Analytical Sensitivity and Specificity of Four Point of Care Rapid Antigen Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR, Quantitative Droplet Digital PCR, and a Mass Spectrometric Antigen Assay as Comparator Methods.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the analytical sensitivity and specificity of 4 rapid antigen diagnostic tests (Ag RDTs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as the reference method and further characterizing samples using droplet digital quantitative PCR (ddPCR) and a mass spectrometric antigen test. METHODS: Three hundred fifty (150 negative and 200 RT-qPCR positive) residual PBS samples were tested for antigen using the BD Veritor lateral flow (LF), ACON LF, ACON fluorescence immunoassay (FIA), and LumiraDx FIA. ddPCR was performed on RT-qPCR-positive samples to quantitate the viral load in copies/mL applied to each Ag RDT. Mass spectrometric antigen testing was performed on PBS samples to obtain a set of RT-qPCR-positive, antigen-positive samples for further analysis. RESULTS: All Ag RDTs had nearly 100% specificity compared to RT-qPCR. Overall analytical sensitivity varied from 66.5% to 88.3%. All methods detected antigen in samples with viral load >1 500 000 copies/mL RNA, and detected ≥75% of samples with viral load of 500 000 to 1 500 000 copies/mL. The BD Veritor LF detected only 25% of samples with viral load between 50 000 to 500 000 copies/mL, compared to 75% for the ACON LF device and >80% for LumiraDx and ACON FIA. The ACON FIA detected significantly more samples with viral load <50 000 copies/mL compared to the BD Veritor. Among samples with detectable antigen and viral load <50 000 copies/mL, sensitivity of the Ag RDT varied between 13.0% (BD Veritor) and 78.3% (ACON FIA). CONCLUSIONS: Ag RDTs differ significantly in analytical sensitivity, particularly at viral load <500 000 copies/mL.

Platelet transfusion: The effects of a fluid warmer on platelet function.

Platelet (PLT) transfusions are an important component of hemostatic resuscitation. The AABB has published several guidelines recommending that PLT units should not be infused through blood warming devices. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-one units of hospital blood bank apheresis PLTs were obtained. PLT-rich plasma (PRP) aggregometry and thromboelastography (TEG) were performed on the unit samples before and after the units were infused through a Ranger blood/fluid warming device. RESULTS: There were no differences in any of the aggregometry results before and after infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer (all P > .32). There was a significant reduction in the TEG maximum amplitude (MA) of 69.8 ± 7.9 mm before and 66.0 ± 8.8 mm after (P < .001) infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer and α angle 61.8 ± 9.4° before and 59.3 ± 8.2° after (P = .044) infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer, although both mean values were within normal range for the TEG and not clinically significant. There were very good correlations of aggregometry and TEG results before and after infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer device. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate significant deleterious effect on PLT function from infusing apheresis PLT units through a blood warming device by PRP aggregometry. We did detect a statistically significant-but not clinically significant-reduction in TEG MA and α angle. The prohibition of transfusing PLT units though the Ranger blood warming device is not indicated.

Error simulation modeling to assess the effects of bias and precision on bilirubin measurements used to screen for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

OBJECTIVES: Error simulation models have been used to understand the relationship between analytical performance and clinical outcomes. We developed an error simulation model to understand the effects of method bias and precision on misclassification rate for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using an age-adjusted risk assessment tool. METHODS: For each of 176 measured total bilirubin (TSBM) values, 10,000 simulated total bilirubin (TBS) values were generated at each combination of bias and precision conditions for coefficient of variation (CV) between 1 and 15%, and for biases between -51.3 µmol/L and 51.3 µmol/L (-3 and 3 mg/dL) fixed bias. TBS values were analyzed to determine if they were in the same risk zone as the TSBM value. We then calculated sensitivity and specificity for prediction of ≥75th percentile for postnatal age values as a function of assay bias and precision, and determined the rate of critical errors (≥95th percentile for age TSBM with <75th percentile TBS). RESULTS: A sensitivity >95% for predicting ≥75th percentile bilirubin values was observed when there is a positive fixed bias of greater than 17.1 µmol/L (1.0 mg/dL) and CV is maintained ≤10%. A specificity >70% for predicting <75th percentile bilirubin values was observed when positive systematic bias was 17.1 µmol/L (1 mg/dL) or less at CV ≤ 10%. Critical errors did not occur with a frequency >0.2% until negative bias was -17.1 µmol/L (-1 mg/dL) or lower. CONCLUSIONS: A positive systematic bias of 17.1 µmol/L (1 mg/dL) may be optimal for balancing sensitivity and specificity for predicting ≥75th percentile TSB values. Negative systematic bias should be avoided to allow detection of high risk infants and avoid critical classification errors.

Is It Time to Remove Total Calcium from the Basic and Comprehensive Metabolic Panels? Assessing the Effects of American Medical Association-Approved Chemical Test Panels on Laboratory Utilization.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of individual tests within the most commonly used disease-oriented test panels has not been well established. We evaluated test-ordering practices for total calcium, both before and after implementation of American Medical Association (AMA)-approved panels (basic metabolic panel [BMP] and comprehensive metabolic panel [CMP]) in our electronic ordering system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all total calcium orders placed during April and June 2018, before and after implementation of the panels. Orders from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) care units were totaled, and the percentage of abnormal test results was calculated. We then queried institutional databases to determine the number of unique patients with calcium-related diagnoses and compared the rates from a 5-month period both before and after implementation of the panels. RESULTS: Total test volumes and tests per unique patient increased by more than 3-fold after implementation of calcium-containing AMA-approved panels, with the majority of those orders coming from BMPs and CMPs. The rate of low calcium values increased because of the shift toward more inpatient testing; however, the percentage of abnormal results within each patient population (inpatient, outpatient, ED) decreased. The prevalence of hypo- and hypercalcemia-related diagnoses among patients in the 5 months after implementation did not change significantly (1.29% before implementation vs 1.27% after implementation). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of BMPs and CMPs dramatically increased total calcium testing volumes without changing the rate of calcium-related diagnoses. The results suggest that the increase in total calcium orders associated with panel-based testing largely constitutes excess or unnecessary testing.

Assessment of Test Performance and Potential for Environmental Contamination Associated with a Point-of-Care Molecular Assay for Group A Streptococcus in an End User Setting.

Although U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and CLIA-waived point-of-care (POC) molecular systems are being implemented in routine clinical practice, instrument reliability, test performance in the hands of end users, and the potential for environmental contamination resulting from use of POC molecular systems have not been extensively evaluated. We performed a prospective evaluation of the Roche cobas Liat group A streptococcus (GAS) assay compared to routine real-time PCR. We evaluated test accuracy, instrument failure rate, and monitored for environmental contamination when testing was performed by minimally trained end users in an Express Care Clinic environment. The overall concordance of the Liat GAS assay with routine testing was 97.2% (455/468). The average Liat failure rate across three analyzers was 6.6% (33/501) (range, 3.7 to 11.6%), and no environmental contamination was detected during the course of the study. The cobas Liat platform and GAS assay demonstrated reliable performance in the end user setting and may serve as a rapid, POC option for routine diagnostic testing for certain infectious diseases, including GAS.

Advances Afoot in Microbiology.

In 2016, the American Academy of Microbiology convened a colloquium to examine point-of-care (POC) microbiology testing and to evaluate its effects on clinical microbiology. Colloquium participants included representatives from clinical microbiology laboratories, industry, and the government, who together made recommendations regarding the implementation, oversight, and evaluation of POC microbiology testing. The colloquium report is timely and well written (V. Dolen et al., Changing Diagnostic Paradigms for Microbiology, 2017, https://www.asm.org/index.php/colloquium-reports/item/6421-changing-diagnostic-paradigms-for-microbiology?utm_source=Commentary&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=diagnostics). Emerging POC microbiology tests, especially nucleic acid amplification tests, have the potential to advance medical care.

Accuracy of Capillary and Arterial Whole Blood Glucose Measurements Using a Glucose Meter in Patients under General Anesthesia in the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a glucose meter with surgical patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. METHODS: Glucose measurements were performed intraoperatively on 368 paired capillary and arterial whole blood samples using a Nova StatStrip (Nova Biomedical, USA) glucose meter and compared with 368 reference arterial whole blood glucose measurements by blood gas analyzer in 196 patients. Primary outcomes were median bias (meter minus reference), percentage of glucose meter samples meeting accuracy criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing as defined by Parkes error grid analysis for type 1 diabetes mellitus, and accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion as defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Time under anesthesia, patient position, diabetes status, and other variables were studied to determine whether any affected glucose meter bias. RESULTS: Median bias (interquartile range) was -4 mg/dl (-9 to 0 mg/dl), which did not differ from median arterial meter bias of -5 mg/dl (-9 to -1 mg/dl; P = 0.32). All of the capillary and arterial glucose meter values met acceptability criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing, whereas only 89% (327 of 368) of capillary and 93% (344 of 368) arterial glucose meter values met accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion. Time, patient position, and diabetes status were not associated with meter bias. CONCLUSIONS: Capillary and arterial blood glucose measured using the glucose meter are acceptable for intraoperative subcutaneous insulin dosing. Whole blood glucose on the meter did not meet accuracy guidelines established specifically for more intensive (e.g., intravenous insulin) glycemic control in the acute care environment.

Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Rules to Reduce Repeat Measurement of Serum Ionized Calcium, Serum Magnesium, and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Intensive Care Unit Inpatients.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) rules within the electronic health record for ionized calcium (iCa), serum magnesium (Mg), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients at a large academic center. METHODS: A repeat order for measurement of iCa or Mg placed within 24 (iCa) or 48 (Mg) h of a previously nonactionable result, or additional orders for NT-proBNP beyond 1 within a single hospitalization, triggered a CDS pop-up alert showing the prior result and offering the opportunity to cancel the order or to place the order after entering an indication for repeat testing. The number of tests performed for each of these analytes and incidence of adverse clinical outcomes potentially associated with hypocalcemia or hypomagnesemia were compared between the 90-day period before CDS implementation and two 90-day periods immediately following. RESULTS: iCa test volumes decreased by 48%, Mg by 39%, and NT-proBNP by 28% in the 90-day period immediately following implementation and remained decreased by 54%, 49%, and 22%, respectively, during the following 90-day period (all P values <0.0002). Adverse clinical outcomes potentially associated with hypocalcemia or hypomagnesemia did not increase (all P-values >0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of CDS dramatically decreased repeat testing of iCa, Mg, and NT-proBNP without adversely impacting clinical outcomes in the ICU. Expansion of the rules from the ICU units to include the entire hospitalized patient population and expansion to additional analytes is expected to lead to further reductions in testing.

Precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet agent therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation protocols used during mechanical circulatory support call for titration of antiplatelet agents. We compared the precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet therapy to distinguish their efficacy for titrating antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: We assessed arachidonic acid-induced platelet function by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), Multiplate impedance aggregometry, VerifyNow, and platelet mapping by thromboelastography (TEG PM). We assessed ADP-induced platelet function by the same methods and flow cytometry. Forty healthy volunteers and 10-13 volunteers on daily aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy were evaluated. We compared tests for intraassay precision, interassay precision (samples from 2 separate blood draws), and reliability coefficient. RESULTS: For arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers, intra- and interassay CVs were ≤ 10% for all methods. Intra- and interassay precision among donors on daily aspirin was ≤ 30% for all methods except LTA (38% interassay CV) and TEG PM (95% intraassay and 104% interassay CV). For ADP-induced platelet function, intra- and interassay precision was ≤ 10% and ≤ 30% for all methods. Only Multiplate demonstrated moderate or greater (R > 0.40) reliability coefficients for arachidonic acid-induced platelet function among all subjects. All methods of ADP-induced platelet function, except TEG PM, demonstrated substantial or greater (R > 0.60) reliability among all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: TEG PM is least suited to monitor effects of antiplatelet agents. Multiplate impedance aggregometry was the only method to demonstrate an acceptable reliability coefficient among healthy volunteers and donors on both aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Local verification and assignment of mean normal prothrombin time and International Sensitivity Index values across various instruments: recent experience and outcome from North America.

Warfarin dosing relies on accurate measurements of international normalized ratio (INR), which is calculated from the prothrombin time (PT), International Sensitivity Index international sensitivity index (ISI) of the thromboplastin, and the geometric mean of normal PT (MNPT). However, ISI assignments of certain reagent/instrument combinations are frequently unavailable, especially when the reagent and instrument are not from the same manufacturer. The effort to be in compliance with widely endorsed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines by locally verifying or assigning an ISI to an unsupported reagent/instrument combination is further hindered by the lack of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved certified plasmas designated for a particular reagent/instrument combination. The objectives of the study include development of a process to verify/assign ISI and MNPT of a single thromboplastin reagent from one manufacturer across multiple instruments including several from another manufacturer and across several campuses of a single institution, the Mayo Clinic. In this study, RecombiPlasTin 2G (R2G), was evaluated on the ACL TOP 700 (IL), STA-R Evolution, STA Compact, and STA Satellite. Random normal donor samples (n = 25) were used to verify/assign MNPT. A subset of the normal donors (n = 8) and 13 warfarin pools (INR range: 1.3-3.9), created from stable warfarin patient plasma, were used for ISI verification/assignment. The manufacturer's assigned ISI was first verified on the ACL TOP 700 (reference method), then assigned on three unsupported instruments using orthogonal regression analysis. The MNPT and manufacturer assigned ISI (11.0, 0.95) were verified on the ACL TOP 700 and subsequently assigned on the STA-R Evolution (11.6, 1.04); STA Compact (11.5, 1.02); and STA Satellite (10.9, 0.99). Linear correlations of the INR results from all the four instruments demonstrated an r2 > 0.99. This process provides a reproducible approach to assigning ISIs on unsupported reagent/instrument combinations. Our data also confirm that ISIs of the same PT reagent differ significantly on different instruments, thus confirming the requirement for evaluations and validation of ISIs for different reagent/instrument combinations.

SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization published sensitivity differences do not correlate with positivity rate in a hospital/reference laboratory setting.

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic skyrocketing demand for testing in the United States, coupled with supply chain issues, necessitated the use of multiple SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing platforms at many health centers. At our institution these platforms consisted of 8 ordered services for sample triage, using 9 emergency use authorized (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RNA nucleic acid amplification tests resulting in 10 possible ordered service/EAU combinations. Here we review the results of the first ∼2.9 million samples tested and note the variability in positivity rates. We conclude that differences in reported limit of detection did not translate to differences in positivity rate or show correlation to discordant results observed. This highlights the importance of balancing patient testing capacity needs with the desire to have more sensitive tests.

CoaguChek and Coag-Sense PT2 Meter Point of Care INR Device Validation.

OBJECTIVE: To standardize international normalized ratio (INR) measurements and improve data integrity by enabling electronic result transmission for warfarin monitoring, two point-of-care (POC) devices were evaluated against an internal plasma INR reference method. METHODS: A multicenter study was pursued (January 24, 2022, through October 19, 2022) to compare concordance of two commercially available POC devices, Coag-Sense PT2 Meter (Coag-Sense) and CoaguChek XS Pro and Plus devices (CoaguChek), against an internal plasma INR method among patients treated with warfarin. Bias and linear regression analysis were assessed for these devices including dosing decision accuracy compared with plasma INR reference. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients treated with warfarin across three Mayo Clinic sites agreed to participate. Atrial fibrillation (n=191, 63.9%), venous thromboembolism (n=65; 21.7%), and heart valve prosthesis (n=46; 15.4%) were common anticoagulant indications with a 2.5 INR target for 280 (93.6%) of patients. For the CoaguChek devices, 243 (81.3%) of values fell within 0.2 INR units with plasma INR referent and 285 (95.3%) within 0.4 units (R2=0.93). For the Coag-Sense device, 102 (34.1%) of values fell within 0.2 INR units and 180 (60.2%) within 0.4 INR units of plasma INR values, (R2=0.83; P<.0001). Using the plasma INR as the gold standard, appropriate dosing recommendations would have occurred for 292 (97.7%) of the CoaguChek and 244 (81.6%) of the Coag-Sense results. CONCLUSION: Compared with a plasma referent, INR values obtained from the CoaguChek devices exhibited less systematic bias compared with Coag-Sense measures. This translates to a greater percentage of concordant management decisions between POC and laboratory INR methods.

Evaluation of the Visby medical COVID-19 point of care nucleic acid amplification test.

Rapid and widespread diagnostic testing is critical to providing timely patient care and reducing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, the Visby Medical COVID-19 point of care (POC) test was granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid at the point of care. We evaluated its performance characteristics using residual specimens (n = 100) collected from Mayo Clinic patients using nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and placed in viral transport media (VTM). The same specimen was tested using both the laboratory reference method (RT-qPCR) and Visby test. The reference methods utilized included a laboratory developed test with EUA (Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Rochester, MN) using the TaqMan assay on a Roche Light Cycler 480 or a commercially available EUA platform (cobas® SARS-CoV-2; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Positive, negative, and overall percent agreement between the Visby COVID-19 test and the reference method were calculated. Additionally, the limit of detection (LoD) claimed by the manufacturer (1112 copies/mL) was verified with serial dilutions of heat inactivated virus. The Visby COVID-19 test correctly identified 29/30 positive samples and 69/70 negative samples, resulting in an overall concordance of 98.0%, positive percent agreement of 96.7%, and negative percent agreement of 98.6%. The abbreviated LoD experiment showed that the analytical sensitivity of the method is as low as or lower than 500 copies/mL. Our study demonstrated that Visby COVID-19 is well-suited to address rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing needs. It has high concordance with central laboratory-based RT-qPCR methods, a low rate of invalid results, and superior analytical sensitivity to some other EUA POC devices.

Authorized SARS-CoV-2 molecular methods show wide variability in the limit of detection.

On February 29th, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued the first Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for a SARS-CoV-2 assay outside of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As of May 3rd, 2021, 289 total EUAs have been granted. Like influenza, there is no standard for defining limit of detection (LoD), but rather guidance that analytical sensitivity/LoD be established as the level that gives a 95% detection rate in at least 20 replicates. Here we compare the performance characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 tests receiving EUA by standardizing sensitivity to a common unit of measure and assess the variability in LoD between tests. Additionally, we looked at factors that may impact sensitivities due to lack of standardization of the test development process and compare results for a standardized reference panel for comparative analysis within a subset of EUA tests offered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Evaluation of the analytical sensitivity of ACON and LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests using samples with presumed Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND: Analytical sensitivity of 2 rapid antigen tests was evaluated for detection of presumed SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants and earlier variants of concern. METHODS: A total of 152 SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive samples (N and ORF1ab positive but S gene negative) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antigen by ACON lateral flow and LumiraDx fluorescence immunoassays. Sensitivity within 3 viral load ranges was compared among these 152 samples and 194 similarly characterized samples collected prior to the circulation of the Delta variant (pre-Delta). RESULTS: Antigen was detected in >95% of pre-Delta and presumed Omicron samples for both tests at viral loads >500,000 copies/mL, and 65 to 85% of samples with 50,000-500,000 copies/mL. At viral load <50,000 copies/mL, antigen tests showed better sensitivity in detecting pre-Delta compared to Omicron variants. LumiraDx was more sensitive than ACON at low viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen tests had decreased sensitivity for detecting presumed Omicron compared to pre-Delta variants at low viral load.

Refining interpretation of transcutaneous bilirubin measurement in newborns born late preterm.

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous bilirubin (TCB) monitoring is widely used for jaundice screening in the newborn period. Limited data exists on adjusting TCB for bias in late preterm infants. The objective of this study was to determine the median bias between transcutaneous bilirubin and total serum bilirubin levels in newborns born at 35-36 weeks' gestation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of late preterm infants born at 35-0/7 to 36-6/7 weeks' gestation who were admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit from May 2018 to February 2020. Transcutaneous and total serum bilirubin levels were assessed within 2 h of each other during the first 60 h of life. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate transcutaneous bilirubin bias. Bilirubin risk stratification based on age (in hours) was done using an adaptation of the Bhutani nomogram for transcutaneous, adjusted transcutaneous, and total serum bilirubin measurements. RESULTS: The median bias between transcutaneous and total serum bilirubin bias was 2.4 mg/dL (IQR 1.7-3.4, 95% CI 2.2-2.7). The kappa statistic demonstrated slight agreement between the unadjusted transcutaneous bilirubin and total serum bilirubin (k = 0.033, p = 0.194. The kappa statistic demonstrated fair agreement between an adjusted transcutaneous bilirubin (subtract 1 mg/dL) and total serum bilirubin (k = 0.298, p < 0.0001) and moderate agreement between another adjusted transcutaneous bilirubin (subtract 2 mg/dL) and total serum bilirubin (k = 0.430, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In a single center study of late preterm infants, transcutaneous bilirubin systematically overestimated the total serum bilirubin level. Subtracting 1 mg/dL from the transcutaneous bilirubin identified infants with total serum bilirubin levels in the high or high intermediate risk range. Adjusting the transcutaneous bilirubin prior to risk stratification may reduce unnecessary blood draws for total serum bilirubin. Studies of racially and ethnically diverse newborns using various transcutaneous bilirubin meters are needed prior to broad application of the adjusted transcutaneous bilirubin approach.

AACC Guidance Document on the Use of Point-of-Care Testing in Fertility and Reproduction.

BACKGROUND: The AACC Academy revised the reproductive testing section of the Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Evidence-Based Practice for Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) published in 2007. METHODS: A panel of Academy members with expertise in POCT and laboratory medicine was formed to develop guidance for the use of POCT in reproductive health, specifically ovulation, pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and high-risk deliveries. The committee was supplemented with clinicians having Emergency Medicine and Obstetrics/Gynecology training. RESULTS: Key recommendations include the following. First, urine luteinizing hormone (LH) tests are accurate and reliable predictors of ovulation. Studies have shown that the use of ovulation predicting kits may improve the likelihood of conception among healthy fertile women seeking pregnancy. Urinary LH point-of-care testing demonstrates a comparable performance among other ovulation monitoring methods for timing intrauterine insemination and confirming sufficient ovulation induction before oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilization. Second, pregnancy POCT should be considered in clinical situations where rapid diagnosis of pregnancy is needed for treatment decisions, and laboratory analysis cannot meet the required turnaround time. Third, PROM testing using commercial kits alone is not recommended without clinical signs of rupture of membranes, such as leakage of amniotic fluid from the cervical opening. Finally, fetal scalp lactate is used more than fetal scalp pH for fetal acidosis due to higher success rate and low volume of sample required. CONCLUSIONS: This revision of the AACC Academy POCT guidelines provides recommendations for best practice use of POCT in fertility and reproduction.