RESUMO
Unfortunately, the first author surname was incorrectly published as "Harrison Farber" instead of "Farber" in original publication.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Radiation exposure is a necessary component of minimally invasive spine procedures to augment limited visualization of anatomy. The surgeon's exposure to ionizing radiation is not easily recognizable without a digital dosimeter-something few surgeons have access to. The aim of this study was to identify an easy alternative method that uses the available radiation dose data from the C-arm to accurately predict physician exposure. METHODS: The senior surgeon wore a digital dosimeter during all minimally invasive spine fusion procedures performed over a 12-month period. Patient demographics, procedure information, and radiation exposure throughout the procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-five minimally invasive spine fusions utilizing 330 percutaneous screws were included. Average radiation dose was 0.46 Rad/screw to the patient. Average radiation exposure to the surgeon was 1.06 ± 0.71 µSv/screw, with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.77) to patient dose. The coefficient of determination (r2) was 0.5928, meaning almost two-thirds of the variability in radiation exposure to the surgeon is explained by radiation exposure to the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-operative radiation exposure to the patient, which is easily identifiable as a continuously updated fluoroscopic monitor, is a reliable predictor of radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous screw placement in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery and therefore can provide an estimate of exposure without the use of a dosimeter. With this, a surgeon can better understand the magnitude of their exposure on a case-by-case basis rather than on a quarterly basis, or more likely, not at all. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Assuntos
Fluoroscopia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Doses de Radiação , Dosímetros de Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion are two common procedures for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Controversy remains regarding the superior surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To compare short-term follow-up of laminoplasty to laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review comparing all patients undergoing surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a single surgeon. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients undergoing laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion by a single surgeon over a 5-year period (2007-2011). OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical alignment and range of motion on pre- and post-operative radiographs and clinical outcome measures including Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index (NDI), short form-12 mental (SF-12M) and physical (SF-12P) composite scores and visual analog pain scores for neck (VAS-N) and arm (VAS-A). METHODS: Patients undergoing laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion by a single surgeon were reviewed. Cohorts of 41 laminoplasty patients and 31 laminectomy with fusion patients were selected based on strict criteria. The cohorts were well matched based on pre-operative clinical scores, radiographic measurements, and demographics. The average follow-up was 19.2 months for laminoplasty and 18.2 months for laminectomy with fusion. Evaluated outcomes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), short form-12 (SF-12), visual analog pain scores (VAS), cervical sagittal alignment, cervical range of motion, length of stay, cost and complications. RESULTS: The improvement in JOA, SF-12 and VAS scores was similar in the two cohorts after surgery. There was no significant change in cervical sagittal alignment in either cohort. Range-of-motion decreased in both cohorts, but to a greater degree after laminectomy with fusion. C5 nerve root palsy and infection were the most common complications in both cohorts. Laminectomy with fusion was associated with a higher rate of C5 nerve root palsy and overall complications. The average hospital length of stay and cost were significantly less with laminoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that laminoplasty may be superior to laminectomy with fusion in preserving cervical range of motion, reducing hospital stay and minimizing cost. However, the significance of these differences remains unclear, as laminoplasty clinical outcome scores were generally comparable to laminectomy with fusion.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Laminectomia , Laminoplastia , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilose/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laminectomia/efeitos adversos , Laminectomia/economia , Laminoplastia/efeitos adversos , Laminoplastia/economia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças do Nervo Trigêmeo/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This multicenter study aims to evaluate the utility of triggered electromyography (t-EMG) recorded throughout psoas retraction during lateral transpsoas interbody fusion to predict postoperative changes in motor function. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-three patients undergoing L4-5 minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from 21 sites were enrolled. Intraoperative data collection included initial t-EMG thresholds in response to posterior retractor blade stimulation and subsequent t-EMG threshold values collected every 5 min throughout retraction. Additional data collection included dimensions/duration of retraction as well as pre-and postoperative lower extremity neurologic exams. RESULTS: Prior to expanding the retractor, the lowestt-EMG threshold was identified posterior to the retractor in 94 % of cases. Postoperatively, 13 (4.5 %) patients had a new motor weakness that was consistent with symptomatic neuropraxia (SN) of lumbar plexus nerves on the approach side. There were no significant differences between patients with or without a corresponding postoperative SN with respect to initial posterior blade reading (p = 0.600), or retraction dimensions (p > 0.05). Retraction time was significantly longer in those patients with SN vs. those without (p = 0.031). Stepwise logistic regression showed a significant positive relationship between the presence of new postoperative SN and total retraction time (p < 0.001), as well as change in t-EMG thresholds over time (p < 0.001), although false positive rates (increased threshold in patients with no new SN) remained high regardless of the absolute increase in threshold used to define an alarm criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged retraction time and coincident increases in t-EMG thresholds are predictors of declining nerve integrity. Increasing t-EMG thresholds, while predictive of injury, were also observed in a large number of patients without iatrogenic injury, with a greater predictive value in cases with extended duration. In addition to a careful approach with minimal muscle retraction and consistent lumbar plexus directional retraction, the incidence of postoperative motor neuropraxia may be reduced by limiting retraction time and utilizing t-EMG throughout retraction, while understanding that the specificity of this monitoring technique is low during initial retraction and increases with longer retraction duration.
Assuntos
Eletromiografia/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Plexo Lombossacral/lesões , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/diagnóstico , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, closed cervical fractures (CCFs) may present in orthopedic clinical settings despite previous workup. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics associated with missed CCF. METHODS: The study was a retrospective database exploration of a cohort of subjects within a department of surgery with cervical pain. The sample consisted of 162 patients seen for a surgical consult for a number of cervical conditions. The examination time frame represented a clinical examination and imaging confirmation of diagnosis after an original initial visit by another provider. Descriptive and diagnostic accuracy values including sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-) were calculated for each targeted variable. Clustered analyses were calculated using the patient history and situational characteristics. RESULTS: Eleven patients in the sample were diagnosed with CCF (6.7%). Six variables were significantly associated with a missed CCF. Using these six variables, it was found that failure to exhibit a condition of 2 of the 6 variables (1 or fewer) was the strongest in ruling out the condition (LR- = 0.0; post-test probability with a negative finding = 0%), whereas a finding of 4 of 6 was the most diagnostic for ruling in the condition (LR+ = 32; post-test probability with a positive finding = 70%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this sample suggest that select patient history or situational factors are still useful even after initial examination and clinicians must stay vigilant because CCFs may be missed during emergent care screens.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Fraturas Fechadas/diagnóstico , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Vértebras Cervicais/patologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Emprego , Feminino , Fraturas Fechadas/complicações , Fraturas Fechadas/patologia , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Masculino , Estado Civil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/diagnóstico , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Cervicalgia/patologia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The use of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and other lateral access surgery is rapidly increasing in popularity. However, limited data is available regarding its use in scoliosis surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of adults with degenerative lumbar scoliosis treated with XLIF. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with adult degenerative scoliosis treated by a single surgeon at a major academic institution were followed for an average of 14.3 months. Interbody fusion was completed using the XLIF technique with supplemental posterior instrumentation. Validated clinical outcome scores were obtained on patients preoperatively and at most recent follow-up. Complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study group demonstrated improvement in multiple clinical outcome scores. Oswestry Disability Index scores improved from 24.8 to 19.0 (P < 0.001). Short Form-12 scores improved, although the change was not significant. Visual analog scores for back pain decreased from 6.8 to 4.6 (P < 0.001) while scores for leg pain decreased from 5.4 to 2.8 (P < 0.001). A total of six minor complications (20%) were recorded, and two patients (6.7%) required additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the significant improvement in validated clinical outcome scores, XLIF is effective in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laminectomia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Radiografia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Escoliose/patologia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Prior reports document macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration with proinflammatory cytokine expression in pathologic intervertebral disc (IVD) tissues. Nevertheless, the role of the Th17 lymphocyte lineage in mediating disc disease remains uninvestigated. We undertook this study to evaluate the immunophenotype of pathologic IVD specimens, including interleukin-17 (IL-17) expression, from surgically obtained IVD tissue and from nondegenerated autopsy control tissue. METHODS: Surgical IVD tissues were procured from patients with degenerative disc disease (n = 25) or herniated IVDs (n = 12); nondegenerated autopsy control tissue was also obtained (n = 8) from the anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus regions. Immunohistochemistry was performed for cell surface antigens (CD68 for macrophages, CD4 for lymphocytes) and various cytokines, with differences in cellularity and target immunoreactivity scores analyzed between surgical tissue groups and between autopsy control tissue regions. RESULTS: Immunoreactivity for IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, and interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) was modest in surgical IVD tissue, although expression was higher in herniated IVD samples and virtually nonexistent in control samples. The Th17 lymphocyte product IL-17 was present in >70% of surgical tissue fields, and among control samples was detected rarely in anulus fibrosus regions and modestly in nucleus pulposus regions. Macrophages were prevalent in surgical tissues, particularly herniated IVD samples, and lymphocytes were expectedly scarce. Control tissue revealed lesser infiltration by macrophages and a near absence of lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: Greater IFNgamma positivity, macrophage presence, and cellularity in herniated IVDs suggests a pattern of Th1 lymphocyte activation in this pathology. Remarkable pathologic IVD tissue expression of IL-17 is a novel finding that contrasts markedly with low levels of IL-17 in autopsy control tissue. These findings suggest involvement of Th17 lymphocytes in the pathomechanism of disc degeneration.
Assuntos
Interleucina-17/metabolismo , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/patologia , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/patologia , Linfócitos T Auxiliares-Indutores/patologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/imunologia , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/metabolismo , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/imunologia , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/metabolismo , Ativação Linfocitária , Subpopulações de Linfócitos , Macrófagos/imunologia , Macrófagos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfócitos T Auxiliares-Indutores/imunologia , Linfócitos T Auxiliares-Indutores/metabolismoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective collected data on 22 patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial clinical experience and outcomes with the extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) approach for spinal diseases requiring access to the thoracic cavity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the thoracic spine have traditionally consisted of thoracoscopic and mini-open thoracotomy techniques. We present our initial experience with employing the XLIF technique to treat thoracic spine diseases. METHODS: Clinical, radiographic, operative, postoperative, and functional outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (15 females, 7 males, average age 64.6 y) with isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases were treated between 2005 and 2009. The indications for surgery included degenerative scoliosis (11), pathological fractures from tumors (2), adjacent level disease from prior fusions (5), thoracic disc herniations (3), and discitis/osteomyelitis (1). A total of 47 levels were treated. In the subset of patients treated for degenerative scoliosis, the mean preoperative and postoperative coronal Cobb angles were 22 and 14, respectively. The mean preoperative and postoperative sagittal angles were 39 and 44, respectively. The average estimated blood loss and length of stay were 227.5 mL and 4.8 d, respectively. Three complications consisting of wound infection, subsidence, and adjacent level disease requiring additional procedures were encountered. There were no neural, vascular, visceral injuries, or death. At a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 3-50), we observed a 95.5% substantial clinical benefit. All patients who had reached a minimum of 6 months (95.5%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The XLIF technique can be expanded to treat diseases in the thoracic spine. Although the magnitude of deformity correction achieved is less than that of the traditional open approaches, the lesser invasiveness of this technique may be tolerable for the elderly and in patients with significant medical comorbidities.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The rate of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (ASD) after newer minimally invasive techniques, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), is not known. This study aimed to assess the incidence of surgically significant ASD in adult patients who have undergone index LLIF and to identify any predictive factors. METHODS: Patients who underwent index LLIF with or without additional posterior pedicle screw fixation between 2010 and 2012 and received a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively included. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded, as well as radiographic data and immediate perioperative complications. The primary endpoint was revision surgery at the level above or below the previous construct, from which a survivorship model of patients with surgically significant symptomatic ASD was created. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with a total of 163 interbody levels were included in this analysis. In total, 17 (25.4%) patients developed surgically significant ASD and required additional surgery, with a mean ± SD time to revision of 3.59 ± 2.55 years. The mean annual rate of surgically significant ASD was 3.49% over 7.27 years, which was the average follow-up. One-third of patients developed significant disease within 2 years of index surgery, and 1 patient required surgery at the adjacent level within 1 year. Constructs spanning 3 or fewer interbody levels were significantly associated with increased risk of surgically significant ASD; however, instrument termination at the thoracolumbar junction did not increase this risk. Surgically significant ASD was not impacted by preoperative disc height, foraminal area at the adjacent levels, or changes in global or segmental lumbar lordosis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of surgically significant ASD after LLIF was similar to the previously reported rates of other minimally invasive spine procedures. Patients with shorter constructs had higher rates of subsequent ASD.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of one surgeon's practice. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the perioperative morbidity of 43 patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion to differentiate risks between primary and revision surgery candidates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive approaches to the lumbar spine have rapidly evolved and the technical feasibility and safety of minimally invasive interbody fusion is well established. Revision surgery is technically more challenging and may cause avoidance of such approaches because of altered anatomy and absent bony landmarks. Description of minimally invasive surgery approaches among revision patients and the feasibility of such techniques demands clarification. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) and posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) were reviewed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, and complication rates were compared between primary and revision patients using Student t tests. RESULTS: Seventeen revision surgery cases (40%) were compared with 26 primary surgeries (60%) to elucidate differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications. Demographic variables were similar in both groups. Estimated blood loss trended higher among the PLIF group and among revision cases, though no statistical significance was observed. A higher rate of complications, most notably incidental durotomy, was observed among revision cases in both PLIF and TLIF patients. One patient undergoing primary surgery had an intraoperative pedicle fracture, and 1 patient undergoing revision surgery had an asymptomatic screw malposition. No patients had a major complication, nerve injury, infection, or conversion to an open procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion by revision surgery is technically feasible and is not associated with more blood loss or neurologic morbidity. However, revision surgery has a higher minor perioperative complication rate, particularly of incidental durotomy. These outcomes demand significant experience before attempting minimally invasive revision surgery in the lumbar spine.
Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/mortalidade , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/mortalidade , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Dura-Máter/lesões , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: This is a meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of neurological outcomes from all available spinal epidural abscess (SEA) literature published between 1980 and 2016. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current literature on SEAs lacks large-scale data characterizing prognostic factors and surgical indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed was queried for studies reporting neurological outcomes from patients undergoing conservative or surgical management for spontaneous SEA. Inclusion criteria included outcomes data measured ≥6 months after presentation, ≥10 human subjects, and diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging or Computed tomography-myelogram. Where available, demographic data, abscess location, comorbidities, pretreatment neurological deficits, treatment methods, bacterial speciation, and complications were extracted from each study. Potential outcome predictors represented by continuous variables were compared using student t test and categorical variables were compared using the Pearson χ test. Variables identified as potentially associated with outcome (P≤0.05) were subjected to meta-analysis using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel testing to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In total, 808 patients were analyzed from 20 studies that met inclusion criteria. 456 (56.3%) patients were treated with surgery and antibiotics, and 353 (43.7%) patients were managed with antibiotics alone. Neither surgical intervention (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.40-2.59), lumbosacral location (OR=1.51, 95% CI=0.23-9.79), nor neurological deficit on presentation (OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.40-1.92) were significantly associated with good (stable or improved) or bad (worsened) neurological outcome, whereas delayed surgery was significantly associated with bad outcome (OR=0.01, 95% CI=0.02-0.62) and cervicothoracic location approached significance for predicting bad outcome (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.15-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Current literature does not definitively support or oppose surgical intervention in all SEA cases. Therefore, until better evidence exists, the decision to operate must be made on an individual case-by-case basis with the goals of preventing neurological decline, obtaining source control after failed conservative treatment, or restoring spinal stability.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Abscesso Epidural/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECT: Cervical spine fusion is performed for various indications in patient populations ranging from young and healthy to aged and frail. Whereas disease pathoanatomy dictates the surgical approach, preoperative neurological status does not necessarily implicate a specific technique. Although one expects anterior decompression to be performed over fewer segments in healthier patients who experience fewer complications and faster recovery, the impact of pre-operative myelopathy on perioperative complications remains unclear. No large-scale study has evaluated rates of common complications for cervical fusion or their association with surgical approach and neurological status. METHODS: Data for 96,773 patients who underwent cervical fusion for degenerative disease between 1988 and 2003 were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (anterior versus posterior) and preoperative neurological status (myelopathic versus nonmyelopathic). Multivariate regression was used to evaluate group effects on selected postoperative complications, length of stay, and disposition at the time of hospital discharge. Although this technique can control for the observed covariates, the absence of key information such as the number of fused levels precludes statistical comparison between patients who underwent anterior or posterior approaches. RESULTS: In this study the authors confirmed that preoperative neurological status impacts perioperative morbidity. For example, patients who were nonmyelopathic and underwent an anterior approach were 7 years younger than the rest of the cohort, and they had a mortality rate of 0.05%. Transfusion was required in 0.34%, and venous thromboembolism occurred in 0.04%. Conversely, these rates were > 13-fold higher in patients with myelopathy who underwent a posterior approach. Furthermore, independent of approach, preoperative myelopathy is highly prognostic of death, pneumonia, transfusion, infection, length of stay, and posthospital disposition. These outcomes at least doubled, with some increasing > 10-fold. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study clarifies the frequency and associations of inpatient complications encountered when treating cervical spine disease. Whereas immediate complications due to anterior approaches are limited, patients with myelopathy who undergo a posterior approach have a more sobering outlook. This study shows that clinical myelopathy augments rates of complication during cervical fusion, regardless of the approach. The exclusion of pathoanatomical data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, of key importance in guiding the surgical approach, prevents any conclusions being drawn about the merits and disadvantages of anterior versus posterior surgery.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/complicações , Fusão Vertebral , Fatores Etários , Transfusão de Sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções/etiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Análise de Regressão , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: History of previous cervical spine surgery is a frequently cited cause of worse outcomes after cervical spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine any differences in clinical outcomes after cervical spine surgery between patients with and without a history of previous cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A multicenter prospective database was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with cervical spondylosis undergoing surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with (W) or without (WO) previous history of cervical spine surgery. Statistical analyses of Health-Related Quality of Life scores were analyzed with statistical software to fit linear mixed models for continuous longitudinal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1286 patients (377 W, 909 WO) met criteria for inclusion. Overall, patients in both groups experienced an improvement in their Health-Related Quality of Life scores. However, patients in the W group had significantly decreased improvement compared with WO patients in the Neck Disability Index score and the following SF-36 domain scores: Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Health Transition, and Physical Component Summary at all time points (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the W and WO groups in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, or complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of previous cervical spine surgery had inferior improvement in quality of life outcome scores. Patients with a history of previous surgical intervention who elect to undergo subsequent surgeries should be appropriately counseled about expected results.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with and without intrawound vancomycin application controlling for confounding factors associated with higher SSI after elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI is a morbid and expensive complication associated with spine surgery. The application of intrawound vancomycin is rapidly emerging as a solution to reduce SSI following spine surgery. The impact of intrawound vancomycin has not been systematically studied in a well-designed multicenter study. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery over a period of 4 years at seven spine surgery centers across the United States were included in the study. Patients were dichotomized on the basis of whether intrawound vancomycin was applied. Outcomes were occurrence of SSI within postoperative 30 days and SSI that required return to the operating room (OR). Multivariable random-effect log-binomial regression analyses were conducted to determine the relative risk of having an SSI and an SSI with return to OR. RESULTS: .: A total of 2056 patients were included in the analysis. Intrawound vancomycin was utilized in 47% (nâ=â966) of patients. The prevalence of SSI was higher in patients with no vancomycin use (5.1%) than those with use of intrawound vancomycin (2.2%). The risk of SSI was higher in patients in whom intrawound vancomycin was not used (relative risk (RR) -2.5, Pâ<â0.001), increased number of levels exposed (RR -1.1, Pâ=â0.01), and those admitted postoperatively to intensive care unit (ICU) (RR -2.1, Pâ=â0.005). Patients in whom intrawound vancomycin was not used (RR -5.9, Pâ<â0.001), increased number of levels were exposed (RR-1.1, Pâ=â0.001), and postoperative ICU admission (RR -3.3, Pâ<â0.001) were significant risk factors for SSI requiring a return to the OR. CONCLUSION: The intrawound application of vancomycin after posterior approach spine surgery was associated with a reduced risk of SSI and return to OR associated with SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Vancomicina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) largely provides successful indirect decompression, some patients have recurrent same-level pain and functional disability. Identifying risk factors for this failure would facilitate better patient selection and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative radiographic risk factors for failure of XLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing XLIF were prospectively enrolled by 3 surgeons at 3 separate institutions. Radiographic variables measured included (1) anterior and posterior disc height, (2) foramen height and area, (3) central canal diameter, (4) central canal area, (5) right and left subarticular diameters, (6) facet arthropathy grade, and (7) presence of bony lateral recess stenosis. Patients failed indirect decompression if Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores did not improve by 20 points or revision surgery was required within 6 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify radiographic predictors of failure of indirect decompression. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients (age 65.6 ± 10.5 years; 14 male) involving 101 spinal levels included in this study, 13 (29%) failed indirect decompression. From univariate analysis, these patients had significantly smaller central canal diameter, foraminal height, and disc height (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis of these parameters and those trending toward significance, bony lateral recess stenosis was the only significant independent predictor for failure of indirect decompression (coefficient, 0.55 [0.24-0.85]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bony lateral recess stenosis is an independent predictor for failure to achieve adequate spinal decompression via XLIF and thus may benefit from undergoing direct decompression.
Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Idoso , Descompressão Cirúrgica/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: It is well-known that radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine procedures can be substantial. Less interest has focused on setup radiation exposure before incision, including preoperative images used for surgical approach. The present study seeks to better quantify the significance of setup radiation in the total radiation exposure of minimally invasive spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiographic localization is necessary in minimally invasive spine procedures to visualize anatomy, but increased radiation exposure is associated with health risks. Preoperative imaging for anatomical localization has not been previously analyzed as an appreciable source of radiation. METHODS: From an institutional review board-approved database of more than 1100 procedures, the minimally invasive spine cases with recorded set-up radiation were extracted. The total radiation, set-up radiation, and procedure type data were evaluated. Statistics were generated using a chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Set-up and total radiation data were collected for 270 spine surgeries performed by four surgeons at two locations. There were 30 thoracic and 240 thoracolumbar/lumbar cases; 78 anterior and 192 posterior cases. Average total radiation (set-up and intraoperative) was 8.04 rad, and average setup radiation was 1.90 rad (28%, std 2.97 rad) across all cases. On average for the thoracolumbar/lumbar cases, set-up radiation accounted for almost 25% of total radiation with 1.76 rad from setup out of 8.16 rad total. Thoracic-only cases often necessitated even more images for localization, generating an average set-up/total percentage of 52%. Across all procedures, set-up radiation significantly increased the total radiation exposure because it accounted for more than 25% of the total procedure. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure during preoperative localization can be substantial. Operating room personnel should recognize the high percentage of radiation that occurs during set-up, and merit should be given to techniques and technologies that can limit unnecessary radiation exposure during this portion of the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Assuntos
Fluoroscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Coluna Vertebral , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Fluoroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) via the retroperitoneal transpsoas approach is a technically demanding procedure with a multitude of potential complications. A relatively unknown complication is the contralateral psoas hematoma. The authors speculate that injury occurs from segmental vessel injury at the time of contralateral annulus release; however, this is not fully understood. In this multicenter retrospective review, the authors report the incidence of this contralateral complication and its neurological sequelae. METHODS This study was a retrospective chart review of all minimally invasive LLIF performed at participating institutions from 2008 to 2014. Exclusion criteria included an underlying diagnosis of trauma or neoplasia as well as lateral corpectomies or anterior column releases. Single-level, multilevel, and stand-alone constructs were included. All patients underwent preoperative MRI. Follow-up was at least 12 months. All complications and clinical outcomes were self-reported by each surgeon. RESULTS There were 3950 lumbar interbody cages placed via the retroperitoneal transpsoas approach, with 7 cases (0.18% incidence) of symptomatic contralateral psoas hematoma, 3 of which required reoperation for hematoma evacuation. Neurological outcome did not improve after reoperation. Reoperation occurred an average of 1 month after the initial operation due to a delay in diagnosis. In 1 case, segmental artery injury was confirmed at the time of surgery; in the others, segmental vessel injury was suspected, although it could not be confirmed. Neurological deficits persisted in 3 patients while the others remained neurologically intact. Two patients were receiving antiplatelet therapy prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The contralateral psoas hematoma is a rare complication suspected to occur from segmental vessel injury during contralateral annulus release. Detailed review of preoperative imaging for aberrant vessel anatomy may prevent injury and subsequent neurological deficit.
Assuntos
Hematoma/etiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Hematoma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Músculos Psoas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Horner's syndrome is a known complication of anterior cervical spinal surgery, but it is rarely encountered in clinical practice. To better understand the incidence, risks, and neurologic outcomes associated with Horner's syndrome, a multicenter study was performed to review a large collective experience with this rare complication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter case series study involving 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network. Medical records for 17 625 patients who received subaxial cervical spine surgery from 2005 to 2011 were reviewed to identify occurrence of 21 predefined treatment complications. Descriptive statistics were provided for baseline patient characteristics. Paired t test was used to analyze changes in clinical outcomes at follow-up compared to preoperative status. RESULTS: In total, 8887 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery at the participating institutions were screened. Postoperative Horner's syndrome was identified in 5 (0.06%) patients. All patients experienced the complication following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The sympathetic trunk appeared to be more vulnerable when operating on midcervical levels (C5, C6), and most patients experienced at least a partial recovery without further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This collective experience suggests that Horner's syndrome is an exceedingly rare complication following anterior cervical spine surgery. Injury to the sympathetic trunk may be limited by maintaining a midline surgical trajectory when possible, and performing careful dissection and retraction of the longus colli muscle when lateral exposure is necessary, especially at caudal cervical levels.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective case series was compiled involving 21 medical institutions. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent cervical spine surgery between 2005 and 2011 and who sustained a vertebral artery injury (VAI). OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency, risk factors, outcomes, and management goals of VAI in patients who have undergone cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients were evaluated on the basis of condition-specific functional status using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, the Nurick scale, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: VAIs were identified in a total of 14 of 16 582 patients screened (8.4 per 10 000). The mean age of patients with VAI was 59 years (±10) with a female predominance (78.6%). Patient diagnoses included myelopathy, radiculopathy, cervical instability, and metastatic disease. VAI was associated with substantial blood loss (770 mL), although only 3 cases required transfusion. Of the 14 cases, 7 occurred with an anterior-only approach, 3 cases with posterior-only approach, and 4 during circumferential approach. Fifty percent of cases of VAI with available preoperative imaging revealed anomalous vessel anatomy during postoperative review. Average length of hospital stay was 10 days (±8). Notably, 13 of the 14 (92.86%) cases resolved without residual deficits. Compared to preoperative baseline NDI, Nurick, mJOA, and SF-36 scores for these patients, there were no observed changes after surgery (P = .20-.94). CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery injuries are potentially catastrophic complications that can be sustained from anterior or posterior cervical spine approaches. The data from this study suggest that with proper steps to ensure hemostasis, patients recover function at a high rate and do not exhibit residual deficits.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A multicentered retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and circumstances surrounding the development of a symptomatic postoperative epidural hematoma in the cervical spine. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, at 23 institutions were reviewed, and all patients who developed an epidural hematoma were identified. RESULTS: A total of 16 582 cervical spine surgeries were identified, and 15 patients developed a postoperative epidural hematoma, for a total incidence of 0.090%. Substantial variation between institutions was noted, with 11 sites reporting no epidural hematomas, and 1 site reporting an incidence of 0.76%. All patients initially presented with a neurologic deficit. Nine patients had complete resolution of the neurologic deficit after hematoma evacuation; however 2 of the 3 patients (66%) who had a delay in the diagnosis of the epidural hematoma had residual neurologic deficits compared to only 4 of the 12 patients (33%) who had no delay in the diagnosis or treatment (P = .53). Additionally, the patients who experienced a postoperative epidural hematoma did not experience any significant improvement in health-related quality-of-life metrics as a result of the index procedure at final follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: This is the largest series to date to analyze the incidence of an epidural hematoma following cervical spine surgery, and this study suggest that an epidural hematoma occurs in approximately 1 out of 1000 cervical spine surgeries. Prompt diagnosis and treatment may improve the chance of making a complete neurologic recovery, but patients who develop this complication do not show improvements in the health-related quality-of-life measurements.