Central Sleep Apnea in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Taking P2Y12 Inhibitors.

ABSTRACT: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common in patients with heart failure. Recent studies link ticagrelor use with CSA. We aimed to evaluate CSA prevalence in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and whether ticagrelor use is associated with CSA. We reviewed consecutive patients with CHD who underwent a polysomnography (PSG) test over a 5-year period from 3 sleep centers. We sampled patients who were on ticagrelor or clopidogrel during a PSG test at a 1:4 ticagrelor:clopidogrel ratio. Patients with an active opioid prescription during PSG test were excluded. Age, left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, and P2Y12 inhibitor use were included in a multivariate logistic regression. A total of 135 patients were included with 26 on ticagrelor and 109 on clopidogrel (age 64.1 ± 11.4, 32% male). High CSA burden (12%) and strict CSA (4.4%) were more common in patients on ticagrelor than in those on clopidogrel (27% vs. 8.3% and 10.0% vs. 1.8%). Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.04-12.9, P = 0.039) and trended toward significance for strict CSA (OR 6.32, 95% CI 1.03-51.4, P = 0.052) when adjusting for age and LV dysfunction. In an additional analysis also adjusting for history of atrial fibrillation, ticagrelor use and strict CSA became significantly associated (OR 10.0, 95% CI 1.32-117, P = 0.035). CSA was uncommon in patients with CHD undergoing sleep studies. Ticagrelor use (vs. clopidogrel) was associated with high CSA burden and trended toward significance for strict CSA.

Adaptive servo-ventilation and mortality in patients with systolic heart failure and central sleep apnea: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Treatment of CSA with a certain type of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) device that targets minute ventilation (ASVmv) was found to be harmful in these patients. A newer generation of ASV devices that target peak flow (ASVpf) is presumed to have different effects on ventilation and airway patency. We analyzed our registry of patients with HFrEF-CSA to examine the effect of exposure to ASV and role of each type of ASV device on mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients with HFrEF and CSA who were treated with ASV devices between 2008 and 2015 at a single institution. Mortality data were collected through the institutional data honest broker. Usage data were obtained from vendors' and manufacturers' servers. Median follow-up was 64 months. RESULTS: The registry included 90 patients with HFrEF-CSA who were prescribed ASV devices. Applying a 3-h-per-night usage cutoff, we found a survival advantage at 64 months for those who used the ASV device above the cutoff (n = 59; survival 76%) compared to those who did not (n = 31; survival 49%; hazard ratio 0.44; CI 95%, 0.20 to 0.97; P = 0.04). The majority (n = 77) of patients received ASVpf devices with automatically adjusting end-expiratory pressure (EPAP) and the remainder (n = 13) received ASVmv devices mostly with fixed EPAP (n = 12). There was a trend towards a negative correlation between ASVmv with fixed EPAP and survival. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with HFrEF and CSA, there was no evidence that usage of ASV devices was associated with increased mortality. However, there was evidence of differential effects of type of ASV technology on mortality.

Clinical and financial impact of sleep disordered breathing on heart failure admissions.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) on heart failure (HF) is increasingly recognized. However, limited data exist in support of quantification of the clinical and financial impact of SDB on HF hospitalizations. METHODS: A sleep-heart registry included all patients who underwent inpatient sleep testing during hospitalization for HF at a single cardiac center. Readmission data and actual costs of readmissions were obtained from the institutional honest broker. Patients were classified based on the inpatient sleep study as having no SDB, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), or central sleep apnea (CSA). Cumulative cardiac readmission rates and costs through 3 and 6 months post-discharge were calculated. Unadjusted and adjusted (age, sex, body mass index, and left ventricular ejection fraction) modeling of cost was performed. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1547 patients, 393 (25%) had no SDB, 438 (28%) had CSA, and 716 (46%) had OSA. Within 6 months of discharge, 195 CSA patients (45%), 264 OSA patients (37%), and 109 no SDB patients (28%) required cardiovascular readmissions. Similarly, 3- and 6-month mortality rates were higher in both SDB groups than those with no SDB. Both unadjusted and adjusted readmission costs were higher in the OSA and CSA groups compared to no SDB group at 3 and 6 months post-discharge with the CSA and OSA group costs nearly double (~ $16,000) the no SDB group (~ $9000) through 6 months. INTERPRETATION: Previously undiagnosed OSA and CSA are common in patients hospitalized with HF and are associated with increased readmissions rate and mortality.

Research Priorities for Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Background: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is common among patients with heart failure and has been strongly linked to adverse outcomes. However, progress toward improving outcomes for such patients has been limited. The purpose of this official statement from the American Thoracic Society is to identify key areas to prioritize for future research regarding CSA in heart failure.Methods: An international multidisciplinary group with expertise in sleep medicine, pulmonary medicine, heart failure, clinical research, and health outcomes was convened. The group met at the American Thoracic Society 2019 International Conference to determine research priority areas. A statement summarizing the findings of the group was subsequently authored using input from all members.Results: The workgroup identified 11 specific research priorities in several key areas: 1) control of breathing and pathophysiology leading to CSA, 2) variability across individuals and over time, 3) techniques to examine CSA pathogenesis and outcomes, 4) impact of device and pharmacological treatment, and 5) implementing CSA treatment for all individualsConclusions: Advancing care for patients with CSA in the context of heart failure will require progress in the arenas of translational (basic through clinical), epidemiological, and patient-centered outcome research. Given the increasing prevalence of heart failure and its associated substantial burden to individuals, society, and the healthcare system, targeted research to improve knowledge of CSA pathogenesis and treatment is a priority.

Central sleep apnea treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is contraindicated for the treatment of central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), limiting treatment options. Though continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level PAP with back-up rate (BPAP-BUR), and transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) are alternatives, not much is known about their comparative efficacies, which formed the basis of conducting this network meta-analysis. We sought to analyze their comparative effectiveness in reducing apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Additionally, we also studied their comparative effectiveness on subjective daytime sleepiness as assessed by Epworth sleepiness score (ESS). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed were analyzed in a network meta-analysis and relative superiority was computed based on P-score ranking and Hasse diagrams. RESULTS: Network meta-analysis based on 8 RCTs showed that when compared to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT-used as a common comparator across trials), reduction in AHI by ASV (- 26.05 [- 38.80; - 13.31]), TPNS (- 24.90 [- 42.88; - 6.92]), BPAP-BUR (- 20.36 [- 36.47; - 4.25]), and CPAP (- 16.01 [- 25.42; - 6.60]) were statistically significant but not between the interventions. Based on 6 RCTs of all the interventions, only TPNS showed a statistically significant decrease in ESS (- 3.70 (- 5.58; - 1.82)) when compared to GDMT, while also showing significant differences when compared with ASV (- 3.20 (- 5.86; - 0.54)), BPAP-BUR (- 4.00 (- 7.33; - 0.68)), and CPAP (- 4.45 (- 7.75; - 1.14)). Ranking of treatments based on Hasse diagram, accounting for both AHI and ESS as outcomes for relative hierarchy showed relative superiority of both ASV and TPNS over BPAP-BUR and CPAP. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated relative superiority of TPNS and ASV to BPAP-BUR and CPAP in their effects on AHI and ESS.

In-Hospital Management of Sleep Apnea During Heart Failure Hospitalization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with increased mortality and readmissions in patients with heart failure (HF). The effect of in-hospital diagnosis and treatment of OSA during decompensated HF episodes remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-site, randomized, controlled trial of hospitalized patients with decompensated HF (n = 150) who were diagnosed with OSA during the hospitalization was undertaken. All participants received guideline-directed therapy for HF decompensation. Participants were randomized to an intervention arm which received positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy during the hospitalization (n = 75) and a control arm (n = 75). The primary outcome was discharge left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The LVEF changed in the PAP arm from 25.5 ± 10.4 at baseline to 27.3 ± 11.9 at discharge. In the control group, LVEF was 27.3 ± 11.7 at baseline and 28.8 ± 10.5 at conclusion. There was no significant effect on LVEF of in-hospital PAP compared with controls (P = .84) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The on-treatment analysis in the intervention arm showed a significant increase in LVEF in participants who used PAP for ≥3 hours per night (n = 36, 48%) compared with those who used it less (P = .01). There was a dose effect with higher hours of use associated with more improvement in LVEF. Follow-up of readmissions at 6 months after discharge revealed a >60% decrease in readmissions for patients who used PAP ≥3 h/night compared with those who used it <3 h/night (P < .02) and compared with controls (P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital treatment with PAP was safe but did not significantly improve discharge LVEF in patients with decompensated HF and newly diagnosed OSA. An exploratory analysis showed that adequate use of PAP was associated with higher discharge LVEF and decreased 6 months readmissions.

Periorbital desmoplastic squamous cell carcinoma.

Desmoplasia is the formation of a dense collagenous stroma around a neoplasm. It occurs in a variety of malignancies including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). While desmoplasia is uncommonly seen in cutaneous SCC, it is an independent risk factor for recurrence and metastasis. We report a case series of desmoplastic SCC in the periorbital region. Seven cases were identified: the median age was 68, four were men. The mean follow-up was 48 months. Two patients (29%) had aggressive local recurrence: one required salvage surgery including orbital exenteration, parotidectomy, and neck dissection to excise involved parotid and cervical lymph nodes; the other required repeat excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. Desmoplastic SCC is an uncommon but highly aggressive subtype. In the periorbital region, due to the high risk of orbital invasion, it is potentially sight and life-threatening.

Bridge flap repair for central nasal dorsum defect.

Surgery of the nose to remove skin cancer often requires the use of local flaps. We present a defect after the extirpation of a previously incompletely excised infiltrative squamous cell carcinoma, which we repaired with a Bridge flap, a bipedicled and subcutaneous islanded flap whose excellent vascularity allows reliable reconstruction and rapid mobilisation, with dependable results.

Transvenous neurostimulation for central sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Central sleep apnoea is a serious breathing disorder associated with poor outcomes. The remedé system (Respicardia Inc, Minnetonka, MN, USA) is an implantable device which transvenously stimulates a nerve causing diaphragmatic contraction similar to normal breathing. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of unilateral neurostimulation in patients with central sleep apnoea. METHODS: We recruited patients from 31 hospital-based centres in Germany, Poland, and the USA in this prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Participants had to have been medically stable for at least 30 days and have received appropriate guideline recommended therapy, be aged at least 18 years, be expected to tolerate study procedures, and willing and able to comply with study requirements. Eligible patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) of at least 20 events per h, tested by a polysomnography, underwent device implantation and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated method stratified by site to either stimulation (treatment) or no stimulation (control) for 6 months. The primary effectiveness endpoint in the intention-to-treat population was the comparison of the proportions of patients in the treatment versus control groups achieving a 50% or greater AHI reduction from baseline to 6 months, measured by a full-night polysomnography assessed by masked investigators in a core laboratory. The primary safety endpoint of 12-month freedom from serious adverse events related to the procedure, system, or therapy was evaluated in all patients. This trial is active, but not recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01816776). FINDINGS: Between April 17, 2013, and May 28, 2015, we randomly assigned 151 eligible patients to the treatment (n=73) or control (n=78) groups. In the analysis of the intention-to-treat population, significantly more patients in the treatment group (35 [51%] of 68) had an AHI reduction from baseline of 50% or greater at 6 months than had those in the control group (eight [11%] of 73; difference between groups 41%, 95% CI 25-54, p<0·0001). 138 (91%) of 151 patients had no serious-related adverse events at 12 months. Seven (9%) cases of related-serious adverse events occurred in the control group and six (8%) cases were reported in the treatment group. Seven patients died (unrelated to implant, system, or therapy), four deaths (two in treatment group and two in control group) during the 6-month randomisation period when neurostimulation was delivered to only the treatment group and was off in the control group, and three deaths between 6 months and 12 months of follow-up when all patients received neurostimulation. 27 (37%) of 73 patients in the treatment group reported non-serious therapy-related discomfort that was resolved with simple system reprogramming in 26 (36%) patients, but was unresolved in one (1%) patient. INTERPRETATION: Transvenous neurostimulation significantly reduced the severity of central sleep apnoea, including improvements in sleep metrics, and was well tolerated. The clinically meaningful effects of the therapy are supported by the concordant improvements in oxygenation and quality of life, making transvenous neurostimulation a promising therapeutic approach for central sleep apnoea. FUNDING: Respicardia Inc.

Sleep disordered breathing and post-discharge mortality in patients with acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for heart failure are associated with a high post-discharge risk for mortality. Identification of modifiable predictors of post-discharge mortality during hospitalization may improve outcome. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is the most common co-morbidity in heart failure patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) in a single academic heart hospital. Between January 2007 and December 2010, all patients hospitalized with AHF who have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% and were not already diagnosed with SDB were the target population. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients underwent in-hospital attended polygraphy testing for SDB and were followed for a median of 3 years post-discharge. Mortality was recorded using national and state vital statistics databases. RESULTS: During the study period, 1117 hospitalized AHF patients underwent successful sleep testing. Three hundred and forty-four patients (31%) had central sleep apnoea (CSA), 525(47%) patients had obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and 248 had no or minimal SDB (nmSDB). Of those, 1096 patients survived to discharge and were included in the mortality analysis. Central sleep apnoea was independently associated with mortality. The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for time to death for CSA vs. nmSDB was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.1, 2.4, P = 0.02). Obstructive sleep apnoea was also independently associated with mortality with a multivariable HR vs. nmSDB of 1.53 (CI: 1.1, 2.2, P = 0.02). The Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for the following covariates: LVEF, age, BMI, sex, race, creatinine, diabetes, type of cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, discharge systolic blood pressure <110, hypertension, discharge medications, initial length of stay, admission sodium, haemoglobin, and BUN. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date to evaluate the effect of SDB on post-discharge mortality in patients with AHF. Newly diagnosed CSA and OSA during AHF hospitalization are independently associated with post-discharge mortality.

Subungual Congenital Nevus with Recurrent Nevus Phenomenon.

Melanonychia is uncommon. We report the first case of histopathologic recurrence of a completely excised subungual congenital nevus that presented as congenital melanonychia.

Sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure: identifying and treating an important but often unrecognized comorbidity in heart failure patients.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is the most common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) and has a significant impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. A number of therapeutic options have become available in recent years that can improve quality of life and potentially the outcomes of HF patients with SDB. Unfortunately, SDB is not part of the routine evaluation and management of HF, so it remains untreated in most HF patients. Although recognition of the role of SDB in HF is increasing, clinical guidelines for the management of SDB in HF patients continue to be absent. This article provides an overview of SDB in HF and proposes a clinical care pathway to help clinicians to better recognize and treat SDB in their HF patients.

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnoea in heart failure.

AIMS: Periodic breathing with central sleep apnoea (CSA) is common in heart failure patients and is associated with poor quality of life and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, acute study to determine the feasibility of using unilateral transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of CSA in heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one patients from six centres underwent attempted transvenous lead placement. Of these, 16 qualified to undergo two successive nights of polysomnography-one night with and one night without phrenic nerve stimulation. Comparisons were made between the two nights using the following indices: apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), central apnoea index (CAI), obstructive apnoea index (OAI), hypopnoea index, arousal index, and 4% oxygen desaturation index (ODI4%). Patients underwent phrenic nerve stimulation from either the right brachiocephalic vein (n = 8) or the left brachiocephalic or pericardiophrenic vein (n = 8). Therapy period was (mean ± SD) 251 ± 71 min. Stimulation resulted in significant improvement in the AHI [median (inter-quartile range); 45 (39-59) vs. 23 (12-27) events/h, P = 0.002], CAI [27 (11-38) vs. 1 (0-5) events/h, P≤ 0.001], arousal index [32 (20-42) vs. 12 (9-27) events/h, P = 0.001], and ODI4% [31 (22-36) vs. 14 (7-20) events/h, P = 0.002]. No significant changes occurred in the OAI or hypopnoea index. Two adverse events occurred (lead thrombus and episode of ventricular tachycardia), though neither was directly related to phrenic nerve stimulation therapy. CONCLUSION: Unilateral transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation significantly reduces episodes of CSA and restores a more natural breathing pattern in patients with heart failure. This approach may represent a novel therapy for CSA and warrants further study.

A mathematical model to serve as a clinical tool for assessing obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder caused by periodic airway obstructions and has been associated with numerous health consequences, which are thought to result from tissue hypoxia. However, challenges in the direct measurement of tissue-level oxygenation make it difficult to analyze the hypoxia exposure pattern in patients. Furthermore, current clinical practice relies on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pulse oximetry to assess OSA severity, both of which have limitations. To overcome this, we developed a clinically deployable mathematical model, which outputs tissue-level oxygenation. The model incorporates spatial pulmonary oxygen uptake, considers dissolved oxygen, and can use time-dependent patient inputs. It was applied to explore a series of breathing patterns that are clinically differentiated. Supporting previous studies, the result of this analysis indicated that the AHI is an unreliable indicator of hypoxia burden. As a proof of principle, polysomnography data from two patients was analyzed with this model. The model showed greater sensitivity to breathing in comparison with pulse oximetry and provided systemic venous oxygenation, which is absent from clinical measurements. In addition, the dissolved oxygen output was used to calculate hypoxia burden scores for each patient and compared to the clinical assessment, highlighting the importance of event length and cumulative impact of obstructions. Furthermore, an intra-patient statistical analysis was used to underscore the significance of closely occurring obstructive events and to highlight the utility of the model for quantitative data processing. Looking ahead, our model can be used with polysomnography data to predict hypoxic burden on the tissues and help guide patient treatment decisions.

Central sleep apnea is a predictor of cardiac readmission in hospitalized patients with systolic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized heart failure patients have a high readmission rate. We sought to determine the independent risk due to central sleep apnea (CSA) of readmission in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of hospitalized patients with SHF. Patients underwent sleep studies during their hospitalization and were followed for 6 months to determine their rate of cardiac readmissions; 784 consecutive patients were included; 165 patients had CSA and 139 had no sleep-disordered breathing (SDB); the remainder had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The rate ratio for 6 months' cardiac readmissions was 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2; P = .03) in CSA patients compared with no SDB. This rate ratio was adjusted for systolic function, type of cardiomyopathy, age, weight, sex, diabetes, coronary disease, length of stay, admission sodium, creatinine, hemoglobin, blood pressure, and discharge medications. Severe OSA was also an independent predictor of readmissions with an adjusted rate ratio of 1.49 (P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this first evaluation of the impact of SDB on cardiac readmissions in heart failure, CSA was an independent risk factor for 6 months' cardiac readmissions. The effect size of CSA exceeded that of all known predictors of heart failure readmissions.

Pathways of Microcirculatory Endothelial Dysfunction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Comprehensive Ex Vivo Evaluation in Human Tissue.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism and markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remain unknown. The microcirculation is the site of early changes in OSA patients who are free of CVD risk. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed moderate to severe OSA (n = 7) were studied before and 12 weeks after intensive treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), along with weight and age matched controls (n = 7). Microcirculatory vessels were isolated from gluteal biopsies and changes in critical functional genes were measured. RESULTS: The following genes changed after 12 weeks of intensive CPAP therapy in the microcirculatory vessels: angiotensin receptor type 1 (AGTR-1) (11.6 (3.4) to 6 (0.8); P = 0.019); NADPH oxidase (NOX4) (0.85 (0.02) to 0.79 (0.11); P = 0.016); and dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH 1) (1 (0.31) to 0.55 (0.1); P = 0.028). Despite decreased nitric oxide (NO) availability as measured indirectly through brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, endothelial NO synthase (NOS3) did not change with CPAP. Other disease markers of OSA that changed with treatment in the microcirculation were endothelin, hypoxia inducible factor 1a, nuclear factor kappa B, interleukin-8, and interleukin-6. CONCLUSIONS: In this ex vivo evaluation of the microcirculation of patients with OSA and no CVD risk, several pathways of CVD were activated supporting that OSA independently induces microcirculatory endothelial dysfunction and serving as disease-specific markers for future pharmacological targeting of OSA-related CVD risk. The findings support the role of renin-angiotensin activation and endothelial oxidative stress in the decreased microcirculatory NO availability in OSA.

Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnea: Clinical and Billing Review.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) frequently coexists with heart failure and atrial fibrillation and contributes to cardiovascular disease progression and mortality. A transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) system has been approved for the first time by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CSA. This system, remede System (Zoll Medical, Inc.), is implanted during a minimally invasive outpatient procedure and has shown a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Currently, patient access to this therapy remains limited by the small number of specialized centers in the United States and the absence of a standard coverage process by insurers. Although a period of evaluation by insurers is expected for new therapies in their early stages, the impact on patients is particularly severe given the already limited treatment options for CSA. Implantation and management of this novel therapy require the establishment of a specialized multidisciplinary program as part of a sleep medicine practice and support from health care systems and hospitals. Several centers in the United States have been successful in building sustainable TPNS programs offering this novel therapy to their patients by navigating the current reimbursement environment. In this article, we review the background and efficacy data of TPNS and briefly address relevant aspects of the clinical activities involved in a TPNS program. The article presents the status of coverage and reimbursement for this novel therapy. We also discuss the current approach to obtaining reimbursement from third-party payors during this transitional period of evaluation by Medicare and other insurers.