Levetiracetam versus carbamazepine monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are effective monotherapies for focal epilepsy in children. However, the best drug remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy (PFE). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2024 comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in PFE. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.2, heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB-2 tool. Risk Ratios (RR) with p < 0.05 were considered significant. The outcomes of interest were seizure freedom, any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, dermatologic adverse events, and the frequency of at least one seizure, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing one or more seizures during the treatment period. Four RCTs comprising 381 children with a mean age of 7.32 to 9.28 years were included, of whom 186 (48.8%) received LEV monotherapy. There was no significant difference between groups (RR: 1.15; 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.31; I2 = 90%) regarding seizure freedom. The frequency of at least one seizure (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.97; p = 0.03; I2 = 8%) and dermatologic adverse events (RR: 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) were both significantly lower in the LEV group. There were no significant differences in the presence of any adverse events (RR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 36%) or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (RR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.13-3.42; p = 0.63; I2 = 30%).Conclusion: In monotherapy, LEV was more advantageous than CBZ for PFE, with a lower frequency of seizures and fewer dermatological adverse events. However, both drugs are equally effective in achieving seizure freedom, adverse events without specification, and those that lead to treatment discontinuation. Our findings have important implications for clinical practice and decision-making in this condition.

Effects of colchicine on the prevention of AF recurrence after atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has become a widely accepted treatment for atrial fibrillation, but early recurrences remain a challenge, often attributed to inflammatory responses triggered during the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of colchicine in preventing short-term AF recurrence post-ablation. METHOD: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing use of colchicine and placebo in patients after AF ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence, GI side effects, and hospitalization. R program (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. RESULTS: Five studies, including 1592 patients, were analyzed. Pooled results revealed no statistically significant decrease in AF recurrence (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48-1.12; p = 0.153) and pericarditis rates (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.26-1.72; p = 0.403) with colchicine use. No significant difference in hospitalization rates was observed between colchicine and placebo groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.63-1.59; p = 0.996). In addition, gastrointestinal side effects were notably higher in the colchicine group (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.58-9.05; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of colchicine after atrial ablation was not associated with a reduction in AF recurrence and pericarditis rates. In addition, there was no difference in the rate of all-cause hospitalization between the groups, and colchicine use was associated with gastrointestinal adverse events.

Early versus Late Caffeine Therapy Administration in Preterm Neonates: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Caffeine is commonly used as therapy for apnea of prematurity and has shown potential in preventing other conditions in preterm neonates. However, the optimal timing for caffeine therapy remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of early versus late administration of caffeine in preterm neonates. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing 0-2 days to ≥3 days caffeine introduction in preterm neonates. Outcomes included were mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), late-onset sepsis, length of hospital stay, and the composite of BPD or death. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 122,579 patients from 11 studies were included, 2 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 63.9% of the neonates received early caffeine administration. The rates of BPD (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: [0.60-0.81]; p < 0.0001), IVH (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: [0.82-0.90]; p < 0.0001), ROP (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: [0.74-0.86]; p < 0.0001), late-onset sepsis (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: [0.79-0.89]; p < 0.00001), and PDA (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: [0.47-0.78]; p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in the early caffeine group. The composite outcome of BPD or death was also lower in the early caffeine group (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: [0.66-0.88]; p < 0.0003). Mortality rate was higher in the early caffeine group (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.12-1.29; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As compared with late caffeine administration, early caffeine is associated with a reduction in BPD, IVH, ROP, late-onset sepsis, and PDA in preterm neonates, albeit increased mortality. Additional RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate whether the effect on mortality may be related to survival bias in observational studies favoring the late treatment group.