Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 76
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Surg ; 2024 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258558

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the utility of enteral contrast-based protocols in the diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) for children. BACKGROUND: Enteral contrast-based protocols for adults with ASBO are associated with decreased need for surgery and shorter hospitalization. Pediatric-specific data are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study between October 2020 and December 2022 at nine children's hospitals who are members of the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium. Inclusion criteria were children aged 1-20 years diagnosed with ASBO who underwent a trial of nonoperative management (NOM) at hospital admission. Comparisons were made between those children who received an enteral contrast challenge and those who did not. The primary outcome was need for surgery. RESULTS: We enrolled 136 children (71% male; median age: 12 y); 84 (62%) received an enteral contrast challenge. There was no difference in rate of operative intervention between the no contrast (34.6%) and contrast groups (36.9%; P=0.93). Eighty-seven (64%) were successfully managed nonoperatively with no difference in median length of stay (P=0.10) or rate of unplanned readmission (P=0.14). Among the 49 children who required an operation, there was no significant difference in time from admission to surgery or rate of small bowel resection based on prior contrast administration. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of enteral contrast-based protocols for management of pediatric ASBO does not decrease the likelihood of surgery or shorten hospitalization. Larger randomized studies may be needed to further define the role of radiologic contrast in the management of ASBO in children.

2.
Ann Surg ; 2023 Oct 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37830240

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To use updated 2021 weighted Pediatric Readiness Score (wPRS) data to identify a threshold level of trauma center emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Most children in the US receive initial trauma care at non-pediatric centers. The National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) aims to ensure that all EDs are prepared to provide quality care for children. Trauma centers reporting the highest quartile of wPRS on the 2013 national assessment have been shown to have lower mortality. Significant efforts have been invested to improve pediatric readiness in the past decade. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of trauma centers that completed the NPRP 2021 national assessment and contributed to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) in 2019-21 was analyzed. Center-specific observed-to-expected mortality estimates for children (0-15y) were calculated using Pediatric TQIP models. Deterministic linkage was used for transferred patients to account for wPRS at the initial receiving center. Center-specific mortality odds ratios were then compared across quartiles of wPRS. RESULTS: 66,588 children from 630 centers with a median [IQR] wPRS of 79 [66-93] were analyzed. The average observed-to-expected odds of mortality (1.02 [0.97-1.06]) for centers in the highest quartile (wPRS≥93) was lower than any of the lowest three wPRS quartiles (1.19 [1.14-1.23](Q1), 1.29 [1.24-1.33](Q2), and 1.28 [1.19-1.36](Q3), all P <0.05). The presence of a pediatric-specific quality improvement plan was the domain with the strongest independent association with mortality (standardized beta -0.095 [-0.146--0.044]). CONCLUSION: Trauma centers should address gaps in pediatric readiness to include a pediatric-specific quality improvement plan and aim to achieve wPRS ≥93.

3.
Ann Surg ; 278(3): e580-e588, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538639

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We used machine learning to identify the highest impact components of emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness for predicting in-hospital survival among children cared for in US trauma centers. BACKGROUND: ED pediatric readiness is associated with improved short-term and long-term survival among injured children and part of the national verification criteria for US trauma centers. However, the components of ED pediatric readiness most predictive of survival are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of injured children below 18 years treated in 458 trauma centers from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017, matched to the 2013 National ED Pediatric Readiness Assessment and the American Hospital Association survey. We used machine learning to analyze 265 potential predictors of survival, including 152 ED readiness variables, 29 patient variables, and 84 ED-level and hospital-level variables. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. RESULTS: There were 274,756 injured children, including 4585 (1.7%) who died. Nine ED pediatric readiness components were associated with the greatest increase in survival: policy for mental health care (+8.8% change in survival), policy for patient assessment (+7.5%), specific respiratory equipment (+7.2%), policy for reduced-dose radiation imaging (+7.0%), physician competency evaluations (+4.9%), recording weight in kilograms (+3.2%), life support courses for nursing (+1.0%-2.5%), and policy on pediatric triage (+2.5%). There was a 268% improvement in survival when the 5 highest impact components were present. CONCLUSIONS: ED pediatric readiness components related to specific policies, personnel, and equipment were the strongest predictors of pediatric survival and worked synergistically when combined.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Centros de Traumatologia , Estados Unidos , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hospitais
4.
J Surg Res ; 276: 251-255, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395565

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are handheld, battery-powered vaporizing devices. It is estimated that more than 25% of youth have used these devices recreationally. While vaping-associated lung injury is an increasingly recognized risk, little is known about the risk of traumatic injuries associated with e-cigarette malfunction. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed by querying the electronic health records at nine children's hospitals. Patients who sustained traumatic injuries while vaping from January 2016 through December 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and the details of trauma management were reviewed. RESULTS: 15 children sustained traumatic injuries due to e-cigarette explosion. The median age was 17 y (range 13-18). The median injury severity score was 2 (range 1-5). Three patients reported that their injury coincided with their first vaping experience. Ten patients required hospital admission, three of whom required intensive care unit admission. Admitted patients had a median length of stay of 3 d (range 1-6). The injuries sustained were: facial burns (6), loss of multiple teeth (5), thigh and groin burns (5), hand burns (4), ocular burns (4), a radial nerve injury, a facial laceration, and a mandible fracture. Six children required operative intervention, one of whom required multiple operations for a severe hand injury. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to vaping-associated lung injury, vaping-associated traumatic injuries are an emerging and worrisome injury pattern sustained by adolescents in the United States. This report highlights another means by which e-cigarettes pose an increasing risk to a vulnerable youth population.


Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Lesão Pulmonar , Vaping , Adolescente , Criança , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lesão Pulmonar/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Vaping/epidemiologia
5.
J Surg Res ; 267: 536-543, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric surgeons are often asked to treat clinical problems for which little high-quality data exist. For adults with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), water soluble contrast-based protocols are used to guide management. Little is known about their utility in children. We aimed to better understand key factors in clinical decision-making processes and integration of adult based data in pediatric surgeon's approach to ASBO. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to practicing pediatric surgeons at institutions comprising the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium. RESULTS: The response rate was 69% (78/113). Over half of respondents reported using contrast protocols to guide ASBO management either routinely or occasionally (n = 47, 60%). Common themes regarding the incorporation of adult-based data into clinical practice included the need to adapt protocols for pediatric patients, the dearth of pediatric specific data, and the quality of the published adult evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that pediatric surgeons use contrast-based protocols for the management of ASBO despite the paucity of pediatric specific data. Furthermore, our survey data help us understand how pediatric surgeons incorporate adult based evidence into their practice.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Obstrução Intestinal , Cirurgiões , Adesivos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Aderências Teciduais/diagnóstico por imagem , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia
6.
J Surg Res ; 244: 57-62, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31279264

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pedestrian-related injuries are a significant contributor to preventable mortality and disability in children. We hypothesized that interactive pedestrian safety education is associated with increased knowledge, safe crosswalk behaviors, and lower incidence of pedestrian-related injuries in elementary school-aged children. METHODS: An interactive street-crossing simulation was implemented at target elementary schools in Los Angeles County beginning in 2009. Mixed-methods were used to evaluate the impact of this intervention. Multiple-choice examinations were used to test pedestrian safety knowledge, anonymous observations were used to assess street-crossing behaviors, and statewide traffic records were used to report pedestrian injuries in elementary school-aged (4-11 y) children in participating school districts. Pedestrian injury incidence was compared 1 y before and after the intervention, standardized to the incidence in the entire City of Los Angeles. RESULTS: A total of 1424 and 1522 children completed the pretest and post-test, respectively. Correct answers increased for nine of ten questions (all P < 0.01). Children more frequently looked both ways before crossing the street after the intervention (10% versus 41%, P < 0.001). There were 6 reported pedestrian-related injuries in intervention school districts in the year before the intervention and 2 injuries in the year after the intervention, resulting in a significantly lower injury incidence (standardized rate ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.73). CONCLUSION: Pedestrian safety education at Los Angeles elementary schools was associated with increased knowledge, safe street-crossing behavior, and lower incidence of pediatric pedestrian-related injury. Formal pedestrian safety education should be considered with injury prevention efforts in similar urban communities.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Pedestres/educação , Segurança , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Educação em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Incidência , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pedestres/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Treinamento por Simulação/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle
7.
J Surg Res ; 240: 70-79, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30909067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of perforated appendicitis in children remains controversial. Nonoperative (NO) and immediate operative (IO) strategies are used with varying outcomes. We hypothesized that IO intervention for patients with perforated appendicitis would be more cost-effective than NO management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with appendicitis from 2012 to 2015 was performed. Patients with perforated appendicitis were defined by evidence of perforation on imaging. We excluded patients who presented with sepsis, organ failure, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. NO management was determined by surgeon preference. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: IO was performed on 145 patients with perforated appendicitis, whereas 83 were treated with NO management. Compared to IO patients, NO patients incurred higher overall costs, greater length of stay, more readmissions, complications, peripherally inserted central venous catheter lines, interventional radiology drains, and unplanned clinic and emergency department visits (P < 0.0001 for all). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, days of symptoms, admission C-reactive protein and white blood cell count revealed that NO management was independently associated with increased costs (OR 1.35, 1.12-1.62, 95% CI). Cost curves demonstrated that total cost for IO surpasses that of NO management when patients present with greater than 6.3 d of symptoms (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that IO is more cost-effective than NO management for patients with perforated appendicitis who present with less than 6.3 d of symptoms, after which point, NO management is more cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Perfuração Intestinal/terapia , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/economia , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Drenagem/economia , Drenagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Perfuração Intestinal/economia , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento
8.
J Trauma Nurs ; 26(5): 239-242, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503196

RESUMO

Child physical abuse is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young children. Identification of abused children is challenging, and can affect risk-adjusted benchmarking of trauma center performance. The purpose of this project was to understand diagnosis coding capture rates for child abuse and develop a standardized approach to clinician documentation to improve trauma registry capture. A retrospective cohort was obtained including all admitted trauma patients with injuries from known or suspected abusive mechanism in 2017. Patients who received forensic workup for child physical abuse were classified as "no abuse," "suspected abuse," and "confirmed abuse" using narratives from social work notes. Our trauma registry was used to abstract International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic and external cause codes for each patient. Abuse classifications defined by chart review were then compared with coding in the registry using crosstabs. A total of 115 patients were identified as having a forensic workup for child physical abuse. Patients who underwent forensic workup were classified as: 40% no abuse, 37% suspected abuse, and 23% confirmed abuse at the time of discharge. Three patients (6%) with a negative forensic workup were overcoded as suspected abuse in our trauma registry. Among patients with clinically confirmed abuse, our trauma registry identified only 63% by diagnostic codes and only 33% by external cause codes. Child physical abuse is frequently undercoded, and clear clinical documentation of the level of suspicion of abuse at discharge is needed to accurately identify abused patients.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Masculino , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
9.
J Community Health ; 43(5): 986-992, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29627913

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to determine whether falls from significant height occur more frequently in young children. We conducted a 10-year (2004-2014), comparative study using a retrospective cohort of 4713 children (< 18 years) from the Los Angeles county trauma database who were evaluated for a fall. Exposure was fall height, dichotomized into < 10 ft/low-risk fall and > 10 ft/high-risk fall. Primary outcome was age of fall. Secondary outcomes were disposition from emergency department, injuries, resource utilization, and mortality. Of all falls, 4481 (95%) were low-risk and 232 (5%) high-risk. High-risk falls were more frequent in children 1-3 years old (58 vs. 30%, p < 0.01), associated with higher frequency of intracranial hemorrhage (19 vs. 10%, p < 0.01), intubation (11 vs. 1%, p < 0.01), and neurosurgical procedure (2 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality (0.86 vs. 0.13%, p = 0.06). In Los Angeles County, children 1-3 years old are most likely to suffer high-risk falls, which are associated with serious injury. Integration of fall prevention education into routine anticipatory guidance should be strongly considered for children 1-3 years old.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteção da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/epidemiologia , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle
10.
J Community Health ; 43(4): 810-815, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492825

RESUMO

Cell phone use has been implicated in driver distraction and motor vehicle crashes, and more recently has been associated with distracted pedestrians. There are limited data on interventions aimed at this important public health issue. We hypothesized that the use of a visual intervention near street crossings would decrease the frequency of distracted behaviors of pedestrians. We performed a prospective observational cohort study examining painted sidewalk stencils reading, "Heads Up, Phones Down" as an intervention to decrease cell phone distractions amongst pedestrians. These stenciled messages were placed at a children's hospital, middle school, and high school in Los Angeles County. Anonymous observations of pedestrian distractions (texting, talking on a phone, headphone use, and other) were conducted before, 1 week after, and 4 months after the intervention. Distractions were compared before and after intervention using Chi square tests. A total of 11,533 pedestrians were observed, with 71% children and 29% adults. Total distractions decreased from 23% pre-intervention to 17% 1 week after stencil placement (p < 0.01), but this was not sustained at 4 months (23%, p = 0.4). A sustained decrease was observed only for texting at 4 months post-intervention (8.5% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.01). A simple visual intervention reduced distracted cell phone usage in pedestrians crossing the street, but this was most effective early after the intervention. Future studies are warranted to determine how to sustain this effect over time and how to minimize other types of distractions.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Pedestres , Segurança , Caminhada , Adolescente , Adulto , Telefone Celular , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Saúde Pública , Assunção de Riscos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Envio de Mensagens de Texto
11.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 34(12): 1353-1362, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324569

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Simulation-based training has the potential to improve team-based care. We hypothesized that implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary simulation-based training program would improve provider confidence in team-based management of severely injured pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: An in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program with structured debriefing was implemented at a free-standing children's hospital. Trauma providers were anonymously surveyed 1 month before (pre-), 1 month after (post-), and 2 years after implementation. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 49% (n = 93/190) pre-simulation, 22% (n = 42/190) post-simulation, and 79% (n = 150/190) at 2-year follow-up. These providers reported more anxiety (p = 0.01) and less confidence (p = 0.02) 1-month post-simulation. At 2-year follow-up, trained providers reported less anxiety (p = 0.02) and greater confidence (p = 0.01), compared to untrained providers. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program may initially lead to increased anxiety, but long-term exposure may lead to greater confidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Prospective cohort.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Ressuscitação/educação , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
12.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 33(3): 311-316, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27878593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Current guidelines for computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma were developed to capture all intra-abdominal injuries (IAI). We hypothesize that current AST/ALT guidelines are too low leading to unnecessary CT scans for children after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). METHODS: Patients who received CT of the abdomen after blunt trauma at our Level I Pediatric Trauma Center were stratified into a high risk (HR) (liver/spleen/kidney grade ≥III, hollow viscous, or pancreatic injuries) and low risk (LR) (liver/kidney/spleen injuries grade ≤II, or no IAI) groups. RESULTS: 247 patients were included. Of the 18 patients in the HR group, two required surgery (splenectomy and sigmoidectomy). Transfusion was required in 30% of grade III and 50% of grade IV injuries. Eleven (5%) patients in LR group were transfused for indications other than IAI, and none were explored surgically. Both AST (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) and ALT (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) correlated with grade of liver injury. Using an increased threshold of AST/ALT, 400/200 had a negative predictive value of 96% in predicting the presence of HR liver injuries. CONCLUSION: The current cutoff of liver enzymes leads to over-identification of LR injuries. Consideration should be given to an approach that aims to utilize CT in pediatric BAT that identifies clinically HR injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/sangue , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Transaminases/sangue , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/sangue , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
13.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 30(10): 677-9, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25272072

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is most common and most lethal in infants. Falls are the most frequently given explanation for NAT, and head injuries can result from both mechanisms. We hypothesized that infant head injuries from NAT have a distinct injury profile compared to falls. METHODS: The trauma registry and patient records were reviewed from 2004 to 2008. Infants with at least 1 head computed tomography were included. RESULTS: Ninety-nine infants were identified. Falls (67 patients) and NAT (21 patients) were the most common mechanism of injury. Falls had lower injury severity scores, 5 versus 17 compared to NAT (P < 0.001). Nonaccidental trauma patients had injuries to face, chest, abdomen, or extremities much more frequently, 62% versus 3% in falls (P < 0.001). Isolated intracranial hemorrhage was higher in NAT (60% vs. 23%, P = 0.002), whereas isolated skull fracture was higher in falls (42% vs. 5%, P = 0.005). Outcomes for NAT showed longer intensive care unit stays (4 days vs. 1 day; P < 0.001), longer hospital stays (7 days vs. 1 day; P < 0.001), and more intracranial operations (9 vs. 1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that all children younger than 1 year, with an isolated intracranial hemorrhage, have a full NAT work-up. Injury severity score greater than 20, Glasgow Coma Scale less than 13, and extracranial injuries should also increase suspicion of NAT.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(7): 1315-1318, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38614949

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low health literacy (HL) has been associated with poor health outcomes in children. Optimal recovery after pediatric injury requires caregiver participation in complicated rehabilitative and medical aftercare. We aimed to quantify HL among guardians of injured children and identify factors associated with low HL of guardians. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the HL using the Newest Vital Sign™ of guardians of injured children (≤18 years) admitted to a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Patient and guardian characteristics were compared across levels of HL using univariate statistics. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently-associated with low HL. RESULTS: A sample of 95 guardian-child dyads were enrolled. The majority of guardians had low HL (n = 52, 55%), followed by moderate HL (n = 36, 38%) and high HL (n = 7, 7%). Many families received public benefits (n = 47, 49%) and 12 guardians (13%) had both housing and employment insecurity. Guardians with low HL were significantly more likely to have insecure housing and not have completed any college. CONCLUSION: The majority of injured children had a primary guardian with low HL. Pediatric trauma centers should consider screening for low HL to ensure that families have adequate post-discharge support. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.


Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Letramento em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Feminino , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Ferimentos e Lesões/psicologia , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Adulto , Tutores Legais/psicologia , Lactente
15.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(3): 243-251, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38059567

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma center benchmarking has become standard practice for assessing quality. The American College of Surgeons adult trauma center verification standards do not specifically require participation in a pediatric-specific benchmarking program. Centers that treat adults and children may therefore rely solely on adult benchmarking metrics as a surrogate for pediatric quality. This study assessed discordance between adult and pediatric mortality within mixed trauma centers to determine the need to independently report pediatric-specific quality metrics. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of trauma centers (n = 493, including 347 adult-only, 44 pediatric-only, and 102 mixed) that participated in the American College of Surgeons TQIP in 2017 to 2018 was analyzed. Center-specific observed-to-expected mortality estimates were calculated using TQIP adult inclusion criteria for 449 centers treating adults (16 to 65 years) and using TQIP pediatric inclusion criteria for 146 centers treating children (0 to 15 years). We then correlated risk-adjusted mortality estimates for pediatric and adult patients within mixed centers and evaluated concordance of their outlier status between adults and children. RESULTS: The cohort included 394,075 adults and 97,698 children. Unadjusted mortality was 6.1% in adults and 1.2% in children. Mortality estimates had only moderate correlation ( r = 0.41) between adult and pediatric cohorts within individual mixed centers. Mortality outlier status for adult and pediatric cohorts was discordant in 31% (32 of 102) of mixed centers (weighted Kappa statistic 0.06 [-0.11 to 0.22]), with 78% (23 of 32) of discordant centers having higher odds of mortality for children than for adults (6 centers with average adult mortality and high pediatric mortality and 17 centers with low adult mortality and average pediatric mortality, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adult mortality is not a reliable surrogate for pediatric mortality in mixed trauma centers. Incorporation of pediatric-specific benchmarks should be required for centers that admit children.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Centros de Traumatologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma recidivism is associated with future trauma-associated morbidity and mortality. Previous evidence suggests that socioeconomic factors predict trauma recidivism in older children (10-18 years); however, risk factors in US children ≤10 have not been studied. We sought to determine the factors associated with trauma recidivism in young children ≤10. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric trauma patients ≤10 years who presented to a single ACS-verified level I Pediatric Trauma Center from 7/1/2017 - 6/30/2021. All patients were evaluated for prior injury during trauma registry entry. Characteristics at the index injury were collected via chart review. Patients were geocoded to assess social vulnerability index (SVI). Logistic regression examined factors associated with recidivism. Best subset selection was used to compare multivariable models and identify the most predictive and parsimonious model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 3,518 patients who presented in the study period, 169 (4.8%) experienced a prior injury. 76% (n = 128) had one prior injury presentation, 18% (n = 31) had 2 prior presentations, and 5.9% (n = 10) had ≥3. Falls were the most common mechanism in recidivists (63% vs. 52%, p = 0.009). Child physical abuse occurred in 6.5% of patients and 0.9% experienced penetrating injury. The majority (83%, n = 137) were discharged home from the ED. There was no significant difference in the frequency of penetrating injury and child physical abuse between recidivists and non-recidivists. Following logistic regression, the most parsimonious model demonstrated that recidivism was associated with comorbidities, age, falls, injury location, non-transfer, and racialization. No significant associations were found with SVI and insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: Medical comorbidities, young age, injury location, and falls were primarily associated with trauma recidivism. Support for parents of young children and those with special healthcare needs through injury prevention programs could reduce trauma recidivism in this population.Level of Evidence: III, Prognostic & Epidemiological.

17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(2): 326-330, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated pressure injuries (HAPI) are known to be associated with medical devices and are preventable. Cervical spine immobilization is commonly utilized in injured children prior to clinical clearance or for treatment of an unstable cervical spinal injury. The frequency of HAPI has been quantified in adults with cervical spine immobilization but has not been well-described in children. The aim of this study was to describe characteristics of children who developed HAPI associated with cervical immobilization. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of children (0-18 years) who developed a stage two or greater cervical HAPI. This cohort was drawn from an overall sample of 49,218 registry patients treated over a five-year period (2017-2021) at ten pediatric trauma centers. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and cervical immobilization were tabulated to describe the population. RESULTS: The cohort included 32 children with stage two or greater cervical HAPI. The median age was 5 years (IQR 2-13) and 78% (n = 25) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The median (IQR) time to diagnosis of HAPI was 11 (7-21) days post-injury. The majority of cervical HAPI (78%, 25/32) occurred in children requiring immobilization for cervical injuries, with only four children developing HAPI after wearing a prophylactic cervical collar in the absence of a cervical spine injury. CONCLUSION: Advanced-stage HAPI associated with cervical collar use in pediatric trauma patients is rare and usually occurs in patients with cervical spine injuries requiring immobilization for treatment. More expedient cervical spine clearance with MRI is unlikely to substantially reduce cervical HAPI in injured children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Epidemiologic and Prognostic).


Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Pescoço , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Centros de Traumatologia
18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness has been associated with lower mortality for injured children but has historically been suboptimal in non-pediatric trauma centers. Over the past decade, the National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) has invested resources in improving ED pediatric readiness. This study aimed to quantify current trauma center pediatric readiness and identify associations with center-level characteristics to target further efforts to guide improvement. METHODS: The study cohort included all centers that responded to the 2021 NPRP national assessment and contributed data to the National Trauma Databank (NTDB) the same calendar year. Center characteristics and pediatric (0-15y) volume from the NTDB were linked to weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRS) obtained from the NPRP assessment. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine associations between wPRS and trauma center type as well as center-level facility characteristics. RESULTS: The wPRS was reported for 77% (749/973) of centers that contributed to the NTDB. ED Pediatric Readiness was highest in ACS level one pediatric trauma centers (PTCs), but wPRS in the highest quartile was seen among all adult and pediatric trauma center types. Independent predictors of high wPRS included ACS level one PTC verification, pediatric trauma volume, and the presence of a PICU. Higher-level adult trauma centers and pediatric trauma centers were more likely to have pediatric-specific physician requirements, pediatric emergency care coordinators, and pediatric quality improvement initiatives. CONCLUSION: ED pediatric readiness in trauma centers remains variable and is predictably lower in centers that lack inpatient resources. There is, however, no aspect of ED pediatric readiness that is constrained to high-level pediatric facilities, and a highest quartile wPRS was achieved in all types of adult centers in our study. Ongoing efforts to improve pediatric readiness for initial stabilization at non-pediatric centers are needed, particularly in centers that routinely transfer children out. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic, Level III.

19.
ASAIO J ; 70(2): 146-153, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37816012

RESUMO

Outcomes of pediatric patients who received extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for COVID-19 remain poorly described. The aim of this multi-institutional retrospective observational study was to evaluate these outcomes and assess for prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Seventy-nine patients at 14 pediatric centers across the United States who received ECLS support for COVID-19 infections between January 2020 and July 2022 were included for analysis. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The median age was 14.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-17 years). Most patients were female (54.4%) and had at least one pre-existing comorbidity (84.8%), such as obesity (44.3%, median body mass index percentile: 97% [IQR: 67.5-99.0%]). Venovenous (VV) ECLS was initiated in 50.6% of patients. Median duration of ECLS was 12 days (IQR: 6.0-22.5 days) with a mean duration from admission to ECLS initiation of 5.2 ± 6.3 days. Survival to hospital discharge was 54.4%. Neurological deficits were reported in 16.3% of survivors. Nonsurvivors were of older age (13.3 ± 6.2 years vs. 9.3 ± 7.7 years, p = 0.012), more likely to receive renal replacement therapy (63.9% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.003), demonstrated longer durations from admission to ECLS initiation (7.0 ± 8.1 days vs. 3.7 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.030), and had higher rates of ECLS-related complications (91.7% vs. 69.8%, p = 0.016) than survivors. Pediatric patients with COVID-19 who received ECLS demonstrated substantial morbidity and further investigation is warranted to optimize management strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Masculino , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , Mortalidade Hospitalar
20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497936

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The benefit of targeting high ratio fresh frozen plasma (FFP):red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in pediatric trauma resuscitation is unclear as existing studies are limited to patients who retrospectively met criteria for massive transfusion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of high ratio FFP:RBC transfusion and the association with outcomes in children presenting in shock. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a 24-institution prospective observational study (4/2018-9/2019) of injured children <18 years with elevated age-adjusted shock index was performed. Patients transfused within 24 hours were stratified into cohorts of low (<1:2) or high (>1:2) ratio FFP:RBC. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square were used to compare characteristics and mortality. Competing risks analysis was used to compare extended (≥75th percentile) ventilator, intensive care, and hospital days while accounting for early deaths. RESULTS: Of 135 children with median (IQR) age 10 (5,14) years and weight 40 (20,64) kg, 85 (63%) received low ratio transfusion and 50 (37%) high ratio despite similar activation of institutional massive transfusion protocols (MTP; low-38%, high-46%, p = .34). Most patients sustained blunt injuries (70%). Median injury severity score was greater in high ratio patients (low-25, high-33, p = .01); however, hospital mortality was similar (low-24%, high-20%, p = .65) as was the risk of extended ventilator, ICU, and hospital days (all p > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite increased injury severity, patients who received a high ratio of FFP:RBC had comparable rates of mortality. These data suggest high ratio FFP:RBC resuscitation is not associated with worst outcomes in children who present in shock. MTP activation was not associated with receipt of high ratio transfusion, suggesting variability in MTP between centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA