Rural-Urban Differences in Telehealth Utilization and Delayed Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose: Use of telehealth among older adults increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but patterns and correlates of its use are poorly understood. The present study uses a representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries to examine rural-urban differences in telehealth utilization during the pandemic and to investigate the associations between the number and type of telehealth services utilized and delayed in-person care. Methods: The study sample (N = 3,257) came from Round 10 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Telehealth was measured in three modalities: phone calls, e-mails or portal messages, and video calls. Multivariable Poisson and logistic regressions were performed to test the study aims, adjusting for sociodemographic and health controls. Analytic weights and survey design factors were incorporated to generate population estimates. Findings: Results show that rurality is associated with lower rates (incidence rate ratio = 0.78, p < 0.001) and lower odds of telehealth use compared with urban older adults. Specifically, rural older adults were less likely to use e-mail or portal messages (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.43, p < 0.001) and video calls (AOR = 0.57, p = 0.004) to communicate with their usual health care provider. Use of any 2 forms of telehealth was associated with greatest increased odds of delayed in-person care among rural and urban populations during the pandemic. Conclusions: Future efforts are needed to expand the utilization of e-mail/portal messages and video call telehealth services among rural older adults. Telehealth may be an important mechanism to support care continuity during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic for both urban and rural older adults when in-person modalities of care are not feasible.

Telemedicine in Advanced Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Studies of Patient Perspectives.

Rationale & Objective: While the use of telemedicine has increased dramatically across disciplines, patient perspectives on telemedicine related to chronic kidney disease are not well understood. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on patients with chronic kidney disease as well as those with kidney transplant to better understand these patients' perspectives related to telemedicine. Study Design: Qualitative meta-analysis. Setting & Participants: Pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients that used telemedicine. Selection Criteria for Studies: English language studies published in the year 2000 and beyond that investigated patient perspectives in a qualitative manner. Works that were not qualitative or did not focus on provider-patient interactive modes of telemedicine were excluded. Data Extraction: 375 articles were pulled from PubMed, Embase, and Academic Science Premier. After filtering, 8 final articles were selected. These articles were critically appraised for quality and were used in the final analysis. Analytical Approach: We used a grounded theory approach to develop a codebook to systematically review each of the selected articles through a qualitative meta-analysis of the included literature. Results: Telemedicine was seen by patients to have notable strengths as well as weaknesses. These characteristics can be organized into 4 primary themes (autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust). Within each primary theme, we identified subthemes. Universally, all articles included the subtheme "fewer trips to the health care facility" as a beneficial factor of telemedicine within the primary theme "logistics." A majority (6 of 8) of the articles included positive patient perspectives on the primary theme "autonomy" in terms of telemedicine promoting the subtheme of "engagement." Patients' views on telemedicine were mixed regarding the primary themes of "privacy/confidentiality" and "trust" related to telemedicine. Limitations: Lack of provider perspectives, non-English studies, and studies published before the year 2000. Articles published after the start of data extraction were also not included. Conclusions: Telemedicine should continue to be offered to patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients to facilitate access. Additional research should focus on ways to decrease negative factors experienced by some patients such as difficulty using the technology.

Telemedicine is the ability to do medical visits using technology such as telephone and video calls. For this study, we researched the experiences and perspectives of patients with chronic kidney disease or kidney transplant, who often require complex, coordinated care. We found 8 articles on this topic from 6 different countries and analyzed the text of these publications to see if there were any common themes across the articles. We found 4 major themes: autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust. Within each of these themes, there were positive and negative connotations to telemedicine. Overall, we feel that telemedicine should continue to be available for interested patients, and more research should be done to remove barriers to telemedicine.

Conflict among experts in health recommendations and corresponding public trust in health experts.

Importance: Public trust in health experts has been decreasing leading to decreased adherence to expert recommendations. Objective: To evaluate public perceptions of conflict and uncertainty among experts in healthcare recommendations and association with decreased trust in health entities for accurate health information. Methods: Analysis of the US nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6-2022). Adults aged 18 and older were respondents to the survey (unweighted n = 5,842, representing 241 million adults). The main outcome was trust in doctors, scientists and government health agencies for health information. Analyses examined trust in experts with public perceptions of conflict about recommendations and changing recommendations. Results: There was high trust in doctors for health information (95%) versus 84% in scientists and 70% in government health agencies. Only 18% have high trust in the health information on social media. Respondents who felt expert recommendations change often were less likely to have high trust (65%) in government agencies compared to those who felt that the recommendations did not often change (82%) (p < 0.01). In logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, race, education, income and trust in social media for health information perceptions of low conflict among expert health recommendations is associated with likelihood of high trust in government health agencies (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.96-4.15). Conclusion: The public has low trust in government health agencies and perceptions of conflict among experts over recommendations is likely playing a role in the erosion of trust in health experts.

Personal Agency and Social Supports to Manage Health Among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Men With Diabetes.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic communities, especially among men who develop this chronic condition at earlier ages. Personal agency and social support are vital aspects to diabetes management. However, less is known about the relationship between these variables among men living with diabetes. The purposes of this study were to identify (1) levels of personal agency to manage health, (2) sources of social supports to manage health based on personal agency levels, and (3) factors associated with lower personal agency to manage health. Cross-sectional data from non-Hispanic Black (n = 381) and Hispanic (n = 292) men aged 40 years or older with T2D were collected using an internet-delivered questionnaire. Three binary logistic regression models were fitted to assess sociodemographics, health indicators, and support sources associated with weaker personal agency to manage health. About 68% of participants reported having the strongest personal agency relative to 32.1% reporting weaker personal agency. Men who relied more on their spouse/partner (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22, p = .025), coworkers (OR = 1.59, p = .008), or faith-based organizations (OR = 1.29, p = .029) for ongoing help/support to improve their health and manage health problems were more likely to have weaker personal agency. Conversely, men who relied more on their health care providers for ongoing help/support to improve their health and manage health problems were less likely to have weaker personal agency to manage health (OR = 0.74, p < .001). Findings suggest personal agency may influence men's support needs to manage T2D, which may also be influenced by cultural, socioeconomics, and the composition of social networks.

How Facebook is used to promote ENDS products near four Big 10 universities: A qualitative analysis.

Objective: Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) proprietors strategically placed near college campuses and pervasive marketing on social media platforms, such as Facebook, are critical to the tobacco industry's effort to acquire new young adult users. Understanding the themes used on Facebook to promote ENDS products to college students is necessary to develop public health messaging to combat the vaping epidemic.Methods: We identified 15 ENDS proprietors located near four Big 10 universities and qualitatively analyzed a random sample of their Facebook posts (n = 405) to identify emerging themes using a grounded theory approach.Results: ENDS proprietors in college towns use Facebook to deploy promotional messaging (n = 319), to market ENDS products as a means of celebration (n = 40), to establish a sense of community (n = 155) among ENDS users, to make marijuana references (n = 36), and to advocate (n = 27) for ENDS products.Conclusions: These themes may increase social acceptability and use of ENDS products among college students.

Building the case for housing policy: Understanding public beliefs about housing affordability as a key social determinant of health.

BACKGROUND: The current housing crisis in the U.S. requires the consideration and promotion of policies that improve the circumstances of severe housing cost burdens. Building public awareness of the health impacts associated with housing affordability may be a key prerequisite for policy change. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data from a national survey were used to investigate public understandings about housing affordability as a key driver of health. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated to test whether any relationships existed between respondents' considerations and concerns about housing affordability and their perceptions about housing affordability as a social determinant of health. FINDINGS: These data support four key findings. First, understandings of the relationship between affordable housing and health are partisan and income-based driven, with Republicans and high-income respondents less likely to acknowledge the effects of housing affordability on health. Second, varied frames of communication about the relationship between housing affordability and health may produce significantly different reactions among political and income subgroups.Third, while there is considerable agreement that housing affordability promotes health when using forced-choice measures, connections between affordable housing and health are not readily volunteered. Finally, the themes of personal responsibility and stability and security significantly resonate with Republicans and high-income earners. CONCLUSIONS: Contextualizing the issue of housing affordability within various domains in ways that effectively resonate with the American public and policymakers and across political and income spectra, is highly imperative.