INSM1 is a useful neuroendocrine marker to differentiate pancreatic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors in cytology and surgical specimens.

INTRODUCTION: Differentiating pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCA) from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs) based on histomorphology is critical yet challenging, particularly in small biopsy samples. Our study aimed to examine the expression profile of INSM1 in cytologic and surgical resection specimens from pancreatic SCA to evaluate its potential as a discriminative marker against pancreatic WDNET. METHODS: We characterized INSM1 immunohistochemistry in 34 patients with pancreatic SCA, comprising 23 surgical resections and 11 cytology specimens. As a control, we used 28 cytology specimens from pancreatic WDNET. Clinical information was retrieved through a review of electronic medical records. RESULTS: All 11 pancreatic SCA cytology specimens and 15 of 23 pancreatic SCA surgical resections exhibited absent INSM1 immunostaining. Each of the remaining eight surgical resection specimens demonstrated 1 % immunoreactivity. In contrast, 27 out of 28 (96 %) pancreatic WDNET cytology specimens were positive for INSM1 immunostaining, with a median immunoreactivity of 90 % and a range of 30-90 %. Overall, INSM1 immunostains perform similarly to chromogranin and synaptophysin in pancreatic SCA. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that INSM1 immunohistochemistry staining may serve as a useful neuroendocrine marker to differentiate pancreatic SCA from pancreatic WDNET in clinical practice. To our knowledge, this represents the first large-scale study to evaluate INSM1 immunostaining in surgical and cytology specimens from pancreatic SCA.

Practice patterns for reporting digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms: results from a large, comprehensive international survey.

AIMS: Criteria for the interpretation of digestive system neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) continue to evolve. Although there are some literature recommendations regarding workup and diagnosis of these lesions, different practice patterns exist among pathologists when signing out these specimens. The aim of this study was to assess practice trends among pathologists worldwide when reporting these neoplasms. METHODS AND RESULTS: We created an online survey with multiple questions pertaining to digestive NENs. The results were analysed based on type of practice setting, years of sign-out experience, and practice location. Respondents included 384 practicing pathologists: 70% academic, 30% private practice; 63% gastrointestinal (GI) pathology-subspecialised, 37% not; 39% North American, 42% European, 19% others; 45% with ≤10 years in practice; 55% with >10 years. Some question responses were chosen by the majority (e.g. 85% use both mitotic count and Ki67 index for grading NENs, 82% complete a synoptic, and Ki67 stain even for small incidental appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours [NETs], and 96% utilize the diagnosis of grade 3 NET). However, some questions showed varying responses, including counting mitotic figures, Ki67 stain interpretation, and pancreatic grade 3 NEN workup. Pathologists also had some variability in interpreting regional metastatic foci of small bowel NETs and in choosing blocks for Ki67 staining in multifocal lesions. CONCLUSION: There existed scenarios wherein practice patterns varied despite recommendations in the literature, and there were also scenarios lacking clear guidelines wherein pathologists used varying judgement. This survey highlights current key grey areas in digestive system NEN evaluation, leading to variation in practice patterns.

Measuring depth of invasion of submucosa - invasive adenocarcinoma in oesophageal endoscopic specimens: how good are we?

AIMS: Emerging data support that submucosa-invasive (pT1b) esophageal adenocarcinomas are cured via endoscopic resection, provided that invasion measures ≤500 µm, they lack other histological features predictive of nodal metastasis and have negative margins. Hence, pathologists' measurement of the depth of submucosal invasion in endoscopic resections may dictate further management (i.e. endoscopic follow-up versus oesophagectomy). In this study, we assessed the interobserver agreement in measuring the depth of submucosal invasion in oesophageal endoscopic resections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six subspecialised gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists from five academic centres independently measured the depth of submucosal invasion in µm from the deepest muscularis mucosae on 37 oesophageal endoscopic resection slides (round 1 scoring). A consensus meeting with a systematic approach for measuring and discussion of pitfalls was undertaken and remeasuring (round 2 scoring) was conducted. Interobserver agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa statistics. A lack of agreement was seen among the six reviewers with a poor ICC for both rounds: 1 [0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26-0.56] and 2 (0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.63). When measurements were categorised as < or >500 µm, the overall agreement among the six reviewers was only fair for both rounds: 1 (kappa = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.22-0.53) and 2 (kappa = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a lack of agreement among gastrointestinal pathologists in measuring the depth of submucosal invasion in oesophageal endoscopic resections despite formulating a consensus approach for scoring. If important management decisions continue to be based upon this parameter, more reproducible and concrete guidelines are needed.

Lack of uniformity in reporting autoimmune gastritis among a diverse group of pathologists.

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a clinicopathologic diagnosis requiring characteristic histopathology and correlation with laboratory work-up. To better understand how the diagnosis of AIG is made and reported in the pathology community, we conducted an anonymous web-based survey which was circulated among a diverse group of pathologists. Excluding trainees there were 64 respondents: 25 academic gastrointestinal pathologists (AGI, 39%), 22 academic general pathologists (AGP, 34%), 17 private general pathologists (PP, 27%). Our survey results highlighted variations in work-up and sign-out practices. The type of metaplasia needed to diagnose AIG lacked consensus. There was variation in accurate interpretation of immunostains with a trend towards more accurate diagnosis of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell hyperplasia by AGI (92%) and AGP (95%) than PP (71%) (p = 0.07). G-cells in antrum on neuroendocrine immunostain, a mimicker of ECL cell hyperplasia, was more frequently misdiagnosed by PP/ AGP (44%), versus AGI (12%) (p = 0.02). A triple immunostain panel (H. pylori, neuroendocrine, gastrin) was used in the work-up of AIG by 72% of AGI versus 23% AGP and 12% PP (p = 0.000061). The less-specific term "atrophic gastritis" was used in the diagnostic line more by respondents with >10 years sign-out experience compared with others (p = 0.04). In conclusion, the survey results highlighted deficiencies in the interpretation of neuroendocrine immunostains which is crucial for AIG diagnosis, as well as variation in reporting practices and definitions. Uniform criteria and terminology are needed in this field to improve communication with clinicians, resulting in appropriate testing and follow-up.

The mRNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 maintains intestinal barrier function by up-regulating occludin expression.

Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) is an mRNA-binding protein that has an oncofetal pattern of expression. It is also expressed in intestinal tissue, suggesting that it has a possible role in intestinal homeostasis. To investigate this possibility, here we generated Villin CreERT2:Igf2bp1flox/flox mice, which enabled induction of an IGF2BP1 knockout specifically in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) of adult mice. Using gut barrier and epithelial permeability assays and several biochemical approaches, we found that IGF2BP1 ablation in the adult intestinal epithelium causes mild active colitis and mild-to-moderate active enteritis. Moreover, the IGF2BP1 deletion aggravated dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. We also found that IGF2BP1 removal compromises barrier function of the intestinal epithelium, resulting from altered protein expression at tight junctions. Mechanistically, IGF2BP1 interacted with the mRNA of the tight-junction protein occludin (Ocln), stabilizing Ocln mRNA and inducing expression of occludin in IECs. Furthermore, ectopic occludin expression in IGF2BP1-knockdown cells restored barrier function. We conclude that IGF2BP1-dependent regulation of occludin expression is an important mechanism in intestinal barrier function maintenance and in the prevention of colitis.

T3 versus T4a staging challenges in deeply invasive colonic adenocarcinomas and correlation with clinical outcomes.

Despite the latest 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual guidelines, disagreement still exists among pathologists regarding staging deeply invasive colonic adenocarcinomas ≤1 mm to the serosal surface. In this retrospective study, 151 untreated colonic adenocarcinomas staged initially as either pT3 or pT4a and with available 5-year follow-up data were retrieved and re-categorized: Group 1 (38 cases): pT4a with tumor at the serosa; Group 2 (49 cases): tumor ≤1 mm from the serosa, with intervening reactive fibrosis (40/49) or inflammation (9/49); Group 3 (64 cases): pT3 tumor >1 mm from the serosa. Clinical outcomes were analyzed. Groups 1 and 2 tumors showed significantly lower 5-year recurrence-free survival and lower overall survival rates (log-rank p < 0.001 for both), when compared with Group 3 tumors. Even after adjusting for adjuvant therapy and nodal metastases, the proportional hazards ratios for the risk of death (p < 0.001) and risk of recurrence (p = 0.005) showed significantly higher risk in Groups 1 and 2 compared with Group 3. The synchronous nodal (p = 0.012) and metachronous distant metastases (p = 0.004) were also significantly more in Groups 1 and 2 versus Group 3. Colonic adenocarcinomas ≤1 mm from the serosal surface behaved more akin to "bona fide" pT4a tumors at the serosal surface in our study with regards to clinical outcomes. We recommend these tumors be staged as pT4a rather than pT3, as supported by outcome data in our study. We hope this will also ensure reproducibility and consistency in staging these tumors across institutions.

Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study.

Challenges exist with standardized colorectal cancer reporting despite adoption of the American Joint Committee on Cancer-Staging Manual 8th edition. We performed this study to gauge current practice patterns among a diverse group of surgical pathologists. A web-based questionnaire depicting problematic issues and images related to colorectal carcinoma staging was circulated among 118 surgical pathologists and their responses were correlated with their geographic location (North America vs. Europe vs. others), nature of practice (academic vs. community), the sign-out model (gastrointestinal subspecialty vs. general surgical pathology), and years of professional experience. We found that a substantial number of practicing pathologists ignore recommended-staging criteria in specific settings, particularly with respect to assessment of advanced T stage. Tumors that communicated with the serosa through inflammatory foci were staged as pT3 (49%) or pT4a (51%) by nearly equal numbers of pathologists regardless of level of experience, the sign-out model, or geographic location. Only 65% assigned T stage and margin status based on extent of viable tumor in the neoadjuvant setting. One-third of pathologists, particularly those in Europe (p = 0.015), classified acellular mucin deposits as N1 disease when detected in treatment-naive cases. Nearly 50% of pathologists classified isolated tumor cells (i.e., deposits <0.2 mm) in lymph nodes as metastatic disease (i.e., pN1, p = 0.02). Our results suggest that pathologists ignore recommendations that are based on insufficient data and apply individualized criteria when faced with situations that are not addressed in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition. These variations in practice limit the ability to compare outcome data across different institutions and draw attention to areas that require further study.

Complete histopathologic examination of risk reduction gastrectomy specimens for CDH1 germline mutation: Is it warranted in routine clinical practice?

AIMS: CDH1 germline mutation is associated with high penetrance of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Due to the lack of endoscopically identifiable lesions, routine surveillance is ineffective in the early detection of gastric cancer, and risk-reduction gastrectomy is often recommended. Many academic pathology departments elect to submit the entire gastrectomy specimen for histological examination, which is associated with significantly increased cost, technical and professional time, and turnaround time. METHODS: We present our experience with 5 completely submitted and 2 representatively submitted prophylactic total gastrectomy cases in HDGC patients. RESULTS: Multifocal intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma was identified in all cases except one, in which only in situ carcinoma was identified. The tumoral foci (2 to 35 per case; average 14.4) were concentrated in proximal stomach. No submucosal invasion or nodal metastases was seen in any case. The final stage was either stage 0 (pTisN0cM0) or stage 1a (pT1aN0cM0). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in line with that reported in the literature. Considering that deeply invasive carcinoma is very rare in this situation, and no further treatment is indicated for the vast majority of those patients, complete submission and pathologic examination of the entire stomach provides little additional value for routine clinical management. We propose a two-step approach with targeted submission of the proximal stomach, and subsequent entire submission of the remaining stomach if no intramucosal carcinoma is identified during the initial targeted examination.

Excision recommended in high-risk patients: Revisiting the diagnosis of papilloma on core biopsy in the context of patient risk.

We investigate the clinical history, past medical history, and risk status in women with benign intraductal papillomas(IDP). We observed an upgrade rate of 3.9% to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and upgrade rate of 10.7% to a high-risk lesion. Prior or concurrent atypia or cancer and high-risk status had a significant increase risk of upgrade. Surgical excision of papillomas is recommended especially in high-risk patients and women with concurrent or history of atypia or malignancy.

Hit or a miss: Concordance between histopathologic-endoscopic findings in gastric mucosal biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Current literature shows a variable degree of concordance between endoscopic and histopathologic findings in gastric mucosal biopsies. Most prior studies have focused on specific gastric entities such as gastritis in patients with high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). In this study, we assess concordance between histologic and endoscopic findings in a wide spectrum of targeted as well as non-targeted gastric endoscopic biopsies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pathology database and slides at Hershey Medical Center to identify 630 gastric mucosal biopsies obtained from 525 consecutive patients. The corresponding clinical and endoscopic findings were retrieved from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: The rate of abnormal endoscopic and histologic findings was 72.9% and 74.4%, respectively, with Cohen's ĸ coefficient of 0.24. There were 444 (70.5%) concordant cases and 186 (29.5%) discordant cases (88 cases with abnormal endoscopy but normal histology, and 98 cases with normal endoscopy but abnormal histology). Some endoscopic findings, in particular, mass, polyp, ulcer, and nodule/papule were highly concordant with abnormal histopathologic findings; while other endoscopic findings such as inflammatory changes, normal and prominent folds were associated with normal and a variety of abnormal histopathology. Multivariate analysis showed no significant association between intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic-endoscopic correlation in gastric biopsies varies depending on endoscopic mucosal patterns. Intestinal metaplasia may not have a significant association with H. pylori infection in populations with low prevalence of H. pylori.

Should we excise? Are there any clinical or histologic features that predict upgrade in papillomas, incidental or non-incidental?

The clinical decision to excise intraductal papilloma (IDP) without atypia diagnosed on biopsy remains controversial. We sought to establish clinical and histologic predictors (if any) which may predict upgrade in IDP. 296 biopsies (in 278 women) with histologic diagnosis of IDP without atypia were retrospectively identified and placed into Incidental (no corresponding imaging correlate), or Non-incidental (positive imaging correlate) groups. 253/296 (85.5%) cases were non-incidental, and 43/296 (14.5%) were incidental. 73.1% (185/253) non-incidental and 48.8% (21/43) incidental cases underwent excision. 12.4% (23/185) non-incidental cases underwent an upgrade to cancer or high-risk lesion; namely 8-Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 8-atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 6-lobular neoplasia, and 1-flat epithelial atypia. There was no histopathologic feature on the biopsy in the non-incidental group which predicted upgrade; however a past history of atypia was significantly associated with upgrade. 2 of the 21 incidental cases upgraded (1 to ADH and 1 to lobular neoplasia); the former had a past history of ADH. Both incidental upgrades were >1 mm in size, and were not completely excised on the biopsy. None of the incidental cases which appeared completely excised on biopsy upgraded, irrespective of the size on biopsy. These findings suggest that all non-incidental IDPs should be considered candidates for surgical excision, given the 12.4% upgrade rate and no definitive histologic predictors of upgrade. Patients with incidental IDPs (if <1 mm, completely excised on biopsy and with no history of high risk breast lesion) can be spared excision.

RNA-seq implicates deregulation of the immune system in the pathogenesis of diverticulitis.

Individuals with diverticula or outpouchings of the colonic mucosa and submucosa through the colonic wall have diverticulosis, which is usually asymptomatic. In 10-25% of individuals, the diverticula become inflamed, resulting in diverticulitis. Very little is known about the pathophysiology or gene regulatory pathways involved in the development of diverticulitis. To identify these pathways, we deep sequenced RNAs isolated from full-thickness sections of sigmoid colon from diverticulitis patients and control individuals. Specifically for diverticulitis cases, we analyzed tissue adjacent to areas affected by chronic disease. Since the tissue was collected during elective sigmoid resection, the disease was in a quiescent state. A comparison of differentially expressed genes found that gene ontology (GO) pathways associated with the immune response were upregulated in diverticulitis patients compared with nondiverticulosis controls. Next, weighted gene coexpression network analysis was performed to identify the interaction among coexpressed genes. This analysis revealed RASAL3, SASH3, PTPRC, and INPP5D as hub genes within the brown module eigengene, which highly correlated (r = 0.67, P = 0.0004) with diverticulitis. Additionally, we identified elevated expression of downstream interacting genes. In summary, transcripts associated with the immune response were upregulated in adjacent tissue from the sigmoid colons of chronic, recurrent diverticulitis patients. Further elucidating the genetic or epigenetic mechanisms associated with these alterations can help identify those at risk for chronic disease and may assist in clinical decision management.NEW & NOTEWORTHY By using an unbiased approach to analyze transcripts expressed in unaffected colonic tissues adjacent to those affected by chronic diverticulitis, our study implicates that a defect in the immune response may be involved in the development of the disease. This finding expands on the current data that suggest the pathophysiology of diverticulitis is mediated by dietary, age, and obesity-related factors. Further characterizing the immunologic differences in diverticulitis may better inform clinical decision-making.

Trends in extramural consultation: comparison between subspecialized and general surgical pathology service models.

Academic and community hospital pathology groups are increasingly adopting subspecialized service models for surgical pathology (SP) practice. Reasons cited include improvements in sign-out efficiency, quality and accuracy, enhancement of clinician-pathologist communications, and augmentation of resident training quality. However, there is a paucity of published quantitative data regarding the outcomes of transitioning from general to subspecialized SP service coverage. Retrospective assessment of the frequencies and outcomes of SP extramural consultations requested by faculty at our institution was performed, encompassing 2 consecutive years each of subspecialized and general SP service models. The frequencies of extramural consultations between the 2 practice models were not significantly different (0.25% vs 0.21%, P = .142). Although more pathology cases were sent out in gastrointestinal (0.29% vs 0.14%, P = .007), gynecologic (0.16% vs 0.02%, P = .009), and pulmonary (1.73% vs 0.28%, P = .008) services during the "subspecialization" era, fewer pediatric cases were sent out (0.48% vs 1.69%, P = .008). Importantly, the transition to the subspecialized model was associated with a marked reduction in the frequency of major disagreements between the original diagnosis and the consultant's diagnosis (1.8% vs 9.3%, P = .018). Our study supports the value of the subspecialized SP sign-out model for increasing diagnostic accuracy and enhancing the quality of patient care.

Essentials of macroscopic evaluation of specimens from gastrointestinal tract.

An astute macroscopic examination, coupled with correlating the gross findings with clinical indication and operative notes along with judicious, yet all pertinent sectioning for pathological examination is crucial for an accurate histopathological diagnosis, eventually leading to optimal patient care. This succinct review highlights the general concepts that lay the foundation of evaluating and grossing specimens from the luminal gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We also discuss the gross evaluation and sectioning of small therapeutic resections, along with a systematic approach and rationale when grossing and submitting histological sections from larger oncological resections from the luminal GI tract. Selected site-specific considerations, for example, grossing treated rectal and oesophageal cancers or taking sections from mucinous tumours of the appendix, among others, are also discussed.

Follow-up biopsies in gastrointestinal immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity may show markedly different inflammatory patterns than initial injury.

Colitis is a common manifestation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicity and can present with varied histologic patterns of inflammation, some of which have been shown to be associated with specific ICI drug types. Although the histologic features of ICI colitis seen at the time of diagnosis have been described, there have been few reports following these patients over time. We evaluated initial and follow-up biopsies in 30 patients with ICI colitis and found that 37% of patients developed a different pattern of injury on follow-up biopsy compared to the initial biopsy. Patients with a different inflammatory pattern were more likely to have restarted ICI therapy before their follow-up biopsy (64%) compared to those without a change in inflammatory pattern (11%; P < 0.01). The majority of these patients had changed ICI drug types (86%). Additionally, many cases changed to an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-like pattern (36%), raising a question of de novo IBD. However, all of our patients with an IBD-like pattern experienced sustained resolution of symptoms without steroids or other immunosuppressive medications following discontinuation of ICI therapy, consistent with a diagnosis of ICI toxicity. Our findings suggest that follow-up biopsies in patients with ICI colitis may show a different histology and that this does not necessarily warrant a change in the histologic diagnosis to another disease.

Macroscopic examination of pathology specimens: a critical reappraisal.

Meticulous macroscopic examination of specimens and tissue sampling are crucial for accurate histopathology reporting. However, macroscopy has generally received less attention than microscopy and may be delegated to relatively inexperienced practitioners with limited guidance and supervision. This introductory paper in the minisymposium, Macroscopy Under the Microscope, focuses on issues regarding macroscopic examination and tissue sampling that have been insufficiently addressed in the published literature. It highlights the importance of specimen examination and sampling, discusses some general principles, outlines challenges and suggests potential solutions. It is critical to get macroscopy right the first time as it may not be possible to rectify errors even with expert histological assessment or to retrospectively collect missing data after the specimen retention period. Dissectors must, therefore, receive adequate guidance and supervision until they are proficient in macroscopic specimen examination. We emphasise the importance of the clinical context, optimal specimen fixation, succinct and clinically relevant macroscopic descriptions, macrophotography and judicious tissue sampling. We note that current recommendations based on the number of blocks to be submitted per maximum tumour dimension are ambiguous as the amount of tissue submitted in a cassette is not standardised and it is unclear whether 'block' refers to a tissue block or a paraffin block. Concerns around potential oversampling of 'therapeutic' specimens that could result in overdiagnosis due to detection of incidentalomas are also discussed. We hope that the issues discussed in this paper will engender debate on this clinically critical aspect of pathology practice.

GI tract tumors with melanocytic differentiation.

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumors with melanocytic differentiation may present significant diagnostic challenges both for the pathologist and the clinician. This comprehensive review discusses the relatively common as well as rare entities that have melanocytic differentiation in the GI tract. Clinical, histologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features are discussed along with prognosis and differential diagnosis.

Histopathologic Manifestations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy-Associated Gastrointestinal Tract Injury: A Practical Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of many advanced cancers by producing robust remissions. They mostly target two immune regulatory pathways: cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed death-1 or its ligand. However, a flip side is the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) commonly affecting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that can cause treatment interruptions or discontinuation. This practical review discusses the clinical and histopathologic findings of irAEs encountered in the luminal GI tract, along with histopathologic differentials that can mimic varied inflammatory, infectious, or other medication-associated etiologies and the importance of clinico-pathologic correlation for an accurate diagnosis.