Improved cognitive apprenticeship clinical teaching after a faculty development program.

BACKGROUND: While it is well known that the cognitive apprenticeship is an effective workplace-based teaching approach for clinical teachers, the effects of faculty development (FD) have not been analyzed from that perspective. The purpose of this study was to investigate self-assessment by clinical teachers of their educational perceptions and behaviors after a FD program using the cognitive apprenticeship model. METHODS: Board-certified pediatricians who participated in a 3-day FD program on practical clinical teaching were asked to complete questionnaires. Fifty participants completed two questionnaires prior to and 3 and 6 months after the FD program: the first was on the participants' general perceptions and behaviors in relation to their own clinical education and the second was a self-assessment using the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) that was developed based on the cognitive apprenticeship model. RESULTS: The general survey demonstrated that 78% of the participants experienced positive changes in their educational perceptions 6 months after FD. Self-assessment using the MCTQ showed that the scores in the categories of "articulation," "exploration," and "safe learning environment" remained significantly improved 6 months after the FD program. CONCLUSIONS: The participants' self-perceived improvement in behaviors was sustainable for 6 months after participation the FD program. The results of the MCTQ show that through their experiences in the FD program, the participants seemingly transformed their clinical teaching to become interactive facilitators, encouraging self-directed learning. Our results also suggest that the MCTQ can be used for self-assessment of clinical teachers and to enhance the effectiveness of the FD program.

Good clinical teachers in pediatrics: The perspective of pediatricians in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify the attributes of good clinical teachers in pediatrics (CTPs) in Japan, and to elucidate pediatricians and pediatric trainees' perceptions of these attributes. METHODS: The attributes of good CTPs were identified qualitatively by conducting a thematic analysis of questionnaires answered by board-certified pediatricians and pediatric trainees. The attributes identified were rated quantitatively by a large number of participants in both groups. RESULTS: Forty-eight individual attributes of good CTPs were identified, which were classified into three domains: personal, pediatrician, and teacher. The three domains and most of the attributes were consistent with previous studies. However, a few additional attributes, including "is kind/thoughtful toward others" and "defends trainees", which may be unique to pediatricians in Japan, were identified. Significant differences in the pediatricians' and trainees' perceptions of these attributes were elucidated: The differences were most noticeable for teacher attributes and least for personal attributes. CONCLUSION: Although most of the identified attributes of good CTPs in our study appear to be universal, there were significant differences in the pediatricians' and trainees' perceptions of good CTPs, especially in relation to teacher attributes. Our study provides additional bases for good CTPs and future faculty development, for enhanced pediatric clinical education.