Is transoral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade more effective on postoperative pain than endoscopic sphenopalatine ganglion blockade?

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to examine and compare the effects of endoscopic SPGB and transoral SPGB on postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing septoplasty. METHODS: Participants were randomly divided into three groups, no blockade (n:20), endoscopic SPGB (n:20), and transoral SPGB (n:20). Those who had no blockage were included in the control group. Demographic data of patients, such as age and sex, VAS (visual analogue scale) and postoperative pain scores (PPS) [determined at arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and after 2, 6, 12, and 24 h], general analgesic use (24 and 168 h after surgery) and postoperative Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) values were recorded and compare them. RESULTS: The PPS PACU of 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24-h values of the transoral group were lower than the endoscopic and control groups (p < 0.001).The values of 24 h and 168 h of analgesic use in the transoral group were lower than in the control and endoscopic groups (p < 0.001).The average recovery QoR-15 scores at 12 h and 24 h differed according to the groups (p < 0.001) and the highest values were in the transoral group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Transoral SPGB is more effective in postoperative pain control than endoscopic SPGB, it decreases the use of postoperative analgesics and improves postoperative recovery scores.

Effects of Anatolian Propolis and Hypertonic Saline Combination Nasal Spray on Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms: A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate how Rhinapi nasal spray affects symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, 10,000 patients (comprising 5028 males and 4972 females) exhibiting symptoms of allergic rhinitis (namely, nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal itching, and nasal obstruction) from different centers in different regions of Turkey were enrolled in the study between March 2022 and March 2023. All the patients wanted to participate in the study and were administered Rhinapi one puff to each nostril three times a day, for a period of 3 weeks. Total symptom scores, quality of life (QoL) scores, and otolaryngological examination scores were evaluated before and 3 weeks after treatment. Results: The scores for discharge from the nose, sneezing, nasal pruritus, and blockage of the nose all indicated improvement when compared to pre-medication and post-medication. This difference achieved statistical significance (P < .001). The mean total symptom score fell following treatment (P < .001): whilst the score was 11.09 ± 3.41 before administering Rhinapi; after administration, the average score was 6.23 ± 2.41. The mean QoL scores also altered after medication (P < .001), improving from a mean value of 6.44 ± 1.55 to a mean of 7.31 ± 1.24. Significant improvement was also noted in the scores for conchal color and degree of edema after the treatment had been administered (P < .001). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that Rhinapi nasal spray decreases total symptom scores, and results in improved QoL and otolaryngological examination scores. Propolis spray may be recommended for patients with allergic rhinitis alongside other treatments.

The Effects of Anterior Palatoplasty and Functional Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty on Voice Quality in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the effects of anterior palatoplasty (AP) and functional expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (FESP) on voice quality in patients with OSAS and to compare them with each other. MERHODS: The study included 380 patients who came to the Otorhinolaryngology Clinic of our hospital with symptoms of snoring and sleep apnea between April 2020 and April 2022 and were referred to the sleep laboratory for polysomnography (PSG).Forty patients who met the study criteria and underwent AP and 26 patients who underwent FESP were included in the study. All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia by the same otolaryngologist within 1 month at the latest after sleep endoscopy. Acoustic voice analysis was performed using the Praat voice analysis program preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months. F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR (noise-to-harmonic ratio) were compared between the groups pre and postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 20 females and 20 males in the AP group, 12 females and 14 males in the FESP group, There was no statistically significant difference in sex distribution between the groups (P = 0.952). The difference between the preop and postop F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR in both the AP and FESP groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). After AP and FESP surgeries, F0 values ​​increased, jitter, shimmer and NHR values ​​decreased (P < 0.01).F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR changes were the greatest in the FESP group.(P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Positive changes in F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR were greatest in the FESP group significantly. FESP surgery affects voice quality more than AP surgery in patients with OSAS.

The Effects of the Newest Palatopharyngeal Surgery (Barbed Pharyngoplasty) on Voice Quality.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the effects of barbed pharyngoplasty (BP) on voice quality in patients with Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and to compare them with the anterior palatoplasty (AP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) surgeries. METHODS: The study included 329 patients who came to the Otorhinolaryngology Clinic of our hospital with symptoms of snoring and sleep apnea between January 2020 and 2022 and were referred to the sleep laboratory for polysomnography (PSG). AP surgery was recommended for those with retropalatal stenosis in the anteroposterior direction, and ESP surgery for those with lateral stenosis. BP was recommended for those with both anteroposterior and lateral retropalatal stenosis. 60 patients who met the study criteria were included in the study. All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia by the same otolaryngologist within 1 month at the latest after sleep endoscopy. Acoustic voice analysis was performed using the Praat voice analysis program preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months. F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR (noise-to-harmonic ratio) were compared between groups pre and postoperatively. RESULTS: F0 %, jitter %, shimmer %, and NHR % changes were highest in BP. Jitter, shimmer, and NHR decreased significantly in the BP group, whereas F0 increased significantly. Although the mean F0 increased in both AP and ESP groups, the greatest change was in the AP group following BP groups. Although the average jitter, shimmer, and NHR decreased in both groups, the greatest change was in the ESP group following BP groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with OSAS, BP surgery changed F0, jitter, shimmer and NHR more than AP and ESP surgeries, and effected the voice quality more positively.

The Effect of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure on Voice Quality.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammation of the upper airways, thickening of the lateral pharyngeal walls, elongation of the soft palate and uvula, hypertrophy of the tonsils and base of the tongue can be seen in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients. Changes in these structures may affect articulation and phonation, negatively affecting the quality of the voice. Positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment reduces the volume of the root of the tongue, dissolves the edema in the upper respiratory tract, increases the posterior pharyngeal area, and positively changes the quality of the voice. METHODS: A total of 151 people, 50 control group, and 101 patients, were included in the study between December 2020 and December 2021. The patient group was divided into two groups as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) users. All voice recordings were made in the control group and the patient group before and 3 months after CPAP and BPAP treatment, and were evaluated with the Praat (Paul, 2001) voice analysis program. The fundamental frequency of the sound (F0), frequency perturbation (jitter), amplitude perturbation (shimmer), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR) values were evaluated in the patient and control groups, and they were compared with each other before and after the treatment in the CPAP and BPAP groups. RESULTS: Before and after PAP treatment; the changes in F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and NHR in the CPAP and BPAP group were statistically significant (P < 0.05). While the F0 change before and after PAP treatment was the most in the CPAP group, the jitter, shimmer and NHR changes were the most in the BPAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Regular 3-month PAP treatment positively affects F0, jitter, shimmer and NHR values. The greatest F0 change is in the use of CPAP, the improvement in jitter, shimmer and NHR is the most in the use of BPAP.