Dedicated phantom tools using traceable 68Ge/68Ga point-like sources for dedicated-breast PET and positron emission mammography scanners.

Since the early 2000s, many types of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners dedicated to breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer have been introduced. However, conventional performance evaluation methods developed for whole-body PET scanners cannot be used for such devices. In this study, we developed phantom tools for evaluating the quantitative accuracy of positron emission mammography (PEM) and dedicated-breast PET (dbPET) scanners using novel traceable point-like 68Ge/68 Ga sources. The PEM phantom consisted of an acrylic cube (100 × 100 × 40 mm) and three point-like sources. The dbPET phantom comprised an acrylic cylinder (ø100 × 100 mm) and five point-like sources. These phantoms were used for evaluating the fundamental responses of clinical PEM and dbPET scanners to point-like inputs in a medium. The results showed that reasonable recovery values were obtained based on region-of-interest analyses of the reconstructed images. The developed phantoms using traceable 68Ge/68 Ga point-like sources were useful for evaluating the physical characteristics of PEM and dbPET scanners. Thus, they offer a practical, reliable, and universal measurement scheme for evaluating various types of PET scanners using common sets of sealed sources.

Clinical practice guidelines for high-resolution breast PET, 2019 edition.

Breast positron emission tomography (PET) has had insurance coverage when performed with conventional whole-body PET in Japan since 2013. Together with whole-body PET, accurate examination of breast cancer and diagnosis of metastatic disease are possible, and are expected to contribute significantly to its treatment planning. To facilitate a safer, smoother, and more appropriate examination, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine published the first edition of practice guidelines for high-resolution breast PET in 2013. Subsequently, new types of breast PET have been developed and their clinical usefulness clarified. Therefore, the guidelines for breast PET were revised in 2019. This article updates readers as to what is new in the second edition. This edition supports two different types of breast PET depending on the placement of the detector: the opposite-type (positron emission mammography; PEM) and the ring-shaped type (dedicated breast PET; dbPET), providing an overview of these scanners and appropriate imaging methods, their clinical applications, and future prospects. The name "dedicated breast PET" from the first edition is widely used to refer to ring-shaped type breast PET. In this edition, "breast PET" has been defined as a term that refers to both opposite- and ring-shaped devices. Up-to-date breast PET practice guidelines would help provide useful information for evidence-based breast imaging.

[Assessment of diagnostic criteria for FDG-PET cancer screening program according to the interpretation of FDG-PET and combined examination].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to establish the diagnostic criteria for FDG-PET cancer screening program of four kinds of organ (breast, thyroid, lung and colon/rectum) according to the interpretation of FDG-PET cancer screening program of the case with proved clinical outcome. METHODS: Among FDG-PET cancer screening examinations performed in two PET centers during 2003 to 2006, two hundreds of examinations with proved clinical outcome were evaluated. Interpretation of breast ultrasonography, thyroid ultrasonography, chest CT and fecal occult blood testing, which were regarded as combined examinations, were performed together with the interpretation of FDG-PET images. RESULTS: As a result of the interpretation, localized FDG accumulating site in all four organs should be recommended for further inspections. In addition, essential point for diagnosis was considered as follows; (1) check over the slight localized FDG accumulation with screening of breast region, (2) combine chest CT with FDG-PET for the evaluation of lung region and (3) check up the shift of FDG accumulation between early and delayed phase with screening of colon/rectum region. CONCLUSIONS: According to the interpretation results of this study, we establish diagnostic criteria of FDG-PET and combined examination of four kinds of organ.

[Report in 2017 April ～ 2018 March].

Women physicians, scientists and nurses are addressing many problems encountered in the practice of their chosen fields. We carried out a survey of the women working in the nuclear medicine field. Two hundred and six professionals answered this questionnaire. The findings of our survey were that we have many female bosses (experts), a low number of sexual harassment issues and enough parental leave. Many members work very hard to practice in this field, but they do not have enough support from their hospitals or research centers, to join medical conferences. And almost a quarter of those surveyed thought it is hard to improve their careers after taking parental leave. A change of perception in how their male colleagues and counterparts regard women in the field of nuclear medicine is required. This change, along with women having a clear and realistic career plan are fundamental answers to the issues faced by women in nuclear medicine.

Inter-observer variations in FDG-PET interpretation for cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic guidelines for the use of 2-(fluorine 18) fluoro-2 deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer screening have yet to be established. We assessed inter-observer variability in screening FDG-PET. METHODS: Subjects comprised 40 individuals who underwent FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) for cancer screening. To assess various patterns of FDG uptakes, three subsets of the cases were selected: 'Cancer', 15 cases with cancer; 'Not malignant', 15 cases with suspected cancer by FDG-PET who were confirmed as cancer-free; and 'Normal', 10 cases without remarkable FDG uptake who were confirmed as cancer-free. A total of 68 lesions made up of malignancy (n = 18), benign (n = 21), and physiological FDG uptake (n = 29) were interpreted by six physicians. Each observer reviewed each case three times. Step 1 involved interpretation of PET images alone, Step 2 involved side-by-side reading of PET and CT images, and Step 3 involved re-evaluation of findings with the results of other screening tests. We assessed inter-observer agreement for each step. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement for all lesions at each step was moderate, compared to fair agreement for 'Normal' subjects. Inter-observer agreement of 'Cancer' and 'Not malignant' subjects in Step 1 were better than those in Step 2 and 3; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The interpretation of FDG-PET is adequately reproducible, while that of 'Normal' subjects is less reproducible. Improvement of inter-observer variability in assessing physiological FDG uptakes requires universal reporting criteria in FDG-PET. Correlative interpretation of PET, CT and other information may require standardization in subjects with suspected cancer by FDG-PET.

Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening on the basis of a Japanese Nationwide Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to survey the situation of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) cancer screening in Japan and to describe its performance profile. METHODS: "FDG-PET for cancer screening" was defined as FDG-PET or positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with or without other tests performed for cancer screening of healthy subjects. We sent questionnaires regarding FDG-PET cancer screening to 99 facilities in which FDG-PET tests were performed during the fiscal year 2005. Replies were obtained from 68 of the 99 facilities, of which 46 facilities performed FDG-PET cancer screening. The total number of subjects who underwent FDG-PET cancer screening was 50 558. From 38 of 46 facilities, reliable results of thorough examinations were obtained for the subjects who were positive by FDG-PET and/or one or more of the combined screening tests was performed and were referred for further evaluation. The total number of subjects in these 38 facilities amounted to 43 996. RESULTS: A total of 50,558 healthy subjects underwent FDG-PET (including PET/CT) scanning with or without other tests for cancer screening in 46 PET centers during the fiscal year of 2005 in Japan. Thorough examination was indicated for 9.8% of the cases as a result of positive findings suggesting possible cancer. On analyzing 43 996 cases from 38 PET centers from which detailed information was obtained, 500 cases of cancers (1.14%) were found, of which 0.90% were PET positive and 0.24% were PET negative, resulting in the relative sensitivity of PET being 79.0%. Cancers of the thyroid, colon/rectum, lung, and breast were most frequently found (107, 102, 79, and 35 cases, respectively) with high PET sensitivity (88%, 90%, 80%, and 92%). PET showed an overall positive predictive value of 29.0%. PET/CT had a better detection rate, sensitivity, and positive predictive value than dedicated PET (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to clarify the performance profile of "FDG-PET for cancer screening" on the basis of a Japanese nationwide survey. The number of facilities possessing PET is increasing steadily, highlighting the necessity of evaluating the usefulness of "FDG-PET cancer screening" as soon as possible by undertaking long-term investigations of large series of subjects.

[Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening based on a Japanese nationwide survey].

A total of 50,558 healthy subjects underwent an FDG-PET (including PET/CT) scan with or without combination of other tests for cancer screening in 46 PET centers during fiscal year of 2005 in Japan. Thorough examination was indicated for 9.8% of the cases due to positive findings suggesting possible cancer. On analyzing 43,996 cases from 38 PET centers, where detailed information was obtained, 500 cases of cancers (1.14%) were found, of which 0.90% was PET positive and 0.24% was PET negative, resulting in the relative sensitivity of PET being 79.0%. Cancers of thyroid, colon/rectum, lung and breast were most frequently found (107, 102, 79, 35 cases, respectively) with high PET sensitivity (88%, 90%, 80%, 92%). PET showed an overall positive predictive value of 29.0%. PET/CT had better detection rate, sensitivity, and positive predictive value than dedicated PET (p<0.01).

Latent cerebral hypoperfusion in a boy with persistent nephrotic syndrome.

Pediatricians are often faced with both bad temper and decreased daily activity in children with persistent nephrotic syndrome. These problems, which might affect both mental and physical development, have been explained as a consequence of general fatigue due to systemic edema and/or long-term hospitalization. However, other factors, such as cerebral hypoperfusion, may be involved. We experienced a case of a boy with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome who showed diffuse cerebral hypoperfusion on single photon emission computed tomography. Diffuse cerebral hypoperfusion dramatically resolved as the nephrotic syndrome remitted. His bad temper, decreased daily activity, and delay of speech and motor development also improved. In our patient, cerebral hypoperfusion might have been associated with his mental problems, physical problems, and delayed development of speech.

Scoring analysis of salivary gland scintigraphy in patients with Sjögren's syndrome.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the validity of a scoring system based on excretion rate of salivary gland scintigraphy in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SjS). Total scintigraphic scores were compared with the results of the Saxon test. One hundred and twenty-four subjects who were clinically diagnosed with SjS and 11 normal ones underwent salivary gland scintigraphy and the Saxon test. In salivary gland scintigraphy, the difference between maximum and minimum counts after stimulation using vitamin C divided by maximum counts was defined as the excretion rate. We then defined a scoring system with 4 grades: severe dysfunction = 3 (excretion rate < 25%), moderate dysfunction = 2 (25% < or = excretion rate < 40%), mild dysfunction = 1 (40% < or = excretion rate < 50%) and normal function = 0 (50% < or = excretion rate). The summation of the total scintigraphic score (0-12) of all 4 salivary glands was used as a semi-quantitative index indicating total salivary gland function, and total scintigraphic scores were compared with the results of the Saxon test. A significant inverse linear correlation (R2 = 0.95) was observed between total scintigraphic scores and mean values of the Saxon test within a range of abnormal scintigraphic scores (> or = 4). The scoring system developed in the present study is a clinically available, objective, and reproducible method for evaluation of salivary gland function in patients with SjS.

Radiation exposure and risk-benefit analysis in cancer screening using FDG-PET: results of a Japanese nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate radiation exposure and evaluate the risks and benefits of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in cancer screening. METHODS: A nationwide survey of FDG-PET cancer screening was conducted in 2006, and the results were analyzed with a common index, "extension/shortening of the average life expectancy." RESULTS: The average estimated effective dose was 4.4 mSv (male 4.7 mSv; female 4.0 mSv) for dedicated PET and 13.5 mSv (male 14.2 mSv; female 12.8 mSv) for PET/computed tomography (CT). The risk-benefit break-even age from the viewpoint of radiation exposure was in the 40s for men and 30s for women for dedicated PET and in the 50s for men and 50s (variable injection dose) or 60s (constant injection dose) for women for PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET cancer screening is beneficial for examinees above the break-even ages. The risks and benefits should be explained to examinees because of the larger radiation used in cancer FDG-PET screening compared with other X-ray tests.