Does delay from injury to surgery increase the risk of dislocation of a hip hemiarthroplasty?

Dislocation of a hip hemiarthroplasty used to treat a hip fracture is a serious complication. The aim of this study was to identify whether a delay in the time from fracture to surgery causes an increase in the rate of post-operative hip dislocation. From a single center, data from intracapsular neck of femur patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty was collected between October 1986 to August 2021. The time from both fall to surgery and admission to surgery was recorded. Surviving patients were followed up for one year. The overall dislocation rate was 51 out of 4155 patients (1.2%). The 3019 patients who had surgery within two days of the injury had a lowest dislocation rate (29 dislocations, 0.96%). For the 197 patients with no history of a fall, there were 5 (2.5%) dislocations (p=0.036, 95% confidence interval of difference 0.15 to 0.97 for comparison with surgery within two days). For the 399 patients with a delay of more than four days from injury till surgery, there were nine dislocations (2.3%) (p=0.045, 95% confidence intervals of difference 0.20 to 0.89 for comparison with surgery within two days). This study demonstrates an increase in the risk of dislocation for those patients with no history of a fall and those with a delay of more than four days from injury to surgery.

E-Handover in Surgery Improves Clinical Efficiency and Adherence to COVID-19 Infection Control Measures.

Introduction The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted all aspects of clinical practice. A district general hospital's surgical department identified that ward rounds based on a paper-based handover system did not adhere to good COVID-19 pandemic infection control measures, including social distancing, reduction of footfall, and reducing contact events during documentation. Surgical E-Handover was introduced as a quality improvement project focussing on increasing efficiency and improving patient safety and compliance with COVID-19 social distancing measures. Other objectives were to reduce the risk of information governance breaches. During the COVID pandemic, there was a significant investment in digital technology, which supported rapid advancement in the use of electronic healthcare solutions to deliver new ways of working. We used the opportunity of the emergency situation to disrupt existing work patterns and introduce surgical E-Handover. Methods A quality improvement team of stakeholders was assembled, and a project to introduce E-Handover was carried out using the trust quality improvement methodology aligned to the Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Questionnaires were sent out pre- and post-implementation to evaluate the impact of using E-Handover during ward rounds. Results The efficiency of ward rounds was improved and improving compliance with COVID 19 social distancing measures was highly successful. These outcomes were achieved by reducing footfall during ward rounds, as key clinical information was available at the bedside (p<0.001). Doctors spent less time in crowded clinical multi-disciplinary team (MDT) rooms, and the integrated paper healthcare records were not accessed by multiple staff members simultaneously. The implementation of the E-Handover improved the safety and efficiency of the surgical department, particularly with reference to potential information governance breaches (p<0.001). Conclusion Surgical E-Handover, as compared to a printed patient list, significantly improved clinical efficiency and adherence to COVID-19 social distancing measures. E-Handover should be routinely used in surgical ward rounds.

Informed Consent for Surgery at Resumption of Elective Activity After the First Wave of COVID-19.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the dynamics of healthcare, and the elective surgical consent process has also evolved. The Royal College of Surgeons of England published guidance on consent during COVID-19. Through this study, we aimed to assess our local consent adherence to these guidelines on the resumption of elective activity after the first wave of COVID-19. Methods This prospective review of consecutive elective surgical consent forms was conducted from 20 July 2020 to 16 August 2020 at the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, England. The primary outcome was evidence of COVID-19 risk documentation on the consent forms. Results A total of 116 patients' consent forms were reviewed. Most patients were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2 (n=70; 60.34%). Only 25 consent forms (21.55%) had COVID -19 and its associated risks documented, with registrars being the most compliant (19/46; 41.3%) followed by consultants (6/51; 11.7%). With regards to the surgical sub-specialities, general surgery, orthopaedics and ENT had the highest compliance with the guidance. Conclusions As the elective activity resumes, peri-operative risks of COVID-19 should be weighted in during the informed consent process, as mentioned in the latest international guidelines on consent to avoid litigation and negligence claims.