Representation of Women on Editorial Boards of Medline-Indexed Spine, Neurosurgery, and Orthopedic Journals.

BACKGROUND: Both neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery are male-dominated specialties. However, the prevalence of women appears to be even lower in the spine surgery field. We intend to determine this prevalence on the editorial boards of spine, neurosurgery, and orthopedic journals. METHODS: The gender of editorial board members of Medline-indexed spine, neurosurgery, and orthopedic journals was systematically analyzed in 2019, and female representation was compared among these fields. RESULTS: In the 34 journals included (5 spine, 13 neurosurgery, and 16 orthopedic journals), women represented 8.84% (N = 185/2094) of editorial board members. Their representation was 5.53% (N = 30/542) in spine, 8.58% (N = 47/548) in neurosurgery, and 10.77 % (108/1003) in orthopedic journals. Only 5.4% (N = 2/37) of the editors-in-chief were women. The likelihood of having female members was higher in orthopedic than in spine journals (OR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.35-3.13; P = 0.001). Neurosurgery journals did not show a significant greater likelihood of having female editorial board members than spine journals (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 0.99-2.57; P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: The representation of women on editorial boards of spine, neurosurgery, and orthopedic journals is very low and appears to be even lower for spine surgery. However, it is still not understood whether or not women are barred from advancing in academics by gender bias within these specialties.

Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate compared to endogenous creatinine clearance.

INTRODUCTION: The guidelines recommend estimating the glomerular filtration rate using serum creatinine-based equations as a predictor of kidney disease, preferably adjusted for local population groups. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that evaluated the performance of four equations used for estimating GFR compared to endogenous creatinine clearance (ClCr) in 1,281 participants. Modification of Diet equations in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), CKD-EPI with adjustment for local population (CKD-EPI local) and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) in comparison with endogenous creatinine clearance (ClCr). We used the Quantile Regression to calculate the median bias, interquartile range (IQR), Bland-Altman agreement analysis and 30% margin of error (P30). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 52.5 ± 16.5 years with 466 women (38%), median ClCr[IQR] of 92.0 [58.0; 122.0] mL/min/1.73 m2, with 320 (25%) participants presenting ClCr < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The performance of the local CKD-EPI and FAS equations were superior to MDRD and CKD-EPI in relation to variability (0.92 [0.89; 0.94]) and P30 (90.5% [88.7; 92, 0]). In the group with ClCr < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the local CKD-EPI and FAS equations showed less variability than the CKD-EPI and MDRD (0.90 [0.86; 0.98] and 1.05 [0.97; 1.09] vs. 0.63 [0.61; 0.68] and 0.65 [0.62; 0.70], P < 0.01) and best P30 (85.5) % [81.0; 90.0], 88.0% [84.0; 92.0] vs. 52.0% (46.0; 58.0) and 53.0% [47.0; 58 .5], P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Local CKD-EPI and FAS equations performed better than CKD-EPI and MDRD when compared to ClCr.

Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate compared to endogenous creatinine clearance / Desempenho das equações baseadas em creatinina para estimativa da taxa de filtração glomerular comparadas à depuração da creatinina endógena

Abstract Introduction: The guidelines recommend estimating the glomerular filtration rate using serum creatinine-based equations as a predictor of kidney disease, preferably adjusted for local population groups. Methods: Cross-sectional study that evaluated the performance of four equations used for estimating GFR compared to endogenous creatinine clearance (ClCr) in 1,281 participants. Modification of Diet equations in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), CKD-EPI with adjustment for local population (CKD-EPI local) and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) in comparison with endogenous creatinine clearance (ClCr). We used the Quantile Regression to calculate the median bias, interquartile range (IQR), Bland-Altman agreement analysis and 30% margin of error (P30). Results: The mean age of participants was 52.5 ± 16.5 years with 466 women (38%), median ClCr[IQR] of 92.0 [58.0; 122.0] mL/min/1.73 m2, with 320 (25%) participants presenting ClCr < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The performance of the local CKD-EPI and FAS equations were superior to MDRD and CKD-EPI in relation to variability (0.92 [0.89; 0.94]) and P30 (90.5% [88.7; 92, 0]). In the group with ClCr < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the local CKD-EPI and FAS equations showed less variability than the CKD-EPI and MDRD (0.90 [0.86; 0.98] and 1.05 [0.97; 1.09] vs. 0.63 [0.61; 0.68] and 0.65 [0.62; 0.70], P < 0.01) and best P30 (85.5) % [81.0; 90.0], 88.0% [84.0; 92.0] vs. 52.0% (46.0; 58.0) and 53.0% [47.0; 58 .5], P < 0.01). Conclusion: Local CKD-EPI and FAS equations performed better than CKD-EPI and MDRD when compared to ClCr.

Resumo Introdução: As diretrizes recomendam a estimativa da taxa de filtração glomerular pelo uso de equações baseadas em creatinina sérica como preditor de doença renal, preferencialmente ajustadas para grupos populacionais locais. Métodos: Estudo transversal que avaliou o desempenho de quatro equações para estimativa da TFG em comparação com a depuração de creatinina endógena (DCE) em 1.281 participantes. Foram avaliadas as equações Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), CKD-EPI com ajuste para a população local (CKD-EPI local) e Full Age Spectrum (FAS) em comparação com a depuração de creatinina endógena (DCE). Utilizamos a Regressão Quantílica para cálculo do viés mediano, intervalo interquartil (IQR), análise de concordância de Bland-Altman e margem de erro de 30% (P30). Resultados: A idade média dos participantes era de 52,5 ± 16,5 anos com 466 mulheres (38%), mediana da DCE [IQR] de 92,0 [58,0; 122,0] mL/min/1,73 m2, com 320 (25%) participantes apresentando DCE < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2. A performance das equações CKD-EPI local e FAS foram superiores às MDRD e CKD-EPI em relação à variabilidade (0,92 [0,89; 0,94]) e P30 (90,5% [88,7; 92,0]). No grupo com DCE < 60 mL/min/1,73 m2, as equações CKD-EPI local e FAS apresentaram menor variabilidade que as CKD-EPI e MDRD (0,90 [0,86; 0,98] e 1,05 [0,97; 1,09] vs. 0,63 [0,61; 0,68] e 0,65 [0,62; 0,70], P < 0,01) e melhores P30 (85,5% [81,0; 90,0], 88,0% [84,0; 92,0] vs. 52,0% (46,0; 58,0) e 53,0% [47,0; 58,5], P < 0,01). Conclusão: As equações CKD-EPI local e FAS tiveram desempenho superior às CKD-EPI e MDRD, quando comparadas a DCE.