How do patients with systemic sclerosis experience currently provided healthcare and how should we measure its quality?

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into SSc patients' perspective on quality of care and to survey their preferred quality indicators. METHODS: An online questionnaire about healthcare setting, perceived quality of care (CQ index) and quality indicators, was sent to 2093 patients from 13 Dutch hospitals. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty patients (mean age 59 years, 75% women, 32% limited cutaneous SSc, 20% diffuse cutaneous SSc) completed the questionnaire. Mean time to diagnosis was 4.3 years (s.d. 6.9) and was longer in women compared with men (4.8 (s.d. 7.3) vs 2.5 (s.d. 5.0) years). Treatment took place in a SSc expert centre for 58%, regional centre for 29% or in both for 39% of patients. Thirteen percent of patients was not aware of whether their hospital was specialized in SSc. The perceived quality of care was rated with a mean score of 3.2 (s.d. 0.5) (range 1.0-4.0). There were no relevant differences between expert and regional centres. The three prioritized process indicators were: good patient-physician interaction (80%), structural multidisciplinary collaboration (46%) and receiving treatment according to SSc guidelines (44%). Absence of disease progression (66%), organ involvement (33%) and digital ulcers (27%) were the three highest rated outcome indicators. CONCLUSION: The perceived quality of care evaluated in our study was fair to good. No differences between expert and regional centres were observed. Our prioritized process and outcome indicators can be added to indicators suggested by SSc experts in earlier studies and can be used to evaluate the quality of care in SSc.

An easy prediction rule for diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis using only the timing and type of first symptoms and auto-antibodies: derivation and validation.

OBJECTIVE: DcSSc is associated with high morbidity related to widespread skin disease and poor prognosis due to earlier and more severe organ involvement. The objective of this study is to derive and validate a simple prediction rule for identifying patients at the time of initial diagnosis of SSc who are likely to progress to dcSSc. METHODS: The Nijmegen cohort consists of 619 SSc patients. Logistic regression was used for predictive modelling. A prediction rule was created by rounding regression coefficients. Patients were stratified as being at low risk (<1) or high risk (⩾1) of progression to dcSSc. Performance was analysed in 445 SSc patients from Madrid. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four out of 535 patients were classified as dcSSc. The final model consisted of gender, time between RP and non-RP, sclerodactyly (first non-Raynaud symptom) and SSc-specific auto-antibodies. The model performed well in the derivation cohort [area under the curve = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.82)] and validation cohort [area under the curve = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.83)]. At the optimal cut point (1) for the prediction rule, sensitivity was 87% and specificity 61% in the derivation cohort, compared with 78% and 65% in the validation cohort. Upon application of the prediction rule to 392 lcSSc patients at initial diagnosis, 32 out of 34 patients were correctly classified as dcSSc. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction rule was designed to attribute a low/high risk category for development of dcSSc.This method is suited for assigning intensified screening at the time of initial diagnosis of SSc to patients most at risk for dcSSc. It provides the opportunity for early identification of potential dcSSc patients for enrolment into clinical trials.

Survival and organ involvement in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies: determined by skin subtype or auto-antibody subtype? A long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: LcSSc is associated with ACAs and a mild course, whereas dcSSc is associated with anti-topoisomerase antibodies (ATAs) and a more severe course. However, ATAs are also present in lcSSc. Little is known about survival and organ involvement in this subgroup. The aim of this study is to determine whether survival and organ involvement of lcSSc ATA-positive patients differs from lcSSc ATA-negative or dcSSc ATA-positive patients. Furthermore, transition from lcSSc to dcSSc was evaluated. METHODS: Data from The Nijmegen Systemic Sclerosis cohort were used, with up to 15 years of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for survival and organ involvement, including interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, cardiac involvement and Scleroderma Renal Crises. Cox proportional hazard modelling was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were included: 58 (13%) lcSSc ATA-positive patients, 237 (52%) lcSSc ATA-negative patients and 78 (17%) dcSSc ATA-positive patients. Cumulative survival in lcSSc ATA-positive patients was 75%, in lcSSc ATA-negative patients 58% and in dcSSc ATA-positive patients 53%. Interstitial lung disease was more prevalent in lcSSc ATA-positive patients (49%) than in lcSSc ATA-negative patients (25%), but less than in dcSSc ATA-positive patients (60%). Forty-eight patients developed dcSSc: 24 ATA-negative and 24 ATA-positive (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LcSSc ATA-positive patients differ from lcSSc ATA-negative patients and dcSSc ATA-positive patients concerning survival and organ involvement. LcSSc patients who are ATA-positive are more likely to develop dcSSc than lcSSc patients who are ATA negative.

Hit hard and early: analysing the effects of high-dose methylprednisolone on nailfold capillary changes and biomarkers in very early systemic sclerosis: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence indicates that inflammatory mechanisms drive systemic sclerosis (SSc) vasculopathy and fibrosis, especially early in the disease. Therefore, patients with very early SSc could benefit from early treatments targeting inflammation. Glucocorticoids are among the most potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. Several studies have demonstrated a mixed response to treatment with glucocorticoids in SSc, probably because it is seldom initiated at very early stages of the disease. We hypothesise that by inhibiting the inflammatory process driving SSc disease progression, glucocorticoid treatments will induce remission in patients with very early SSc. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial analysing the effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in very early SSc. Thirty patients who fulfil the criteria for very early SSc will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either intravenous methylprednisolone or a placebo on three consecutive days over three consecutive months. In this study, the primary endpoint will be the change in capillary density between the baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary outcomes of this study are a change in selected biomarkers, other changes in the nailfold capillaries, signs of established SSc and changes in physical function, general health and utilities, as reported through questionnaires. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first aiming to treat very early SSc and is promising because it targets the very early stages of the disease process by using an inexpensive and relatively safe treatment known to be highly effective against inflammation. The use of vasculopathy and inflammatory biomarkers as well as clinical signs and symptoms as the endpoints in our study enables us to meet the patient need for markers of disease activity. If it is possible to prevent clinically significant disease in patients with very early SSc by using a safe treatment, this will cause a paradigm shift in scleroderma care and research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03059979 . Registered on 20 February 2017.

Need for online information and support of patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Interactive health communication applications (IHCAs) offer interesting possibilities to support systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients, since SSc is an uncommon, severe disease that needs a multidisciplinary treatment. This study aimed to investigate patients' needs for a hospital-based IHCA. METHODS: A survey study was conducted among a large sample (n = 429) of SSc patients of the University Medical Centre St. Radboud in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Patients were asked about their current disease-related internet use, their perceived importance of diverse information topics, and their usefulness of 8 widely used online health services. To examine how disease specific their needs were, the results of SSc patients were compared with the results of a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 1,284). RESULTS: In total, 746 patients (44% of the approached patients) returned a completed questionnaire and fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria. Of them, 569 (76%) had internet access. SSc patients used the internet especially for information (85%), and they expressed a need for information on physical, psychological, and social consequences of the disease. Concerning a hospital-based IHCA, e-consults, information about disease and treatment, and home access to their electronic medical records were perceived as most useful. SSc patients were more positive about the usefulness of the online applications than were RA patients, especially for e-consults and peer support forums. CONCLUSION: It would be valuable to offer SSc patients a hospital-based IHCA, including the online information and support they desire. When taking the needs of patients into account, an IHCA could become a valuable addition to their regular treatment.