Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study.

BACKGROUND: We present findings from the multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 study, CENTURION. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of and consistency of response to lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine across four attacks. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three treatment groups - lasmiditan 200 mg; lasmiditan 100 mg; or a control group that received placebo for three attacks and lasmiditan 50 mg for either the third or fourth attack. The primary endpoints were pain freedom at 2 h (first attack) and pain freedom at 2 h in ≥2/3 attacks. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, sustained pain freedom and disability freedom. Statistical testing used a logistic regression model and graphical methodology to control for multiplicity. RESULTS: Overall, 1471 patients treated ≥1 migraine attack with the study drug. Both primary endpoints were met for lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg (p < 0.001). All gated secondary endpoints were met. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest during the first attack. The most common TEAEs with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea; these were generally mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the early and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg and demonstrate consistency of response across multiple attacks.Trial Registration Number: NCT03670810.

Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study).

OBJECTIVES: To address the need for long-term lasmiditan data, the GLADIATOR study evaluated the safety (primary) and efficacy (secondary) of lasmiditan for the intermittent, acute treatment of migraine attacks for up to 1 year. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study, patients who had completed either of two single-attack studies were offered the opportunity to be randomized 1:1 to lasmiditan 100 mg or 200 mg. Patients were asked to use lasmiditan as the first treatment for each new migraine attack of at least moderate severity. Assessments occurred at baseline and at prespecified time increments up to 48 hours after each dose of study drug using an electronic diary, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) was assessed at each visit. RESULTS: As of the cut-off date for this interim analysis (6 March 2018), 1978 patients had received ≥ 1 lasmiditan dose and treated 19,058 migraine attacks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar to those in the single-attack studies and included dizziness (18.6%), somnolence (8.5%), and paresthesia (6.8%). The frequency of TEAEs generally decreased with subsequent attacks. No treatment-related serious adverse events and no cardiovascular TEAEs potentially due to vasoconstriction were observed. For both lasmiditan doses, efficacy measures were generally consistent over study quarters and treated attacks. Overall, across all treated attacks at 2 hours post-dose, pain freedom was observed in 26.9% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 100 mg and 32.4% of the attacks treated with lasmiditan 200 mg. MIDAS total scores decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The interim results of this long-term study showed intermittent lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) to be generally well tolerated and efficacious for the acute treatment of migraine over a 1-year period. Trial registration number: NCT02565186; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02565186.

Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.

PURPOSE: We explored the impact of once daily tadalafil on urodynamic measures in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia via invasive and noninvasive urodynamic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial comparing once daily tadalafil 20 mg vs placebo during 12 weeks in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without bladder outlet obstruction. Invasive and noninvasive urodynamics, International Prostate Symptom Score and general safety were assessed. The primary study end point was change in detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate. RESULTS: Urodynamic measures remained largely unchanged during the study with no statistically significant or clinically adverse difference between tadalafil and placebo in change in detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate (mean difference between treatments -2.2 cm H(2)O, p = 0.33) or any other urodynamic parameter assessed including maximum urinary flow rate, maximum detrusor pressure, bladder outlet obstruction index or bladder capacity (all measures p ≥0.13). Treatment with tadalafil resulted in significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference between treatments -4.2, p <0.001). Tadalafil was generally well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in severity and few patients discontinuing due to adverse events (tadalafil 2.0%, placebo 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tadalafil once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia showed no negative impact on bladder function as measured by detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate or on any other urodynamic parameter assessed. Nonetheless men receiving tadalafil reported significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score with an adverse events profile similar to other recent studies of tadalafil for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.

PURPOSE: We explored the impact of once daily tadalafil on urodynamic measures in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia via invasive and noninvasive urodynamic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial comparing once daily tadalafil 20 mg vs placebo during 12 weeks in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without bladder outlet obstruction. Invasive and noninvasive urodynamics, International Prostate Symptom Score and general safety were assessed. The primary study end point was change in detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate. RESULTS: Urodynamic measures remained largely unchanged during the study with no statistically significant or clinically adverse difference between tadalafil and placebo in change in detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate (mean difference between treatments -2.2 cm H(2)O, p = 0.33) or any other urodynamic parameter assessed including maximum urinary flow rate, maximum detrusor pressure, bladder outlet obstruction index or bladder capacity (all measures p > or = 0.13). Treatment with tadalafil resulted in significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference between treatments -4.2, p < 0.001). Tadalafil was generally well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in severity and few patients discontinuing due to adverse events (tadalafil 2.0%, placebo 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tadalafil once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia showed no negative impact on bladder function as measured by detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate or on any other urodynamic parameter assessed. Nonetheless men receiving tadalafil reported significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score with an adverse events profile similar to other recent studies of tadalafil for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Urodynamic standardization in a large-scale, multicenter clinical trial examining the effects of daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms with or without benign prostatic obstruction.

AIMS: To present the methodology, standardization techniques, and results from post hoc test-retest reproducibility analyses for a large, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, employing urodynamic studies (UDS) to assess the impact of daily tadalafil on men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with or without benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: UDS implemented International Continence Society (ICS) Good Urodynamic Practice guidelines and standardized urodynamic and LUTS terminology. Further standardization procedures included: equipment calibration; a detailed procedure manual and centralized training; and implementation of a central reader. Measures included: monitoring of invalid studies, comparison of actual versus expected standard deviation (SD) for primary outcome (detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate [p(detQmax)]), and test-retest reproducibility of the placebo arm at baseline and endpoint. RESULTS: Two hundred men with moderate to severe LUTS (baseline IPSS >or=13) at 20 sites were randomized to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo. All men underwent non-invasive uroflow and pressure-flow studies. Numbers of invalid studies at baseline and endpoint were 9.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Variability of p(detQmax) was lower than anticipated based on actual versus expected SD of 15 and 30, respectively. Correlation coefficients were very good for pressure-flow parameters including p(detQmax) (r = .83). CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter clinical trials using urodynamic outcomes require additional standardized procedures to limit inter-site variability. By implementing centralized training with a detailed procedure manual and use of a central reader, we were able to limit common difficulties arising in multicenter clinical trials, as well as demonstrate good test-retest reproducibility of pressure flow measures.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: With once-daily administration of tadalafil, dosing and sexual activity would no longer need to be temporally linked for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily for the treatment of ED. METHODS: Patients > or = 18 years of age with ED of any functional severity or etiology received tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 1 (N = 234) or 2 (N = 238) years during the open-label extensions of two previously reported studies. Patients who completed the 1-year open-label extension concluded with a 4-week ED treatment-free period. Baseline was defined as prior to receiving any study drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety measures included adverse events, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory measures. Efficacy measures included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-Erectile Function (-EF), -Intercourse Satisfaction (-IS), and -Overall Satisfaction (-OS) domain scores, and the Global Assessment Questions (GAQ1: improved erections; GAQ2: improved ability to engage in sexual activity). RESULTS: Overall, 208/234 (88.9%) and 139/238 (58.4%) patients completed the 1- and 2-year open-label extensions, respectively. No study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed in > or = 5% of the patients during the first year of either open-label extension were dyspepsia, headache, back pain, and influenza. No clinically meaningful abnormalities associated with tadalafil were observed for electrocardiograms or clinical laboratory measures. Mean IIEF domain scores improved from baseline to the conclusions of the 1- and 2-year open-label extensions, respectively: -EF, +10.4 and +10.8; -IS, +4.0 and +3.7; and -OS, +3.0 and +3.2. At the conclusion of the 2-year open-label extension, 95.7% and 92.1% of the patients reported positive responses to GAQ1 and GAQ2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In these long-term, open-label, once-daily dosing studies, tadalafil 5 mg was well tolerated and effective, making it a viable alternative to the current on-demand dosing of tadalafil for men with ED.

Hemodynamic effects of once-daily tadalafil in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia on concomitant α1-adrenergic antagonist therapy: results of a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of daily coadministration of α-blockers with tadalafil 5 mg in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The standard-of-care medical therapy for moderate to severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia is α(1)-adrenergic antagonist (α-blocker) therapy. METHODS: Men aged ≥ 45 years receiving stable α-blocker therapy were evaluated for eligibility before a 2-week single-blind, placebo lead-in period. Subsequently, 318 men were randomized to tadalafil 5 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Enrollment was monitored to ensure inclusion of men ≥ 75 years old and men taking nonuroselective α-blockers. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of men reporting treatment-emergent dizziness between the 2 treatment groups. Orthostatic vital signs, general safety, and the International Prostate Symptom Score were also assessed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who reported treatment-emergent dizziness was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups (tadalafil 7.0%; placebo 5.7%; P = .403). No difference between treatment groups was observed with respect to patients meeting the criteria for a positive orthostatic test (30 per treatment group, P = 1.00). The incidence of discontinuations was low among both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Recognizing the limitations of the present study, the changes in the hemodynamic signs and symptoms were similar for the tadalafil and placebo groups in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia receiving concomitant α-blocker therapy. However, consistent with the results of previous clinical pharmacology studies of healthy subjects, a trend was seen for increased hemodynamic signs and symptoms in men taking nonuroselective α-blockers, most notably those taking doxazosin.

Retinal effects of 6 months of daily use of tadalafil or sildenafil.

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in electroretinography (ERG) and other retinal function parameters during 6 months of daily use of tadalafil, sildenafil citrate, or placebo. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to use of a placebo (n=82), 5 mg of tadalafil (n=85), or 50 mg of sildenafil (n=77) daily for 6 months. Electroretinographs were recorded using the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) protocol and standardized ERG equipment at all 15 study sites. Other tests of ocular anatomy and visual function were performed at each assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the average mean change for both eyes from baseline to endpoint in ERG b-wave amplitude using dark-adapted combined standard response to a bright ISCEV standard flash. Secondary endpoints were other ERG parameter changes, visual acuity, number of errors in color discrimination testing, mean deviation in automated visual field testing, and intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between treatment/placebo groups for the primary outcome, most other ERG variables, visual function, IOP, or anatomic assessments. The medications were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: No abnormalities in ERG or visual function and no treatment-related findings suggestive of drug toxicity are associated with daily administration of tadalafil or sildenafil for 6 months. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessed visual safety of tadalafil/sildenafil administered daily over a prolonged period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00333281.