Obstacles to implement machine perfusion technology in routine clinical practice of transplantation: Why are we not there yet?

Machine perfusion of solid human organs is an old technique, and the basic principles were presented as early as 1855 by Claude Barnard. More than 50 years ago, the first perfusion system was used in clinical kidney transplantation. Despite the well-known benefits of dynamic organ preservation and significant medical and technical development in the last decades, perfusion devices are still not in routine use. This article describes the various challenges to implement this technology in practice, critically analyzing the role of all involved stakeholders, including clinicians, hospitals, regulatory, and industry, on the background of regional differences worldwide. The clinical need for this technology is discussed first, followed by the current status of research and the impact of costs and regulations. Considering the need for strong collaborations between clinical users, regulatory bodies, and industry, integrated road maps and pathways required to achieve a wider implementation are presented. The role of research development, clear regulatory pathways, and the need for more flexible reimbursement schemes is discussed together with potential solutions to address the most relevant hurdles. This article paints an overall picture of the current liver perfusion landscape and highlights the role of clinical, regulatory, and financial stakeholders worldwide.

International Multicenter Study of Ultra-Low GRWR Grafts in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Decreasing the graft size in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) increases the risk of early allograft dysfunction. Graft-to-recipient-weight-ratio (GRWR) of 0.8 is considered the threshold. There is evidence that smaller volume grafts may also provide equally good outcomes, the cut-off of which remains unknown. In this retrospective multi-center study, 92 adult LDLT with a final GRWR<=0.6 performed at 12 international liver transplant (LT) centers over a 3-year period were included. Perioperative data including preoperative status, portal flow hemodynamics (PFH) and portal flow modulation (PFM), development of SFSS, morbidity and mortality was collated and analyzed. Thirty-two (36.7%) patients developed SFSS and this was associated with increased 30-day, 90-day and one-year mortality. Pre-operative MELD and inpatient status were independent predictors for SFSS (p<0.05). Pre-LT renal dysfunction was an independent predictor of survival (Hazard ratio- 3.1;95% ci 1.1,8.9, p=0.035). PFH or PFM were not predictive of SFSS or survival. We report the largest ever multi-center study of LDLT outcomes using ultralow-GRWR grafts and for the first-time validate the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI consensus definition and grading of SFSS. Pre-operative recipient condition rather than GRWR and PFH were independent predictors of SFSS. Algorithms to predict SFSS and LT outcomes should incorporate recipient factors along with GRWR.

An Analysis of 10,000 Cases of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Japan: Special Reference to the Graft-Versus-Recipient Weight Ratio and Donor Age.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze 10,000 cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipient data to elucidate outcomes with special reference to the graft-versus-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), based on the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society (JLTS) registry. BACKGROUND: The JLTS registry has been accurate and complete in characterizing and following trends in patient characteristics and survival of all patients with LDLT. METHODS: Between November 1989 and August 2021, 10,000 patients underwent LDLT in Japan. The procedures performed during the study period included pediatric liver transplantation (age <18 years, n = 3572) and adult liver transplantation (age ≥18 years, n=6428). Factors related to patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were also analyzed. RESULTS: The GRWR was <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, 0.8 to <3, 3 to <5, and ≥5 in 0.2%, 2.0%, 61.8%, 31.8%, and 2.6% of pediatric patients and <0.6, 0.6 to <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, and ≥0.8 in 8.0%, 12.7%, 17.7%, and 61.5% of adult patients, respectively. Among pediatric recipients, the PS rate up to 5 years was significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≤5 than in those with a GRWR >5. When the GRWR and donor age were combined, among adult recipients 50 to 60 years old, the early PS and GS up to 5 years were significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≥0.7, than in those with a GRWR <0.7. (P = 0.02). In adults, a multivariate analysis showed that GRWR <0.6, transplant era (<2011), donor age (>60 years), recipient age (>60 years), model for end-stage liver disease score (≥20), and center volume (<10) were significant prognostic factors for long-term PS. CONCLUSION: Although a satisfactory long-term PS and GS, especially in the recent era (2011-2021), was achieved in the JLTS series, a GRWR ≥5 in pediatric cases and relatively old donors with a GRWR <0.7 in adult cases should be managed with caution.

Efficiency of machine perfusion in pediatric liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation is the only life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver disease. The field is however heterogenic with various graft types, recipient age, weight, and underlying diseases. Despite recently improved overall outcomes and the expanded use of living donors, waiting list mortality remains unacceptable, particularly in small children and infants. Based on the known negative effects of elevated donor age, higher body mass index, and prolonged cold ischemia time, the number of available donors for pediatric recipients is limited. Machine perfusion has regained significant interest in the adult liver transplant population during the last decade. Ten randomized controlled trials are published with an overall advantage of machine perfusion techniques over cold storage regarding postoperative outcomes, including graft survival. The concept of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) was the first and only perfusion technique used for pediatric liver transplantation today. In 2018 the first pediatric candidate received a full-size graft donated after circulatory death with cold storage and HOPE, followed by a few split liver transplants after HOPE with an overall limited case number until today. One series of split procedures during HOPE was recently presented by colleagues from France with excellent results, reduced complications, and better graft survival. Such early experience paves the way for more systematic use of machine perfusion techniques for different graft types for pediatric recipients. Clinical reports of pediatric liver transplants with other perfusion techniques are awaited. Strong collaborative efforts are needed to explore the effect of perfusion techniques in this vulnerable population impacting not only the immediate posttransplant outcome but the development and success of an entire life.

An international survey of venous thromboembolic events and current practices of peri-operative VTE prophylaxis after living donor hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolic complications are an uncommon but significant cause of morbidity & mortality after live donor hepatectomy . The precise incidence of these events and the current practices of centers performing living donor liver transplantation worldwide are unknown. METHODS: An online survey was shared amongst living donor liver transplantation centers containing questions regarding center activity, center protocols for donor screening, peri-operative thromboembolic prophylaxis and an audit of -perioperative venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy in the previous five years (2016-2020). RESULTS: Fifty-one centers from twenty countries completed the survey. These centers had cumulatively performed 11500 living donor liver transplants between 2016-2020. All centers included pre-operative l assessment for thromboembolic risk amongst potential liver donors in their protocols. Testing for inherited prothrombotic conditions was performed by 58% of centers. Dual-mode prophylaxis was the most common practice (65%), while eight and four centers used single mode or no routine prophylaxis respectively. Twenty (39%) and 15 (29%) centers reported atleast one perioperative deep venous thrmobosis or pulmonary embolism event respectively. There was one donor mortality directly related to post-operative pulmonary embolism. Overall incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism events was 3.65 and 1.74 per 1000 live donor hepatectomies respectively. Significant variations in center practices and incidence of thromboembolic events was identified in the survey primarily divided along world regions. 75% of participating centers agreed on the need for clear international guidelines. CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy are an uncommon but important cause of donor morbidity. There is significant variation in practice among centers. Evidence-based guidelines regarding risk assessment, and peri-operative prophylaxis are needed.

Criteria for immediate extubation after pediatric liver transplantation in a single pediatric liver transplant center in Japan.

Immediate extubation (IE) following liver transplantation (LT) has become the standard practice, even for pediatric patients. However, no preoperative or postoperative case selection protocols for IE are currently available. We have developed selection criteria for IE following pediatric LT. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of these selection criteria and anesthetic management protocol implemented in our hospital for IE after pediatric LT. METHOD: This was a retrospective study. The records of all cases undergoing LT in our center from January 2016 to December 2020 were collected. We excluded cases > 18 years old at the time of LT. Enrolled cases were divided into two groups: cases with immediate extubation (IE) or without immediate extubation (NIE). We compared preoperative conditions, intraoperative management, and postoperative courses. Finally, we classified NIE group patients into cases extubated at postoperative day 1 (early; E-NIE) and others (delayed; D-NIE) and compared their underlying diseases and postoperative courses. RESULTS: In the IE group, there were 81 cases, while the NIE group consisted of 185 cases. All patients in the IE group were successfully extubated without any instances of re-intubation due to respiratory failure. Within the E-NIE group, comprising 130 cases, all patients were ultimately extubated without the need for tracheostomy. However, in the D-NIE group, which encompassed 53 cases, seven patients required tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: In our center, the implementation of our anesthesia management protocol and the use of pre/postoperative case selection criteria have allowed for the safe practice of IE following pediatric LT. However, it should be noted that patients who cannot be extubated by Postoperative Day 1 (POD1) may be at an increased risk of requiring a tracheostomy. When contemplating IE, it is crucial to take into account the disease-specific physiological aspects and surgical site situations.

Impact of preoperative bloodstream infection on outcomes of pediatric liver transplant recipients treated for acute liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a component of multisystem organ failure that causes severe liver dysfunction in patients without underlying chronic liver disease. The patients with ALF are prone to have infections, including bacteremia. However, studies of the infectious impact for post liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric ALF are limited. We aimed to evaluate our current practice for pediatric LT cases of ALF with preoperative bacteremia. METHODS: The records of all patients under 18 years old undergoing LT for ALF in our center from November 2005 to December 2021 were collected. They were divided into two groups: those with a preoperative bloodstream infection (BSI) and those without (NBSI). We compared the preoperative status and also reviewed the details of the BSI group. Intraoperative course and postoperative outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: There were 19 BSI patients and 66 NBSI patients. One BSI case was detected on the day of LT. This patient had no changes in vital signs and general condition. After evaluation and therapeutic intervention by pediatric infectious disease specialists, LT was performed on the same day. Five cases developed septic shock at the time of detection of BSI. All BSI patients were in stable condition on the operation day with proper interventions. There were no significant differences in mortality and hospital stay between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LT might be able to be performed for pediatric ALF even with positive blood cultures. In addition, appropriate therapeutic intervention by specialists and patient's stable condition before LT are essential.

The role of liver transplantation in COACH syndrome (Joubert syndrome with congenital hepatic fibrosis): A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: COACH syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease characterized by liver fibrosis, which leads to severe complications related to portal hypertension. However, only a few patients with COACH syndrome undergoing liver transplantation (LT) have been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We herein report the outcomes of four children who underwent LT for COACH syndrome at our institute and review three previously reported cases to elucidate the role of LT in COACH syndrome. RESULTS: All four patients in our institute were female, and three received living donors LT. All patients were diagnosed with COACH syndrome by genetic testing. LT was performed in these patients at 3, 7, 9, and 14 years old. The indication for LT was varices related to portal hypertension in all patients. One showed an intrapulmonary shunt. Blood tests revealed renal impairment due to nephronophthisis in three patients, and one developed renal insufficiency after LT. The liver function was maintained in all patients. A literature review revealed detailed information for three more patients. The indication for LT in these three cases was portal hypertension, such as bleeding from esophageal varices. One patient had chronic renal failure on hemodialysis at LT and underwent combined liver and kidney transplantation. Of these three previous patients, one died from hepatic failure due to de novo HCV infection 3 years after LT. CONCLUSIONS: LT should be considered an effective treatment for COACH syndrome in patients with severe portal hypertension. However, a detailed follow-up of the renal function is necessary.

Clinical outcomes after transplantation of domino grafts or standard deceased donor livers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Domino liver transplantation (DLT) utilizes otherwise discarded livers as donor grafts for another recipients. It is unclear whether DLT has less favorable outcomes compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). We aimed to assess the outcomes of DLT compared to DDLT. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science database were searched to identify studies comparing outcomes after DLT with DDLT. Data were pooled using random-effects modeling, evaluating odds ratios (OR) or mean difference (MD) for outcomes including waiting list time, severe hemorrhage, intensive care unit (ICU), length hospital stay (LOS), rejection, renal, vascular, and biliary events, and recipient survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: Five studies were identified including 945 patients (DLT = 409, DDLT = 536). The DLT recipients were older compared to the DDLT group (P = 0.04), and both cohorts were comparable regarding lab MELD, hepatocellular carcinoma, and waitlist time. There were no differences in vascular (OR: 1.60, P = 0.39), renal (OR: 0.62, P = 0.24), biliary (OR: 1.51, P = 0.21), severe hemorrhage (OR: 1.09, P = 0.86), rejection (OR: 0.78, P = 0.51), ICU stay (MD: 0.50, P = 0.21), or LOS (MD: 1.68, P = 0.46) between DLT and DDLT. DLT and DDLT were associated with comparable 1-year (78.9% vs 80.4%; OR: 1.03, P = 0.89), 3-year (56.2% vs 54.1%; OR: 1.35, P = 0.07), and 10-year survival (6.5% vs 8.5%; OR: 0.8, P = 0.67) rates. DLT was associated with higher 5-year survival (41.6% vs 36.4%; OR: 1.70; P = 0.003) compared to DDLT, which was not confirmed at sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of the best available evidence (Level 2a) demonstrated that DLT and DDLT have comparable outcomes. As indications for liver transplantation expand, future high-quality research is encouraged to increase the DLT numbers in clinical practice, serving the growing waiting list candidates, with the caveat of uncertain de novo disease transmission risks.

Living-donor liver transplantation for methylmalonic acidemia patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by defects in propionyl-CoA (P-CoA) catabolism; of note, liver neoplasms rarely occur as a long-term complication of the disorder. Herein, we report the case of a patient with MMA and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who was successfully treated with a living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) following prior kidney transplantation. CASE REPORT: A 25-year-old male patient with MMA underwent LDLT with a left lobe graft because of metabolic instability and liver neoplasms. He had presented with chronic symptoms of MMA, which had been diagnosed by genetic testing. Additionally, he had undergone living-donor kidney transplantation with his father as the donor due to end-stage kidney disease 6 years before the LDLT. He had an episode of metabolic decompensation triggered by coronavirus disease in 2019. Imaging studies revealed an intrahepatic neoplasm in the right hepatic lobe. Due to concerns about metabolic decompensation after hepatectomy, LDLT was performed using a left lobe graft obtained from the patient's mother. Pathological findings were consistent with the characteristics of well-to-moderately differentiated HCC. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 48 days after the LDLT without any complications. At the 9-month follow-up, the patient's condition was satisfactory, with sufficient liver graft function and without metabolic decompensation. CONCLUSION: This case indicates that although HCC is a rare complication in patients with MMA, clinicians should be aware of hepatic malignancies during long-term follow-up.

Evaluation of living donors for hereditary liver disease (siblings, heterozygotes).

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is recognised as an alternative treatment modality to reduce waiting list mortality and expand the donor pool. Over recent decades, there have been an increasing number of reports on the use of LT and specifically LDLT for familial hereditary liver diseases. There are marginal indications and contraindications that should be considered for a living donor in paediatric parental LDLT. No mortality or morbidity related to recurrence of metabolic diseases has been observed with heterozygous donors, except for certain relevant cases, such as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, protein C deficiency, hypercholesterolemia, protoporphyria, and Alagille syndrome, while donor human leukocyte antigen homozygosity also poses a risk. It is not always essential to perform preoperative genetic assays for possible heterozygous carriers; however, genetic and enzymatic assays must hereafter be included in the parental donor selection criteria in the aforementioned circumstances.

Advances and innovations in living donor liver transplant techniques, matching and surgical training: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference.

The practice of LDLT currently delivers limited impact in western transplant centers. The American Society of Transplantation organized a virtual consensus conference in October 2021 to identify barriers and gaps to LDLT growth, and to provide evidence-based recommendations to foster safe expansion of LDLT in the United States. This article reports the findings and recommendations regarding innovations and advances in approaches to donor-recipient matching challenges, the technical aspects of the donor and recipient operations, and surgical training. Among these themes, the barriers deemed most influential/detrimental to LDLT expansion in the United States included: (1) prohibitive issues related to donor age, graft size, insufficient donor remnant, and ABO incompatibility; (2) lack of acknowledgment and awareness of the excellent outcomes and benefits of LDLT; (3) ambiguous messaging regarding LDLT to patients and hospital leadership; and (4) a limited number of proficient LDLT surgeons across the United States. Donor-recipient mismatching may be circumvented by way of liver paired exchange. The creation of a national registry to generate granular data on donor-recipient matching will guide the practice of liver paired exchange. The surgical challenges to LDLT are addressed herein and focuses on the development of robust training pathways resulting in proficiency in donor and recipient surgery. Utilizing strong mentorship/collaboration programs with novel training practices under the auspices of established training and certification bodies will add to the breadth and depth of training.

Significance of a multidisciplinary approach to congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt: A changing paradigm for the treatment.

AIM: To review the current institutional practice to treat patients with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) and to determine the optimal strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 55 patients diagnosed with CEPS at our center between December 2008 and March 2022. RESULTS: Among these 55 patients, 44 (80.0%) received treatment for CEPS at a median age of 4.7 years. The most common indication for treatment was cardiopulmonary complications (45.5%). Therapeutic intervention included shunt closure by endovascular techniques (50.0%) or surgery (40.9%), and liver transplantation (9.1%). A total of 11 were classified as short shunt types, and surgical ligation was performed in all to preserve the major vascular system and prevent complications (p < 0.001). Children who received a surgical ligation were more likely to develop complications after shunt closure (p = 0.02). Among seven patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), one patient, who received a shunt ligation at <1 year-of-age, was only able to completely discontinue medication. Most other CEPS-related complications were completely resolved. Post-treatment complications, including thrombosis and symptoms of portal hypertension, were seen in 16 patients. After shunt closure, one patient was scheduled to undergo liver transplantation for progressive POPH and large residual hepatocellular adenoma. During follow-up, one patient without any treatment for CEPS developed POPH 16 years from the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Earlier therapeutic interventions should be strongly considered for patients with POPH related to CEPS. However, in view of the invasiveness and treatment complications, special attention should be paid to the management of patients with short shunt types.

Rare sequence variants associated with the risk of non-syndromic biliary atresia.

AIM: The etiology of non-syndromic biliary atresia (BA) remains largely unknown. In this study, we performed genome-wide screening of genes associated with the risk of non-syndromic BA. METHODS: We analyzed exome data of 15 Japanese patients with non-syndromic BA and 509 control individuals using an optimal sequence kernel association test (SKAT-O), a gene-based association study optimized for small-number subjects. Furthermore, we examined the frequencies of known BA-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the BA and control groups. RESULTS: SKAT-O showed that rare damaging variants of MFHAS1, a ubiquitously expressed gene encoding a Toll-like receptor-associated protein, were more common in the BA group than in the control group (Bonferroni corrected p-value = 0.0097). Specifically, p.Val106Gly and p.Arg556Cys significantly accumulated in the patient group. These variants resided within functionally important domains. SKAT-O excluded the presence of other genes significantly associated with the disease risk. Of 60 known BA-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms, only eight were identified in the BA group. In particular, p.Ile3421Met of MYO15A and p.Ala421Thr of THOC2 were more common in the BA group than in the control group. However, the significance of these two variants is questionable, because MYO15A has been linked to deafness, but not to BA, and the p.Ala421Thr of THOC2 represents a relatively common single-nucleotide polymorphism in Asia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that rare damaging variants in MFHAS1 may constitute a risk factor for non-syndromic BA, whereas the contribution of other monogenic variants to the disease predisposition is limited.

Successful pediatric liver transplantation case with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test at the time of transplant.

AIM: We report a successful liver transplantation (LT) in a child with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 3-year-old female patient with decompensated cirrhosis due to Alagille syndrome underwent a split LT with a left lateral segment graft. She had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection 4 months before LT. She was exposed to SARS-CoV-2 after the decision for organ acceptance. We repeatedly confirmed the negative SARS-CoV-2 test by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before LT. Liver transplantation was carried out in the negative pressure operational theater with full airborne, droplet, and contact precautions as the patient was considered to be within the incubation period of SARS-CoV-2. The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test became positive in the nasopharyngeal swab specimen at the operation. Remdesivir, the antiviral treatment, was held off due to potential hepatotoxicity and no exacerbation of COVID-19. She received tacrolimus and low-dose steroids per protocol. She remained SARS-CoV-2 positive on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 5. The presence of antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 at LT was confirmed later. On POD 53, she was discharged without any symptomatic infection. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrated that a positive SARS-CoV-2 result was not an absolute contraindication for a life-saving LT. Liver transplantation could be safely performed in a pediatric patient with asymptomatic COVID-19 and S-immunoglobulin G antibodies for SARS-CoV-2.

Optimal graft size in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: How are children different from adults?

BACKGROUND: Pediatric liver transplantation is an established treatment for end-stage liver disease in children. However, it is still posing relevant challenges, such as optimizing the graft selection according to the recipient size. Unlike adults, small children tolerate large-for-size grafts and insufficient graft volume might represent an issue in adolescents when graft size is disproportionate. METHODS: Graft-size matching strategies over time were examined in pediatric liver transplantation. This review traces the measures/principles put in place to prevent large-for-size or small-for-size grafts in small children to adolescents with a literature review and an analysis of the data issued from the National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. RESULTS: Reduced left lateral segment (LLS; Couinaud's segment II and III) was widely applicable for small children less than 5 kg with metabolic liver disease or acute liver failure. There was significantly worse graft survival if the actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was less than 1.5% in the adolescent with LLS graft due to the small-for-size graft. Children, particularly adolescents, may then require larger GRWR than adults to prevent small-for-size syndrome. The suggested ideal graft selections in pediatric LDLT are: reduced LLS, recipient body weight (BW) < 5.0 kg; LLS, 5.0 kg ≤ BW < 25 kg; left lobe (Couinaud's segment II, III, IV with middle hepatic vein), 25 kg ≤ BW < 50 kg; right lobe (Couinaud's segment V, VI, VII, VIII without middle hepatic vein), 50 kg ≤ BW. Children, particularly adolescents, may then require larger GRWR than adults to prevent small-for-size syndrome. CONCLUSION: Age-appropriate and BW-appropriate strategies of graft selection are crucial to secure an excellent outcome in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Portal vein pressure and flow modulation in pediatric liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) has been indicated for smaller and more clinically severe patients in recent years. Small biliary atresia (BA) patients often show portal hypoplasia and sclerotic portal vein (PV), which may make PV reconstruction more difficult during the operation. Among PV complications, intraoperative PV thrombosis can be considered a disaster, and it is important to prevent this catastrophic event by the precise assessment of the PV structure and PVF using radiological imaging before and during LT. However, there are no objective parameters to indicate whether sufficient PVF can be obtained. PV pressure (PVP) and PV flow (PVF) have mainly been studied in adult living donor LT, for the purpose of preventing small-for-size syndrome, and PVP has been considered an objective parameter of graft inflow modulation (GIM). In the setting of pediatric LT, GIM is mainly performed to prevent hypoperfusion, and it must be performed before graft implantation. GIM to maximize the PVF of pediatric patients with potentially low PVF in LT consists of the interruption of collateral vessels, the assessment of the usability of the native PV, and technical modifications in PV reconstruction. Reliable objective parameters that represent sufficient PVF before graft implantation are desired. Our recent study proposed that a PVP of ≥25 mmHg before graft implantation can be considered an objective parameter to obtain sufficient PVF (cutoff value: 50 mL/min/100 g of graft weight). Further investigation is needed to determine the best strategy for successful PV reconstruction in pediatric LT.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy as bridging therapy for liver transplantation in an infant with an advanced hepatic rhabdoid tumor.

BACKGROUND: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) are rare, aggressive tumors that mainly affect children and currently lack effective chemotherapeutic regimens. Liver MRTs are particularly challenging to manage due to the difficulty of performing one-stage liver resection, and preemptive liver transplantation is associated with high recurrence rates. However, the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique offers a promising surgical approach for advanced-stage liver tumors where conventional liver resection is not feasible. CASE REPORT: A patient with a large liver rhabdoid tumor that had invaded the three main hepatic veins underwent four courses of cisplatin-pirarubicin chemotherapy. ALPPS was performed due to insufficient residual liver capacity, with hepatic parenchymal dissection between the anterior and posterior liver zones in the first stage of surgery. After confirming adequate remaining liver volume, the liver was resected except for S1 and S6 on postoperative day 14. LDLT was performed 7 months after ALPPS due to the gradual deterioration of liver function caused by chemotherapy. The patient was recurrence-free 22 and 15 months after ALPPS and LDLT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ALPPS technique is a curative option for advanced-stage liver tumors that cannot be managed with conventional liver resection. In this case, ALPPS was used successfully to manage a large liver rhabdoid tumor. Then, liver transplantation was performed after chemotherapy. The ALPPS technique should be considered a potential treatment strategy for patients with advanced-stage liver tumors, particularly those who can undergo liver transplantation.

Perioperative risk factors for neurological impairment in infants with acute liver failure following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Neurological impairment is not rare in infants with acute liver failure (ALF). This study aimed to investigate the perioperative risk factors for neurological impairment following liver transplantation (LT) in infantile ALF. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed in infants who were younger than 1 year with ALF who subsequently underwent LT at our hospital between January 2005 and December 2016. Patients were considered to have neurological impairment if the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score was between 2 and 5 at the age of 6 years. A comparison between the groups of infants with and without neurological impairment was performed, and factors with p < .10 in the comparison were analyzed using univariate logistic regression analysis for neurological impairment. RESULTS: Twenty-six infants survived until 6 years of age, and 31% (8/26) of them had neurological impairment. Patients with neurological impairment were significantly younger in age at ALF onset, had significantly higher pre-LT bilirubin and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, and stayed significantly longer in the intensive care unit than those without neurological impairment. Total bilirubin (odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.22, p = .012), indirect bilirubin (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, p = .025), direct bilirubin (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.47, p = .040), and age in month at ALF (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.999, p = .049) showed significant association with neurological impairment. CONCLUSIONS: High pre-LT peak bilirubin value and younger age at ALF onset can be perioperative risk factors for neurological impairment after LT in infantile ALF.

Optimal liver transplant procedure in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 treated with biliary diversion or intestinal transplantation: Lessons learned from three cases treated with different approaches.

BACKGROUND: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) is an autosomal recessive cholestatic liver disorder caused by ATP8B1 gene mutations. Although liver transplantation (LT) is indicated for progressive liver disease, postoperative complications, including severe diarrhea and graft steatohepatitis leading to graft loss, have been reported. CASES: The first patient had jaundice, pruritus, diarrhea, and growth retardation (weight z-score: -2.5; height z-score: -3.7). She underwent LT with total internal biliary diversion (TIBD) to the colon at 2 years of age. Graft biopsy at the 7-year follow-up examination revealed microvesicular steatosis (60%). Her diarrhea improved, and her growth failure was recovering (weight z-score: -1.0; height z-score: -1.7). The second patient underwent sequential intestine-liver transplantation at 8 years of age due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and short bowel syndrome caused by massive bowel resection for internal hernia after partial external biliary diversion (PEBD) at 21 months of age. She developed severe pancreatitis induced by steroid-bolus therapy for rejection after transplantation. She died 1.7 years after intestinal transplantation due to an uncontrollable pancreatic abscess and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The third patient underwent PEBD at 15 months of age and received LT with TEBD at 15 years of age due to ESLD with hepatic encephalopathy. Throughout the perioperative period, she showed no abdominal symptoms, including diarrhea and pancreatitis. Graft biopsy at the 2-year follow-up examination revealed macrovesicular steatosis (60%) with inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The patients showed different outcomes. Effective therapeutic options to mitigate post-LT complications in patients with PFIC1 must be considered individually.