: GH homes showed substantial variation in practices to support resident choice and decision making; neither GH nor legacy homes provided complete choice, and all GH homes excluded residents from some key decisions. GH homes were most consistent with the model and one another in elements to create a real home, such as private rooms and baths and open kitchens, and in staff-related elements, such as self-managed work teams and consistent, universal workers. CONCLUSIONS: Although variation in model implementation complicates evaluation, if expansion is to continue, it is essential to examine GH elements and their outcomes.

Obesity treatment: broadening our perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To selectively review the dietary literature to broaden perspectives on energy restriction as the primary determinant of successful obesity treatment. METHODS: Forty-five articles describing novel dietary behaviors and nutrient intakes that may impact obesity treatment are examined. RESULTS: Two areas of promising research were identified: (a) Dietary behaviors and patterns--eating frequency, meal timing, specific dietary pattern and (b) Nutritional factors--fat, fiber, glycemic load, carbohydrate. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric restriction leads to weight loss. However, promotion of dietary behaviors that focus primarily on cutting calories needs evaluation. There may be many dietary behaviors and patterns that promote weight loss and maintenance, making it essential to consider new nutritional approaches for obesity treatment.

Frontline caregiver daily practices: a comparison study of traditional nursing homes and the Green House project sites.

OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in frontline caregiver daily practice in two types of skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, Green House (GH) homes and traditional SNF units, related to overall staffing (nursing and nonnursing departments), direct care and indirect care time per resident day, and staff time interacting with residents. DESIGN: Observational, interview, and survey study comparing frontline caregiver daily practice in GH homes and traditional SNFs. SETTING: Twenty-seven sites (GH homes and traditional SNF units). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty staff from participating sites. MEASUREMENTS: Site and resident characteristics, nursing and nonnursing department staff hours per resident day (HPRDs), certified nursing assistant (CNA) direct and indirect care HPRDs, and CNA HPRDs engaged with residents. RESULTS: Staffing from nursing and nonnursing departments combined, excluding administrative, was 0.3 less HPRDs (18 minutes) in GH homes than in traditional SNFs. CNAs in GH homes, although responsible for more nonnursing activities such as laundry and housekeeping, spent 0.4 more HPRDs (24 minutes) in direct care activities than CNAs in traditional SNFs. CONCLUSION: The results challenge the assumption that staffing efficiencies cannot be achieved in small environments such as a GH home. Although the GH model has higher ratio of CNA staff to residents than traditional SNF units, overall staff time (combined total of nursing and nonnursing HPRDs) is slightly less in GH homes. The GH model allows for expanded responsibilities of CNAs in indirect care activities and more time in direct care activities and engaging directly with resident.

Navigating practice and academic change in collaborative partnership with a community advisory board.

University-based allied health programs must prepare entry-level professionals for a continually-evolving practice landscape. Health care education must demonstrate relevance to community needs in an environment of diminishing resources and increased scrutiny from governmental and accreditation bodies. Diverse perspectives, insights, and strategic counsel are needed to meet these challenges. Strategies associated with the development and functions of corporate and non-profit boards were used to tailor a community advisory board for a dietetics program at a public university. Over a 4-year period, this new board established an annual scholarship conference, funded an endowed scholarship, organized a student mentorship program, and secured new program equipment. The board played a pivotal role in development of and securing administrative approval for the establishment of a Nutrition Center for research, innovative practice, and service learning. In a recent accreditation site visit report, the role of the advisory board was cited as helping to meet education standards. An active advisory board can support strategic program innovation, resource development and help prepare health professionals for 21st century practice. The change-oriented, creative approach described can serve as a model for professional education programs seeking to engage the community in the success of their students.

Beyond CMS quality measure adjustments: identifying key resident and nursing home facility factors associated with quality measures.

OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement (QI) project was initiated to understand what differentiates nursing homes (NHs) that perform well on publicly reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures (QMs). The intent was to assist NH staff to direct QI efforts to positively impact QM rates. A key step was to determine if any resident or facility characteristics might account for some of the variability in QMs of high-risk pressure ulcers (HRPrUs), low-risk incontinence (LRI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) decline, beyond those already adjusted for by CMS. DESIGN: Observational Study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The setting was 147 NHs across 12 northeast states owned by 1 for-profit, multifacility organization in 2006 and 2007. INTERVENTION: None MEASUREMENTS: Minimum Data Set (MDS), patient admission information, facility staffing metrics, and CMS QM data. RESULTS: Relationships of facility and resident characteristics to QMs were evaluated using regression analyses performed separately for 2006 and 2007. Among factors found consistently to be significant (P < or = .05) for HRPrUs were percent admissions with pressure ulcers and percent residents with end-stage disease. For LRI, there was significant association with percent residents readmitted and percent incontinent of bladder on admission. ADL decline showed significant associations with licensed nurse turnover and facilities in specific states. CONCLUSION: Several resident and facility factors were associated with QMs beyond those previously adjusted for by CMS. With introduction of MDS 3.0, we suggest further exploration of resident and facility factors identified in this study.