Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutr Rev ; 78(1): 65-76, 2020 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407778

RESUMO

Although chemotherapy succeeds in reducing tumor burden, the efficacy is limited due to acquired drug resistance and often irreparable side effects. Studies show that antioxidants may influence the response to chemotherapy and its side effects, although their use remains controversial. The evidence shows that some chemo-drugs induce oxidative stress and lead to normal tissue apoptosis and the entry of cancer cells to a dormant G0 state. Through the suppression of oxidative stress, antioxidants could protect normal cells and bring the tumor out of dormancy so as to expose it to chemotherapies. This review is focused on the redox biology of cancer/normal cells and association of reactive oxygen species with drug resistance, cancer dormancy, and side effects. To this end, evidence from cellular, animal, and clinical studies is provided to better understand the conundrum of dietary antioxidants in cancer chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Dieta , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Animais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo
2.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ ; 44(4): 349-60, 2016 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26898954

RESUMO

Metadiscourse markers (MDMs) are lexical resources that writers employ to organize their discourse and state their stance towards the content or the reader. This study investigated the frequency with which interactive and interactional MDMs were employed in biological research articles (RAs). It also explored the possible relationship between the frequency of these markers and Impact Factor (IF) of journals as an index of quality. Moreover, it aimed at finding out the difference(s) between two groups of authors (Iranian and American) in their use of these markers. Forty biological RAs published in years 2008-2011 written by Iranian non-native authors and published in four ISI journals with different IFs and 40 articles with the same characteristics published by American native authors were selected and examined for the use of the markers. The results showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the frequency of MDMs and IF of the journals. Regarding the frequency of MDMs, it was observed that Iranian authors employed interactive and interactional markers slightly more than their American counterparts. These results may provisionally confirm the considerable role of MDMs in enhancing the coherence and organization of articles for possible publication in high-impact journals. © 2016 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(4):349-360, 2016.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Disseminação de Informação , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Redação , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico) , Estados Unidos
3.
Bioimpacts ; 4(4): 171-4, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25671172

RESUMO

The experience of work in BioImpacts and direct involvement in whole the process of publication inspired us to tackle here the dimensions which we recognize as problematic areas in publication, namely, scientific setbacks, language and technical issues. Authors besides readers as competent future authors are urged not to neglect the significance of well-writing either through considering the language-associated issues or attending the technical matters besides enriching the scientific content. The article offers a scope for the authors to manifest themselves, hence we suggest how to best appear in this play.

4.
Bioimpacts ; 2(1): 61-8, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23678443

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: journal selection for publication purposes is one of the concerns of biomedi-cal researchers. They apply various criteria for choosing appropriate journal. Here, we have tried to collect main criteria biomedical researchers use to select a journal to submit their works. METHODS: we collected these criteria through focus group conversations with researchers during our careers, feedbacks from participants of our scientific writing work-shops and non-systematic review of some related literature. RESULTS: we have presented a summative and informative guidance in the selection of journals for biomedical paper submission and publication. CONCLUSION: Categorized criteria as a mnemonic tool for au-thors may help the authors in journal selection process.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA