RESUMO
Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and R-bendamustine (R-B) are the most common frontline treatment strategies for advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL). After R-CHOP induction therapy, using rituximab for maintenance therapy notably improves outcomes; however, whether this can be achieved by using the same approach after R-B therapy is still being determined. This retrospective analysis compared 476 FL patients from 17 GELTAMO centers who received R-based regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy for untreated advanced-stage FL. The complete response rate at the end of induction was higher with R-B and relapses were more frequent with R-CHOP. During induction, cytopenias were significantly more frequent with R-CHOP and so was the use of colony-stimulating factors. During maintenance therapy, R-B showed more neutropenia and infectious toxicity. After a median follow-up of 81 months (95% CI: 77-86), the 6-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were 79% (95% CI: 72-86) for R-bendamustine vs. 67% (95% CI: 61-73) for R-CHOP (p = 0.046), and 6-year overall survival (OS) values were 91% (95% CI: 86-96) for R-B vs. 91% (95% CI: 87-94) for R-CHOP (p = 0.49). In conclusion, R-B followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with previously untreated FL resulted in significantly longer PFS than R-CHOP, with older patients also benefiting from this treatment without further toxicity. Adverse events during maintenance were more frequent with R-B without impacting mortality.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This phase II clinical trial evaluated the combination of Ibrutinib with rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) in patients with non-germinal centre B-cell-like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IBDCL trial (NCT02692248) included patients with histological diagnosis of non-GCB DLBCL with relapsed or refractory disease and non-candidates for stem cell transplantation. Patients received an induction treatment consisting of 6 or 8 cycles of R-GemOx at standard doses every 2 weeks, in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg daily), followed by a maintenance treatment with ibrutinib for a maximum of 2 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included, 72% of them refractory to the last regimen. The ORR and CR rate after the 4th cycle were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-65) and 34% (95% CI, 24-46), respectively. Twenty-four (37%) patients started maintenance and 7 (11%) completed the planned 2 years. After a median follow-up of 29.7 months (range: 0.4-48.6), the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 18% (95% CI, 8 - 28) and 26% (95% CI, 14 - 37), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (44%), neutropenia (30%) and anemia (14%). Grade ≥3 infectious and cardiovascular TRAEs were reported in 6 (9%) and 1 (2%) patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib in combination with R-GemOx, followed by ibrutinib maintenance, demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses and a manageable toxicity in patients with non-GCB DLBCL.
RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1188818.].