Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in patients with low grade and anaplastic glioma after long-term seizure freedom: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: When glioma patients experience long-term seizure freedom the question arises whether antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be continued. As no prospective studies exist on seizure recurrence in glioma patients after AED withdrawal, we evaluated the decision-making process to withdraw AEDs in glioma patients, and seizure outcome after withdrawal. METHODS: Patients with a histologically confirmed low grade or anaplastic glioma were included. Eligible patients were seizure free ≥ 1 year from the date of last antitumor treatment, or ≥ 2 years since the last seizure when seizures occurred after the end of the last antitumor treatment. Patients and neuro-oncologists made a shared decision on the preferred AED treatment (i.e. AED withdrawal or continuation). Primary outcomes were: (1) outcome of the shared decision-making process and (2) rate of seizure recurrence. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients fulfilled all eligibility criteria. However, in 12/83 (14%) patients, the neuro-oncologist had serious objections to AED withdrawal. Therefore, 71/83 (86%) patients were analyzed; In 46/71 (65%) patients it was decided to withdraw AED treatment. In the withdrawal group, 26% (12/46) had seizure recurrence during follow-up. Seven of these 12 patients (58%) had tumor progression, of which three within 3 months after seizure recurrence. In the AED continuation group, 8% (2/25) of patients had seizure recurrence of which one had tumor progression. CONCLUSION: In 65% of patients a shared decision was made to withdraw AEDs, of which 26% had seizure recurrence. AED withdrawal should only be considered in carefully selected patients with a presumed low risk of tumor progression.

Symptoms and medication management in the end of life phase of high-grade glioma patients.

During the end of life (EOL) phase of high-grade glioma (HGG) patients, care is primarily aimed at reducing symptom burden while maintaining quality of life as long as possible. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of symptoms and medication management in HGG patients during the EOL phase. We analyzed disease-specific symptoms, general EOL symptoms, symptom frequency, and medication use at 3 months and 1 week before death in a cohort of 178 HGG patients, based on questionnaires completed by physicians responsible for EOL care. In addition, information on patient's perceived quality of care (QOC) was derived from 87 questionnaires completed by patient's relatives. Somnolence, focal neurological deficits and cognitive disturbances were the most prevalent symptoms during the EOL phase. Overall, disease-specific symptoms occurred more often than general EOL symptoms at both 3 months and 1 week before death. Somnolence and/or dysphagia were present in 81 % of patients whose medication was withdrawn and 96 % of patients in whom antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were withdrawn. One week before death, 65.9 % of patients with high symptom frequency experienced good QOC, compared to 87.5 % of patients with low symptom frequency (p = 0.032). Disease-specific symptoms are the main concern in EOL care for HGG patients. Somnolence and dysphagia may hamper the regular oral administration of drugs, and particularly AEDs, during the EOL phase. High symptom frequency at 1 week before death negatively affects patient's perceived QOC.

End of life care in high-grade glioma patients in three European countries: a comparative study.

Exploring cross-national differences is useful to evaluate whether different patterns of end of life (EOL) care meet patient's specific needs. This study aimed to (1) compare EOL care processes for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients in three European countries, (2) explore differences in perceived quality of care (QOC), and (3) identify aspects of good QOC in the EOL phase. We analyzed 207 questionnaires from relatives of deceased HGG patients, using a similar retrospective study design in three countries [The Netherlands (n = 83), Austria (n = 72) and the UK (n = 52)], and examined four subthemes: (1) organization of EOL care, (2) treatment preferences, (3) experiences with EOL care, (4) perceived QOC. Three months before death 75 % of patients were at home. In all countries, on average, 50 % were transferred to a hospital at least once and received effective symptom treatment during the last 3 months. In The Netherlands, Austria and UK, respectively, patients most often died at home (60 %), in a hospital (41 %) or hospice (41 %) (p < 0.001). Advance directives were present in 46 % of Dutch, 36 % of British and 6 % of Austrian patients (p < 0.001). Fifty-three percent of patients experienced good QOC, irrespective of country. Dying at the preferred place, satisfaction with information provided and effective symptom treatment were independently associated with good QOC. There are various cross-national differences in organization and experiences with EOL care for HGG, but patient's perceived QOC is similar in the three countries. As symptom treatment was considered effective in only half of HGG patients, and independently predicted good QOC, this particularly needs further improvement in all countries.

[Development of concepts of disease, diagnostics and neurosurgical treatment of brain tumours in The Netherlands (1890-1950)]. / Ontwikkeling van ziekteconcept, diagnostiek en neurochirurgische behandeling van hersentumoren in Nederland (1890-1950).

The history of the treatment ofbrain tumours in the Netherlands begins around 1890. From this time up to 1950, following other European countries and later the United States, the conceptualization, diagnostics, and surgical treatment of brain tumours changed dramatically. New morphological classifications were introduced, as well as technical innovations in the fields ofimaging diagnostics and surgical methods. At the same time, the common view ofclinical signs ofbrain tumours changed into the concept that symptoms were caused by increased intracranial pressure. As is the case today, the innovations in Dutch neurosurgery in the first half of the 20th century were based on the interaction between techniques, knowledge and clinical experiences.