Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 10(4): 411-20, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24097112

RESUMO

Renal dysfunction (RD) is a frequent comorbid condition and a major determinant of outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). It is likely that the etiology of RD in patients with HF is much more complex than we first thought and represents a matrix of independent, albeit interacting, pathophysiological pathways with effects on both the kidney and the heart that share a common denominator: aging and inflammation. Renal dysfunction in HF has been attributed, among others, to biochemical, hormonal, and hemodynamic factors, coupled with pharmacological interventions. Regardless of the cause, the development of RD or worsening renal function is common in patients with HF, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There is increasing evidence, however, that transient increases in creatinine in the setting of acute HF are not prognostically important, whereas persistent deterioration does portend a higher mortality in this patient population. In addition, congestion seems to play an important role in the course of renal deterioration, and the combination of congestion and worsening renal function is the most significant clinical prognosticator in HF patients. This review aims to provide an update on the epidemiology and prognostic significance of RD in HF patients, in both the acute and the chronic setting.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/diagnóstico , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Prognóstico , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Insuficiência Renal/diagnóstico
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19126660

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension results from the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. Since the renin-angiotensin and the natriuretic peptide systems contribute to blood pressure regulation, variations in the relative genes are candidates for the development of hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 194 hypertensives and 304 controls of Hellenic origin, the possible association between the (CA)n repeat polymorphism of angiotensinogen (AGT), the 250 bp insertion/deletion (I/D) of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), the tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism (TCTG)n of renin, and the (CT)n repeat polymorphism of the natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPRA) and hypertension was assessed. RESULTS: No association between AGT and NPRA polymorphisms and hypertension was observed. The presence of ID or DD genotype of ACE was associated with an increased risk for hypertension compared with the II genotype (OR: 1.782 [95% CI: 1.032-3.077]), whereas the LL genotype of the renin gene was associated with a decreased risk compared with the SS genotype (OR: 0.174 [95% CI: 0.044-0.689]). However, after adjustment for confounding factors only the latter association remained. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study conducted in a homogeneous Hellenic population, no associations between AGT,ACE, and NPRA gene polymorphisms and hypertension were found. The presence of a significant negative association between the LL polymorphism of the renin gene and hypertension requires further confirmation.


Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença , Hipertensão/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Receptores do Fator Natriurético Atrial/genética , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/genética , População Branca/genética , Idoso , Angiotensinogênio/genética , Demografia , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Grécia , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Peptidil Dipeptidase A/genética
3.
Open Cardiovasc Med J ; 8: 68-75, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25152778

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the independent role of perceived stress, measured by the PSS-14, on the likelihood of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS). CONCLUSION: This is a case-control study with individual matching by age and sex. During 2010-2012, 250 consecutive patients (60±11 years, 78% men) with a first ACS and 250 population-based, control subjects (60±8.6 years, 77.6% men), were enrolled. Perceived stress levels were evaluated with the PSS-14 scale, depression status was assessed with the Zung Depression Rating Scale, anxiety status with the STAI scale and adherence to the Mediterranean diet was assessed by the MedDietScore. CONCLUSION: Higher perceived stress was associated with increased likelihood of having an ACS, after adjusting for various factors (OR=1.15, %CI 1.11, 1.18). STAI and ZUNG scale were positively associated with the likelihood of having an ACS (OR: 1.27 %CI 1.20-1.34, p<0.001 and OR: 1.49 %CI 1.36-1.63, p<0.001 respectively). Stratified analysis by sex showed a greater impact of perceived stress in men, compared with women (Wald test value 45.65 vs 18.56, respectively). When stratifying by depression levels, the effect of perceived stress on ACS was not significant among depressed individuals. When stratifying by level of anxiety, higher odds of having an ACS was found in the low anxiety group (OR: 1.129, %CI 1.047-1.218). CONCLUSION: Perceived stress appears as an independent ACS risk factor, although no causal relationship can be extracted due to the nature of the study. Early recognition and treatment of perceived stress may lead to ACS risk reduction.

4.
Int J Cardiol ; 172(1): 115-21, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485633

RESUMO

AIMS: The role of low-dose dopamine infusion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains controversial. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high- versus low-dose furosemide with or without low-dose dopamine infusion in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: 161 ADHF patients (78 years; 46% female; ejection fraction 31%) were randomized to 8-hour continuous infusions of: a) high-dose furosemide (HDF, n=50, 20mg/h), b) low-dose furosemide and low-dose dopamine (LDFD, n=56, 5mg/h and 5 µg kg(-1)min(-1) respectively), or c) low-dose furosemide (LDF, n=55, furosemide 5mg/h). The main outcomes were 60-day and one-year all-cause mortality (ACM) and hospitalization for HF (HHF). Dyspnea relief (Borg index), worsening renal function (WRF, rise in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥ 0.3mg/dL), and length of stay (LOS) were also assessed. The urinary output at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24h was not significantly different in the three groups. Neither the ACM at day 60 (4.0%, 7.1%, and 7.2%; P=0.74) or at one year (38.1%, 33.9% and 32.7%, P=0.84) nor the HHF at day 60 (22.0%, 21.4%, and 14.5%, P=0.55) or one year (60.0%, 50.0%, and 47%, P=0.40) differed between HDF, LDFD, and LDF groups, respectively. No differences in the Borg index or LOS were noted. WRF was higher in the HDF than in LDFD and LDF groups at day 1 (24% vs. 11% vs. 7%, P<0.0001) but not at sCr peak (44% vs. 38% vs. 29%, P=0.27). No significant differences in adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In ADHF patients, there were no significant differences in the in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes between high- vs. low-dose furosemide infusion; the addition of low-dose dopamine infusion was not associated with any beneficial effects.


Assuntos
Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Diuréticos/administração & dosagem , Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Furosemida/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cardiotônicos/efeitos adversos , Diuréticos/efeitos adversos , Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Furosemida/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Método Simples-Cego , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Urina
5.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 10(6): 747-65, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22894631

RESUMO

Diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (DCAN), the impairment of the autonomic balance of the cardiovascular system in the setting of diabetes mellitus (DM), is frequently observed in both Type 1 and 2 DM, has detrimental effects on the quality of life and portends increased mortality. Clinical manifestations include: resting heart rate disorders, exercise intolerance, intraoperative cardiovascular lability, orthostatic alterations in heart rate and blood pressure, QT-interval prolongation, abnormal diurnal and nocturnal blood pressure variation, silent myocardial ischemia and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Clinical tests for autonomic nervous system evaluation, heart rate variability analysis, autonomic innervation imaging techniques, microneurography and baroreflex analysis are the main diagnostic tools for DCAN detection. Aldose reductase inhibitors and antioxidants may be helpful in DCAN therapy, but a regular, more generalized and multifactorial approach should be adopted with inclusion of lifestyle modifications, strict glycemic control and treatment of concomitant traditional cardiovascular risk factors, in order to achieve the best therapeutic results. In the present review, the authors provide aspects of DCAN pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and an algorithm regarding the evaluation and management of DCAN in DM patients.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Algoritmos , Animais , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/terapia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/terapia , Tolerância ao Exercício , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA