Pediatric Fractures Associated With Riding Bicycles: A National 20-year Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Biking is a popular childhood activity with an intrinsic risk of injury. While advocacy groups have promoted protective equipment to help mitigate these risks, trends in the national health burden of fractures associated with biking in the pediatric population have not been explored in depth. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was queried between 2001 and 2020 to identify patients aged 18 years or below with fractures presenting to US emergency departments associated with riding bicycles. The patient narratives were analyzed to exclude patients not actively riding bicycles and to note helmet use and collisions with motor vehicles (MVs). RESULTS: A total of 33,955 fractures were identified in the database, representing an estimated 1,007,714 fractures from 2001 to 2020, or 50,331 fractures annually. Linear regression noted a significant decrease in fractures over the period ( R2 =0.899; P <0.001). Most fractures occurred in patients who were male (71.8%, 95% CI: 70.4% to 73.2%), White (53.1%, 46.0% to 60.0%), and aged 10 to 12 (30.6%, 29.6% to 31.7%) or 13 to 15 years (24.8%, 23.4% to 26.2%). Fractures occurred most frequently in the forearm (25.2%, 22.8% to 27.8%), wrist (21.2%, 19.5% to 22.9%), and shoulder (10.5%, 9.7% to 11.3%). Patients who sustained fractures after being struck by a MV were >6 times more likely to be admitted to the hospital (36.0%, 28.6% to 44.2%) compared with patients not struck by a MV (5.4%, 4.3% to 6.8%). When helmet use was recorded in patients with skull fractures, most patients were not wearing helmets at the time of injury (85.7%, 74.6% to 92.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the national burden of fractures associated with riding bicycles in pediatric populations has steadily decreased, it remains a significant cause of injury for children. Fractures involving MV more often require hospitalization, and an alarming number of skull fractures are noted in children not wearing helmets. These data support continued efforts to promote consistent helmet use and safer riding environments around MV in all children, but especially among 10- to 15-year-old males. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

Patella and Trochlea Osteochondritis Dissecans: Demographics and Treatment Paradigms.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research on patellar and trochlear groove osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is limited by small sample sizes. This study aims to describe the presentation of patients with OCD lesions of the patella and trochlea and characterize the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatments. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified all patients from a single institution from 2008 to 2021 with patellar and/or trochlear OCD lesions. Patients were excluded from the study if surgical records were unavailable or if the patient had knee surgery for a different injury at index surgery or in the 12 months postoperative. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes included a return to sports (RTS), pain resolution, radiographic healing, and treatment "success" (defined as full RTS, complete pain resolution, and full healing on imaging). RESULTS: A total of 68 patients (75 knees) were included-45 (60%) with patellar OCD and 30 (40%) with trochlear. Of the patients, 69% were males. The median age at knee OCD diagnosis was 14 years. At the final follow-up, 62% of knees (n = 44) recovered sufficiently to allow a full RTS and 54% of knees (n = 39) had full pain resolution. Of the 46 knees with radiographic imaging at least 1 year apart, 63% had full healing of the lesion. There was no significant difference in RTS, pain resolution, radiographic healing, or overall success when comparing treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable epidemiologic demographic and outcome data regarding the scarcely reported patellar and trochlear OCD. While over half of patients fully returned to sports and reported full pain resolution, a large proportion continued to experience symptoms over a year after presentation. Future research should aim to better define the treatment algorithms for these OCD subtypes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Delayed Presentation and Diagnosis of Youth Wrestling Injuries: A 20-Year Analysis of National Injury Data.

INTRODUCTION: The nature of wrestling may lead athletes to mask injuries with the delayed presentations of youth wrestling-related injuries not being well characterized. METHODS: This descriptive epidemiological study queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database to characterize delayed presentations of wrestling-related injuries in middle and high-school athletes. Data collection consisted of national estimates, demographics, and injury characteristics of patients with delayed (D) presentations (≥1 day) and same-day (S) presentations to US emergency departments after sustaining a wrestling-related injury during the scholastic wrestling season (December to February, 2000 to 2019). RESULTS: Of middle and high-school wrestlers presenting to US emergency departments, 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3% to 7.1%) reported delayed presentations for a total of 1,110 patients (CI, 591 to 1,630) annually. Most commonly (P < 0.001), injuries were sustained on Saturdays in both cohorts (D, 28.2%; CI, 22.4% to 34.8%; S, 29.6%; CI, 24.3% to 35.5%). Patients reporting delayed presentations were less likely to sustain fractures (D, 11.5%; CI, 8.3% to 15.6%; S, 18.9%; CI, 15.0% to 23.5%; P = 0.019) and injuries of the head/neck (D, 20.0%; CI, 16.5 to 24.1%; S, 26.2%; CI, 21.4% to 31.7%; P = 0.011). DISCUSSION: A substantial proportion of adolescent wrestlers report delayed presentations of injuries. This emphasizes the need for vigilance in detecting subtle signs of injury.

Removing or Only Moving a Barrier? Screening Applications with US Medical Licensing Examination Step 2CK Instead of Step 1 May Benefit Women but Not Underrepresented Minorities in Orthopaedics.

Most orthopaedic surgery program directors report using a minimum score cutoff for the US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 examination when evaluating residency applicants. The transition to a Pass/Fail grading system beginning in the 2022-2023 application cycle will alter applicant evaluation in the interview selection process. The impact of this change, particularly on women and underrepresented minority (URM) applicants, remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate how a shift to screening applications using Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) instead of Step 1 scores could impact selection for residency interviews. Methods: We reviewed all 855 Electronic Residency Application Service applications submitted to the University of Pennsylvania's orthopaedic surgery residency program in the 2020-2021 cycle. Applicant age, sex, medical school of graduation, self-identified race, and permanent zip code were evaluated for association with Step 1 and Step 2CK scores using a 2-sample t test. A multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to understand the predictive value of demographic features and medical school features on Step 1 and 2CK scores. Results: Multivariable linear regression revealed both Step 1 and 2CK scores were lower for applicants of URM status (Step 1: p < 0.001; Step 2CK: p < 0.001) and from international medical schools (p = 0.043; p = 0.006). Step 1 scores but not Step 2CK scores were lower for applicants who were women (p < 0.001; p = 0.730), ≥30 years of age (p < 0.001; p = 0.079), and from medical schools outside the top 25 in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding or US News and World Report (USNWR) ranking (p = 0.001; p = 0.193). Conclusions: Conversion of Step 1 grading to Pass/Fail may reduce barriers for groups with lower average Step 1 scores (URM, female, ≥30 years of age, and from institutions with lower NIH funding or USNWR rankings). However, if Step 2CK scores replace Step 1 as a screening tool, groups with lower Step 2CK scores, notably URM applicants, may not experience this benefit. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The risk of COVID-19 transmission upon return to sport: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate COVID-19 transmission rates in athletes upon return to sport (RTS), as well as the effectiveness of preventive and surveillance measures associated with RTS. METHODS: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify all articles reporting on RTS during COVID-19. Articles were excluded on the basis of the following criteria: (1) non-English text, (2) only abstract available, (3) population not athlete-specific, (4) outcome not RTS-specific, (5) COVID-19 transmission data not quantified, (6) editorial, or (7) review article or meta-analysis. Study characteristics; athlete demographics; COVID-19 preventive, surveillance, and diagnostic measures; COVID-19 transmission outcomes; and RTS recommendations were collected from each included article and analyzed. RESULTS: 10 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising over 97,000 athletes across a wide variety of sports, levels of play, and RTS settings. Of the 10 studies, eight identified low transmission rates and considered RTS to be safe/low risk. Overall, COVID-19 transmission rates were higher in athletes than in contacts, and more prevalent in the greater community than in athletes specifically. The risk of COVID-19 did not appear to be necessarily higher for athletes who played high-contact team sports, shared common facilities, or lived in communities impacted by high transmission rates, provided that rigorous COVID-19 safety and testing protocols were implemented and followed. Mask wearing and physical distancing during active play presented the greatest challenge to athletes. CONCLUSION: Rigorous preventive and surveillance measures can mitigate the risk of COVID-19 transmission in athletes upon RTS. However, the heterogeneity of RTS playing conditions, availability of COVID-19 resources, rise of unforeseen novel variants, and undetermined long-term impact of vaccination on athletes remain a challenge to safe and effective RTS in the era of COVID-19.

Acute Vertebral Fractures in Skiing and Snowboarding: A 20-Year Sex-Specific Analysis of National Injury Data.

Background: The epidemiology of acute vertebral fractures (AVFs) sustained while skiing and snowboarding remains poorly defined in the United States. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that there would be no significant differences across sex and a greater number of AVFs in younger age groups associated with skiing and snowboarding. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: The authors utilized the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System to identify patients who were reported in emergency departments in the United States from 2000 to 2019. All patients were noted to have sustained AVFs during skiing or snowboarding. National estimates and demographic analysis were performed. Results: A total of 466 AVFs were identified, or roughly 23.3 AVFs per year. Compared with women, men accounted for the majority of AVFs sustained in both skiing and snowboarding: 67.8% (95% CI, 62.6%-73.0%) during skiing and 82.1% (95% CI, 76.3%-87.8%) during snowboarding. This represented a significantly larger percentage of AVFs while snowboarding compared with skiing (P = .002). Women accounted for 32.2% (95% CI, 27.0%-37.4%) of AVFs while skiing and 17.9% (95% CI, 12.2%-23.7%) while snowboarding, which indicated a significantly larger percentage of AVFs sustained during skiing compared with snowboarding (P = .002). Snowboarders were more likely than skiers to sustain an AVF in the region of the coccyx (21.5% [95% CI, 14.3%-28.7%] vs 11.5% [95% CI, 3.5%-16.9%], respectively; P = .003) and as a result of a fall at ground level (69.2% [95% CI, 62.1%-76.4%] vs 52.8% [95% CI, 43.2%-62.4%], respectively; P = .009). A significant decrease in the number of snowboarding-related AVFs was identified over the 20-year study period: 899 in 2000-2003 versus 283 in 2016-2019 (P < .01). The change in skiing-related AVFs over the study period was not statistically significant (694 vs 462; P = .5). Conclusion: This national study of AVFs sustained while skiing and snowboarding identified critical sex- and age-specific differences in the population at risk, anatomic location of injury, and mechanism of injury. The national data generated from this study over a 20-year period may be utilized to better inform public health injury awareness and prevention initiatives in the rapidly growing sports of skiing and snowboarding.