The impact of motivational interviewing on participation in childbirth preparation classes and having a natural delivery: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing on women's participation in childbirth classes and their subsequent natural vaginal delivery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Prenatal clinic of the Shohada Women's Hospital, Behshahr, Mazandaran, Iran. POPULATION: This study was conducted with 230 nulliparous women. Participants were randomised into three groups, including 76 women in the motivational interviewing group, and 77 women in both the lecture and the control groups. METHODS: Participants were assessed at three time points, including at baseline (16-19 weeks of gestation) and then following the intervention (at 21 and 37 weeks of gestation). The motivational interviewing group received two focus interviews and two telephone follow-up sessions (at 3 and 6 weeks after the last session of motivational interviewing). The lecture group received a speech session. The control group received routine care service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of participation in childbirth preparation classes and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Over 90% of women in the motivational interviewing group participated in childbirth preparation classes, whereas the rate of participation in the lecture and the control groups was 59.7 and 27.3%, respectively. The probability of maternal participation in childbirth classes in the motivational interviewing and in the lecture groups was 3.3 (95% CI 2.1-4.5) and 2.2 (95% CI 1.4-3.0) times the probability of maternal participation in the control group, respectively. Moreover, the intervention groups had 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.4) times the probability of natural delivery, compared with the control group. The frequency of natural delivery in motivational interviewing, lecture, and control groups was 68.4, 54.5, and 48.1%, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the mean scores for the awareness and attitude scores between the three groups in different time periods. CONCLUSION: We found that motivational interviewing can be a useful tool for encouraging pregnant women to attend childbirth preparation classes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Motivational interviewing with nulliparous women is strongly associated with their attendance in childbirth preparation classes.

Development and validation of a new tool to measure Iranian pregnant women's empowerment.

Empowering pregnant women improves their health and reduces maternal mortality, but there is a lack of suitable tools to measure women's empowerment in some cultures. This study aimed to design and validate a questionnaire for measuring the dimensions of empowerment among Iranian pregnant women. After a literature review, and face and content validity testing, a 38-item questionnaire was developed and tested on a sample of 161 pregnant women. Factor analysis grouped the items into 3 subscales: educational empowerment (e.g. prenatal training), autonomy (e.g. financial independency and mental ability) and sociopolitical empowerment (e.g. involvement in social and political activities). Criterion validity testing showed a strong positive correlation of the total scale and subscales scores with the Kameda and the Spritzer empowerment scales. Cronbach alpha was 0.92 for total empowerment. A total of 32 items remained in the Self-Structured Pregnancy Empowerment Questionnaire, which is a valid new tool to measure the dimensions of pregnant women's empowerment.

Risk factors for spinal osteoporosis as compared with femoral osteoporosis in urban Iranian women.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to define and compare the risk factors of spinal and femoral osteoporosis in postmenopausal Iranian women. METHOD: It was a multicentre based study carried out in two stages during 2002 to 2005 among post menopausal women in Tehran. In first stage case group included 140 women with diagnosed spinal osteoporosis using DEXA method as definition of WHO and Controls were 167 women with normal spinal BMD. In second stage, among the same study population case groups were 72 women with total femoral neck osteoporosis. The controls included 191 women with normal femoral BMD.' Odds Ratio was used for estimation the association of risk factors with spinal and femoral osteoporosis. RESULTS: PLUS COMMON WELL KNOWN OSTEOPOROSIS RISK FACTORS, SIGNIFICANT RISK FACTORS FOR EACH REGION WITH THEIR ODDS RATIOS INCLUDED: Steroid use (2.4) and low activity (3.6) for femoral osteoporosis and parity>3 (2) and lactation duration > 2 yr (1.9) for spinal osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: There are some common and different protective and risk factors for spinal and femoral osteoporosis in this population.