Removal or retention of minimally invasive screws in thoracolumbar fractures? Systematic review and case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding delayed removal versus retention of minimally invasive screws following percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. We conducted a systematic review and case-control study to test the hypothesis that delayed metalwork removal following percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar fractures improves outcome. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Our case-control study retrospectively evaluated 55 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent percutaneous fixation in a single unit: 19 with metalwork retained (controls) and 36 with metalwork removed. Outcomes were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a supplemental questionnaire, and complications. RESULTS: The systematic review evaluated nine articles. Back pain was reduced in most patients after metalwork removal. One study found no difference in the ODI after versus before metalwork removal, whereas three studies reported significant improvement. Six studies noted no significant alterations in radiological markers of stability after metalwork removal. Mean complication rate was 1.7% (0-6.7). Complications were superficial wound infection, screw breakage at the time of removal, pull-out screw, and a broken rod. In the case-control study, both groups were well matched. For metalwork removal, mean operative time was 69.5 min (range 30-120) and length of stay was 1.3 days (0-4). After metalwork removal, 24 (68.6%) patients felt better, 10 (28.6%) the same and one felt worse. Two patients had superficial hematomas, one had a superficial wound infection, and none required re-operation. Metalwork removal was a significant predictor of return to work or baseline household duties (odds ratio 5.0 [1.4-18.9]). The ODI was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of both the systematic review and our case-control study suggest that removal of metalwork following percutaneous fixation of thoracolumbar fractures is safe and is associated with improved outcome in most patients.

Retrospective review of the epidemiology, microbiology, management and outcomes of intra-cranial abscesses at a neurosurgical tertiary referral centre, 2018-2020.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial abscesses are rare but serious, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Due to both the rarity and severity of these infections, well-controlled trials have not been reported in the literature, and optimal management is a matter for expert opinion. Advances in surgical management have improved outcomes and increased rates of microbiological diagnosis. However, the approach to antimicrobial chemotherapy varies considerably, including the choice of antibiotic, the duration of treatment, and the timing of oral switch. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 43 cases of intracranial abscesses from a large, tertiary neurosurgical centre in London, UK, between 2018 and 2020, including 29 primary intra-parenchymal abscesses, 11 subdural abscesses and 3 extradural abscesses. RESULTS: The majority of cases had surgical intervention; 6/43 (14%) required repeat intervention (all intra-parenchymal abscesses). A microbiological diagnosis was made in 83% of cases. Intravenous antibiotics were given for a median of 33 days (IQR 23-44 days), with a variable duration of oral follow-on antibiotics. Total duration of antibiotic treatment ranged from 0 to 467 days. Only three patients from our cohort are known to have died. CONCLUSION: Shorter courses of intravenous antibiotics for brain abscesses were not associated with increased mortality. In the absence of well-controlled trials, a national registry of intracranial abscesses would provide invaluable data to inform optimal treatment.

A novel case of paravertebral glomangiomyomatosis.

Glomangiomyomatosis is an extremely rare variant of glomus tumours. We describe the first known case of paravertebral glomangiomyomatosis in the literature to cause spinal cord compression. A 45-year old female patient presented with sudden onset of left leg pain and progressive weakness in left-sided hip flexion. An MRI spine revealed a large, lobulated, heterogeneous mass cantered on the left L2/3 foramen, mimicking a dumbbell nerve sheath tumour. The mass was invading the psoas muscle and displayed evidence of recent haemorrhage. The patient underwent debulking of the lesion via a left retroperitoneal approach. Surgery was uneventful, with clinical improvement and resolution of leg pain post-operatively. Histopathology of the tumour revealed delineated glomus-like cells and foci of spindled shaped cells resembling myoid differentiation. Immuno-histochemical features of the tumour confirmed the diagnosis of glomangiomyomatosis. The patient continued under close follow up, representing 18 months later with clinical and radiological progression of the disease with similar symptoms of leg pain but no weakness. Follow up MRI revealed progression of the intraspinal and paraspinal components of the tumour with thecal compression. A posterior approach was utilized in order to decompress the intraspinal component, which again was uneventful, and improved the patient's symptoms. This is the first known case of paravertebral glomangiomyomatosis in the literature and this rare entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of nerve sheath tumours due to risk of progression and recurrence.

Impact of Preoperative Mapping and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Deep-Seated Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery changes the surgical strategy for deep-seated lesions by promoting a deficit-sparing approach. When integrated with preoperative brain mapping and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), this approach may potentially improve patient outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of preoperative brain mapping and IONM in tubular retractor-assisted neuro-oncological surgery. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery for resection of deep-seated brain tumors from 2016 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: group 1, no preoperative mapping or IONM (17 patients); group 2, IONM only (25 patients); group 3, both preoperative mapping and IONM (38 patients). RESULTS: We analyzed 80 patients (33 males and 47 females) with a median age of 46.5 years (range: 1-81 years). There was no significant difference in mean tumor volume (26.2 cm3 [range 1.07-97.4 cm3]; P = 0.740) and mean preoperative depth of the tumor (31 mm [range 3-65 mm], P = 0.449) between the groups. A higher proportion of high-grade gliomas and metastases was present within group 3 (P = 0.003). IONM was related to fewer motor (P = 0.041) and language (P = 0.032) deficits at hospital discharge. Preoperative mapping and IONM were also related to shorter length of stay (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping and monitoring enhance transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery in neuro-oncology. Patients had a reduced length of stay and prolonged overall survival. IONM alone reduces postoperative neurological deficit.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neurosurgery: A Review of the Current Literature.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) play an important role in the evaluation of health outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction, and have been successfully utilized in many areas of clinical medicine and surgical practice. The prevalence of PROMs in neurosurgery is not known. OBJECTIVE: To review the PROMs that have been utilized in the published neurosurgery literature to date. METHODS: Articles were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, PsycARTICLES, and PsycINFO using search terms related to neurosurgery and PROMs, published from 1806 to August 2016. A total of 268 articles were identified that were stratified by the inclusion and exclusion criteria leading to a total of 137 articles. Twenty-six PROMs, involving both adult and pediatric populations, were identified. RESULTS: A large number of generic and disease-specific PROMs are used in the neurosurgical literature. Generic PROMs are usually nonspecific measures of health status. Disease-specific PROMs may not address issues relevant to neurosurgical procedures. There are very few neurosurgery-specific PROMs that take into account the impact of a neurosurgical procedure on a specific condition. CONCLUSION: PROMs that currently feature in the neurosurgical literature may not address the specific outcomes relevant to neurosurgical practice. There is an emergent need for generic and disease-specific PROMs to be validated in neurosurgical patients and neurosurgery-specific PROMs developed to address unmet needs of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Referrers' point of view on the referral process to neurosurgery and opinions on neurosurgeons: a large-scale regional survey in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: There is an increased reliance on online referral systems (ORS) within neurosurgical departments across the UK. Opinions of neurosurgeons on ORS are extensively reported but those of referrers have hardly been sought. Our study aims at ascertaining our referring colleagues' views on our ORS and its impact on patient care, their opinions on neurosurgeons and how to improve our referral process. SETTING: 14 district general hospitals and one teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 641 healthcare professionals across a range of medical and surgical specialties including doctors of all grades, nurses and physiotherapists. Survey responses were obtained by medical students using a smartphone application. RESULTS: Although 92% of respondents were aware of the ORS, 74% would routinely phone the on-call registrar either before or after making referrals online. The majority (44%) believed their call to relate to a life-threatening emergency. 62% of referrers considered the ORS helpful in informing patients' care and 48% had a positive opinion of their interaction with neurosurgical registrars. On ways to improve the ORS, 50% selected email/text confirmation of response sent to referrers and 16% to referring consultants. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that referrers feel that using our ORS positively impacts patient care but that it remains in need of improvement in order to better suit our colleagues' needs when it comes to managing neurosurgical patients. We feel that the promotion of neurosurgical education and mitigation of the effects of adverse workplace human factors are likely to achieve the common goal of neurosurgeons and referrers alike: a high standard in patient care.