RESUMO
BACKGROUND: According to the 5th edition of the Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer, proximal gastrectomy is recommended for patients with early upper gastric cancer who can retain the distal half of the residual stomach after R0 resection. However, a large number of recent clinical studies suggest that surgical indications for proximal gastrectomy in the guidelines may be too narrow. Therefore, this meta-analysis included patients with early and advanced gastric cancer and compared short- and long-term postoperative outcomes between the two groups. At the same time, we only had high-quality clinical studies such as propensity score-matched studies and randomized controlled trials, which made our research more authentic and credible. METHODS: Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library up to June 2023, and included treatment outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The primary results were Early-phase complications(Anastomotic leakage, Anastomotic bleeding, Abdominal abscess, Abdominal infection, Pulmonary infection, Incision infection, Intestinal obstruction, Dumping syndrome, Pancreatic fistula), Late-phase complications(Intestinal obstruction, Anastomosis stricture, Dumping syndrome, Reoperation, Internal hernia, Incidence of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux), Serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), Quality of life[Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III), Los Angeles classification(C or D)], Nutritional status(Hemoglobin, Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation), Oncologic Outcomes(The 5-year overall survival rates). Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes (Operative time, Estimated blood loss, Postoperative hospital stay, Number of harvested lymph nodes, Gas-passing, Postoperative mortality).The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and NewcastleâOttawa scale were used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: After screening, 11 studies were finally included, including 1154 patients. Results from the combined literature showed that total gastrectomy had a significant advantage over proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in mean operating time (MD = 4.92, 95% CI: 0.22â¼9.61 P = 0.04). However, meta-analysis results showed that Hemoglobin (MD = 7.12, 95% CI:2.40â¼11.84, P = 0.003) and Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation (OR = 0.12, 95% CI:0.05â¼0.26, P < 0.00001) in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction group were better than those in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group. There is no significant difference between the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group in Early-phase complications(OR = 1.14,95% CI:0.79â¼1.64, P = 0.50), Late-phase complications(OR = 1.37,95% CI:0.78â¼2.39, P = 0.27), Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III)(OR = 0.94,95% CI:0.14â¼1.07 P = 0.07), Los Angeles classification(C or D)(OR = 0.33,95% CI:0.01â¼8.21, P = 0.50), the 5-year overall survival rates (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.83 ~ 1.23, P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract anastomosis is a safe and feasible treatment for upper gastric carcinoma. However, the operating time was slightly longer in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract group compared to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group. The two groups were comparable to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group in terms of serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), early-phase complications, late-phase complications, and quality of life. Although the scope of proximal gastrectomy is smaller than that of total gastrectomy, it does not affect the 5-year survival rate, indicating good tumor outcomes for patients. Compared to total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction had higher hemoglobin levels, lower probability of vitamin B12 supplementation, and better long-term efficacy. In conclusion, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction is considered one of the more rational surgical approaches for upper gastric cancer.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Pontuação de Propensão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias Gástricas , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/métodos , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: At present, there is no convincing evidence-based medical basis for the efficacy of single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy. To make a high-quality comparison of the short- and long-term outcomes of single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy, we performed this meta-analysis, which only included propensity score-matched studies and randomized controlled trials comparing single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy with multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP up to January 2023, and the data included the outcomes of treatment after single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy and multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy. The primary outcomes were early complications, survival rate after surgery at 1 year, and survival rate after surgery at 5 years. The secondary outcomes were number of pain medications, mean operation time, estimated blood loss, hospital mortality, time to first soft fluid diet, time to first flatus, hospital stay after surgery, and retrieved number of lymph nodes. The Jadad score and NewcastleâOttawa scale were used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: After screening, 9 studies were finally included, including 988 patients. The meta-analysis results showed that estimated blood loss (MD=-29.35, 95% CI: -42.95-15.75, P < 0.0001), hospital stay (MD=-0.99, 95% CI:-1.82~-0.17, P = 0.02), and number of pain medications(MD=-0.65, 95% CI:-1.07~-0.23, P = 0.002) in the single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy group were better than those in the multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy group. There is no significant difference between the single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy group and the multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy group in mean operation time(MD = 5.23,95% CI:-16.58~27.04,P = 0.64), time to first soft fluid diet(MD=-0.06,95% CI: -0.30~0.18,P = 0.63), time to first flatus(MD=-0.18,95% CI:-0.43~0.07,P = 0.16), early complication(OR = 0.73,95% CI:0.50~1.09,P = 0.12), hospital mortality(OR = 1.00,95% CI:0.09~11.16,P = 1.00), retrieved number of lymph nodes(MD=-1.15, 95% CI:-2.71~0.40, P = 0.15), survival rate after surgery 1 year(OR = 2.14,95% CI:0.50~9.07,P = 0.30), and survival rate after surgery 5 year(93.7 vs. 87.6%; p = 0.689). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy is both safe and feasible for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, with similar operation times and better short-term outcomes than multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy in terms of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and estimated blood loss. There was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy and multiport laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Flatulência/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Laparoscopia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to explore the potential impact of pyloric stenosis (PS) on the nutritional status, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the long-term prognosis of distal gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 343 GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2010 and December 2013. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the status of PS. Their clinical and pathological features, nutritional indicators, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared and potential prognostic factors were analyzed using the propensity score matching analysis (PSM). RESULTS Seventy-four (21.6%) patients had PS. Patients with PS had worse survival outcomes than those without PS (χ²=21.369, P<0.001). Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that PS, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05) were the independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Patients with PS had significantly higher lymph node metastasis in No. 3, 4sb, 4d, 6, 8a, 9, and 14v lymph nodes. Patients with PS had significantly lower preoperative BMI, more weight loss, and lower prealbumin than those without PS. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative complications, morbidity, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS Distal GC patients with PS have poor clinicopathological and nutritional status and poor prognosis. However, PS does not increase surgery-related morbidity and mortality.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Estado Nutricional , Período Pré-Operatório , Estenose Pilórica/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estômago/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is still controversial whether tumor size (Ts) should be considered an important indicator for evaluation the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). The purpose of this study was to elucidate the prognostic prediction superiority of Ts in the large-scale cohort of GC patients. METHODS: Data from 1,521 patients who underwent the curative resection were analyzed for demonstration the prognostic value of Ts. In addition, a tumor size-node-metastasis (TsNM) classification system was proposed to evaluate the comparative superiorities of the prognostic prediction of GC patients. RESULTS: With the univariate and multivariate analyses, Ts was identified as an independently prognostic predictor of GC patients, as was T stage. Ts was demonstrated to have smaller Akaike information criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion values within the Cox regression analyses than shown by T stage, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification. TsNM classification was also found to be competent for accurately prognostic evaluation of GC patients. The matched case-control logistic regression showed that TsNM classification could provide very powerful discriminations of patients' overall survival, compared with TNM classification. Additionally, Ts stage was found to enhance the survival discriminations in patients with certain clinicopathological characteristics, including male gender, T4a stage, N0 stage, diffuse type of Lauren classification, or age ≤60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Ts should be recommended as an important clinicopathologic variable to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of GC clinical patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric bronchogenic cysts (BCs) are extremely rare cystic masses caused by abnormal development of the respiratory system during the embryonic period. Gastric bronchial cysts are rare lesions that were first reported in 1956; as of 2023, only 33 cases are available in the PubMed online database. BCs usually have no clinical symptoms in the early stage, and imaging findings also lack specificity. Therefore, they are difficult to diagnose before histopathological examination. CASE SUMMARY: A 34-year-old woman with respiratory distress presented at our hospital. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed an anechoic mass between the spleen, left kidney and gastric fundus, with hyperechogenic and soft elastography textures and with a size of approximately 6.5 cm × 4.0 cm. Furthermore, a computed tomography scan demonstrated high density between the posterior stomach and the spleen and the left kidney, with uniform internal density and a small amount of calcification. The maximum cross section was approximately 10.1 cm × 6.1 cm, and the possibility of a cyst was high. Because the imaging findings did not suggest a malignancy and because the patient required complete resection, she underwent laparotomy surgery. Intraoperatively, this cystic lesion was found to be located in the posterior wall of the large curvature of the fundus and was approximately 8 cm × 6 cm in size. Finally, the pathologists verified that the cyst in the fundus was a gastric BC. The patient recovered well, her symptoms of chest tightness disappeared, and the abdominal drain was removed on postoperative day 6, after which she was discharged on day 7 for 6 months of follow-up. She had no tumor recurrence or postoperative complications during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is a valuable report as it describes an extremely rare case of gastric BC. Moreover, this was a very young patient with a large BC in the stomach.
RESUMO
Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3), a multifunctional cytokine, is able to inhibit cell growth and migration by blocking the Janus kinase signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling (JAK/STAT) activation in oncogenesis. Although the STAT-3 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis from gastric cancer (GC), the implication of SOCS-3 expression in GC is not clearly elucidated. In this study, SOCS-3, STAT-3, and pSTAT-3 were evaluated in GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues of 107 patients who underwent curative surgery by immunohistochemistry. Further, SOCS-3 and STAT-3 mRNA levels were also detected simultaneously. In addition, survival analysis was performed between clinicopathologic variables and prognosis of GC patients. Finally, correlative analysis was adopted for demonstration the best predicator of the survival independent factor. From the results, we demonstrated that only the lymph node metastasis was the independent predictor of the overall survival (OS) of GC patients, although SOCS-3, STAT-3, and other variables were significantly relative to OS. With multivariate logistical regression analysis, SOCS-3, STAT-3, and the status of extragastric nodal metastasis were identified to be the independent factors of the lymph node metastasis from GC. Ultimately, the SOCS-3 was the best predicator of lymph node metastasis from GC identified with the nominal regression analysis. Therefore, SOCS-3 should be considered as a potential indicator for prediction the lymph node metastasis from GC.
Assuntos
Mucosa Gástrica/metabolismo , Fator de Transcrição STAT3/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Proteínas Supressoras da Sinalização de Citocina/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fosforilação , Prognóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Fator de Transcrição STAT3/genética , Estômago/patologia , Estômago/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Proteína 3 Supressora da Sinalização de Citocinas , Proteínas Supressoras da Sinalização de Citocina/genética , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of tumor size in the prognosis of T4a stage gastric cancer. METHODS: The best cut-off point depending on tumor size was selected by Kaplan-Meier. Compare cliniclópathological characteristics between small size gastric cancer (SSG) and large size gastric cancer (LSG). Univariate analysis was done by Log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The independent prognostic factors of patients were performed subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Eight centimetre was the optimal cut-off of tumor size for T4a stage gastric cancer. There were significantly differences between SSG and LSG in tumor location (χ² = 15.695), histological grade (χ² = 4.393), macroscopic type (χ² = 5.629) and early recurrence (χ² = 4.292). Univariate analysis showed age (χ² = 4.463), tumor size (χ² = 9.057), macroscopic type (χ² = 6.679), histological grade (χ² = 5.122), location of tumor (χ² = 8.707) and N stage (χ² = 132.954) are related to survival (P < 0.05). Among them, tumor size (HR = 1.339), histological grade (HR = 1.169) and N stage (HR = 1.876) were independent risk factor for survival (P = 0.05). For SSG, N stage (HR = 2.014) and histological grade (HR = 1.192) were independent risk factor for survival (P = 0.05), and for LSG, N stage (HR = 1.876) was independent risk factor for survival (P = 0.000). Further stratified analysis indicated that the 5-year survival rate of LSG is significantly lower than that of SSG in T4a stage patients of gastric cancer without lymph nodes metastasis or poorly differentiated (HR = 0.182 and 0.653, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor in patients of T4a stage gastric cancer. Tumor size cut-off point of 8 cm can exert significant impact on the prognosis of T4a stage gastric cancer without lymph nodes metastasis or poorly differentiated.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Estômago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and necessity of No.13 lymph node dissection in D2 radical gastrectomy for lower-third advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Data of 379 cases who were diagnosed as TNM II-III stage AGC were collected from January 2001 to June 2007. One hundred cases who undergone No.13 lymph node dissection during D2 gastrectomy for lower-third AGC were selected as study group. Other 279 cases (control group) received only D2 gastrectomy. The differences in clinicopathologic and intraoperative and postoperative parameters and 5-years survival rate were compared using the SPSS 17.0 software. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in patients' gender, age, tumor size, histologic type, Borrmann type, duodenum invasion, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, TNM classification, operative time, blood loss and the incidence of postoperative complications (P > 0.05). In the study group, there were 9 patients with positive No. 13 lymph node, and its 5-year survival rate (46.0%) was higher than the control group (36.5%, χ² = 4.452, P < 0.05). The Univariate analysis showed that age (χ² = 7.539), No.13 lymph node dissection (χ² = 4.452), tumor size (χ² = 7.100), duodenum invasion (χ² = 9.106), tumor depth (χ² = 7.428), lymph node metastasis (χ² = 45.046), TNM classification (χ² = 57.008) are associated with prognosis of lower-third AGC (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified age (HR = 0.500, 95% CI: 0.343 - 0.730), tumor size (HR = 0.545, 95%CI: 0.339 - 0.876), duodenum invasion (HR = 5.821, 95%CI: 2.326 - 14.572), and tumor depth (T4: HR = 2.087, 95% CI: 1.283 - 3.394) as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: No. 13 lymph node dissection for TNM II-III stage lower-third advanced gastric cancer is feasible and necessary.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of negative lymph node count (NLNC) in prediction of prognosis of advanced gastric cancer after radical resection. METHODS: The 544 cases of radical gastrectomy patients with complete clinical and follow-up data between January 2011 and July 2007 were collected. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Merier method and univariate analysis was done by Log-rank test, Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed age (χ(2) = 4.449), T stage (χ(2) = 30.482), N stage (χ(2) = 205.452), location of tumor (χ(2) = 16.649), tumor size (χ(2) = 35.117), macroscopic type (χ(2) = 4.750), histological grade (χ(2) = 6.130), NLNC stage (χ(2) = 150.369) and type of gastrectomy (χ(2) = 25.605) were related to survival. Among them, T stage, N stage, tumor size and NLNC stage were independent risk factors for survival (P < 0.05). The prognostic factors of patients were performed subgroup analysis, NLNC > 15 group can prolong the survival than NLNC ≤ 15 group in the T2 stage (HR = 0.315), T4 stage (HR = 0.401), the same classification of location of tumor (HR = 0.286-0.493), tumor size (HR = 0.336, 0.465), macroscopic type (HR = 0.306, 0.418), histological grade (HR = 0.411, 0.365) and type of gastrectomy (HR = 0.444, 0.358 and 0.356, all P < 0.05). More NLNC can prolong Disease-Free Survival for patient of early recurrence (χ(2) = 8.648, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient negative lymph node count can prolong the survival and decrease the risk of early recurrence.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the necessity of para-aortic lymph nodal dissection in D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in N3 stage. METHODS: A total of 278 gastric cancer patients staged N3 who underwent gastrectomy between January 2003 and December 2007 were enrolled. There were 180 male and 98 female patients, and the patients' age were 26-93 years (median was 61 years). All patients had undergone surgical treatment. There were R0 resection in 246 cases and R1 resection in 32 cases. Lymph node dissection included D1 lymphadenectomy with 125 cases, D2 lymphadenectomy with 109 cases and D2+para-aortic lymph nodal dissection(PAND) with 44 cases. The surgical approach were total gastrectomy (98 cases) and subtotal gastrectomy (180 cases). Potential prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The lymph node metastasis of each station was high in gastric cancer patients staged N3 and 34.1% patients had the para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis. Borrmann type (HR = 1.350, 95%CI: 1.018-1.790, P = 0.037), curability (HR = 1.580, 95%CI: 1.076-2.322, P = 0.020), depth of invasion (HR = 1.697, 95%CI: 1.005-2.864, P = 0.048), metastatic lymph node ratio (HR = 1.631, 95%CI: 1.261-2.111, P = 0.000), extranodal metastasis (HR = 1.336, 95%CI: 1.027-1.738, P = 0.031), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.312, 95%CI: 1.015-1.696, P = 0.038), extent of lymphadenectomy (HR = 1.488 and 2.114, P = 0.054 and 0.000) and number of retrieved lymph node (HR = 1.503 and 2.112, P = 0.025 and 0.000) were found to be factors correlated to overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only Borrmann type (HR = 1.399, 95%CI: 1.050-1.863, P = 0.022), metastatic lymph node ratio (HR = 1.353, 95%CI: 1.016-1.802, P = 0.039) and extent of lymphadenectomy (HR = 1.725, 95%CI: 1.111-2.678, P = 0.015) were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients in N3 stage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in N3 stage should at least have 30 lymph node examined. D2 lymph node dissection plus PAND may improve the overall survival for gastric cancer patients in N3 stage.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer is more common, metastatic lymph nodes are often around the stomach, and metastasis is carried out in a certain order, but gastric cancer metastasis to axillary lymph nodes is very rare. Due to the small number of patients with this kind of metastasis, its clinical features and treatment are not very clear. We initially thought that the enlarged axillary lymph nodes were inflammatory lesions. Axillary lymph node biopsy was later diagnosed as gastric cancer metastases to axillary lymph nodes. The patient refused further treatment and died 11 months after the second operation because of multiple systemic metastases. We believe that metastasis of gastric cancer to axillary lymph nodes is rare and the prognosis is poor. In clinical work, the possibility of metastatic lymph nodes should be considered in patients with a history of gastric cancer with enlarged axillary lymph nodes.
RESUMO
Background: Gastric cancer and colon cancer are rarely seen in clinic, but there are still related reports. For gastric cancer and simultaneous colon cancer, surgical resection is the main treatment. Traditional surgery requires an incision from xiphoid process to pubic symphysis. With the progress of minimally invasive technology, laparoscopic surgery is also used in the treatment of gastric cancer, but also in the abdominal incision to remove specimens and in vitro anastomosis of digestive tract. Taking specimens through the natural cavity as a new surgical method can not only reduce the abdominal incision, but also reduce the occurrence of wound-related complications. Here, we report a patient with gastric cancer and colon cancer who was treated in our hospital. Case Summary: We report a series of patients with gastric cancer and colon cancer. upper abdominal pain was treated in our hospital for 6 months. electronic gastroscopy showed large irregular ulcers on the lesser curvature of the gastric antrum and biopsy showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum. The enhanced CT of abdomen and pelvis showed irregular thickening of gastric antrum wall, irregular thickening of sigmoid colon wall and no obvious enlarged lymph nodes around. Further electronic enteroscopy showed that the sigmoid colon showed cauliflower protuberance, the intestinal cavity was slightly narrow, the intestinal wall was stiff, and the biopsy pathology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon. No obvious abnormality was found in serological tumor indexes. We diagnosed gastric cancer with sigmoid colon cancer and the patient received Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy and sigmoidectomy combined with natural orifice specimen extraction surgery. At present, 12 months after operation, no clear tumor recurrence was found in the metastasis. Conclusion: We should improve the understanding of gastric cancer and sigmoid cancer and combine examination with pathology to avoid misdiagnosis as metastatic cancer. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy should be performed for tumors with no serosa invasion, body mass index <30 and tumor diameter <6.5â cm. Sigmoidectomy combined with natural nostril sampling is feasible.
RESUMO
We describe a case of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with gastric metastasis misdiagnosed as primary gastric cancer. In addition, combined with the literature, we summarized the clinical and imaging features of gastric metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in order to improve the understanding of the preoperative diagnosis. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is accurate in evaluating the primary tumor, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis of patients. In addition, immunohistochemical staining can determine the primary site of metastatic adenocarcinoma. For patients who can not determine the location of the primary tumor, the rigorous preoperative examination is necessary, it can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and avoid excessive treatment of patients.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the recurrence patterns of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after curative total gastrectomy and further explore predictors for each pattern of recurrence.Data of 299 AGC patients between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the clinicopathologic factors affecting the recurrence pattern of AGC patients underwent curative total gastrectomy.Sixty-eight (22.7%) AGC patients had recurrence after total gastrectomy. Distant metastasis (DM) was the most prevalent pattern with 29 (42.6%) cases, followed by peritoneal recurrence (PR) with 25 (36.8%) patients, and locoregional recurrence (LR) occurred in 23 (33.8%) patients. The recurrence rates within 2 and 5 years were 77.9% and 97.1%. Extent of lymphadenectomy (Pâ<â.001, χ2â=â17.366), depth of tumor invasion (Pâ<â.001, χ2â=â21.638), lymph node metastasis (Pâ=â.046, χ2â=â9.707), and number of negative lymph nodes (Pâ=â.017, χ2â=â2.406) were associated with tumor recurrence by univariate analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed that the extent of lymphadenectomy (Pâ=â.034, 95% CI: 1.074-6.414) and T4b status (Pâ=â.015, 95% CI: 0.108-0.785) were independent predictors for LR; histological type (Pâ=â.041, 95% CI: 0.016-0.920) and T4b status (Pâ=â.007, 95% CI: 0.102-0.690) for PR; and pN status (Pâ=â.032) for DM.In AGC patients following total gastrectomy, recurrent predictors various among locoregional, peritoneal, and distant recurrence. Recurrent predictors of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and histological type could guide follow-up and risk-oriented adjuvant treatment, extended lymphadenectomy was considered to reduce LR of AGC patients after curative total gastrectomy.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/normas , Recidiva , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Celiac trunk is a wide and short ventral branch. It originates from the anterior abdominal artery at the level of L1 vertebra, and divides into three branches: the left gastric, common hepatic and splenic arteries, supplying the upper abdominal organs such as stomach, liver, spleen, pancreas, and duodenum. However, there are many types of branches variations. The branches of celiac trunk are classified into several types. We establish a classification of variation type according to the origin of left gastric, common hepatic and splenic arteries, which includes hepatogastrosplenic trunk type, hepatosplenic trunk type, hepatogastric trunk type, gastrosplenic trunk type, and the others include hepatosplenomesentery trunk type, hepatogastrospleno-mesentery trunk type, hepatogastrosplenocolonic trunk type, hepatogastrosplenopancreatic trunk type, gastrospenic trunk plus hepatomesentery trunk type, hepatogastrosplenoic left liver trunk type, hepatogastro-splenopancreatoduodenal trunk type, hepatogastric trunk plus hepatosplenic trunk type. Development of celiac trunk variation type was introduced based on the classification of Lipshutz, Adachi, Michels and Zhang Nianjia. Mastering the types of branches variations is necessary for us to perform the upper abdominal operations safely and effectively.
Assuntos
Artéria Celíaca/anormalidades , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of familial gastric cancer(FGC) and to provide clinical evidence for rational treatment program. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of 91 patients with FGC and 293 patients with sporadic gastric cancer(SGC) in our department from March 2003 to October 2007 were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Tumors with a diameter of less than or equal to 5 cm were more common in FGC patients than SGC patients [65.9%(60/91) vs. 52.6%(154/293), P=0.025]. Proportion of FGC patients with poor differentiation was significantly higher as compared to SGC patients [68.1%(62/91) vs. 55.6%(163/293), P=0.034]. The 5-year overall survival rate in FGC patients was significantly lower than that in SGC patients(25.6% vs. 38.9%, P=0.001). Further stratified analysis revealed that the 5-year survival rates of T4 FGC and T4 SGC patients were 14.5% and 30.5% respectively, the 5-year survival rates of N3 FGC and N3 SGC patients were 10.4% and 17.3% respectively, and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05), while other T stage and N stage between the two groups were not significantly different(all P>0.05). Univarite analysis showed that tumor size, tumor location, pathological type, operation method, infiltration depth and lymph node metastasis were influencing factors of prognosis of FGC. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size(HR=2.271), pathology types(HR=1.449), lymph node metastasis(HR=1.748) and the infiltration depth(HR=1.487) were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with FGC. CONCLUSION: Compared with SGC, FGC is associated with poor differentiation and poor prognosis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
AIM: To elucidate the potential impact of examined lymph nodes (eLNs) on long-term survival of node-negative gastric cancer patients after curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 497 node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2008 in our center were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to eLNs through cut-point analysis. Clinicopathological features were compared between ≤ 15 eLNs group and > 15 eLNs group and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The Log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was performed to investigate the impact of eLNs on patient survival in each stage. Overall survival was also compared among the four groups. Finally, we explored the recurrent sites associated with eLNs. RESULTS: Patients with eLNs > 15 had a better survival compared with those with eLNs ≤ 15 for the entire cohort. By the multivariate survival analysis, we found that the depth of invasion and the number of eLNs were the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) of patients with node-negative gastric cancer. According to the cut-point analysis, T2-T4 patients with 11-15 eLNs had a significantly longer mean OS than those with 4-10 eLNs or 1-3 eLNs. Patients with ≤ 15 eLNs were more likely to experience locoregional and peritoneal recurrence than those with > 15 eLNs. CONCLUSION: Number of eLNs could predict the prognosis of node-negative gastric cancer, and dissection of > 15 eLNs is recommended during lymphadenectomy so as to improve the long-term survival.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that the sixth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for gastric cancer involving the staging of regional lymph nodes (N) has inappropriate cut-offs with regard to counts of metastatic lymph nodes. It remains controversial, however, as to whether the seventh edition of this classification system is completely accurate in staging N for the prediction of the prognosis of gastric cancer. Our aim was to determine which of these two editions of the TNM classification system was superior with regard to the prediction of the prognosis of Chinese patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: We analyzed relevant clinicopathological data statistically from 1,563 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone curative resection to evaluate the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification system for N staging with regard to the prediction of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Our survival analyses demonstrated that N staging via use of both the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification system was correlated with OS. Furthermore, case-control analysis indicated that the seventh edition was significantly superior to the sixth edition in predicting the OS of patients, regardless of the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 or D2) and the number of dissected lymph nodes (<16 or ≥16). By taking into consideration both the extent of lymphadenectomy and the number of dissected lymph nodes simultaneously, we determined that the seventh edition of the TNM classification system was superior to the sixth edition regarding the evaluation of the OS in the various subgroups of gastric cancer patients. CONCLUSION: The seventh edition proved more reliable and accurate than the sixth edition of the TNM classification system in categorizing the number of metastatic lymph nodes for the purpose of predicting the OS of patients with gastric cancer after curative resection.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Gastrectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estômago/patologia , Estômago/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the necessity of No.14v lymph node dissection in D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of 131 cases of advanced gastric cancer receiving D2 or D2+ plus No.14v lymph node dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological factors associated with No.14v lymph node metastasis were analyzed and prognostic value of No.14v lymph node metastasis was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 131 patients, 24 (18.3%) had positive No.14v lymph node. The incidence of 14v metastasis was associated with tumor location, tumor size, depth of invasion, N staging, TNM staging, No.1, No.6, and No.8a lymph nodes metastasis. Tumor location and N staging were independent risk factors for No.14v metastasis (all P<0.05). The 5-year survival rate was 8.3% and 37.8% in patients with and without No.14v metastasis respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastasis of No.14v was an independent prognostic factor for advanced gastric cancer after D2 lymphadenectomy (P=0.029, RR=1.807, 95%CI:1.064-3.070). CONCLUSIONS: For advanced middle and lower gastric cancers, especially those with larger size, serosa invasion and possibility of No.6 lymph node metastasis, it is necessary and feasible to remove the No.14v lymph node.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) for gastric cancer patients with less than 15 lymph nodes dissected. METHODS: Clinical data of 610 gastric cancer patients undergoing operation in Tianjin Cancer Hospictal from January 2003 to July 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: <15 lymph nodes dissected group (n=320) and ≥ 15 lymph nodes dissected group (n=290). MLR was classified based on the following intervals: rN1 ≤ 10%, rN2 10%-30%, rN3 30%-60% and rN4 >60%. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier method and difference was assessed by Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model. Survival rates were compared between two groups in pN and rN stages respectively. RESULTS: In <15 nodes group, all the survival differences among various rN stages were not significant (all P>0.05), while in same rN stage, all the survival differences among various pN stages were not significant (all P>0.05). Significant differences of 5-year cumulative survival rates were found between the two groups in pN2 and pN3a stage patients (both P<0.05) while no significant differences were found among different rN stages (all P>0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated rN stage was an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients with <15 lymph nodes dissected (P=0.012, RR=1.617, 95%CI:1.111-2.354). CONCLUSION: The rN staging system based on MLR can predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with less than 15 lymph nodes dissected.