Primary radiotherapy and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction for patients with breast cancer (PRADA): a multicentre, prospective, non-randomised, feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy before mastectomy and autologous free-flap breast reconstruction can avoid adverse radiation effects on healthy donor tissues and delays to adjuvant radiotherapy. However, evidence for this treatment sequence is sparse. We aimed to explore the feasibility of preoperative radiotherapy followed by skin-sparing mastectomy and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in patients with breast cancer requiring mastectomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-randomised, feasibility study at two National Health Service trusts in the UK. Eligible patients were women aged older than 18 years with a laboratory diagnosis of primary breast cancer requiring mastectomy and post-mastectomy radiotherapy, who were suitable for DIEP flap reconstruction. Preoperative radiotherapy started 3-4 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and was delivered to the breast, plus regional nodes as required, at 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks) or 42·72 Gy in 16 fractions (over 3·2 weeks). Adverse skin radiation toxicity was assessed preoperatively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grading system. Skin-sparing mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction were planned for 2-6 weeks after completion of preoperative radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of open breast wounds greater than 1 cm width requiring a dressing at 4 weeks after surgery, assessed in all participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02771938, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Jan 25, 2016, and Dec 11, 2017, 33 patients were enrolled. At 4 weeks after surgery, four (12·1%, 95% CI 3·4-28·2) of 33 patients had an open breast wound greater than 1 cm. One (3%) patient had confluent moist desquamation (grade 3). There were no serious treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Preoperative radiotherapy followed by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction is feasible and technically safe, with rates of breast open wounds similar to those reported with post-mastectomy radiotherapy. A randomised trial comparing preoperative radiotherapy with post-mastectomy radiotherapy is required to precisely determine and compare surgical, oncological, and breast reconstruction outcomes, including quality of life. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research.

Preoperative volume estimation in transverse upper gracilis flap surgery: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap provides a good alternative to the gold standard DIEP in breast reconstruction. However, flap volume estimates are subjective, making preoperative planning potentially challenging. STUDY AIM: To derive a reliable, accurate, and reproducible mathematical algorithm for the preoperative calculation of TUG flap volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients with 30 TUG flaps were prospectively included. On the assumption that the TUG flap resembles two isosceles prisms, the formula of the volume of a prism was used to calculate their preoperative flap weights. These were then intraoperatively compared to the actual flap weights. A regression equation was calculated from the correlation analysis of 10 random flaps. This was then applied to the remaining 20 flaps to assess for improved reliability and weight prediction accuracy. RESULTS: The prism volume equation used to clinically calculate flap volumes was: Geometric flap weight = (h1bT)/2+ (h2bT)/2, (h = height, b = base, T = flap thickness); all in centimetres. Geometric and actual flap weights were found to be significantly correlated (r2 = 0.977) generating the following regression formula: predicted TUG weight = 0.924 × geometric weight + 26.601. When this was applied to the remaining 20 flaps, no significant difference was found (p = 0.625) between predicted and actual flap weights, demonstrating an increased accuracy of predicting flap volume. CONCLUSION: The proposed formula provides the clinician with a more accurate and reliable estimation of available TUG flap volume and may potentially aid with preoperative planning and patient consultations.

A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of aesthetics after breast reconstruction is challenging. In the absence of an objective measurement, panel assessment is widely adopted. Heterogeneity of scales and poor internal consistency make comparison difficult. Development and validation of an expert panel scale using a Delphi consensus process is described. It was designed specifically for use as the gold standard for development of an objective evaluation tool using 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging (3D-SI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 items relating to aesthetic assessment were identified for consideration in the Delphi consensus process. Items were selected for inclusion in the definitive panel scale by iterative rounds of voting according to importance, consensus discussion, and a final vote. The Delphi-derived scale was tested on a clinical research series for intra- and inter-panellist, and intra-panel reliability, and correlation with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). RESULTS: 61 surgeons participated in the Delphi process. Oncoplastic and plastic surgeons were represented. The Delphi-derived scale included symmetry, volume, shape, position of breast mound, nipple position, and a global score. Intra-panellist reliability ranged from poor to almost perfect (wκ<0to0.86), inter-rater reliability was fair (ICC range 0.4-0.5) for individual items and good (ICC0.6) for the global score, intra-panel reliability was moderate to substantial (wκ0.4-0.7), and correlation with PROMs was moderate (r = 0.5p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi-derived panel evaluation is at least as good as other scales in the literature and has been developed specifically to provide expert evaluation of aesthetics after breast reconstruction. The logistical constraints of panel assessment remain, reinforcing the need to develop an objective evaluation method.

Comparison of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Flap Reconstruction in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction in women who have undergone deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction without postmastectomy radiotherapy were the control group. METHODS: Participants who had undergone DIEP flap reconstruction between September 1, 2009, and September 1, 2014, were recruited, answered the BREAST-Q, and underwent three-dimensional surface-imaging. A panel assessed the aesthetic outcome by reviewing these images. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven women participated. Eighty women (48 percent) underwent immediate DIEP flap reconstruction and no postmastectomy radiotherapy; 28 (17 percent) underwent immediate DIEP flap reconstruction with postmastectomy radiotherapy; 38 (23 percent) underwent simple mastectomy, postmastectomy radiotherapy, and DIEP flap reconstruction; and 21 (13 percent) underwent mastectomy with temporizing implant, postmastectomy radiotherapy, and DIEP flap reconstruction. Median satisfaction scores were significantly different among the groups (p < 0.05). Post hoc comparison demonstrated that women who had an immediate DIEP flap reconstruction were significantly less satisfied if they had postmastectomy radiotherapy. In women requiring radiotherapy, those undergoing delayed reconstruction after a simple mastectomy were most satisfied, but there was no significant difference between the immediate DIEP flap and temporizing implant groups. Median panel scores differed among groups, being significantly higher if the immediate reconstruction was not subjected to radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in panel assessment among the three groups of women who had received radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who avoid having their immediate DIEP flap reconstruction irradiated are more satisfied and have better aesthetic outcome than those who undergo postmastectomy radiotherapy. In women requiring radiotherapy and who wish to have an immediate or "delayed-immediate" reconstruction, there were no significant differences in panel or patient satisfaction. Therefore, immediate DIEP flap reconstruction or mastectomy with temporizing implant then DIEP flap surgery are acceptable treatment pathways in the context of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

A single-center experience of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: long-term clinical, hematological and hemodynamic results.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Sorin Bicarbon (SB) bileaflet valve, available since 1990, has a good clinical safety profile. The study aim was to assess the long-term clinical results following implantation, plus hemodynamic and hematological aspects of the valve. METHODS: A total of 195 SB prostheses (100 aortic, 67 mitral, 14 double valve replacements) was implanted in 181 patients (108 males, 73 females) since 1991. RESULTS: Mean age at implantation was 60.5 +/- 10.8 years. Actuarial analysis at 9.0 years showed an overall survival of 63.9 +/- 5.5%; 28.2% of deaths were early (n = 11), and 71.8% late (n = 28). Freedom from thrombosis was 99.4 +/- 0.6% (one early event, successfully reoperated on), and from embolic events was 86.3 +/- 4.7%. Freedom from endocarditis and hemorrhagic complications were respectively 98.1 +/- 1.1% and 98.6 +/- 0.9%. No occurrence of hemolysis was reported. Freedom from non-structural valve dysfunction was 98.7 +/- 0.9%, and from reoperation was 96.1 +/- 1.6%. Hemodynamic evaluation by echocardiography and hematological testing was performed at 7.0 +/- 1.3 years (range 5-9 years) in a subset of 31 patients (20 males, 11 females). Mean valve size was 23.9 mm for aortic mitral. Echocardiography showed that aortic valves had a mean effective orifice area (EOA) of 2.26 +/- 1.28 cm2, with peak and mean pressure gradients of 23.6 +/- 14.6 and 12.9 +/- 8.1 mmHg, respectively. The mean EOA of mitral valve prostheses was 2.67 +/- 0.66 cm2, with peak and mean pressure gradients of 12.2 +/- 4.5 and 3.8 +/- 1.6 mmHg, respectively. Overall mean hemoglobin was 13.4 +/- 1.35 g/dl, and serum lactate dehydrogenase 630 +/- 13 IU/l. Serum haptoglobin was detectable in one patient only, and the mean reticulocyte count was 1.24 +/- 0.51%. CONCLUSION: In the present authors' experience, the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis has low complication rates and maintains an excellent hemodynamic function over time. Hemolytic potential is insignificant with this valve.

Cartilage recycling in rhinoplasty: polydioxanone foil as an absorbable biomechanical scaffold.

BACKGROUND: Primary and secondary rhinoplasty often requires multiple cartilage grafts. Polydioxanone foil may be used as a temporary biomechanical scaffold on which routinely discarded cartilage fragments can be assembled to make maximal use of harvested material. METHODS: The authors performed an outcome analysis of 58 primary and secondary rhinoplasties in which polydioxanone foil was used in combination with autologous cartilage for aesthetic and valvular reconstruction of the nose. Graft performance, complications, and technical points are reported. RESULTS: The temporary scaffold (polydioxanone foil) was used most often to construct columellar struts, septal extension grafts, and alar battens. Other uses included revision septoplasty and upper lateral replacement grafts. Two minor complications occurred: one infection and one partial extrusion. The long-term stability of the nose following this technique was found to be satisfactory (mean follow-up, 18 months), for both structural and aesthetic purposes. CONCLUSIONS: This technique is both simple and effective. By making maximal use of otherwise discarded cartilage fragments, it protects other graft harvest sites and decreases the incidence of the "graft-depleted" patient.

Purinergic receptor expression in the regeneration epidermis in a rat model of normal and delayed wound healing.

This study investigated changes in the protein expression of purinergic receptors in the regenerating rat epidermis during normal wound healing, in denervated wounds, and in denervated wounds treated with nerve growth factor (NGF), where wound healing rates are normalized. Excisional wounds were placed within denervated, pedicled, oblique, groin skin flaps, and in the contralateral abdomen to act as a control site. Six rats had NGF-treated wounds and six had untreated wounds. Tissue was harvested at day four after wounding. The re-epithelializing wound edges were analyzed immunohistochemically for P2X(5), P2X(7), P2Y(1) and P2Y(2) receptors, and immunostaining of keratinocytes was quantified using optical densitometry. In normal rat epidermis, P2Y(1) and P2Y(2) receptors were found in the basal layer where keratinocytes proliferate; P2X(5) receptors were associated with proliferating and differentiating epidermal keratinocytes in basal and suprabasal layers; P2X(7) receptors were associated with terminally differentiated keratinocytes in the stratum corneum. In the regenerating epidermis of denervated wounds, P2Y(1) receptor protein expression was significantly increased in keratinocytes (P<0.001) but P2Y(1) receptors (P<0.001) compared with untreated denervated wounds. In innervated wounds, NGF treatment enhanced expression in keratinocytes. P2X(5) (P>0.001) and P2Y(1) receptor protein (P<0.001) expression in keratinocytes. P2X(7) receptors were absent in all experimental wound healing preparations. P2X(5), P2X(7), P2Y(1) and P2Y(2) receptor protein expression in the regenerating epidermis was altered both during wound healing and also by NGF treatment. Possible roles for purinergic signalling and its relation to NGF in wound healing are discussed.