Quality benchmarking of smartphone laboratory medicine applications: comparison of laboratory medicine specialists' and non-laboratory medicine professionals' evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: There are many mobile health applications (apps) now available and some that use in some way laboratory medicine data. Among them, patient-oriented are of the lowest content quality. The aim of this study was to compare the opinions of non-laboratory medicine professionals (NLMP) with those of laboratory medicine specialists (LMS) and define the benchmarks for quality assessment of laboratory medicine apps. METHODS: Twenty-five volunteers from six European countries evaluated 16 selected patient-oriented apps. Participants were 20-60 years old, 44% were females, with different educational degrees, and no professional involvement in laboratory medicine. Each participant completed a questionnaire based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and the System Usability Scale, as previously used for rating the app quality by LMS. The responses from the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: The median total score of NLMP app evaluation was 2.73 out of 5 (IQR 0.95) compared to 3.78 (IQR 1.05) by the LMS. All scores were statistically significantly lower in the NLMP group (p<0.05), except for the item Information quality (p=0.1631). The suggested benchmarks for a useful appear: increasing awareness of the importance and delivering an understanding of persons' own laboratory test results; understandable terminology; easy to use; appropriate graphic design, and trustworthy information. CONCLUSIONS: NLMP' evaluation confirmed the low utility of currently available laboratory medicine apps. A reliable app should contain trustworthy and understandable information. The appearance of an app should be fit for purpose and easy to use.

Lupus Antibody Mimicking Reduced Plasmatic Coagulation in a Patient With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke.

Background: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) owns procoagulant properties in vivo and prolongs phospholipid-dependent clotting times in vitro. The prolonged in vitro clotting time can be misinterpreted as a bleeding disorder. In some cases, it is necessary to differentiate LA-associated in vitro changes from in vivo coagulation factor deficiency. In this case, we used different laboratory testing in a patient with ischemic stroke and reduced prothrombin time (PT) to identify an in-vitro effect of LA excluding an in-vivo bleeding disorder. Methods: The activity of various coagulation factors was evaluated both with recombinant thromboplastin Innovin (Siemens Healthcare) and reagent tissue extracted thromboplastin Thromborel® (Siemens Healthcare). Moreover, a 1:1 plasma mixing test with standard plasma was performed. In order to exclude the interaction of tromboplastin and LA thromboplastin, an independent global coagulation test, thromboelastography, was used. Diluted-Russel-Viper-Venom (dRVVT) assay was applied to detect the presence of LA detection. Results: The activity of several coagulation factors measured with recombinant thromboplastin Innovin (Siemens Healthcare) showed a reduced activity of the following coagulation factors: Factor V (20.9%), Factor VII (23.8%), Factor X (19.7%) and international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.33. Re-assessment of the factor's activity with another reagent tissue extracted thromboplastin Thromborel® (Siemens Healthcare) showed a normalization of INR and factor's activity in comparison to thromboplastin reagent Innovin®: Factor V (77%), Factor VII (45.4%), Factor X (64.2%), and INR of 1.28. A plasma mixing study with 1:1 standard plasma revealed reduced (<50%) normalization of INR as well as coagulation factor's activity confirming a LA-inhibitor in the patient plasma. Diagnostic LA testing was also performed with dRVVT assay showing a significantly prolonged (112.8 s) test time. Thromboelastography revealed no abnormalities. Conclusions: Different thromboplastin reagents and plasma mixing tests as well as thromboplastin independent coagulation tests may be helpful to differentiate LA and in vitro changes from in vivo factor deficiency in patients with LA.